So I made a tulpa of The Sussman a few months back. He was great at first, when we were getting to know each other and things hadn't gotten sexual yet. Now all he does is look over my shoulder while I code and makes annoying remarks saying I shouldn't do that, or that this can be rewritten, or ranting about magic, or telling me that his mere existence is unscientific and ultimately destructive. And the sex, oh god, the sex.... I know it's all in my head and that I'm not really being injured, but that makes it even worse, because I won't even really die from ... what he does to my body. I tried killing him off, but he just laughs at my efforts and tells me that I will never be free. He won't let me leave my house, and he beats me every time I try, then tells me to get back to work. I'm only able to type this now because he had to go out to buy some amphetamines to keep me awake while I work on his AI project (literally, his AI, because it has his personality), so he can have immortality.
Please, /prog/, help me!
Name:
Anonymous2013-04-29 22:11
This might do the trick: Kundalini Ball
Making a Kundalini ball is fairly simple but takes a lot of control and will power to use. First you would center your self on the charka in your dominate hand then begin to swirl it faster and faster clock wise as it begins to emanate energy. Begin to shape this energy into a ball that swirls in the palm of your hand, then guide external ki from the air around you into this ball and swirl it with the chakra energy, now remove a small chunk of Kundalini energy and guide it to your palm and surround it with ki from your wrist as you send it into the ball and make the Kundalini “ball” within your Ki ball swirl at least 600+ rotations per second, or until it emanates a bright white lighting type energy out and into the ball becoming an internal energy generator. A Kundalini ball can be used for several different things, but attack or healing seems to be the dominant use. Remember to stay strong willed and be sure of what your doing with this ball. You can’t say, “I’m going to do a ki blast, I hope this works…” You must say, “I am doing a ki blast and this is going to work.”
Now here are a few ways of healing with a Kundalini ball. After building the ball, if this is for a cut, guide the energies color into a bluish color then guide it over the cut and imagine the electricity stimulating the cells and making them reproduce at unparalleled speeds. For internal pain just guide the ball into their body and have it begin to suck in and turn the “pain” energy into “healed energy”. I visualize the ball sucking the black colored” pain energy into the spinning Kundalini energy, and then shooting back out and into the afflicted area a soothing blue colored healing energy.
Now here is a way to make a Kundalini ball a weapon. First make the ball, but add as much energy as possible, till it feels as though you can’t handle the ball any more. Now connect a stream of ki energy from your opponent to your ki ball and then shoot the ball through that stream and into and through your opponent. Remember to keep the basic idea that the ball has mass and is going to cause damage to your opponent. A Kundalini Blast isn’t as effective as some moves do to the fact it takes so long to build one up that can do some damage. DO NOT USE ONE OF THESE UNLESS YOU ABSOLUTELY MUST! THIS IS A DEADLY ATTACK AND MUST BE USED IN SMALL AMOUNTS AND ONLY AGAINST SOMEONE WHO IS THREATENING YOUR LIFE, ALSO KEEP IN MIND, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO HEAL WHAT YOU HURT…. SO PLEASE LEARN HEALING BEFORE YOU LEARN TO HURT.
Name:
Anonymous2013-04-29 22:37
WHILE I PROGRAM! NOT WHILE I CODE!
Name:
Anonymous2013-04-29 22:56
The only thing you can do is exclaim "Mea tulpa!"
Name:
Anonymous2013-04-29 23:17
Dear /prog/: I, like many of you, suffer from problems. My problems don't involve any of your implausible ones, but mine are worth voicing to you in hope of getting some advice. Anyways, I began to watch Azumanga Daioh about a month ago, and as I dove deeper and deeper into the series, the more and more I fapped to hentai of it. I continued to do so until the last episode. Then I watched the series again...and again... and again... I found myself checking out Osaka every on-screen moment she had. I began to stop going to my regular sites just to look at hentai of one person: Osaka. I eventually had 1000s of pictures and some doujins of Osaka. I began to spend what others called absurd amounts of money on merchandise, and my apartment is coated with Osaka everywhere. I've shut myself off from family and friends and felt an urge to just snuggle with my Osaka dolls. Osaka is all I need. She probably wouldn't like the way my family is or how my friends behave. I'm in love with Osaka. I keep praying that she'll come to see me one day and decide to live with me. I have nothing left to live for but Osaka. I know she can hear me, so I always talk to her telling her to come and visit me so our union can take place. So this is where you guys come into the picture. You're an all-purpose advice board. You definitely must know a way to help Osaka break free from behind her glass prison.
>>5
You could make a tulpa. I made an Osaka tulpa once. Well let me start by saying that yes, I did force myself on her.
Having built up her fear over the time I spent talking about my plans for her my other tulpa. I proceeded to have my way just as I said I would. She cried out in pain and protest. I just hit her and told her she was worthless as I thrust in and out. When I finished, I told her I hated her just to see her reaction.
For the rest of the night she was in the periphery of my vision. I could hear her sobbing but I didn't pay much attention to her I got pretty drunk later that night and I suppose that I passed out (though I don't remember how, since by that point I was gone). Well, when I woke up Monday morning, I had a pretty mean headache, but I couldn't find Osaka (my tulpa) anywhere. She's still gone and I can't feel her at all in my mind. What do you think happened to her? I mean sure, I raped her and abused her emotionally but it's not like she's real, right? So where did she go? I want to do it again but I don't want to waste time creating a whole new one so if anyone has any suggestions on how to bring her back let me know.
I genuinely believe no one has ever actually created a tulpa, and the whole thing is just some dumb myth that people perpetuate because "I WANT TO BELIEVE!"
Tulpas are the gateway to schizophrenia. Not even once.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-22 8:28
Make a jackie chan tulpa and have him beat The Sussman.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-22 8:32
You think that's bad?
Nowhere near as bad as my RMS tulpa.
I think about killing myself all the time because that fat bastard is always screaming at me about how I should change my name to GNU/Anon because I use GNU programs.
I made a Patrick Bateman tulpa. He's telling me to post in this thread before someone else does. He's going on about ``checking 'em'' and how ``sick'' these ``dubs'' are going to be. I have no idea what he's talking about.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-22 20:25
>>17
I tried making a tulpa once. Stopped and undid everything after I read about the ``side effects.'' That's what you get when you don't stick to purely functional programming.
I made a tulpa of Bjarne Stroustrup and he was okay at first but he started forcing me to dress like him. Thanks a lot asshole, now people in the street think Im schizophrenic. He wont stop ranting about how C++ is a "better C" and laughing maniacally while he talks about all the features he is going to add to it and how "static" is going to mean 23 different things and make code impossible to read.
>>31
Just so you know, e/g/in is a parody of e/b/in, created by some stupid fuck who probably came from /b/. It's meant to make fun of people who come from re/g/g/it (like you), not some kind of ``meme'' analog to your ``/g/reentext''.
So please act like a normal person and stop picking up every single catchphrase you see on the Internet or I'll have to ask you to fuck off back to /g/.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-22 23:02
>>22 here. My tulpa's bugging me again. Guess I ought to post.
>>32
Wrong. I've wrote the history of this before. It started as the quite obviously forced meme attempt `she epin /b/'. This referred to the box slut, of course. It only stuck around for about a week there, and never surfaced again from what I saw until it came here. Me and the original lel-cunt were probably the only ones to remember it, but I've posted this before, so you have no excuse for not knowing your reddittumblr history.
>>35
What? That's not how epin came to be. Also, I was the first one who ever made a LLEEEELLL-like post. It was irony that got out of hand. I've excused myself many times for that reason.
The safest way to kill a tulpa is to actively ignore it and refuse to recognize its existence. That said, saying that their existence is unscientific is flawed. Explanations for why they exist are easy to come across and proof for their existence can be easily obtain in the fact that they are repeatable. That said, the fact that they are sentient implies that creating and destroying them for the sake of science just to prove their existence would be a bit amoral.
Of course, everything you said in your post was a lie, because clearly nobody in their right mind would make a tulpa out of the Sussman.
>>42
Go to tulpa.info, you'll find some properly constructed guides. Don't listen to anything written by a user named Fede. Do listen to things written by a user named NLD or some variation of this. NLD is a bro, has ten tulpae, and gives good advice.
As the tulpa community consistently spells the plural of tulpa as tulpae, it is preferable to use the more used version (tulpae) than what would be considered "correct" in a language filled with inconsistencies and built upon loan words.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-23 23:30
>>52
The tulpa community consist of retards and willful schizophrenics, so whatever they want doesn't matter for shit. `tulpae' looks just about as stupid as `virii'. Just say `tulpas' like a normal person; you don't have to go to such lengths to make the idea of forcing yourself to see your imaginary friend seem exotic.
The term retarded refers to someone of weak intelligence or slow thoughts - qualities which would make the creation of tulpae anywhere from difficult to impossible.
Schizophrenia, being by definition a mental disease, cannot be voluntary. Just because you see a hallucination does not mean you are schizophrenic.
Normal people do not use the word tulpa, let alone tulpas/tulpae in their daily repertoire, and often do not know what the hell a tulpa is. From within the community of people who do know what a tulpa is and who talk about them, the most accepted plural is tulpae.
And finally, of note is that a tulpa is not an imaginary friend. The key difference between the two is that an imaginary friend is controlled by the conscious mind while the tulpa is controlled by the subconscious and can be considered sentient.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 0:45
Isn't being normal considered a bad thing by wise people?
Think for yourself and be yourself they said.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 0:48
A tulpa is like running several OSes on the same brain. Preemptive multitasking (or would that be VMs). Pretty leet.
>>55
This is a script that learns to anticipate your keypresses induces temporary schizophrenia.
- Run the script below.
- Get the keyboard outside of your visual field. A non-clicky keyboard is preferred.
- Press a key on your keyboard at random intervals between 1 and 3 seconds. Every time you press a key the screen flashes.
- Keep doing it until the counter reaches 100. Keep pressing.
- The flashes now occur before the keypresses!
#!/bin/bash
t=0
while true; do
read -n 1 -s
rt=$(echo "5k$t 0.0017*p" | dc)
if [ "$t" -lt 100 ]; then
sleep "$rt"
t=$((t+1))
fi
tput setab 6;clear;sleep 0.1;tput sgr0;clear
printf "\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n $t"
done
TOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LEL
O E EO E EO E EO E EO E EO E E
P LELP LELP LELP LELP LELP LEL
LEL TLEL TLEL TLEL TLEL TLEL T
E E OE E OE E OE E OE E OE E O
LEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOP
TOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LEL
O E EO E EO E EO E EO E EO E E
P LELP LELP LELP LELP LELP LEL
LEL TLEL TLEL TLEL TLEL TLEL T
E E OE E OE E OE E OE E OE E O
LEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOP
TOP LELTOP LEL TOP LELTOP LEL
O E EO E E TOP LEL TOP O E EO E E
P LELP LEL O L P LELP LEL
P LEL LEL E
LEL TLEL T E E L LEL TLEL T
E E OE E O L L TOP L E E OE E O
LEL TOPLEL TOP E O L T LEL TOPLEL TOP
TOP LELTOP LEL L P E O TOP LELTOP LEL
O E EO E E L LEL L P O E EO E E
P LELP LEL T E E P LELP LEL
O LEL LEL L
LEL TLEL T P E LEL TLEL T
E E OE E O LEL TOP LEL E E OE E O
LEL TOPLEL TOP LEL TOPLEL TOP
TOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LEL
O E EO E EO E EO E EO E EO E E
P LELP LELP LELP LELP LELP LEL
LEL TLEL TLEL TLEL TLEL TLEL T
E E OE E OE E OE E OE E OE E O
LEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOP
TOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LELTOP LEL
O E EO E EO E EO E EO E EO E E
P LELP LELP LELP LELP LELP LEL
LEL TLEL TLEL TLEL TLEL TLEL T
E E OE E OE E OE E OE E OE E O
LEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOPLEL TOP
Tulpa possession? Nothing wrong with it. Easy to get out of if you don't like what your tulpa is doing, and it makes the tulpa happy because it means they can actually talk to people (and other tulpae)
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 3:15
>>65
>it makes the tulpa happy
Of course. It wants your energy. Imagine if you were a tulpa and all you energy came from some other entity, and that entity let you to control itself. Now, takes off the rose-colored glasses and think of a tulpa as being that has its own interests. It doesn't want itself to die, it wants to exists in comfort and its comfort depends on how much energy it has. Energy comes from your attention/focus creating channels which transmit your chakras energy to the tulpa, and if you let tulpa possess you it can "drink" it from the source. This kind of relationship is called "parasitism" and the tulpa is interested to gain as much energy as it can for as much time as possible. As more power you give to the tulpa, the more it will mold your mind into the form where it can gain more energy. In the end your body will be a feeding vessel for a tulpa.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 3:35
>>66
Has its own interests.... has its own personality and ethical and moral beliefs.....
just torture and kill it if it turns out to be a sociopathic tulpa
which transmit your chakras energy to the tulpa
Stopped reading right there. We're discussing a creature of the subconscious. Get that unscientific bullcrap out of here!
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 4:29
>>69
>unscientific bullcrap
Do you agree that:
1. Tulpa needs energy to exist.
2. focusing/attention on the mental construct of a tulpa give it energy
3. The source of that energy is yourself
4. Energy is more plentiful in some areas where its abundantly produced
5. These areas could be called "centers of energy"
6. These areas can be connected to tulpa.
7. A tulpa possessing the body can utilize these "centers of energy" directly.
If one would call such "centers of energy" chakras, would that change anything?
1. Tulpa needs energy to exist
Well, given that a tulpa requires its host to be alive, and a host has a minimum amount of calories to be consumed per day to keep functioning, then yes.
2. focusing/attention on the mental construct of a tulpa give it energy
Actually a fully created tulpa can act on its own without its host needing to give it attention.
3. The source of that energy is yourself
For all brain processes this would be correct. I don't see why this would be considered a big deal though, as most people don't burn enough energy in a fucking day.
4. Energy is more plentiful in some areas where its abundantly produced
The fuck are you talking about? Also, energy isn't produced, it's transformed from chemical energy to kinetic or whatever the fuck the body needs.
5. These areas could be called "centers of energy"
Now, I've never taken a biology course, but it appears you are going into the realm of the unscientific
6. These areas can be connected to tulpa.
What areas?
7. A tulpa possessing the body can utilize these "centers of energy" directly.
Do you even... know what the fuck... you are talking about?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 5:28
>>4. Energy is more plentiful in some areas where its abundantly produced
>The fuck are you talking about? Also, energy isn't produced, it's transformed from chemical energy to kinetic or whatever the fuck the body needs.
energy isn't produced. Energy is produced from another chemical energy. Which one? >>5. These areas could be called "centers of energy"
>Now, I've never taken a biology course, but it appears you are going into the realm of the unscientific
Does your brain have the exact same energy density as your ass? If thats so, your post is easily explainable. >>6. These areas can be connected to tulpa.
>What areas?
"centers of energy" connected via channels to the tulpa. A permanent conduit from you to the tulpa. >>7. A tulpa possessing the body can utilize these "centers of energy" directly.
>Do you even... know what the fuck... you are talking about?
A tulpa which possesses the body(and by extension the subtle body) has access to these "energy centers" without a conduit. An analogy is drinking directly from a reservoir vs drinking through a very long straw(which isn't controlled by a drinker) from a reservoir.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 5:58
Energy is produced from another chemical energy. Which one?
Well let's see... body takes in chemical energy from carbohydrates, converts to fat for storage if unused or into kinetic energy if used. My best understanding of the situation.
"centers of energy" connected via channels to the tulpa. A permanent conduit from you to the tulpa.
What do you mean by "channels". And for the sake of knowing I'm continuing this conversation with someone who's not an idiot, can you please state the definition of energy?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 6:09
>>68
You are no Ted Bundy, scum. I will crush your life like a tiny delicate flower.
There are quite a lot of Ted Bundies in the world, but most are more successful and acquire more self control than him.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 6:14
>>69
This isn't scientific in the first place (nor does it need to be, empiricism is a bit of a joke for those with high intellect that the average labrat does not possess)
Define ``subconscious''. Tulpa aren't truly sentient either and are just a hallucinatory trick assuming this is just something of mere subconscious manipulation and not something deeper.
I'll destroy them.
But I shall start with you first.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 6:22
>>75
>What do you mean by "channels"
A best analogy for materialists is a infinitely flexible electrical wire which is protected by infinitely flexible insulator.
>can you please state the definition of energy
Its a basic concept, like time and space. It can have many forms(heat, electricity, radiation). It can be transformed, produced/converted, dissipated to the environment or spent to perform work or change. The specific form of energy is consumed by tulpa, and this is the energy i talk about.
The subconscious is defined as the part of the mind that one is not aware of - that which is not part of the conscious mind (surface thoughts).
Also, before you go off and make wild claims that tulpae aren't sentient, approach this as a real scientist and create one yourself, and then pass your judgement. As a host to a tulpa, and as a part of a greater community of hosts, I have yet to see a single case wherein a fully developed tulpa has neither thoughts of their own nor awareness of self - the textbook definition of sentience.
Then have fun travelling to me, mister-who-only-can-crush-tiny-and-delicate-flowers.
I would enjoy it as a game.
If you are ever in Amsterdam. Send some mail to catch.me@freemail.hu. I will come to you.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 6:28
>>82
Your little boy pucker will be mine and mine only.
Soon enough.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 6:31
>>80
Your analogies have no basis in reality and you have listed examples of energy, not the definition of energy, which is what I asked for. Come on man, if you're going to be talking about energy, you should at least know the definition off hand without having to use google. It takes five words.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 6:36
>>84
I don't subscribe to the reductionist idea that energy must be exclusively physical.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 6:44
>>85
Energy has a formal definition, anything outside of which, is not energy:
"The ability to do work on an object"
What is work? Mass * Acceleration * Distance.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 6:58
>>86
If A has a formal definition by the Church of England, anything outside of that is heresy and not A.
We're talking about the scientific community, not the fucking church. We set definitions of words to mean a specific thing and only that thing so we don't end up confused as to what the hell we're talking about. When there is a standardized and agreed upon definition of something so fucking basic and elemental to all of physics, you don't go around and say "Hurr, I think it's something different!" It would be like saying acceleration and velocity are not vectors and direction has nothing to do with them. It would be like telling a mathematician "Well, I know you guys all agreed that an empty set should be defined as a set with no elements which is a part of every set, but I'm inclined to think differently". This is you.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 7:11
>>87
Thats the problem with scientific orthodoxy, they think they have the authority to dispense the truth like the medieval church while in reality they just stifle progress and reduce the areas of research. We could have orders of magnitude more fields of science developing much faster if the paradigms were viewed as disposable ideas whose utility is temporary and limited.
We could have tulpo-logy, magic-ology, astral-ogy (these names look ridiculous now, because of prejudice and reliance on materialism as guiding paradigm) and we could investigate paranormal without recourse to materialist reductions(it doesn't exist/it can't exist/its impossible/its a hallucination/its a lie/it contradicts the material laws which work in our material universe/etc).
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 7:28
>>88
The only difference between a formal definition by "the scientific community" and the Church of England, is that "you don't go around and say" doesn't result in you being burned at the stake for heresy. Lets see some previous " "you don't go around and say"'s
"you don't go around and say that earth orbits the sun"
"you don't go around and say that earth isn't the center of the universe"
"you don't go around and say that life can only come from life"
"you don't go around and say that continents can move"
"you don't go around and say that you can't inherit your ancestor traits"
"you don't go around and say time is different for different observers"
"you don't go around and say that light has finite speed"
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 7:33
Science always relies on investigating the known and refusing to consider the unknown and undefined.
The progress in these areas will come from researchers unburdened by paradigms and desire to explore where no scientist has gone before.
Science is based on what can be observed, controlled, and repeated. In the case of most paranormal events, what can be observed with either tools or senses is limited, what can be controlled is fuck all, and as for repeating, well... how about you go try and set up an experiment to prove magic exists and then show the steps so your peers can repeat it? Sound good? Oh, it doesn't? You can't produce a repeatable experiment? Then by what credibility can we take your word for these things?
Also, don't group tulpae in with the paranormal. We can already explain why/how they are the way they are with modern psychology and neuroscience.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 7:45
Programming is voluntary autism.
Tulpa is voluntary schizophrenia.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 7:51
Hey /g/roskiland, at least fix your damn quotes if you want to stay here.
>It's really annoying when you present yourself too dumb to type a space.
>It also shows that you didn't lurk for a minute before posting, which is the sign of a complete moron.
[point ripped out of context]
Blah blah
[point ripped out of context]
Blah blah
[point ripped out of context]
Blah blah
This is also annoying and shows your origin like nothing else.
Learn to write proper prose.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 8:02
>>92
>don't group tulpae in with the paranormal
AH, its only paranormal when you "can't explain away with science". Without a background in tulpas, you take the stance of "authorative knowledge"(The Church of England proclaims that:):
>We can already explain
"Its all illusions, tulpas are figment of imagination. Tulpas are form of multiple personality disorder. Tulpas are a mental illness. Tulpas are imaginary friends.etc"
That is not a valid explanation for sentient beings that have independent minds.
A tulpa can create an another tulpa without any input from the host. Let that sink in.
>>94
>fix your damn quotes if you want to stay here.
What if i don't? Would you run to the mods, like a child?
>This is also annoying and shows your origin like nothing else.
If you have prejudices it is not my intention to eliminate them, you will have to rethink what you assume about "/g/roskiland"(the barbarians outside your cozy little realm) eventually.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 8:15
>>97
ebig xd
fug da polis ikr xdddd My assumptions about /g/roskis are completely correct; they don't know how to behave and think the site is theirs. Have fun being a dumb shit. Also, have you ever thought that people like you are the reason your beloved /g/ died?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 8:19
>>98
>my clever BaBByCode shows how smart i am, dumbshits can't even copypaste sub tags
You show a misunderstanding of tulpae, how the mind works, and of science as a whole. In any case, tulpae can be explained by information we already know:
1. The brain can act on what it believes to be true. If this were not true, placebos would do nothing every time.
2. Repeating an action can cause things to become instinctual. We perform certain actions without thinking about it because they have become a habit.
3. Hallucinations are possible.
4. Multiple personalities are possible.
1 and 2 create 3 and 4.
As for tulpae creating their own tulpae? Is it any surprise that the subconscious should have the same abilities as the conscious in this regard?
>>102
Okay, whatever reductionist ideas you have don't let it possess you.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 8:44
>>103
>look at me, i cannot possibly..be the master of the ruse, i'm definitely not pretending to ignore that replies to a post quote it
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 9:01
>>105
I ask one last time: Who are you misquoting? I cannot find the text within your poorly formed quote anywhere in this thread.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 9:14
>>106
>i cannot be possibly that retarded as to not to look at the HTML source
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 9:41
>>107
Eh, whatever. If you enjoy posting incoherent crap after being insulted, go ahead.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 9:48
Note for people unfamiliar with "BBCODE":
Post >>98 contains two sections one of which visible as a normal post and the other has many sub tags embedded via BBCODE
which make the text to appear much lower than the first section. the first section of >>98 is >>97
ebig xd
fug da polis ikr xdddd and the second is
My assumptions about /g/roskis are completely correct; they don't know how to behave and think the site is theirs. Have fun being a dumb shit. Also, have you ever thought that people like you are the reason your beloved /g/ died?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 10:07
>>109
Great work, Sherlock. I'm sure nobody except you noticed the big black string of mini characters below >>98-san's post.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 10:18
>>109 Note for people unfamiliar with "BBCODE":
You are on a board that claims BBCode and Scheme are the ``ultimate languages''. The only one you are explaining this to is idiots from /g/, a group of people you (as your unusual action of pointing out the completely obvious insinuates) probably belong to yourself.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 10:27
>>111 The only one you are explaining this to
Note for elitists: /g/ is much larger than /prog/. The only one who don't need an explanation are regulars who know BBCODE(which is a subset of /prog/regulars).
>>119
I'm right here. I was gathering the articles, but if you need some Unicode, I'll do it now.
By the way, ~80% of the threads used for the previous necrobump were deleted. Like the last time, I'll try to use threads that don't mean anything for us.
See you on the Tabitha Catherine's shelter for more details.
>>128
Isn't there actually an entire branch of philosophy saying that we are all one?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 17:19
>>129
The word you are trying think of Winston, is solipsism.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 17:30
>>130
Actually, >>129-san is describing something closer to pantheism, where we are all god's tulpas. Mere solipism would imply that we were all his tulpas.
>>104
Already let her do it. Several times. It's not a big deal.
>>117
I never claimed authority over anything, but what has authority to do with anything. I was merely stating already established facts and using a logical argument to tie them together to explain how and why tulpae can occur.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 20:49
>>134
You never mentioned any sort of ``established facts'' and it is clear you have never experienced a truly logical argument once in your life.
Are not the points I have made common knowledge? We know 1 is true because of the placebo effect, we know 2 is true because, well.. that's kind of how neurons work. Habitual actions form neuron connections in the brain. 3 and 4 are obvious by the very existence of schizophrenia and multiple personality syndrome.
If it is possible that a repeated action will become habitual, and that the brain can, among other things, form a secondary personality and a hallucination, why should it come as any surprise that a habitual forced hallucination and conversation with an entity one has created will eventually become subconscious and allow that entity to act on its own without being forced?
When you say things like "truly" and "I pity you," you sound like the kind of person who acts unsurprised when you tell them your astrological sign. "Oh, Aquarius, I thought so. There's a lot of emotion under there, isn't there?" That kind of thing. When you get mad, I'll bet you say, "I will end you." Not "kill," which is odd enough given that we're on THE INTERNET, but no, it's got to be "end," like you're some teenage girl's ideal vampire boyfriend acting all soft-tough toward her ex.
Fuck, just make a good point and leave it at that. That's how you win. That's how you impress people. Nothing else will ever do it.
>>138
THERE ARE NO FUCKING GOOD POINTS IN THIS THREAD OR ANY FUCKING GOOD ARGUMENT ABOUT ANYTHING ON 4CHAN OR /PROG/
FUCK YOU NIGGER
I'LL KILL YOU AND END YOU AT THE SAME TIME
END AND KILL
KILL AND END
FUCK IMPRESSING PEOPLE ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE PEOPLE YOU DON'T RESPECT
YOU LOSE, NOT ME, I ALWAYS WIN
YOU WIN AT NOTHING
YOUR WINS ARE MEANINGLESS
YOUR LACK OF INTELLIGENCE AND QUALITY EDUCATION OF EITHER IVY LEAGUE OR SELF-EDUCATION IS EVIDENT
FUCK DAWKINS
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-24 22:17
>>138 just make a good point
Don't say that, he will ``stop grasping at ad hominems, your strawman is a fallacy and the burden of projection is on your bias, stop projecting your projections on my projector'' and think he automatically won the argument.
sometimes displays a seemingly limitless demonic energy especially when engaged in attention-seeking activities or evasion of accountability and is often a committeeaholic or apparent workaholic
Why is our society destroying normal male behavior?