Freedom to say nigger and faggot

We should have the freedom to say NIGGER and FAGGOT and the freedom to hate and even "incite" hate. People can discern and judge for themselves how to react, don't censor opposing viewpoints.

ive never been guilty or ashamed of who i am or where im from. you dont like the music, change the channel fool. are you that dumb. youd rather listen and be mad? lifes too short. as far as forcing minorities in the workpace, its because ppl like you dont give them a chance. and to be honest ive never personally heard a of someone losing a job or getting fired to make room for a minority. it sad, i know more white folks who listen to rap then otherwise. music is suppose to move you. if you dont have a groove thats ur prob, switch the station. or make a request to shut it off

>>40
* Niggers

>>42
^* African Americans

Also, fail for not using ^BB _CODE

The ones that say, "Nigger is OUR word!" are the ones who deserve to be called niggers. Much like the 'retards' who (knowingly?) prefer to be called 'mentally challenged' that don't own the word 'retard,' you don't own the word 'nigger.'

Hell, I find anyone who insists upon changing 'nigger' to 'African American' to have an unstable OCD, and therefore is 'mentally challenged.'

I only speak of 'nigger' because of some stupid news channel that happened to be on a few years ago that mentioned the banning of the word. I don't hate black people and have never addressed one as a nigger, but if you're going to try and stop hate by trying to ban a word, you just got some more hate in return.

As for faggot, much like cracker, I don't think it would banned... unless I didn't catch that broadcast.

Anyway, just call them all fat asses, it's still highly useful.

Who determined the term "nigger" to be pejorative? Leftists.

It's not the term that was pejorative but attitudes toward niggers. Even reasonable people like Mark Twain used the term aplenty.

Fifty years from now the term "African-American" will be regarded as a racial slur, which is a progress in leftist thought. What is the actual goal remains uncertain.

As profoundly described by Theodore Kaczynski in Industrial Society And Its Future, leftism is a celebration of weakness - specifically, leftists embrace what they themselves consider inferior; niggers, for instance. Leftist slave morality is simply admiration of weakness and flaw.

Leftists considered the nigger inferior, thus they invented the negro. The negro was still inferior in their eyes, thus they invented the black. After that came the "African-American". Surely something will come after that, because the leftists still consider the nigger inferior.

>>45

So left wingers are the true racists and not right wingers?

>>46
Yes, why else would they specifically target ethnic minority youths, tell them they are worthless and can never succeed except through them?

>>47
Very nearly all Whites who have had any contact with H. Sapiens Africansis know full well that the savage, lazy, stupid mud-colored monkeymen are not true Humans.

The difference is that those whom it is fashionable to call "Progressive" are terrified of the niggers and want to appease them, preferably by throwing working-class White men under the bus, whereas those whom it is fashionable to call "racist" lack this fear and understand implicitly that it is unwise to appease an aggressor, whether it be Dayshawn or the hook-nosed kikes pulling Dayshawn's strings.

>>48
Very nearly all Whites who have had any contact with H. Sapiens Rutilus Gutter know full well that the savage, lazy, stupid pasty monkeymen are not true Humans.

The difference is that their inbreeding, social isolation, and constant failure to adapt to a just society has fostered a culture of fear and blame.  So have another Coors Light, Bubba.  There's a NASCAR race on the TV soon.

>>48 I'll bet niglets raised by white surrogate parents would abandon ghetto mentality by a statistically significant amount. If you're going to argue that heredity is the defining factor in intelligence, economic success, anything actually, first start by explaining what makes races distinct.

Also, niggers could easily be rounded up and killed. It's the white population that would object. Besides, harming them would solve a nonexistent problem.

>>50
Niglets raised by human surrogate parents sometimes abandon slum mentality and some do not.  Recall how hard the entertainment/Jewsmedia pushes wigger culture in all their agitprop "entertainment."  If the slum mentality is environmental, the 15% deficit in cranial capacity, and inescapable resultant 2 standard deviation deficit in cognitive ability remain.  "Naturam expelles furca, tamen usque recurret."

What makes races distinct, of course, is their genomes, developed in isolation, in vastly different environments.

Also, could you explain what you mean by "a nonexistent problem?"  The nigger problem is very real.  Come to Detroit some time and stand on the corner of Six Mile and Livernois and observe for yourself--but you'd better have some bodyguards, because the Vice Lords will want that pretty white skin of yours, to make into a drum.

>>51

pushes wigger culture in all their agitprop "entertainment."

Why would one call it "agitprop"? They merely follow their "rational self-interest" to appease the advertisers and shareholders. To ascribe corporate media an ideology is like saying that Cthulthu is immoral for eating his own mother, even though he was hungry.

the 15% deficit in cranial capacity, and inescapable
resultant 2 standard deviation deficit in cognitive ability
remain

Brain size doesn't matter, what matters is the density of grey matter. Even then, humans use at most 10% of their brain at the time; the rest is backup in case of something severe, like encephalopathy, so that with time one can recover with but minor damage toward their reasoning abilities.

Different IQ-test scores can be as well explained by a pathological culture and improper education.

What makes races distinct, of course, is their genomes,
developed in isolation, in vastly different environments.

The question is whether "races" can be any longer considered distinct with such an amount of interbreeding. An analogy can be drawn to evolution, which generally occurs in self-contained populace of moderate size.

The nigger problem is very real.

Well as in this post I am arguing from a leftist position, the party line is that ingroup mentality (actual leftist term: bourgeois nationalism) must be abandoned in favor of proletarian internationalism. And private property must be abolished too, for a good measure.

Yeah, this doesn't make any sense, as well as the right-wing answer, "rational self-interest".

Humans aren't as much intrinsically "good" or "evil" as incompetent. Incompetent at living.

>>2

What color is their skin? Their skin is African-American? That's not a color and not everyone from Africa is a nigger. Just sub-Saharan Africa.

>>53
What the hell are you on about?

>>54
Just more cowardly racist bullshit.

>>52 humans use at most 10% of their brain

facepalm.jpg  This one was debunked in the 1920s, yet you hear it again and again and again.

>>56 Heard that one as part of "scientific" "rebuttal" to some New Age shit about how people can become uber-genius by using more of their brain.

>>57
After World War I, there was a lot of analysis done of men who'd survived shrapnel or bullet wounds to the brain.  Every portion of the human brain, every lobe, every little cluster of neurons, serves a purpose.  Damage to any portion causes noticeable impairment that is predictable, because the functions of the different areas of the brain are now, if not perfecly understood, then better understood than before.

"You only use 10% of your brain" is an old false belief from 100+ years ago, when the functions of only 10% of the brain were known.

Now, it's true that people don't use all their brains at once, as a rule.  Which is a good thing.

"I use 100% of my brain sometimes.  It's called a grand mal seizure."

as long as you don't hurt anyone. its not a crime to hate black people, but it is a crime to physically hurt them or treat then unequally. this is meant in a public sense. like if you don't like black people then you don't have to invite them into your home or befriend them, that's your choice and it isn't a crime, but as citizens they have the right go and do whatever you do. non of this 'no-blacks' restaurant bullshit.

>>59
Isn't a restaurant private property too?

>>60

not exactly. its open for strangers to come in and you trade with them. they give you money, you give them food. its business. work doesn't necessarily constitute private life. its like an actor saying no black people can watch the movies he's in.

>>61
. its like an actor saying no black people can watch the movies he's in.

Like that?  Maybe a little; but you are comparing a product, the film, with a proprietorship, the theatre.
A little misleading; don't you think?

>>62
hmm this is true. well then i apologize for an erroneous argument. but it was based on the premise that it is ok to believe anything, but if acting on your beliefs have a direct negative consequence on the liberty and rights of others then that should be wrong. like its fine to think non-Christians are going to hell, but if you act on it and burn them preemptively, there in lies the crime. so by that logic, its fine to think black people are inferior, but if you act on that inferiority and treat them unequally, then it goes against their right of equality as a citizen. I agree with OP when he says we should have the right to say and believe what we want, but acting on those beliefs is another story imo.

>>63 What if I said that "Barack Obama should die"? That would be "believing and saying what I want", right? Because it goes without question that FBI would be pretty busy about it.

>>64 Just in case, I don't really think he should die, or anyone for that matter.

>>64
I don't think so. how would the FBI found out you said it?

if you wanna show the world you're a bigot, i say go for it

>>66

By subpoenating moot, for instance.

That nigger lover and fag enabler Moot is above the law.

>>39makes whites feel guilty

Oh shut the fuck up. I agree that the media sometimes plays a bit of white guilt, but that's far from the norm. This reminds me of something I read up on last night. Long story short, black guy plays race card when his girl gets called a whore, everyone calls it a weak attempt at racial guilt. The person who called her a whore was white, he was black.

>>forcing nigger music upon us

lol

no ones forcing jack shit on you. You're the one buying that shit, if it doesn't sell, it doesn't play. Simple. No one forced it on you in the 70's when it was an obscure genre, no one forced it on you in the 80's were it was still relatively new, no one forced it on you in the 90's when EVERYBODY BOUGHT ALL RAP ALBUMS ON STORE SHELVES,

You're the ones who bought it, end.

>>forces us to have certain numbers of minorities in every classroom and workplace.

I'm against giving some an opportunity simply because of their race, so I agree. But you do realize that some people do get into positions of power on their own merits, right?

sad as hell

>>71
http://www.google.com/#q=%22drgreenthumb82%40yahoo.com%22&hl=en&filter=0&fp=74f5ed7994d722e7

What is this faggotry?

Fucking nigger leeches!!!!! They need to leave our country!!!! We need to start an uprising or they will take over the country!!

>>73
^* African Americans
Thank you, Stormfronter, see you next year now! Don't let the door hit you on your way out!

>>74
nigger nigger nigger nigger

>>75
^* African American
Also, to help you on your way, here's a link: http://www.stormfront.org/ Good day to you, sir and see you next year!

People who aren't cool with a little racism tend to be tools.

>>77
I don't mind it if presented in a humorous non-serious manner. Anything otherwise is hateful and does not belong in public discourse in this day and age.

http://www.iwantapal.com/

>>76
http://www.billytheheretic.com/bandaid.php