>>152
they'll just end up finding some other bogeyman group […] intellectuals, science, etc
Not to mention anonymous non-shitposters, for adding actual content to anonymous boards. (Just had to point that out, since someone has clearly discovered that there's a whole board outside /b/)
Or, well, anonymous posters in general. One «should be man enough to stand for what one says» etc, right? Especially when it is a potentially controversial opinion, the type that can really ruin one's life. Like failing to call bullshit on Darwin when the Truth™ is that infamous 6000 years, etc.
There was, after all, this outcry after that joyous little event last July, that anonymous posts had to be banned, to stop hatecrime etc.
As such, that Jew-shitposter of late is giving ammo to those shitheads, as are the «nig/fag» ones. «Ban Anonymous, and nothing of value will be lost». No need then to spend energy pointing away from the actual content, as it's being drowned in shitposts.