We should have the freedom to say NIGGER and FAGGOT and the freedom to hate and even "incite" hate. People can discern and judge for themselves how to react, don't censor opposing viewpoints.
I say those words whenever I want, and I'm white. Since when don't we have the freedom to say those words? You're just scared that a nigger will pop out and harm you. So you want to be protected while saying it. Like the smaller guy who has to stand behind his bigger friend to talk shit to others. So stop being a bitch and just say it. It's not illegal to say those words. So it is your own pussyness that allows you to not say it. Fuck off coward.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-05 21:04
I could care less about some crazy violent armed Negro. I just don't want to be sued for "hate crime" laws because I believe in "separate but equal".
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-05 21:58
You can say it, nigger, faggot, holocaust didn't happen.
* African American, Male Homosexual, Holocaust happened, but that harp gets played upon too much at times.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-05 22:26
>>6
"separate but equal"!? Sounds perfect for a flat earth that was created in seven days.
Get with it, would ya? 2009, Mr. Potato Head. 2009.
I agree with the OP, though I find his examples disappointing. The standard for free speech is an important question. I like the oft quoted "You can't falsely yell fire in a crowded theater" thing(see Schenck v. United States 249US47), but I have a different take. I believe the "clear and present danger" must be personal and proximate. Political speech never presents an immediate personal and proximate threat. Hate speech can. One man calling another a fag nigger is pathetic, but shouldn't be illegal. Though there is certainly a threat implied none is spoken. Implied is not "clear". Now, what if a threat of violence is spoken? I'll say maybe. If some sad "man" is getting his jollies by scaring the shit out of these people and making them suffer, then I damn sure think he's morally guilty. I wouldn't want to legislate it though. So I'll say this. If I catch ya, I'll hold you down and let the bitch scratch your face up a little. And to the "Homosexual African American" community I say; Buck up, fellas! It's our physically defending these fundamental rights that have made room for you guys lately. You've got you're own network, that Bravo channel, right? See? It'll be fine.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-10 2:00
actually in some european countries saying nigger and faggot is illegal.. and you get to pay a shitfat-of-a bill if there is a witness.. that sucks..
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-16 18:15
Fuck your free speech. Millions of people do not want to have to walk around enduring racial slurs from idiots like you that want to set the progress of society back to the Stone Ages. What's so important about your "right" to walk up to people and call them dumb ape niggers? There's nothing wrong about dissenting or unpopular opinions but when you start to cause emotional harm to people, you're pushing it.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-16 19:14
>>11
I don't want to endure seeing fags make out on the streets and ignorant people play loud rap music that glorifies gangs, drugs, writing on other people's property, and degrading women.
We shouldn't have to discuss this type of thing in this day and age!
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-17 5:32
>>11
I'm very offended. You said my white brother is setting progress back to the Stone Ages. That's hate speech, and you don't deserve a "right" to type up mean words to people on the internet. You're causing emotional harm to people, and you're pushing it.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-18 6:28
I'd be ok with faggots if they stopped having anal sex in public and spilling shit, blood and semen over the pavement and onto people's faces. What really bothers me is they do it because communists tell them to, in order to "empower" themselves, whatever that means.
I will never accept negroes anywhere except on plantations, out of sight of everyone except those paid to keep them in line.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-18 11:58
niggers aren't all black anymore.
faggots aren't all gay anymore.
a nigger is a social leech and an offense to civilization; a faggot is an obnoxious, pushy, bitching moron. in an age of anonymous conversation, these things have nothing to do with race or sexual identity anymore.
>>16 That's an anti-communist lie. Homosexuality has been illegal or looked down upon in every "communist state" that's ever existed.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-19 12:03
>>17
still, the majority of faggots are gay males and the majority of niggers are afro-negro-blacks. Can we agree on that?
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-19 12:34
>>19
I mean faggy American communists, the ones who will tell you the awesome totalitarian regime of Soviet Russia is not "real communism".
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-19 14:16
What does supporting state ownership of most industries have to do with supporting faggots' right to spread AIDS in public? Anyway law, medicine, and religion used to be steadfast in their opposition to homosexuality. What happened?
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-20 7:36
>>22
Faggy american communists only support our enemies to get attention and pretend they are worth something, even though they are weak effeminate pussies compared to actual marxist guerillas and communist commissars.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-21 1:18
>>20
I'd argue that most faggots are "bi" males that wear women's jeans and small tight shirts and call themselves "hipsters" or "emo"
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-21 4:15
Sure is intolerant and or antisocial loser in here.
Six college students founded the Ku Klux Klan between December 1865 and the summer of 1866 in the town of Pulaski, Tennessee. Former Confederate officers, the six young men organized as a social club or fraternity and spent their time in horseplay of various types, including wearing disguises and galloping about town after dark. They were surprised to learn that their nightly appearances were causing fear, particularly among former slaves in the area. They quickly took advantage of this effect and the group began a rapid expansion. Various factions formed in different towns, which led to a meeting in April 1867 to codify rules and organizational structure.
At this meeting, former Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest was elected Grand Wizard, or supreme leader, of all the Klan. The organization was divided into a number of realms, dominions, provinces and dens, which were in turn led by Grand Dragons, Titans, Giants and Cyclopes.
The policies of Reconstruction -- aiming to extend the rights of Southern blacks -- had the unintended effect of pushing hundreds of resentful and anxious veterans into the Klan, which soon began instituting a systematic policy of violence in opposition to the new social order. Former slaves were the obvious target of this terrorism, but the Klan also harassed, intimidated and even killed Northern teachers, judges, politicians, "scalawags" and "carpetbaggers" of all ilk. By late 1867, the movement had spread throughout the small towns of the South, though it did not take hold in urban areas, perhaps because at that time the cities were not suffering the economic hardships of rural regions. Klansmen began waging guerilla warfare against what they perceived as a corrupt system depriving them of rights. This feeling of grievance, which began during the time of the first Klan, would characterize Klan sensibility and ideology throughout the 20th century.
By 1869, internal strife led Klansmen to fight against Klansmen as competing factions struggled for control. The Klan's increasing reputation for violence led the more prominent citizens to drop out and criminals and the dispossessed began to fill the ranks. Local chapters proved difficult, if not impossible, to monitor and direct. In disgust, Forrest officially disbanded the organization and the vast majority of local groups followed his lead. Some number of local units continued to operate but were eventually disbanded or sent into hiding by federal troops.
Name:
The Klansman2009-09-21 11:19
In 1915, William J. Simmons, a lifelong joiner of clubs, was inspired to reorganize the Ku Klux Klan after seeing the movie "Birth Of A Nation," D.W. Griffith's spectacular account of Reconstruction, told from the perspective of the Klan and adopting the group's mythic vision of a noble and pristine antebellum South (the movie's loathing of blacks is extraordinary to a modern eye and was highly controversial even at the time; President Woodrow Wilson captured the sensation of the film's release -- even as he validated its message -- when he famously declared that the movie was "like writing history with lightning."). Dissatisfied with the many fraternal organizations of which he was a member (or by his lack of control over those groups), Simmons sought to establish his own organization dedicated to "comprehensive Americanism." When "Birth of a Nation" opened in Atlanta, he ran an advertisement for the Klan next to the movie's ad in the Atlanta newspaper.
The timing was perfect. The United States was struggling to meet the challenges imposed by a massive influx of immigrants, many of whom were Catholic or Jewish and few of whom spoke English. Appealing to the middle class and claiming to be a "purely benevolent" club, the Klan drew members immediately. When the United States finally entered World War I, the group capitalized on the conflict by promising to defend the home front against "alien enemies, slackers, idlers, strike leaders and immoral women," as well as African Americans, Catholics and Jews.
Simmons hired publicists Edward Young Clarke and Elizabeth Tyler to help advertise and recruit in 1920, and in the ardently xenophobic atmosphere of post-World War I America Klan membership soared. Becoming more strident, the group now articulated opposition to "Ni--ers, Catholics, Jews...dope, bootlegging, graft, night clubs and road houses, violation of the Sabbath, unfair business dealings, sex and scandalous behavior." By 1921, the Klan numbered almost 100,000 members and money flooded its coffers. At its peak in 1924, 40,000 uniformed Klansmen paraded through the streets of Washington, D.C., during the Democratic National Convention. Like a modern political lobby, the group was so influential that many politicians felt compelled to court it or even to join, particularly in the Midwestern states. Senators, congressmen, governors, judges at all levels, even future President Harry Truman donned the hood and robe (though Truman shortly quit, apparently disgusted by an anti-Catholic tirade).
As the Klan grew, so did the number and intensity of violent acts committed by its members. The group's image suffered; the hypocrisy of a self-proclaimed "law and order" organization that utilized lynchings and vigilantism did not escape public censure. Additionally, the central leadership proved incapable of effectively controlling the organization's fringes, largely due to their own infighting and competition over the enormous revenue the organization was generating. Scandal followed scandal and the rank-and-file became alienated by the sexual and alcoholic exploits of its leaders. By the outbreak of the Great Depression in 1929, the Klan had fragmented into dozens of independent realms and membership plummeted.
Name:
The Klansman2009-09-21 11:19
Prewar alliances with organizations like the German Bund led to desertions from the ranks and the post-World War II era of unprecedented prosperity further dissipated interest in and support for the Klan. The last of the universally recognized Imperial Wizards, Dr. Samuel Green, died in 1949.
Several leaders throughout the 1950s and 1960s attempted to reunify the movement, but none were successful. Most Klaverns (local units) remained stubbornly independent, although the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s encouraged some unification into independent realms of varying sizes. Outrage over the rising fortunes of African Americans and the perceived inaction or even cooperation of whites led to an increase in membership. At the same time, American society seemed consciously to turn against the Klan during this period as never before. This shift was most clearly reflected in the new commitment by the F.B.I. and other law enforcement agencies, both local and federal, to monitor, infiltrate and disrupt the Klaverns.
Name:
The Klansman2009-09-21 11:19
Fragmentation, decentralization and decline characterized the Klan during this time period, though there was a brief Klan revival in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Many of the Klaverns remained at least nominally independent, although a few were attached to national organizations. These national Klans, which were a pale shadow of the organization's former self, included the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Knights of the White Kamelia and the Imperial Klans of America. Taking a cue from David Duke, former Imperial Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1970s, many attempted to "mainstream" their image by using euphemisms instead of racial epithets, talking of pride in their "heritage" rather than hatred of other groups and participating in state-run good-citizenship initiatives, like "adopt a highway" cleanup programs. At the same time, other Klan groups adopted camouflage uniforms and paramilitary activities.
Many Klan groups also adopted Christian Identity beliefs. They feared the "New World Order," believed Jews and liberals were attempting to outlaw their religious practices, and considered gays and other "deviants" to be forcing their lifestyles into the mainstream. Although many Klansmen received food stamps and other forms of government assistance, they continually raged at African Americans who received "welfare" and accused them of "sucking the blood out of hard-working real Americans."
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Klan groups increasingly aimed their racist invective at immigrants, particularly Hispanics, who were settling in a number of American cities for the first time in the history of those cities. The anti-immigration theme once again became a major issue used by the Klan to both recruit new members and attract publicity.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-22 3:02
I find it funny that the KKK started as an idea at a late night drunken frat party.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-23 13:43
Remember when it was normal to be a Klansman? Now there's social stigma.
ya'll are punks, with narrow minds that keeps society the way it is. why the fuc.k are you so worried about what other people do. i hear just as many ppl bumping country and other shat i dont listen to, but i dont really give a shat because they are not trying to push country music on me. when you openly say words to demean another person because of race or sexual orientation, it just shows how STUPID you really are. most people that think like this dont go very far in life, so have fun in your trailer or at your next klam meeting or date with your cousin. i love going to bars, i dont drink, i just hang with friends till some fool like you says something dumb, i tell them that shat isnt tolerated and if anything degrading said again there is gonna be problems. 2/5 times a fight ensues and some poor fool and his friends get their azz beat. i have broken a few jaws in this manner and would not hesitate a min if anyone of you came stepping. by the way why are all you lames posting as anonymous, shows how down for the "cause" you are. so as i leave to go roll a blunt of jack the ripper, ill leave you with this. dont worry about what other ppl do. this country is big enough for all of us. if you really want and are down for the cause, save your government check a few years, buy some land in the middle of nowhere, and (die alone, j/k) have your lame meeting or commune where you can dicuss "the problem" and what to do about it. i guaruntee you will never have enough ppl to make a difference. I GUARUNTEE it. prove me wrong!
if whites are so superior and better than everbody else why arent we "on top" of the world?????? because it not true, duh. there are so many different white power groups out there, you would figure at least 1 of them "got it right", why dont you guys offer to send other peoples back to their "homeland"? there are dumb people and smart people in every culture and race, it all depends on how you use your mind. open your mind a bit and maybe you can figure some of these things out
The media makes whites feel guilty and ashamed of being white and at the same time forces nigger music upon us and forces us to have certain numbers of minorities in every classroom and workplace.
ive never been guilty or ashamed of who i am or where im from. you dont like the music, change the channel fool. are you that dumb. youd rather listen and be mad? lifes too short. as far as forcing minorities in the workpace, its because ppl like you dont give them a chance. and to be honest ive never personally heard a of someone losing a job or getting fired to make room for a minority. it sad, i know more white folks who listen to rap then otherwise. music is suppose to move you. if you dont have a groove thats ur prob, switch the station. or make a request to shut it off
The ones that say, "Nigger is OUR word!" are the ones who deserve to be called niggers. Much like the 'retards' who (knowingly?) prefer to be called 'mentally challenged' that don't own the word 'retard,' you don't own the word 'nigger.'
Hell, I find anyone who insists upon changing 'nigger' to 'African American' to have an unstable OCD, and therefore is 'mentally challenged.'
I only speak of 'nigger' because of some stupid news channel that happened to be on a few years ago that mentioned the banning of the word. I don't hate black people and have never addressed one as a nigger, but if you're going to try and stop hate by trying to ban a word, you just got some more hate in return.
As for faggot, much like cracker, I don't think it would banned... unless I didn't catch that broadcast.
Anyway, just call them all fat asses, it's still highly useful.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-29 14:03
Who determined the term "nigger" to be pejorative? Leftists.
It's not the term that was pejorative but attitudes toward niggers. Even reasonable people like Mark Twain used the term aplenty.
Fifty years from now the term "African-American" will be regarded as a racial slur, which is a progress in leftist thought. What is the actual goal remains uncertain.
As profoundly described by Theodore Kaczynski in Industrial Society And Its Future, leftism is a celebration of weakness - specifically, leftists embrace what they themselves consider inferior; niggers, for instance. Leftist slave morality is simply admiration of weakness and flaw.
Leftists considered the nigger inferior, thus they invented the negro. The negro was still inferior in their eyes, thus they invented the black. After that came the "African-American". Surely something will come after that, because the leftists still consider the nigger inferior.
So left wingers are the true racists and not right wingers?
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-30 17:50
>>46
Yes, why else would they specifically target ethnic minority youths, tell them they are worthless and can never succeed except through them?
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-31 14:03
>>47
Very nearly all Whites who have had any contact with H. Sapiens Africansis know full well that the savage, lazy, stupid mud-colored monkeymen are not true Humans.
The difference is that those whom it is fashionable to call "Progressive" are terrified of the niggers and want to appease them, preferably by throwing working-class White men under the bus, whereas those whom it is fashionable to call "racist" lack this fear and understand implicitly that it is unwise to appease an aggressor, whether it be Dayshawn or the hook-nosed kikes pulling Dayshawn's strings.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-31 14:57
>>48
Very nearly all Whites who have had any contact with H. Sapiens Rutilus Gutter know full well that the savage, lazy, stupid pasty monkeymen are not true Humans.
The difference is that their inbreeding, social isolation, and constant failure to adapt to a just society has fostered a culture of fear and blame. So have another Coors Light, Bubba. There's a NASCAR race on the TV soon.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-31 15:03
>>48 I'll bet niglets raised by white surrogate parents would abandon ghetto mentality by a statistically significant amount. If you're going to argue that heredity is the defining factor in intelligence, economic success, anything actually, first start by explaining what makes races distinct.
Also, niggers could easily be rounded up and killed. It's the white population that would object. Besides, harming them would solve a nonexistent problem.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-31 15:34
>>50
Niglets raised by human surrogate parents sometimes abandon slum mentality and some do not. Recall how hard the entertainment/Jewsmedia pushes wigger culture in all their agitprop "entertainment." If the slum mentality is environmental, the 15% deficit in cranial capacity, and inescapable resultant 2 standard deviation deficit in cognitive ability remain. "Naturam expelles furca, tamen usque recurret."
What makes races distinct, of course, is their genomes, developed in isolation, in vastly different environments.
Also, could you explain what you mean by "a nonexistent problem?" The nigger problem is very real. Come to Detroit some time and stand on the corner of Six Mile and Livernois and observe for yourself--but you'd better have some bodyguards, because the Vice Lords will want that pretty white skin of yours, to make into a drum.
pushes wigger culture in all their agitprop "entertainment."
Why would one call it "agitprop"? They merely follow their "rational self-interest" to appease the advertisers and shareholders. To ascribe corporate media an ideology is like saying that Cthulthu is immoral for eating his own mother, even though he was hungry.
the 15% deficit in cranial capacity, and inescapable resultant 2 standard deviation deficit in cognitive ability remain
Brain size doesn't matter, what matters is the density of grey matter. Even then, humans use at most 10% of their brain at the time; the rest is backup in case of something severe, like encephalopathy, so that with time one can recover with but minor damage toward their reasoning abilities.
Different IQ-test scores can be as well explained by a pathological culture and improper education.
What makes races distinct, of course, is their genomes, developed in isolation, in vastly different environments.
The question is whether "races" can be any longer considered distinct with such an amount of interbreeding. An analogy can be drawn to evolution, which generally occurs in self-contained populace of moderate size.
The nigger problem is very real.
Well as in this post I am arguing from a leftist position, the party line is that ingroup mentality (actual leftist term: bourgeois nationalism) must be abandoned in favor of proletarian internationalism. And private property must be abolished too, for a good measure.
Yeah, this doesn't make any sense, as well as the right-wing answer, "rational self-interest".
Humans aren't as much intrinsically "good" or "evil" as incompetent. Incompetent at living.
facepalm.jpg This one was debunked in the 1920s, yet you hear it again and again and again.
Name:
Anonymous2009-11-02 21:32
>>56 Heard that one as part of "scientific" "rebuttal" to some New Age shit about how people can become uber-genius by using more of their brain.
Name:
Anonymous2009-11-03 12:31
>>57
After World War I, there was a lot of analysis done of men who'd survived shrapnel or bullet wounds to the brain. Every portion of the human brain, every lobe, every little cluster of neurons, serves a purpose. Damage to any portion causes noticeable impairment that is predictable, because the functions of the different areas of the brain are now, if not perfecly understood, then better understood than before.
"You only use 10% of your brain" is an old false belief from 100+ years ago, when the functions of only 10% of the brain were known.
Now, it's true that people don't use all their brains at once, as a rule. Which is a good thing.
"I use 100% of my brain sometimes. It's called a grand mal seizure."
Name:
Anonymous2009-11-04 16:43
as long as you don't hurt anyone. its not a crime to hate black people, but it is a crime to physically hurt them or treat then unequally. this is meant in a public sense. like if you don't like black people then you don't have to invite them into your home or befriend them, that's your choice and it isn't a crime, but as citizens they have the right go and do whatever you do. non of this 'no-blacks' restaurant bullshit.
not exactly. its open for strangers to come in and you trade with them. they give you money, you give them food. its business. work doesn't necessarily constitute private life. its like an actor saying no black people can watch the movies he's in.
Name:
Anonymous2009-11-04 22:30
>>61 . its like an actor saying no black people can watch the movies he's in.
Like that? Maybe a little; but you are comparing a product, the film, with a proprietorship, the theatre.
A little misleading; don't you think?
Name:
Anonymous2009-11-05 17:31
>>62
hmm this is true. well then i apologize for an erroneous argument. but it was based on the premise that it is ok to believe anything, but if acting on your beliefs have a direct negative consequence on the liberty and rights of others then that should be wrong. like its fine to think non-Christians are going to hell, but if you act on it and burn them preemptively, there in lies the crime. so by that logic, its fine to think black people are inferior, but if you act on that inferiority and treat them unequally, then it goes against their right of equality as a citizen. I agree with OP when he says we should have the right to say and believe what we want, but acting on those beliefs is another story imo.
Name:
Anonymous2009-11-05 21:12
>>63 What if I said that "Barack Obama should die"? That would be "believing and saying what I want", right? Because it goes without question that FBI would be pretty busy about it.
Name:
Anonymous2009-11-05 21:13
>>64 Just in case, I don't really think he should die, or anyone for that matter.
Name:
Anonymous2009-11-05 23:29
>>64
I don't think so. how would the FBI found out you said it?
Name:
Anonymous2009-11-05 23:45
if you wanna show the world you're a bigot, i say go for it
Oh shut the fuck up. I agree that the media sometimes plays a bit of white guilt, but that's far from the norm. This reminds me of something I read up on last night. Long story short, black guy plays race card when his girl gets called a whore, everyone calls it a weak attempt at racial guilt. The person who called her a whore was white, he was black.
>>forcing nigger music upon us
lol
no ones forcing jack shit on you. You're the one buying that shit, if it doesn't sell, it doesn't play. Simple. No one forced it on you in the 70's when it was an obscure genre, no one forced it on you in the 80's were it was still relatively new, no one forced it on you in the 90's when EVERYBODY BOUGHT ALL RAP ALBUMS ON STORE SHELVES,
You're the ones who bought it, end.
>>forces us to have certain numbers of minorities in every classroom and workplace.
I'm against giving some an opportunity simply because of their race, so I agree. But you do realize that some people do get into positions of power on their own merits, right?
>>77
I don't mind it if presented in a humorous non-serious manner. Anything otherwise is hateful and does not belong in public discourse in this day and age.
I think its fine, it is legal where im from to say nigger, me and all my friends say it (all different kinds of people) I'm white and my friends know im racist in a way, my friends are racist (mostly asian / indians) none of us really hang out with niggers we treat it light heartily. Why be insulted by a term that defines you, why be offended by anything? to enlarge your victim status?
We know gays and call them fags for lols. the issue is that it isnt an insult to call me straight i guess? unfair play ground, but it shouldn't be an insult to call them gay. whole idea of that is fuckedd. So in essence don't be such PC victims, or enlarge victim status like lib cunts. Just have fun and don't be a gay nigger, lols joax take it easy ppl.
I don't necessarily get insulted when people use those terms, but I am somewhat offended that they assume that I want to hear, or am fine with open and unapologetic bigotry.
I don't get angry or flustered, I just would no longer associate with you, and discourage others from doing the same. I don't like being with people who are intellectually and emotionally inferior to me.
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-12 7:52
>>86
The fact you dont want to hear it only increases the motivation to use it.
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-12 8:24
Actually you do have the freedom to say it.
And others have the freedom to criticize you for it.
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-17 3:34
WE SHOULD SEND THE JEWS BACK TO AFRICA
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-17 3:34
We should send the jews back to africa
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-17 5:38
We should send the jews back to africa :)
Name:
Anonymous2010-02-17 7:04
We should send the Africans back to the Jews. Since Israel knows very well the horrors of the holocaust they will enjoy being forced to accept unrestricted immigration with the entire negro population of the planet to prove they are not hypocrites.
>>19
No, he means Marxism in cultural terms, "Cultural Marxism". It has nothing to do with Communism at all, and you're right, homosexuality was illegal or looked down upon in Communist states. The one's who promote the social acceptance of homosexuality and such are or have been influenced by cultural Marxism.
the sad truth is,..niggers ARE the third biggest problem in the u.s. I am NOT a racist. that is THEIR excuse. I dont put up with that crap. Some f-n coon runs his ignorant mouth in public..on the bus on the street corner ( why are they allways in a group on the corners ,runnin their stupid mouths ? ) with their pants half off. Talkin tough, trying to act tough. tough is getting up and going to work everyday. or hittin the bricks to find a way to make an honest dollar. they are pussies! I love that look on their face when a guy like me ends the charade I ALMOST feel sorry for them. They just havent been taught,.or refused to be taught. They dont have "no daddy" thats why they are so into their FAT ASSED IRRESPONSIBLE mothers. My grandfather told me "THEY are light!" He showed me a photo of him holding one nigger up over his head. Its true! you can kick the shit out of them, easy!! You just gotta do it! next time they act like you should be scared, knock him right out in front of his punk friends,...they are so ignorant they will probably laugh at their own friend. If there are too many I think they should be mowed down like the animals that they truly are. I also would destroy the parent_ , for not training them to RESPECT OTHER people. ( means shut your damn mouth!) NO NIGGERS=peace in the land. next+muslums
I didn't realize that such freedoms weren't already available to you, well except for the "inciting hatred" bit.
Name:
Anonymous2010-07-16 23:53
>>95
Obviously if I were rallying skinheads to lynch niggers that might be conspiracy, but saying I'm going to kill Barack Obama is not a serious threat.
i got suspended from saying i dont like faggots at all and the teacher that is illegal and i said i got a freedom of speech and the right to say my own opinions so fuck off if you think differnt
Name:
Anonymous2011-05-05 16:21
Freedom of speech does not apply, hat speech is not a valid form of speech.
Name:
Anonymous2011-05-05 21:48
>>105
Who decides what is hateful? "Hate" is a relative term.
You do, and minorities have the freedom to talk shit about you in their music and then make you so unpopular in real life that you retreat to 4chAn.....oh wait!
I am the 1000 of my GET.
VIP is my body, and kopipe is my blood.
I have created over 999 posts.
Unaware of /b/.
Nor aware of fchan.
Withstood bans to create many flamewars.
Waiting for one's arrival.
I have no regrets, this was the only path.
My whole life was Unlimited Troll Works.
Free speech means harassment
Harassment means free speech
This is what Americans actually believe.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-28 5:39
>>121
Shouldn't you be trying to ban steak knives or wiring up more CCTV?
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-28 12:50
nigger and faggot
[mm]oh look, i didn't get hanged![/mm]
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-28 12:56
Freedom to say truth about Israel and holocaust of Palestinians without being called anti-semitic
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-28 23:00
>>124
You already have the right to lie about that in most nations. 1.4 billion sand niggers do it every day. :)
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-29 0:27
you're free to say them in public, but freedom of speech doesn't mean you'll be safe from leaving wherever with a black eye.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-29 3:26
>>126
But you do have the freedom to put whoever gave you a black eye in jail for assault, assuming you go somewhere that isn't a moralfag kangaroo court.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-29 15:21
>>127
You say that, but just wait until someone calls YOU a niggerfaggot! You'll be singing a different tune, believe me my niggerfaggot friend!
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-30 3:25
OP here I just punched my third queer for the night. It felt great.
>2011
>pretending to be white on the internet
straight crackers
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-30 22:08
Nobody gets mad when someone says "white people are stupid and lazy". Why? Because it's obviously not true.
People get mad though when someone says "niggers are stupid and lazy". Why? Because it's true.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-31 7:03
>>140
the trailer park would like 2 have a word wth u
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-31 9:04
>>141
Whites aren't allowed project housing or welfare so they don't get to live in the ghetto, they have to work and they have to provide their own accomodation.
We should have the freedom to say what we please, and I am a white.
I believe we should be able to call blacks niggers if we want we don't mean harm by it, anyways, it is just another term for negro and black etc...
Because they can call us 'crackers' and 'white trash'and they do mean it badly, but if we get offended by that we are crazy.
And if we call them a nigger which we don't mean harm by saying it, they can get as offended as all get out, and were not supposed to say anything.
They can go around on television and such, half naked and acting a fool but if we say anything we are 'racist'... But when a white woman (or man...) does that they can act upon it however they want.
Government; Congress; President; ANYONE should put a stop to this is some way.
I believe we should be all equal, not looked at badly because of our skin, but I do believe we should be able to define blacks and whites by their color WITHOUT being a so called "racist" .
Because they can call us 'crackers' and 'white trash'and they do mean it badly, but if we get offended by that we are crazy.
Complete bullshit. If someone called me that, you're goddamn right I would get offended and let them know it. Only a stupid person or a highschooler would think that's crazy. And something tells me you're one of the two...
I believe we should be able to call blacks niggers if we want we don't mean harm by it,
Funny that you think you should be the one to decide if it's harmful and not the one on the receiving end.
I do believe we should be able to define blacks and whites by their color WITHOUT being a so called "racist"
I don't know what you mean by "define" but it sounds like you want the freedom to be racist without being called a racist. Makes perfect sense...
Name:
Anonymous2011-12-09 16:19
If we'd just do what Lincoln wanted to do at the end of the Civil War--round the niggers up and send them all back to Africa--we wouldn't be having this discussion.
>>147
Nah. If that happened you'd all find another group to hate against, and it's back to square one.
Name:
Anonymous2011-12-15 1:19
bump
Name:
Anonymous2011-12-15 22:51
>>148
>Nah. If that happened you'd all find another group to hate against, and it's back to square one.
Liberals and hippies. I'd be so cool to lynch them in KKK outfits and NOT be called racists. Niggers simply fucked up everything by being here. Admit it, that outfit looks pretty hip.
Name:
Anonymous2011-12-16 3:52
>>148
Blacks were hated instead of that other group because it was easier, so getting rid of the blacks would still reduce racism because it's more difficult to find an excuse to oppress someone who looks and acts like you do and has the same intelligence, just differs on one insignificant detail.
>>150 Liberals and hippies.
You'll still end up hating yet other groups based on some wild silly notions. Admit it, that outfit looks pretty hip.
Nah, I think Hitler and his brownshirt boys were light years ahead of the KKK in being racist hateful shits and still managing to do it in style.
so getting rid of the blacks would still reduce racism because it's more difficult to find an excuse to oppress someone who looks and acts like you do and has the same intelligence, just differs on one insignificant detail.
Nah, they'll just end up finding some other bogeyman group to discriminate against. Hispanics, Catholics, Irish Americans, atheists, Jews, Muslims, Christians they don't agree with, intellectuals, science, etc. just to name a few.
>>152 they'll just end up finding some other bogeyman group […] intellectuals, science, etc
Not to mention anonymous non-shitposters, for adding actual content to anonymous boards. (Just had to point that out, since someone has clearly discovered that there's a whole board outside /b/)
Or, well, anonymous posters in general. One «should be man enough to stand for what one says» etc, right? Especially when it is a potentially controversial opinion, the type that can really ruin one's life. Like failing to call bullshit on Darwin when the Truth™ is that infamous 6000 years, etc.
There was, after all, this outcry after that joyous little event last July, that anonymous posts had to be banned, to stop hatecrime etc.
As such, that Jew-shitposter of late is giving ammo to those shitheads, as are the «nig/fag» ones. «Ban Anonymous, and nothing of value will be lost». No need then to spend energy pointing away from the actual content, as it's being drowned in shitposts.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-03 19:33
Tsk.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-03 19:43
>>155
Sorry, I have no clue what you're talking about, from beginning to end. I think there's sarcasm in the middle but it's muddled by not having that first clue. For starters, what is this "event last July" you're talking about?
You can speak those words because of the times we live in, I think there are lots of whites, ready to fight a nigger, after calling him a nigger. If you don't want to be addressed as a nigger, which no one does anyway, you should start using your head and realize we're not living by the code of the Zulu tribe. If being called a nigger somehow causes violence, then blacks should educate their young kids to be resilient toward the word, it's that simple. The word nigger is the nigger's burden. BUT NOOOOOOO, white man has to hold himself, and consequently the nigger's niggery has turned into white men's burden once again.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-03 21:32
>>157
So what you're saying, is that you're clueless.
Big shock there. And?
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-03 22:12
>>159
And I would like to understand what you are saying (or what >>157 is saying, if that was not you) better. If it is referring exclusively to something that happened in July on /b/, you'll need to explain with at least minimal detail; I haven't been to our Random board in years and would rather not go there today either.
Specifically, the position taken on Anonymous posts appears waffled. I can not determine the over-all intent, bitter though the words sound.
Name:
155, 1592012-09-03 22:57
>>160
(Just noticed the typo in >>155, oops. That'll be "last year".)
You may have noticed how just about every thread these days keep being derailed by some schmuck that just _has_ to mention Jews? Especially when they have sub-fuckall to do with the subject? The type that's sub-average intelligent even by /b/'s standards?
Also, there's (off-board, aka IRL) the occasional outcry when some net-newspaper's comments section starts being bogged down with shitposts, by some kind of anonymous. And the more "racist hatecrime" they get, the better.
Especially since one Mr Breivik's little ...escapades last year, and the public (figureheads? talking heads?) elected to find anonymity on the net to be threatening. Because that was how he'd gone and radicalised himself, right?
And so that aforementioned "Jews Jews everywhere" schmuck, gets to start looking awfully much like some CIA BlackOps, to deliberately make us all look bad before some upcoming Reichstag-style event.
You imply a set-up job is being executed. I think you might be giving 4chan's lesser-known text forums too much credit by implicating them in the scheme, even though I agree your hypothesis fits the characterization of the said "Jewshitposter." He's too dedicated to just be a troll, yet too saturating not to be a troll or obsessed. He at times seems too well researched to be making the exaggerations and terrible metaphors that he does, even if that research is through a prism of his beliefs only, to the exclusion of all other possibilities. Personally, I give him the benefit of a doubt, that he actually does vehemently believe what he says. He's all talk, his threads/the threads he takes over never go anywhere, and it's not like the forum can get rid of him anyway.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-04 2:03
>>162
Shalom, Hymie! Why wont you migrate to Israel?
>>162
They go exactly where I want them to go and you can't even begin to understand what I say simply because you can't handle the implications of it, shabbos-goyim.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-04 6:34
>>164
So, your intention is to make the threads ramble and be ostracized by the user base?
>>162
I'm not implying anything. Yet. I'm saying he's looking way too much like how that shit would be done. (>>163: Case in point,)
Also, I'm giving a warning for those with more-than-goldfish memory, what to look out for. At this pace, it's just a question of time.
Also, textboard threads stay up and going, basically forever. Imageboard threads have a "delete-by" stamp. So it's only when the $EVIL_THEM starts gearing up, that they need to shitspam those. Phuxx0ring achievable threads, especially along with credible timestamps, takes more time.
Let's just say I prefer being (somewhat) paranoid. Being wrong's less scary that way.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-04 17:59
>>167
But the Jews are the $EVIL_THEM and if we all the Jewish parasites will suddenly die, society will only become better.
>>165 You are not the userbase and definitely not enough to ostracize anything here.
But enjoy your delusion, since you do so ceaselessly anyway.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-05 20:52
>>171
Oh, I'm hardly the number of replies these threads get denouncing them as I'm sure you are not the number of posts made in this thread in promotion of your views. I would be disappointed if either of us were cheapening our positions in that manner. All the same, the basic progression of these threads tend to follow a lot of people making arguments against each other and no one making any progress. Many threads don't even start on the topic but must be derailed (and there was even an admission of that in another thread) down the path we currently walk.
>>161 And so that aforementioned "Jews Jews everywhere" schmuck, gets to start looking awfully much like some CIA BlackOps, to deliberately make us all look bad before some upcoming Reichstag-style event.
You know, I hadn't quite thought of it like that before, it's a *possibility* but I think a very unlikely one. I'm inclined to believe that there nutjobs that are this fucked in the head out in the real world who are on state welfare/their parents' dime who can't make anything better of themselves and "Jews" are the target of their frustrations.
I imagine that the global recession hit Russia worse than it did the countries of Western Europe and North America, and there are millions in a similar position, so he's found answers within an anti-semitic framework. They're not the *right* answers to his problems, but to him, they're answers nonetheless.
But back to your theory, in short, no. I'm more concerned about the massive data mining that's been going on. It's become part of the news in recent years, what with the advent of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and this whole centralization of information on the Web, etc. but I think it's been going on for far longer than that.
If anything, world4ch holds quite a bit of information for studying anonymous online behavior; going on nearly eight years now.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-14 8:14
>>173
I did say «look awfully like», not «is» or any such thing.
Meant as a warning, though; While there is indeed something to be said for not seeing evil conspiracy theories where simple stupidity can explain just as much, that's not really much of an excuse, especially when the stupidity in question, appears (of even is) a conscious choice rather than a case of being genuine retarded. That's where the bad vibes set in.
Thing is, if I were head of a blackop to discredit anon, i'd start with hiring some shitpost-flooder precisely like Comrade Shalom.
With the notable exception that I'd have them (yes, plural) keep up the flood for months (to drown out the sanity). With sock-puppets galore. Spiced with thinly-coded «planning sessions» for some high-profile-low-actual-damage …event, like the one in Norway last year (where nobody of actual importance (to the present government) was killed or injured, despite the bomb being detonated right on their fkin doorstep).
At least one of those events would then take place.
Cue some anonymous tip (oh the irony!) to the biggest mainstream media, for the real fuckfest to ensue.
Also, 4chan is still the main anon-board, which would make it a target right there. Not to mention, real blackops are not as see-thru retarded as that "hackers on crack" shithead on FoxNews.
All that said, I'm just as happy Comrade Shalom seems to be on some sort of vacation by now (b&? un-/b/&?). Makes things considerably less retarded.
The main reason I brought up blackops, was that his shitposts were too pervasive for a simple troll, and more like a retard on a mission. Which is, incidentally, what false-flag blackops tend to make themselves look like whenever they have to plant stuff.
Tl;dr: I was trying to tell Comrade Shitposter that «y'know those jews you claim to hate? You're actually serving them, the way you behave».
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-14 10:15
>>173 I imagine that the global recession hit Russia worse than it did the countries of Western Europe and North America,
There is nothing to hit in Russia, because Russia has no economy, besides raw materials.
Name:
Anonymous2012-09-14 10:18
>>173 he's found answers within an anti-semitic framework. They're not the *right* answers to his problems, but to him, they're answers nonetheless.
They are. Because entire Russian economy is in the the hands of the Jews: Roman Abramovich, Vladimir Lisin, Mikhail Fridman, Viktor Vekselberg, Deripaska, German Khan, Boris Ivanishvili, Peter Aven, Leonid Michelson, Vladimir Iorich, Dmitry Pumpyansky, Sergey Galitsky, David Davidovich, Shalva Chigirinsky, Valery Kogan, Kantor, Valerie Oif, Leo Kvetnoy, Vitaly Malkin, Alexander Girda Yuri Scheffler, Vyacheslav Bresht, Arkady Rotenberg, Suleiman Kerimov, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Boris Berezovsky, Vladimir Gusinsky, Alexander Smolensky...
The revenue these Jews gain from selling natural resources they invest into anything but the Russian economy. So any Russian knows his enemies.