Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

why africa is poor and america is rich

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 15:55

african debts:     $300,000,000,000
american debts: $14,000,000,000,000

africa need to loan more money, then they'll be rich as america

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 16:34

If Africa had the same population as the United States each person would only have $1000 to pay off the debt in one go.  Realistically-speaking, this is Africa, so it's not like that will ever happen.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 18:04

Because Africans rather kill each other over petty racial difference than work to make their own lives better?

But let's face it, no one is going to loan money to people with 12 years old snorting gunpowder coke and shooting aks. Lenders are more likely to be fooled when the applicant dresses in a fancy suits that were brought though deficit spending.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 18:07

african american debts:     $14,300,000,000,000

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 18:08

your mom zaaaa xd

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 22:04

Interesting all of this debt wasn't a problem before Jews and faggots hijacked our country in the 1960s.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-07 22:46

>>6
Well, then, you shouldn't have taken all those handouts and all that charity that was offered.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-08 2:19

"You"? I think you mean the Jews who occupied our government took those handouts they give themselves.

Name: Angieisback 2011-01-08 16:05

The better question is, why did all the black(Negroid) and dark skinned mongoloid populations "decay" after white imperialism. Whereas Asian and Indian cultures benefited from the imperialism? Don't bring up the caste system, that's a joke compared to the condition of Africa and Haiti. Really though, why does it seem like it's because they were the only ones able to be taken advantage of? Even in today's society... I think it has something to do with intellegence.

Name: Angieisback 2011-01-08 16:11

If all intelligence is based on cultural aspects, why weren't whites able to " hold down" the intelligence of Asians, and force them into ghettos. It is obviouse that intellegence is based on race and evolution through careful observation of history and the world today.   Asians aren't as successful politicaly, but why aren't they living in violent ghettos? Think people.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-08 16:22

>>9
Why did White populations decay after Roman imperialism whereas North African and Middle Eastern Arab populations benefited from the imperialism?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 0:43

OP

Read "Guns, Germs and Steel"

Answers this exact question. With actual sense.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 2:42

>>10
are you the type of girl that has a pussyhole from the day you where borned

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 3:42

>>12
Black people must be genetically inferior because they had access to old world crops, old world cattle, old world technology and immunity to old world diseases yet could not construct a civilization on the scale of the Aztecs and Incas who had none of those advantages?

I see.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 4:04

>>14
There were several ancient and early medieval civilizations in East Africa that were more advanced than the Aztecs and Incas.
For some reason, they didn't colonize less advanced regions in Africa (like say the Roman Empire did) which is a shame, colonization is good, it spreads technology to more primitive regions, and Africa would have benefitted from being colonized in ancient times.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 9:45

>>15
Who but a capitalist would try to spin this thread I waiting for him to come into the rapist thread and argue that rape in capitalist country could be a good thing WTF!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 10:18

>>16
I'm not sure I fully understand you, but I have no strong opinions on economics. I do think that technological/scientific progress is extremely important, and that colonization by adavanced nations of primitive regions has caused immense progress for the human race. If the Americas were left untouched, there is no way the Native Americans would have contributed even a tiny fraction of what the modern nations in the Americas have contributed to the advancement of the human race.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 13:10

>>16
i lol'ed

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 13:16

>>17
Sorry Thought U were one of capitalist slugs thats been hang on the boards. No doubt paid to endoctrinate us into capitalist way so we rejoin the sleeping consumers I quess the "benefitted from being colonized" that got me thinking it might be him(possiblly two). Colonizetion by east india trading corp I think was done with intent of exploitetion and the materialist aspects but hey like I said sorry

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 14:44

Its the fucking Irish they niggeerphied africa!
Fucking Gingers!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-09 15:09

Kill the gingers!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 22:32

Um, lemmesee...
- most of the plants we farm and eat, come from Eurasia
- most of the animals we keep as livestock, come from Eurasia
- most of the early technologies (i.e. pre-Columbus) come from Eurasia

- the deadliest parasites are found in tropical climates, like Africa
- so are the most violent weather types (storms, droughts, etc)
- just about every single animal found natively in Africa, has serious attitude issues where humans are concerned (i.e. useless as livestock; ever tried riding a zebra? or an ostrich?)

Add a mixture of daft religions (esp. Christian missionaries and Moslem conquests), cold war proxy-war-style coups-d'etat, phuxx0rd schooling regimes, sabotaged civil rights movements, and a culture that clowns on anyone with higher education (esp if it's whitey's education), and let me see how far you get.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 0:38

>>22
Cattle herding has been around in Africa for millenia. The Aztecs, Mayans and Incas had no problem adapting their own crops and domesticated animals from native flora and fauna. Try again.

Africa had more advantages than the mesoamericans yet their only civilizations were either heavily influenced by the arabs or a primitive cattle culture empire in west Africa in the 15th century which is pretty late. About their only accomplishment is somehow managing to resist civilization from spreading inland up until european colonialization.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-27 16:09

>>23
Cattle herding has been around in Africa for millenia
And the rest of the world is only now caching on?

The Aztecs, Mayans and Incas had no problem adapting their own crops and domesticated animals from native flora and fauna
So Africa had the exact same flora and fauna America did?

Simply put; the foodstuffs that we now eat, mostly came from Eurasia, the rest from America. Not Africa.

As for why so much stuff (food&tech) came from Eurasia, it's a fkin huge place, basically going east-west. In practical terms, this means that all of it has the same basic climate; the same seasons, the same basic weather patterns, etc.(*) A plant that grows well in China, grows well in France. And a fuckton of places in-between. Similar with animals and tech.

(* There are anomalies (Taklamakan, Himalaya, Tundra etc), but those are, relatively speaking, too small to have any impact on this particular mechanism; the remainder is still fkin huge.)

America and Africa both go north-south; not only are there more climate types going on (esp with America), each climate zone has less space to itself. Try getting two crops a year in Alaska. Try growing anything in Death Valley.

And once European colonists arrived in America, the climate there is more European-friendly than Africa. This, and the free-for-all land-grab that was the conquest of the West, attracted people that were used to thinking in terms of empires, and now had the opportunity to build one.


By the time America was exposed to the tech that we now take for granted, the important bits of it were in the hands of European conquerors and colonists. Even more so with Africa.

Not to mention how Africa's societal power structures beyond villages and tribes, were fubar'd by the colonial masters, who didn't bother putting anything worthwhile in their place. Also, it was the locals that threw the colonials out. Just about all of them too, since few Europeans bothered to settle there (except for the southern parts, with its somewhat more European-friendly climate).

In America the colonists not only outnumbered the locals, they had settled there to stay, to the point where most were even born there. Also, enough of them had the experience and mindset to build and maintain a nation that could grow into an empire.

In Africa, the general population was kept grossly under-educated. The educated elite was small, inexperienced and jammed between two cultures (trying to be European and largely forgetting to be Africans with their knowledge). This small number and inexperience, coupled with how many of these states were outright sabotaged by their former masters, made them vulnerable to the proxy war part of the Cold War, not to mention the local useful idiots that had no further ambitions than to carve out a small empire(tte) for themselves, with whatever oh-so-not-colonial help from abroad that they would need to get that.



Damn, that was long!

tl;dr:  Africans have had the deck stacked against them, to the point of deliberately cheating. And they have idiots, psychos and assholes like the rest of us, which isn't exactly helping.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-27 19:21

Erm, Egypt is in africa. They had one of the most kick ass civilizations ever.

Also, the civilization level does not necessarily guarantee victory. Genkis khan owned half of the known world. He wasn't exactly advanced. The byzantine empire (then called eastern roman empire) was taken over by the turks and so on.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 3:36

>>24
And the rest of the world is only now caching on?
No. Most of the world has had cattle herding for millenia also.

all of it has the same basic climate
Nope. India and South East asia have a tropical climate like much of sub-saharran Africa and Central America.

the important bits of it were in the hands of European conquerors and colonists
Africa was exposed to old world crops, cattle and technology for millenia through trade with the arab world, mesoamericans had no exposure whatsoever until Columbus.

>>25
Victory determines "civilization level", Ghengis Khan had superior military technology even if his economic technology wasn't as sophisticated.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 9:57

>>25
It is, but Egyptians are a Caucasoid race.  They are not and never were niggers.  That's the difference.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 12:51

>>26
Words like "basic" and "anomalies" confuse you or something?

OK, let's try a different simplification: The climates of Eurasia are basically distributed in belts (tundra, temperate, (sub)tropic) that stretch out for thousands of miles (don't have exact numbers, but look at a map, you'll get the basic idea).
Pick one point, go ten thousand miles east (or west, depending on where you start), and the basic climate will be the same.

And so a crop that grows in one place, a livestock animal that thrives in one spot, or a tech (agriculture, construction, etc) that works in one place, can be transported thousands of miles along this belt, and everything still works fine. And surprise, surprise: that's exactly how these things spread for thousands of years.

All of this translates to a huge area of applicability that makes the US look small.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 15:38

>>28
this

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 16:21

>>28
I'm talking about sub-saharran Africa. Proving that the mesoamericans were at a disadvantage only proves sub-saharran Africans were more privileged.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 2:20

>>30
facepalm.jpg

How exactly was Mesoamerica at a disadvantage by all this? Who had the potatos and the corn? What crop has Africa given us?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 11:37

>>31
AIDS.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 15:24

>>31
What crop has Africa given us?
That's a good question.

Blonde Blue Eyed Europeans developed their own crops in their inhospitable frozen northern climate, Indians and South east asians developed their own crops, MesoAmericans developed their own crops without exposure to the old world. All these races and peoples from difficult environments for agriculture and horticulture all developed their own crops and cattle.

What crop has Africa given us?

They might have given us some nuts and coffee or something, maybe half-caucasoid places like Ethiopia managed someagriculture but no sophisticated agriculture to support large cities like those seen in similar climates in central America, India and South East asia.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-30 8:27

>>33
Africa has vast tracts of fertile land, it has huge numbers of animals capable of being domesticated, numerous crops capable of being farmed.

Nigger animals with an IQ of 50-60 are simply not capable of inventing anything, and no amount of federal laws and government handouts will make them equal to the white.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-30 13:13

>>34
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 17:30

>>35
Tsk yourself.  It's the truth.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 18:55

>>36
Reactionary, xenophobic, racist hyperbole that its basis only agreed upon by its retarded adherents is not "the truth". Sorry.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:38

>>35
>>37
Now now. >>34 has had his say, how about you share your thoughts on the dilemma presented by >>33?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:52

>>37
What color is the sky in your world, niggerlover?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 20:46

>>39
Tsk.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List