>>62
hmm this is true. well then i apologize for an erroneous argument. but it was based on the premise that it is ok to believe anything, but if acting on your beliefs have a direct negative consequence on the liberty and rights of others then that should be wrong. like its fine to think non-Christians are going to hell, but if you act on it and burn them preemptively, there in lies the crime. so by that logic, its fine to think black people are inferior, but if you act on that inferiority and treat them unequally, then it goes against their right of equality as a citizen. I agree with OP when he says we should have the right to say and believe what we want, but acting on those beliefs is another story imo.