>>63
>Your "men" only resembles the competent top portion of the gender, probably because of your own reference point.
I agree, but also my reference point if you mean myself isn't top tier at all.
>Not all guys are like you--I know. Guys, in general, are more likely to go after a girl because of sheer looks.
That's the only reason I've ever thought about women ever. I'm no better, in fact I'm worse and this is why I make sure to stave myself away from any of them so they can go about their merry lives in peace.
>Your "women" resemble the bottom portion of the gender.
But so does the OP's or rather, the OP's reference point is that of the bottom portion, but even the OP's women aren't what I'd consider at all top tier.
>Another aspect you missed is that women look for different things in a relationship than you.
I'm not looking for a relationship, you get into relationships for sex? Ack, that would be misery, so much wasted time.
>Without feeling connected to a man, even if it's one that treats her like shit, many women feel powerless.
It is the same both ways however there are many men out ther perfectly willing to connect, if you really want it you can go and get it.
>This is why women will stay in a relationship where the man does not live up to...anything.
All for sex, such a pity what hormones do to an individual but such is humanity and why I pity it.
>It's not about who uses their head, and who's shallow. Each gender has a downside. We're all human.
But it is about who uses their head, who is shallow, who suck shit, so on and so forth, a countless array of thing that anyone can rely on to make sure they do not fall into such a pit.
Yes both genders suck, humanity sucks, so no one should be together, or as few people as possible, in order to fufill this I must live it and present the perspective to any that need to hear it for it is always too obvious that they never have before.
>>65
>Of course. Thing is, I rarely hear of guys, even the assholes, who keep women like that around for any reason other than sex. They're not actually fooled into thinking she's great and wonderful. We may be shallow at first but we aren't perpetually blind. We're aware when she's got nothing to offer us other than a good body.
This is key, by maintaining a stance of general asexuality/mysogeny and keeping the mind of the person (for it is what makes a person a person) high in concern, usually first and foremost, or as a 2nd item of consideration after you see what one may consider attractive, a man or anyone can make sure they never get to the point of considering being around them in any form for whatever reason, if not merely being sure that they are not your type. And why should you be looking for anything, who says you have to be with anyone? Who says anyone has to be with anyone, fags that's who, and I will not associate with such people.
>So then what is it women look for in a relationship? A false, made up "connection" with assholes who treat them poorly?
If you would recall, girls get assholes for sex and little else, women are different.
>Just a fantasy? A guy's standards are simple--either good looks/sex or relationship material with sex.
Both are hard to get and vary greatly among varying qualities of men.
>Women seem to settle for and be attracted to the bottom of the barrel--that is, if one is to make the claim that they're not just in it for sex.
The guys who don't want sex (SHOCK) won't talk to most if not all women, at least not the way someone different would. If he meets one he likes and knows he'll only then really start considering getting into that king of situation, so on top of having the spare chance of being attractive and or relationship material to any given one of them, it is not easy to find many of them. Also I guess the odds are pretty high that those who do pursue a woman aren't the one she wants, just about everything goes both ways because of how many different people there are how many different type of people there are being pitted across two opposing fields. The chance for differentiation is pretty staggering, even in spite of the majority of the populace being sickeningly similar to each other.
The only advice I could give to a woman trying to find a guy for love and not sex would be pretend to be a guy on the internet, meet guys, find one that interests you and present the situation if you think he likes you as a person, you have to be careful though, he'd have to know and be pretty cool with you if you don't expect him to be upset about it when you tell him you don't have a dong. But going undercover is the only way to not be singles out immediately and cast away by anyone who doesn't want to deal with a) people they don't know or b)women/women they don't know, don't tell me that guy's like that don't exist because I'm one of them.
It is something that would take time and you don't have time to waste so you might as well go out and meet the people that run around outside in the towns together and pray you get lucky I guess, I find it hilarious in the amount of cruelty in the facts of it, but it's really how it is. Or you can just say fuck love and fuck asshole and live it up while you're young, just don't be upset when everyone is married or strictly homosexual or anything, there's nothing you can do at that point, your looks have all faded and why would old people want to get together? Hah, especially someone who has never liked the idea throughout their entire life, man, the very concept of it has always made me laugh since it is such a comically ridiculous notion, I always felt sorry for those who had been suckered into it because of myself indirectly, while as unlikely as it sounds it has happened, "more than I think" supposedly, of course I don't buy that though.