Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

why africa is poor and america is rich

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 15:55

african debts:     $300,000,000,000
american debts: $14,000,000,000,000

africa need to loan more money, then they'll be rich as america

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 16:34

If Africa had the same population as the United States each person would only have $1000 to pay off the debt in one go.  Realistically-speaking, this is Africa, so it's not like that will ever happen.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 18:04

Because Africans rather kill each other over petty racial difference than work to make their own lives better?

But let's face it, no one is going to loan money to people with 12 years old snorting gunpowder coke and shooting aks. Lenders are more likely to be fooled when the applicant dresses in a fancy suits that were brought though deficit spending.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 18:07

african american debts:     $14,300,000,000,000

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 18:08

your mom zaaaa xd

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 22:04

Interesting all of this debt wasn't a problem before Jews and faggots hijacked our country in the 1960s.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 22:46

>>6
Well, then, you shouldn't have taken all those handouts and all that charity that was offered.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-08 2:19

"You"? I think you mean the Jews who occupied our government took those handouts they give themselves.

Name: Angieisback 2011-01-08 16:05

The better question is, why did all the black(Negroid) and dark skinned mongoloid populations "decay" after white imperialism. Whereas Asian and Indian cultures benefited from the imperialism? Don't bring up the caste system, that's a joke compared to the condition of Africa and Haiti. Really though, why does it seem like it's because they were the only ones able to be taken advantage of? Even in today's society... I think it has something to do with intellegence.

Name: Angieisback 2011-01-08 16:11

If all intelligence is based on cultural aspects, why weren't whites able to " hold down" the intelligence of Asians, and force them into ghettos. It is obviouse that intellegence is based on race and evolution through careful observation of history and the world today.   Asians aren't as successful politicaly, but why aren't they living in violent ghettos? Think people.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-08 16:22

>>9
Why did White populations decay after Roman imperialism whereas North African and Middle Eastern Arab populations benefited from the imperialism?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 0:43

OP

Read "Guns, Germs and Steel"

Answers this exact question. With actual sense.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 2:42

>>10
are you the type of girl that has a pussyhole from the day you where borned

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 3:42

>>12
Black people must be genetically inferior because they had access to old world crops, old world cattle, old world technology and immunity to old world diseases yet could not construct a civilization on the scale of the Aztecs and Incas who had none of those advantages?

I see.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 4:04

>>14
There were several ancient and early medieval civilizations in East Africa that were more advanced than the Aztecs and Incas.
For some reason, they didn't colonize less advanced regions in Africa (like say the Roman Empire did) which is a shame, colonization is good, it spreads technology to more primitive regions, and Africa would have benefitted from being colonized in ancient times.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 9:45

>>15
Who but a capitalist would try to spin this thread I waiting for him to come into the rapist thread and argue that rape in capitalist country could be a good thing WTF!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 10:18

>>16
I'm not sure I fully understand you, but I have no strong opinions on economics. I do think that technological/scientific progress is extremely important, and that colonization by adavanced nations of primitive regions has caused immense progress for the human race. If the Americas were left untouched, there is no way the Native Americans would have contributed even a tiny fraction of what the modern nations in the Americas have contributed to the advancement of the human race.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 13:10

>>16
i lol'ed

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 13:16

>>17
Sorry Thought U were one of capitalist slugs thats been hang on the boards. No doubt paid to endoctrinate us into capitalist way so we rejoin the sleeping consumers I quess the "benefitted from being colonized" that got me thinking it might be him(possiblly two). Colonizetion by east india trading corp I think was done with intent of exploitetion and the materialist aspects but hey like I said sorry

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 14:44

Its the fucking Irish they niggeerphied africa!
Fucking Gingers!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 15:09

Kill the gingers!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 22:32

Um, lemmesee...
- most of the plants we farm and eat, come from Eurasia
- most of the animals we keep as livestock, come from Eurasia
- most of the early technologies (i.e. pre-Columbus) come from Eurasia

- the deadliest parasites are found in tropical climates, like Africa
- so are the most violent weather types (storms, droughts, etc)
- just about every single animal found natively in Africa, has serious attitude issues where humans are concerned (i.e. useless as livestock; ever tried riding a zebra? or an ostrich?)

Add a mixture of daft religions (esp. Christian missionaries and Moslem conquests), cold war proxy-war-style coups-d'etat, phuxx0rd schooling regimes, sabotaged civil rights movements, and a culture that clowns on anyone with higher education (esp if it's whitey's education), and let me see how far you get.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 0:38

>>22
Cattle herding has been around in Africa for millenia. The Aztecs, Mayans and Incas had no problem adapting their own crops and domesticated animals from native flora and fauna. Try again.

Africa had more advantages than the mesoamericans yet their only civilizations were either heavily influenced by the arabs or a primitive cattle culture empire in west Africa in the 15th century which is pretty late. About their only accomplishment is somehow managing to resist civilization from spreading inland up until european colonialization.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-27 16:09

>>23
Cattle herding has been around in Africa for millenia
And the rest of the world is only now caching on?

The Aztecs, Mayans and Incas had no problem adapting their own crops and domesticated animals from native flora and fauna
So Africa had the exact same flora and fauna America did?

Simply put; the foodstuffs that we now eat, mostly came from Eurasia, the rest from America. Not Africa.

As for why so much stuff (food&tech) came from Eurasia, it's a fkin huge place, basically going east-west. In practical terms, this means that all of it has the same basic climate; the same seasons, the same basic weather patterns, etc.(*) A plant that grows well in China, grows well in France. And a fuckton of places in-between. Similar with animals and tech.

(* There are anomalies (Taklamakan, Himalaya, Tundra etc), but those are, relatively speaking, too small to have any impact on this particular mechanism; the remainder is still fkin huge.)

America and Africa both go north-south; not only are there more climate types going on (esp with America), each climate zone has less space to itself. Try getting two crops a year in Alaska. Try growing anything in Death Valley.

And once European colonists arrived in America, the climate there is more European-friendly than Africa. This, and the free-for-all land-grab that was the conquest of the West, attracted people that were used to thinking in terms of empires, and now had the opportunity to build one.


By the time America was exposed to the tech that we now take for granted, the important bits of it were in the hands of European conquerors and colonists. Even more so with Africa.

Not to mention how Africa's societal power structures beyond villages and tribes, were fubar'd by the colonial masters, who didn't bother putting anything worthwhile in their place. Also, it was the locals that threw the colonials out. Just about all of them too, since few Europeans bothered to settle there (except for the southern parts, with its somewhat more European-friendly climate).

In America the colonists not only outnumbered the locals, they had settled there to stay, to the point where most were even born there. Also, enough of them had the experience and mindset to build and maintain a nation that could grow into an empire.

In Africa, the general population was kept grossly under-educated. The educated elite was small, inexperienced and jammed between two cultures (trying to be European and largely forgetting to be Africans with their knowledge). This small number and inexperience, coupled with how many of these states were outright sabotaged by their former masters, made them vulnerable to the proxy war part of the Cold War, not to mention the local useful idiots that had no further ambitions than to carve out a small empire(tte) for themselves, with whatever oh-so-not-colonial help from abroad that they would need to get that.



Damn, that was long!

tl;dr:  Africans have had the deck stacked against them, to the point of deliberately cheating. And they have idiots, psychos and assholes like the rest of us, which isn't exactly helping.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-27 19:21

Erm, Egypt is in africa. They had one of the most kick ass civilizations ever.

Also, the civilization level does not necessarily guarantee victory. Genkis khan owned half of the known world. He wasn't exactly advanced. The byzantine empire (then called eastern roman empire) was taken over by the turks and so on.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 3:36

>>24
And the rest of the world is only now caching on?
No. Most of the world has had cattle herding for millenia also.

all of it has the same basic climate
Nope. India and South East asia have a tropical climate like much of sub-saharran Africa and Central America.

the important bits of it were in the hands of European conquerors and colonists
Africa was exposed to old world crops, cattle and technology for millenia through trade with the arab world, mesoamericans had no exposure whatsoever until Columbus.

>>25
Victory determines "civilization level", Ghengis Khan had superior military technology even if his economic technology wasn't as sophisticated.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 9:57

>>25
It is, but Egyptians are a Caucasoid race.  They are not and never were niggers.  That's the difference.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 12:51

>>26
Words like "basic" and "anomalies" confuse you or something?

OK, let's try a different simplification: The climates of Eurasia are basically distributed in belts (tundra, temperate, (sub)tropic) that stretch out for thousands of miles (don't have exact numbers, but look at a map, you'll get the basic idea).
Pick one point, go ten thousand miles east (or west, depending on where you start), and the basic climate will be the same.

And so a crop that grows in one place, a livestock animal that thrives in one spot, or a tech (agriculture, construction, etc) that works in one place, can be transported thousands of miles along this belt, and everything still works fine. And surprise, surprise: that's exactly how these things spread for thousands of years.

All of this translates to a huge area of applicability that makes the US look small.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 15:38

>>28
this

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 16:21

>>28
I'm talking about sub-saharran Africa. Proving that the mesoamericans were at a disadvantage only proves sub-saharran Africans were more privileged.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 2:20

>>30
facepalm.jpg

How exactly was Mesoamerica at a disadvantage by all this? Who had the potatos and the corn? What crop has Africa given us?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 11:37

>>31
AIDS.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 15:24

>>31
What crop has Africa given us?
That's a good question.

Blonde Blue Eyed Europeans developed their own crops in their inhospitable frozen northern climate, Indians and South east asians developed their own crops, MesoAmericans developed their own crops without exposure to the old world. All these races and peoples from difficult environments for agriculture and horticulture all developed their own crops and cattle.

What crop has Africa given us?

They might have given us some nuts and coffee or something, maybe half-caucasoid places like Ethiopia managed someagriculture but no sophisticated agriculture to support large cities like those seen in similar climates in central America, India and South East asia.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-30 8:27

>>33
Africa has vast tracts of fertile land, it has huge numbers of animals capable of being domesticated, numerous crops capable of being farmed.

Nigger animals with an IQ of 50-60 are simply not capable of inventing anything, and no amount of federal laws and government handouts will make them equal to the white.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-30 13:13

>>34
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 17:30

>>35
Tsk yourself.  It's the truth.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 18:55

>>36
Reactionary, xenophobic, racist hyperbole that its basis only agreed upon by its retarded adherents is not "the truth". Sorry.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:38

>>35
>>37
Now now. >>34 has had his say, how about you share your thoughts on the dilemma presented by >>33?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:52

>>37
What color is the sky in your world, niggerlover?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 20:46

>>39
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 22:34

>>38
It's not really a dilemma, Africa (or any other place in the world for that matter), is not inherently obligated to "give the rest of world anything". Sorghum and millet are traditional crops to Africa, even though they're grown in other parts of the world. Sure, large scale agriculture (or at least large enough to develop a small city) was not really developed (except for maybe the Nok culture), but for all we know, there could have been micro farms no bigger than a tenth of a hectare, enough to satisfy any applicably sized tribe.

Needs are mostly relative, if there's not much of a need to expand, then expansion is likely not to happen.

>>39
What are you on about?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-12 11:30

>>41
Not inherently obligated?  Is the West inherently obligated to "give the world anything," then?  You know, the West?  The ones who created penicillin, the Internet, weather satellites, the printing press, the concept of equality before the law?  Yeah, them.  THAT West.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-13 5:43

>>42
What, you mean the west that has stolen everything they liked from the third world at gunpoint and through slavery? The west that got rich through genocide? The ones that poisoned the whole planet? I wouldn't be very proud of this.

Plus, the west didn't invent those things you mentioned, certain people did. And they're not giving it out to the world for free. They charge an arm and a leg for it. Therefore, it's stupid to be proud of these things as you have no more connection to these people than the people in Africa do.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-13 7:02

<--- check my dubs

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-13 14:25

>>43
I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of the niggers scratching in the dirt with wooden tools for the last 250,000 years while my people put men on the moon.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-13 18:41

>>43
So when a westerner commits a crime all are guilty and when a westerner does good only the individual should be lauded.

Sounds like you're a racist.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-15 5:22

>>46
Stop playing with words mate. If you had actualy learned to read properly, you would have noticed that I don't accuse the west for anything, I'm taking the piss out of your opinion that the west is so great and 'civilized'.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-15 6:36

>>47
I'm not that other guy, I was just saying. Lots of people try to downplay the achievements of the west because racism made them mad. The truth is that last comment of yours is the crux of the matter, there are racists and thugs in every society so if the west isn't civilized with it's science and democracy then no society is but that's irrelevant because we are individuals not collectives.

the west didn't invent those things you mentioned, certain people did

Anyway I believe Africa is poor because it's terrain is suited to guerilla warfare, it is a vast continent with lots of jungle and few mountains, inland seas, rivers or other obstructions, foreigners can supply insurgencies in neighbouring states very easily, bands of gunmen can create little fiefdoms of their own in the wilderness and states trying to regain control would have to spend vast amounts of money for little gain. If you look at the asian tigers you can see they are all coastal or islands, easily defended city state like enclaves of security where capitalists can invest in sophisticated industries without fear of it all being destroyed in some stupid revolution or civil war.

Name: NObody 2011-03-05 5:39

Ahem. SO, bitches....
Well isn't it obvious? America is driven by its need to remain powerful, like any great state. Behind it are corporations that direct its power, to an extent. Think Shell in Nigeria and you'll have understood where I'm coming from.

So.

If any of you hate the corporations like Cargill, Perdue (if you speak french, this name is ironic) and the destruction that others like them are wreaking upon the earth and humanity in the name of profit, then I invite 4chan to expose them. Take the red pill, and the most rocking trip since time began.

If I have inadvertantly posted in the wrong board, please forgive me and direct me to another. This same message will appear again and again until Anonymous finds it and chooses to act. or not. I mean, it's up to them. But, if they've successfully targeted Scientology then American corporations and special interests ought to be a piece of cake.

Ready for the revolution?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-13 18:10

The reason why Africa isn't as rich because it has been ravaged by years of colonialism, poverty, and is now collectively controlled by manipulative conservatives.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-14 17:24

Africa is poor because the human-chimpanzee hybrids who make up the bulk of the population south of the Sahara Desert have an average IQ of 55.

If you'd ever been around niggers you'd already know this.  Turn off Mommy's computer, turn off the televitz, open the door, open your eyes, and walk outside.  There's a whole wide world out there, and it's full of objective truth.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-15 23:44

When the conservatives are through as America we'll be just as poor as Africa.  Africa, wait for us. It won't be long now. Don't go liberal before we sink to your level, otherwise we'll be the only butt monkey of the world.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-16 13:22

>>51
How come I never hear anyone with IQ over 55 themselves say that? Could it be, say, projection or something?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-16 13:50

>>50
So it has nothing to do with marxists like Mugabe.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-16 18:11

>>53
Tell yourself that.

>>54
Marxism is a very inefficient economic system and has been disproven by the real world, but niggers aren't capable of doing better under any system, anywhere.  Stop anthropomorphizing them and you'll realize why.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-20 19:13

>>55
>>53
Tell yourself that.
Wasn't it Bill Hicks, btw, that noticed how creationists keep looking unevolved, with eyes very close together &stuff?
- God created me on the sixth day!
- Yeah, looks like He rushed it.

>>51
Turn off Mommy's computer
I turn off my computer every time I go to Africa. Or other places for that matter. The people I meet there, tend to have brains like the rest of us...
...however also a culture where education has to translate into a job in less than 5 seconds or else be deemed useless. In no small part because they don't have the money to spend years milling around uselessly daydreaming. Hence business ideas have to be simple to explain, and research goals so short-stepped they're practically begging for the richer parts of the world to bypass them before results can start to show up.

And so they don't usually have the education needed to know what a cargo cult is, much less recognise the forms of Christianity thus outright perversely prevalent, as precisely that.

FYI: When people start resorting to blind faith that their particular superstition will bring cash and good luck, they usually don't look that hard any more for inventive solutions or intelligent inventions not first used by just about everyone else. "No need for me to help myself; I'll just keep my faith strong, and massa up there will help me".

Which is the main reason I'd rather not talk to burning bushes. You don't get all that many intelligent answers from them.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-23 17:40

>>56
Yup, you've never been alone in a room full of niggers in your life.  PROTIP:  real life is not the Disney Channel.  What are you, thirteen years old?

Turn off the televitz, turn off Mommy's computer, and take a walk outside.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 11:44

>>57
So, dunno how to read, do you?
"Every time" implies "several times", "meet" tends to mean "talk to", even "get to know".
Oh and yeah, BEEN TO AFRICA usually means ACTUALLY MEETING THE PEOPLE THERE.

But since you just displayed the reading skills of a 5-year-old, you'll also not have noticed how I never mentioned bling or gangsta-rap, or whatever this Disney Channel of yours (which is NOT on my very short list of channels I ever watch) is on about. I'm talking about REAL LIFE, most of which is OUTSIDE America. Y'know, that insignificant, piddling little 95% of the world's population? Yeah, THAT little backyard.

As for American blacks (which seem to be the only ones you even know to exist), they're more likely be idiots for being Americans, not for their skin tone. To see just how fuxxored Yankeeland really is, check your hallway mirror. (or someone else's, since you'll be to pathetic to have one of your own)

In any case, you're clearly either a retard or a troll, most likely both. In any case, I have nothing more to say to you. Go back to your FoxNews.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 13:34

>>58
I've never been to Africa, but I've been to Detroit, and that's how I can tell you've never seen a real flesh-and-blood nigger in your life.

You're, what, about twelve, thirteen?  I bet your mommy and daddy are sweating blood to send you to an expensive lily-white private school.  And instead of doing your homework, you're going onto the Internet to tell those big bad racists the TROOTH that you saw on the Jewtube and pounding on your hairless widdle chest the whole time.

Maybe you should turn off Mommy's computer and do your homework, kid.  Grownups are talking here.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 15:21

>>59
You're, what, about twelve, thirteen?
42, actually. How d'you think I could go to places like (sub-Saharan) Africa repeatedly?

I've been to Detroit
That's in the USA, which is the most self-absorbed assclown nation on record. They (you) just LOVE making it look as if they've got some kind of right to (mis)represent the human race, when in reality, that's where the most retarded of morons reside. This goes for blacks as well as whites (in fact, even more for whites). Main reason I never go there.

I've never been to Africa
Ever been outside the US? Y'know, that microscopic 95% of the planet called "the rest of planet Earth"? Where there's more actual real world than the US could ever hope to hold? Ever even seen any of that?


What are you? 10? And you IQ? 10?
It's /b/'s job to be the asshole of the internet. You just got permabanned from there for being retarded-even-by-their-standards or something?

When I was your age, we were already laughing at Americans' poor excuse for a grasp on the world, its geography and customs. College students unable to find Dallas,TX on a map of the US, mistaking houses more than 50 years old for ruins just cos they're old, and stuff.

I even overheard an episode of "Are you smarter than a fifth grader", where the contestant was asked something like "which European country..." Forgot the rest of the question, cos my mind locked itself on her answer: "I thought Europe WAS a country!" And these people are supposed to be the best America has to offer?

These, then, are the people lecturing me about the "real world", after I've been there (in fact, grew up there!) and they — by their own admission! — have not?

Loser!

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 15:59

>>60
Shut the fuck up you stupid fucking eurofag.

Marxist traitors like yourself should be hung from the nearest tree.

Niggers are poor because they are subhuman monkeys with an average IQ of 70. Intelligence is almost entirely genetics, so no amount of well wishing liberal BULLSHIT will ever change it.

>>52
Except africa is run by communists and marxists and formerly soviet funded dictators.

"conversatives" want to CONSERVE the nation, want to keep it strong and existing.
LIBERALS want change, they want white genocide, and want to destroy our civilization.
Look at the argument of these filthy nigger lovers here. They have this BLATANTLY FALSE claim that we're "all equal", and from there they have endless excuses for the nigger.

Jewish marxists invented the term "racist", racial differences are OBVIOUS and ESSENTIAL. Our nations were nice because they were WHITE. Third world nations are third world because they were filled with third world people!

Name: not 60 2011-03-26 16:32

>>61
Listen asshole. In order to call somebody a traitor you need to be on the same team to start with. You're on your own team and I'm on mine. 60 is right. You do belong to /b/ and even there you would still be an asshole. Even by their standards. As for marxists, even though I'm not one, I take it all you know is what you heard on fox. Go back to fox then and enjoy 'reality'.

One thing you're right about:
>Intelligence is almost entirely genetics...
Too bad you have subnigger IQ.

What do you call your species anyway? McHuman?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 17:51

>>61
Boo hoo hoo, real grownups won't agree with me. WAAAAH!
Fix'd.

Also,
implying that anyone more intelligent than me, is a marxist
Wow, you really are a moron.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 18:18

>>62
>>63

Listen, assholes:
Nigger stupid traitor bastard whore monkey jew.
As you can see, my argumentation is foolproof. I was right and you were wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 19:25

>>64
Is that you cartman?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 19:57

>>64
You been smoking again? What have I told you about smoking, boy?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 22:15

>>60
Aw, is the widdle baby gonna cwy?  Is it not going like you planned, widdle boy?  Cry some more big fat tears for us, niggerlover.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-27 3:58

>>67
Retarded troll is retarded

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-27 11:12

>>68
Sooooooooooo, you have no response, then?  I accept your surrender.  You're going to turn off Mommy's computer and finish your homework now, right?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-27 20:00

>>62
>In order to call somebody a traitor you need to be on the same team to start with.

62 admits he is a filthy non-white who supports anti-white policies because it benefits him and his race.

Why would liberals ally themselves with jews and non-whites who hate them and see them only as temporary friends while overcoming the last remnants of sane civilized society?

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-27 20:01

>>70
yer mom

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-28 2:48

>>69
Comical Ali indahouse!

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-03 10:05

No more trolling? /b/ lifted their ban or something?

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List