Black Africans are incapable of running a decent country. I propose we kill them all this time and give a piece of Africa to every country that aided in killing them. Perhaps we can keep a few primitive tribes alive and put them in walled-off reservations without access to modern technology or consumer goods. It would be a nice tourist attraction.
I don't think we should kill them all. I think it would be better to gain support of any intelligent Africans and use them to somehow try to breed intelligent Blacks instead of letting them be niggers. The ones who do not have the capability to be intelligent or beneficial to society should be killed. Then after years of eugenic cleansing and colonization we let Africans have a bit of sovreignity and let them test run their own country. If they fail yet again we take harder action against them. Then repeat the process. If after 3 or 4 times they still cannot get their shit together than we move all the smart Africans to a safe spot and just start an extermination campaign against Africa and repopulate it.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-19 13:42
ordinary genocide is so boring
we need to take chimps and breed them for intelligence/capability to use tools
then we raise an army of uber-chimps armed with ak47's and rpg's and have them fight to the death against africans
the winner takes all
I said nigger because that is what most of them are. Nigger does not automatically mean black or any other race. The fact that you think it only applies to blacks is in fact racist. Nigger is a term used for any ignorant person who is of no use to society. Notice I differentiated between Africans and niggers. You can be a black person and be a wonderful Human, but if you are useless you are automatically a nigger. No matter what race you are. I do not use the word nigger in the typical racist sense of it.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-21 22:58
>>11
What if you are useless to society because a random psycho chopped your arms and legs off?
>>11
Oh, I see you're using the word based upon its original meaning. Still, it carries a bad connotation because of its use during slavery and the apartheid laws that went into effect after the civil war.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-22 9:55
>>13
is a PC faggot, and has surely never spent much time around niggers.
Well that person is useless but his situation was not his fault. Nigger is more often used for people who have the choice to be productive members of society but choose not to. Although in my opinion that person is best euthanized unless he could be useful using his mental capacity.
Exactly. I am anti-racist and I think that people assuming the word nigger is only used for blacks is just as racist as the people who call blacks niggers because of their skin color. And the word may hold bad connotations but it I still use the word because it is just that, a word. It has no meaning besides what people give it. I would never use the word nigger in the racist manner. Also when I use the word I try to make it clear I am not using it in a racist manner.
Your "White nationalist" movement won't grow very large unless you decide to work within the confines of political correctness. Since many of you fail to do so, it'll just remain a fringe movement.
I certainly know how the majority of Blacks act just from simple observation from being in a majority Black city late at night. However, there are exceptions to the rule and not every single Black acts this way. Yet, I do not use the n-word because like I said it carries a bad connotation and is ultimately pointless racism.
I very much get that it's offensive to African-Americans. So I can see why it would be offensive to refer to an African-American as a Nigger. Like any number of other terms (Kike, Wop, Dago, Mick etc. etc.) to other ethnic groups.
What I don't get is why the very utterance of the word is taboo. IOW, all this "N-word" stuff. Why this tremendous hypersensitivity to the utterance of these syllable whatever the context?
Right now, Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY) is apologizing for use of the word. The context here is that 1) she was relaying something that someone else said, and 2) that other person used the word specifically as an example of something offensive.
And yet, there she is, having to apologize for simply having let that terrible terrible word emerge from her lips. (The fact that she's preparing for a Senate race probably adds to the issue, in this case.)
My suspicion - and it's not more than that - is that a lot of African-Americans have a deep sense that they are being discriminated against in all sorts of ways that are hard to put a finger on. And as a result, some of them - not all - look for opportunities to be offended, so as to capture what they feel are legitimate grievances that are hard to specify in concrete terms. And this leads to an overemphasis on and oversensitivity to symbols of this sort.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-22 23:31
>>15
Euthanasia? Wouldn't it be more justified to make the psycho or some other criminal his slave to support him as a form of compensation?
Well the person who has been incapacitated already is still useless unless he can do something with his mind such as a teacher, mathematician,etc. But the person who did that to him should be executed as well. Becuase that person is now a threat to society.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-23 7:18
>>19
No, that person is a victim of society. Only someone who was brainwashed by the corporations and the fascist government would want to cut someone's limbs off. That person needs to be helped and rehabilitated!
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-23 11:26
>>19
Well my reasoning is that if someone steals something they must pay money back to the owner rather than the state. If we are going to enslave felons the proceeds should go to the victims of crime, the victims shouldn't be euthanized without warning in their sleep so the proceeds can go to the state.
The person being chopped up does not need to be helped. He needs to be removed from society. Also where do you get people being brainwashed by corporations and fascists would want to cut up people? That does not support their agenda at all. You need to stop being an angsty teen and learn to hate governments and corporations for actual reasons. Not dumb bullshit like that.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-24 3:08
>>22 The person being chopped up does not need to be helped. He needs to be removed from society.
Would you say the same if that was your arms and legs? You being chopped up?
Where are the trolls? Do you think that maybe you are calling people who just disagree with you trolls?
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-25 3:42
>>1
Africa needs to be run by white people. South Africa, the only african country that you could call remotely developed, was founded by whites and has a white history. And look at this shithole now, after just 20 years of letting the niggerz run it themselves.
>>24
I'd like to see you get chopped up and live and then when you try to convict the criminal who did that to you, the courts decide to execute you instead. I doubt you would still hold that opinion.
Well, I think that the person who chopped off the person's legs should be executed automatically. But the person with the chopped off limbs should be killed unless he has the ability to use his mind in order to help society or be of use. But if I had no way to be useful to society and my limbs were chopped off I would choose death anyway. For the benefit of society and for my own benefit of not being a freak. I am not selfish and realize that I do not deserve to leech off of society and would not wish to do so.
Africa does not need to be run by white people. The country needs to be run by intelligent and able Africans. As of now niggers run most African countries. This is why the continent is in such shambles. If we get able and intelligent Africans in government then we would see a major shift in the way the continent is.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-25 9:11
>>22
I never said I believed corporations and fascists want to chop people up, just random psychos. I fully support corporations in running the economy and I possess fascist leanings.
Well you sound like a right-wing fascist. And we all know your track record when it comes to governing. You fail to make improvements and fail utterly. And you never learn from past mistakes. Hand over the reigns of power to more efficient and intellectual leftist authoritarian groups. Such as Oligarchical Collectivism and Libertarian Authoritarianism.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-25 10:03
>>31
It's a fact that all modern and civilized countries today are run by white people with only very few exceptions such as Japan (and Japan would not be a modern democratic country if it wasn't for the whites who forced democracy on them after WW2). The European culture is the most advanced and most highly developed culture of all. It has always been like that since ancient times. I don't think Africa will ever get any better than this and its mostly their own fault. You can't blame all your problems on European imperialism, sorry. In fact without European imperialism Africa would probably be in a even greater mess today.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-25 11:35
The niggers are just going through their dark (lol) ages like europe did 1600 years ago. Give it a couple of centuries for things to settle down and the niggers to build true nigger-countries, not states with borders imposed on them by foreigners. 40 years since decolonization, that's nothing. it took Roman Europe 500 years to recover from the dark ages. You can't blame the niggers for complaining about western imperialism, many of them lived through it and most heard the stories from their parents which is a great influence on them. Give it a couple of centuries and we'll be seeing a whole different Africa with productive niggers who don't complain about colonization just like the europeans today who don't care about the Roman colonization.
I suggest a new Great Game. Let's use those resources, help build our economy, and get our citizens working again! Oh, it looks like China beat us to it. Never mind then.
>>30 But the person with the chopped off limbs should be killed unless he has the ability to use his mind in order to help society or be of use.
That's completely up to the individual. No Government in the civilized world has the authority (or should have) to arbitrarily end the life of a human being who was the victim of a tragic and horrible act by another. Of course if the individual should chose to end his or her life him or herself, then that's a different story altogether. That debate is nothing new and was most notable during the trial of Jack Kevorkian.
>>35
The borders imposed on western europe by the Romans still exist today. The borders of England and France for instance.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-26 2:58
>>39
Yes, there are a few similarities, but the current borders are not imposed by the Romans. They have been changed countless times in the past 1500 years. And some borders the Romans had just made sense (the Pyrenees fe).
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-26 8:48
>>40
The borders the europeans drew up were still influenced by economic and military accessibility, so what if they chopped a few clans in half and didn't leave the state enough power to control them, the concept of a nation state alone took europe 1000 years to figure out. Though I suppose we have robbed Africa of an awesome medieval era with knights and warrior kings and shit.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-26 11:33
Undisturbed Feudalism tends to develop a rich civilization later. Interfering in the process is like stunting a civilization's growth through its teenage years.
Building better defended structures and cities, developing the technology for better weapons, creating a moral and political code to distinguish citizens from enemies, protecting citizens and developing agriculture to ensure military and political strength, and creating national pride through history and folklore. Random tribes becomes organized and form systems in relation to each other. The actual period of feudal warfare is bloody and wasteful, but at the end the nation still has a better understanding of technology and politics, which it can use for peace to avoid the same bloody conflicts.
Modern Japan has a great sense of history and pride, with an appreciation of the past including old temples and samurai, but civilization has progressed past that point so it can never go back, but only looks back in wonder. If China invaded Japan when they were still undeveloped and ruled over them, they might be like the native americans who want a sense of pride but are so marginalized that they don't have an actual civilization. Europe rationalized violence as service to God, and developed a moral system around knights and kings that gave peace centuries later. Africa has tribal politics, but allowing tribes to develop on their own in their own system could create a natural building of defense, treaties, and customs for war, peace, trade, mining, agriculture, and some permanency of civilization, even if it takes a lot longer than everyone else to get there.
But more importantly, you could have African samurais in pop culture and they'd have cool swords and then you could have some impressive fantasy stories based on those myths that would be more than just talking to animals while carving sticks and soon there would be books and anime and comics and it would have some history instead of the crap in Black Panther.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-30 17:54
>>1
Not entirely. May I recommend Ghana as a possible vacation destination? It's the Costa Rica of West Africa - the part that's safe for white people. I'd bet in twenty years there's a decent fat, Texan, retiree population in Ghana.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-30 18:18
>>11
Haha, same as other thread. Try learning a little etymology. It helps!
nigger Look up nigger at Dictionary.com
1786, earlier neger (1568, Scot. and northern England dialect), from Fr. nègre, from Sp. negro (see Negro). From the earliest usage it was "the term that carries with it all the obloquy and contempt and rejection which whites have inflicted on blacks" [cited in Gowers, 1965]. But as black inferiority was at one time a near universal assumption in Eng.-speaking lands, the word in some cases could be used without deliberate insult. More sympathetic writers late 18c. and early 19c. seem to have used black (n.) and, after the American Civil War, colored person. Also applied by Eng. settlers to dark-skinned native peoples in India, Australia, Polynesia. The reclamation of the word as a neutral or positive term in black culture, often with a suggestion of "soul" or "style," is attested first in the Amer. South, later (1968) in the Northern, urban-based Black Power movement. Variant niggah, attested from 1925 (without the -h, from 1969), is found usually in situations where blacks use the word. Nigra (1944), on the other hand, reflects a pronunciation in certain circles of Negro, but meant to suggest nigger, and is thus deemed (according to a 1960 slang dictionary) "even more derog. than 'nigger.' " Slang phrase nigger in the woodpile attested by 1800; "A mode of accounting for the disappearance of fuel; an unsolved mystery" [R.H. Thornton, "American Glossary," 1912]. Nigger heaven, "the top gallery in a (segregated) theater" first attested 1878 in ref. to Troy, N.Y.
" 'You're a fool nigger, and the worst day's work Pa ever did was to buy you,' said Scarlett slowly. ... There, she thought, I've said 'nigger' and Mother wouldn't like that at all." [Margaret Mitchell, "Gone With the Wind," 1936]
Used in combinations (e.g. nigger-brown, nigger-head, nigger-toe) since 1840s for various dark brown or black hues or objects; euphemistic substitutions (e.g. Zulu) began to appear in these senses c.1917.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-02 9:32
>>45
I had a friend who went to Ghana and he said there were dead people in the streets and nobody cleaned them up.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-02 11:48
>>47
There is a sign in Ghana that says "dead nigger storage".
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-02 11:53
>>47
What's the point of cleaning them up? They're dead! They don't care anymore if they get dirty.
I'm a black person, and like some of the people on here, belive that the word "nigger" doesn't have to be entirely racist...take for example John Lennon's song "Woman is the Nigger of the World".
This song's meaning is self-explanatory...but when it was released, some ignoramuses (almost all black) complained that the song was offensive and racist. I really hate it when ANY race just nitpicks everywhere for racism when it's not actually there...just my thoughts.
Blame the German cartographer Martin Waldseemüller, he's the one who made the first map with the name "America" on it. The USA has nothing to do with that, as that didn't come into the picture until 1776.
Just think of "America" as both the continents North and South America, and you'll understand when USA is referenced as United States of America.
>>67
You're the one going around meticulously correcting people. I think a happy medium between the overly politically correct "Indigenous people of Sub-Saharan Africa" and the race baiting "nigger" is "negro". Negro means black in Spanish so if you think that's racist then you are wrong and racist against Spanish speaking peoples.
>>71
What's wrong with speaking Spanish? There is no way saying "negro" is racist. You're a racist, against Spanish speaking peoples. I suppose you're one of these dumb hicks who complains about illegal immigrants taking his job even though he'd never pick oranges for a living. You're obviously a stereotypical racist. >>72
（ ≖‿≖） haha your so stupid. You're mom is a whore. >>73
See, I can do it aswell. Try a logical argument next time, unless you believe it cannot withstand debate of course.
Shouldn't we recolonize the Middle East first? Africa isn't doing anything to harm us, and the Muslims are Jihading on us. Once we've pacified Greater Arabia, we'll be in a much better position for further colonization.
Nero es debole dopo egipto. I see your Spanish and raise you Italian
born in African and then migrated to the USA = African-American
or
Born in the USA = black or American
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-15 20:02
But then how would we remind ourselves they were transported in slave ships from Africa?
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-16 9:34
>>86
Wow, just wow. For years I have pondered the decrepidation and barbarism of mankind but that video is the only time I've really seen it.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-16 10:54
>>86
It's a mondo film, so it must be trustworthy!
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-16 10:58
Filthy fucking animals, I absolutely agree they are!
Name:
pork soda2009-08-16 10:59
>>86
Wow, just wow. For years I have pondered the perkyness and bareness of African titties but that video is the only time I've really seen it.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-16 11:56
Genocide is ugly and requires lots of work. Why can't we just reinstate slavery? Africans are hopeless at managing themselves, but they can't survive without the white man's help. It's only natural law that they become the property of the higher races.
>>44
You place too much emphasis on irrelevant cultural facets like mythology which seems absurd to me. Philosophy and politics are far more influential but you haven't mentioned anything about those, I agree that a nation has to experience the need for various concepts such as Hobbe's leviathan in order to take them seriously but I reject the notion they somehow need to be tailored to a nation's cuisine and literature.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-16 18:00
I'd like to see less focus on runes and norse mythology in that case.