>>162
I'm not implying anything. Yet. I'm saying he's looking way too much like how that shit would be done. (
>>163: Case in point,)
Also, I'm giving a warning for those with more-than-goldfish memory, what to look out for. At this pace, it's just a question of time.
Also, textboard threads stay up and going, basically forever. Imageboard threads have a "delete-by" stamp. So it's only when the $EVIL_THEM starts gearing up, that they need to shitspam those. Phuxx0ring achievable threads, especially along with credible timestamps, takes more time.
Let's just say I prefer being (somewhat) paranoid. Being wrong's less scary that way.