Freedom to say nigger and faggot

We should have the freedom to say NIGGER and FAGGOT and the freedom to hate and even "incite" hate. People can discern and judge for themselves how to react, don't censor opposing viewpoints.

Free speech means harassment
Harassment means free speech

This is what Americans actually believe.

>>121
Shouldn't you be trying to ban steak knives or wiring up more CCTV?

nigger and faggot

[mm]oh look, i didn't get hanged![/mm]

Freedom to say truth about Israel and holocaust of Palestinians without being called anti-semitic

>>124
You already have the right to lie about that in most nations. 1.4 billion sand niggers do it every day. :)

you're free to say them in public, but freedom of speech doesn't mean you'll be safe from leaving wherever with a black eye.

>>126
But you do have the freedom to put whoever gave you a black eye in jail for assault, assuming you go somewhere that isn't a moralfag kangaroo court.

>>127
You say that, but just wait until someone calls YOU a niggerfaggot! You'll be singing a different tune, believe me my niggerfaggot friend!

OP here I just punched my third queer for the night. It felt great.

>>129
thats what it means to be an american

NI   ER
  \ /
  GG
  / \
FA   OT

Note that this chart also results in the insults of NIGGOT and FAGGER.

>>126

Assault is against the law.

Saying the word nigger in itself is not against the law.

Assault is against the law? How about a pepper?

typical pussy whiteboys being racist behind a computer screen

>>128
That won't happen because I'm a more evolved creature than that and therefore don't punch people over petty insults.

Dumbest thread ever.

insecure racists give me a chuckle :) Grow the fuck up.

>>135
>white people actually believe this XD

>2011
>pretending to be white on the internet
straight crackers

Nobody gets mad when someone says "white people are stupid and lazy". Why? Because it's obviously not true.

People get mad though when someone says "niggers are stupid and lazy". Why? Because it's true.

>>140
the trailer park would like 2 have a word wth u

>>141
Whites aren't allowed project housing or welfare so they don't get to live in the ghetto, they have to work and they have to provide their own accomodation.

>>132
Actually.

http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/sirens/2011/aug/31/aryan-hate-crime-faces-5-years-life/

Apparently yelling nigger trumps the fact that the filthy nigger animal trespassed, threatened with a baseball bat, and was yelling his own slander.

Such is life in our jewified black run america. It's a crime to be white.

>>143
repeat offender

We should have the freedom to say what we please, and I am a white.
I believe we should be able to call blacks niggers if we want we don't mean harm by it, anyways, it is just another term for negro and black etc...
Because they can call us 'crackers' and 'white trash'and they do mean it badly, but if we get offended by that we are crazy.
And if we call them a nigger which we don't mean harm by saying it, they can get as offended as all get out, and were not supposed to say anything.
They can go around on television and such, half naked and acting a fool but if we say anything we are 'racist'... But when a white woman (or man...) does that they can act upon it however they want.
Government; Congress; President; ANYONE should put a stop to this is some way.
I believe we should be all equal, not looked at badly because of our skin, but I do believe we should be able to define blacks and whites by their color WITHOUT being a so called "racist" .

>>145

Because they can call us 'crackers' and 'white trash'and they do mean it badly, but if we get offended by that we are crazy.
Complete bullshit. If someone called me that, you're goddamn right I would get offended and let them know it. Only a stupid person or a highschooler would think that's crazy. And something tells me you're one of the two...

I believe we should be able to call blacks niggers if we want we don't mean harm by it,
Funny that you think you should be the one to decide if it's harmful and not the one on the receiving end.

I do believe we should be able to define blacks and whites by their color WITHOUT being a so called "racist"
I don't know what you mean by "define" but it sounds like you want the freedom to be racist without being called a racist. Makes perfect sense...

If we'd just do what Lincoln wanted to do at the end of the Civil War--round the niggers up and send them all back to Africa--we wouldn't be having this discussion.

>>147
Nah. If that happened you'd all find another group to hate against, and it's back to square one.

bump

>>148
>Nah. If that happened you'd all find another group to hate against, and it's back to square one.
Liberals and hippies. I'd be so cool to lynch them in KKK outfits and NOT be called racists. Niggers simply fucked up everything by being here. Admit it, that outfit looks pretty hip.

>>148
Blacks were hated instead of that other group because it was easier, so getting rid of the blacks would still reduce racism because it's more difficult to find an excuse to oppress someone who looks and acts like you do and has the same intelligence, just differs on one insignificant detail.

>>150
Liberals and hippies.
You'll still end up hating yet other groups based on some wild silly notions.
Admit it, that outfit looks pretty hip.
Nah, I think Hitler and his brownshirt boys were light years ahead of the KKK in being racist hateful shits and still managing to do it in style.

so getting rid of the blacks would still reduce racism because it's more difficult to find an excuse to oppress someone who looks and acts like you do and has the same intelligence, just differs on one insignificant detail.
Nah, they'll just end up finding some other bogeyman group to discriminate against. Hispanics, Catholics, Irish Americans, atheists, Jews, Muslims, Christians they don't agree with, intellectuals, science, etc. just to name a few.

Nigger fag.

Fag Nigger Fag

>>152
they'll just end up finding some other bogeyman group […] intellectuals, science, etc
Not to mention anonymous non-shitposters, for adding actual content to anonymous boards. (Just had to point that out, since someone has clearly discovered that there's a whole board outside /b/)

Or, well, anonymous posters in general. One «should be man enough to stand for what one says» etc, right? Especially when it is a potentially controversial opinion, the type that can really ruin one's life. Like failing to call bullshit on Darwin when the Truth™ is that infamous 6000 years, etc.

There was, after all, this outcry after that joyous little event last July, that anonymous posts had to be banned, to stop hatecrime etc.

As such, that Jew-shitposter of late is giving ammo to those shitheads, as are the «nig/fag» ones. «Ban Anonymous, and nothing of value will be lost». No need then to spend energy pointing away from the actual content, as it's being drowned in shitposts.

Tsk.

>>155
Sorry, I have no clue what you're talking about, from beginning to end.  I think there's sarcasm in the middle but it's muddled by not having that first clue.  For starters, what is this "event last July" you're talking about?

>>5

You can speak those words because of the times we live in, I think there are lots of whites, ready to fight a nigger, after calling him a nigger.  If you don't want to be addressed as a nigger, which no one does anyway, you should start using your head and realize we're not living by the code of the Zulu tribe. If being called a nigger somehow causes violence, then blacks should educate their young kids to be resilient toward the word, it's that simple. The word nigger is the nigger's burden. BUT NOOOOOOO, white man has to hold himself, and consequently the nigger's niggery has turned into white men's burden once again.

>>157
So what you're saying, is that you're clueless.
Big shock there. And?

>>159
And I would like to understand what you are saying (or what >>157 is saying, if that was not you) better.  If it is referring exclusively to something that happened in July on /b/, you'll need to explain with at least minimal detail; I haven't been to our Random board in years and would rather not go there today either.

Specifically, the position taken on Anonymous posts appears waffled.  I can not determine the over-all intent, bitter though the words sound.