Libya - short version

King: I am negro king over all of Libya. Fuck you all!
Gaddafi: No, fuck YOU!
King: *dies*
Gaddafi: My fellow niggers, I've always been a big fan of direct democracy, so let's do this shit. Libya is now liberated!
Libyans: Nigger-nigger-nigger-nigger...
Gaddafi: Now you can all do negro shit amongst yourself without my involvement.
Libyans: Nigger-nigger-nigger-nigger...
Gaddafi: WTF??? Stop acting like niggers, for Gods sake!
Libyans: Nigger-nigger-nigger-nigger...
Gaddafi: Right. I see that I have to have SOME involvment in all of this.
Libyans: Fuck you-nigger-nigger-nigger...
Gaddafi: No, fuck YOU! *kills everyone.*
Libyans: WTF??? Did you just kill people for speaking their mind?
Gaddafi: Yes, what of it?
Libyans: Well, FUCK YOU! We want freedom of speech and other human rights.
Gaddafi: No! FUCK you! *has death squads adbuct and kill people.*
Libyans: We want another ruler! You're fucking nuts!
Gaddafi: No! I said FUCK you! *kills people.*
Libyans: You are committing crimes against humanity! If we ever get our hands on you, you're dead!
Gaddafi: Are you saying that you want to assassinate me, an icon of democracy and freedom? FUCK YOU!
Libyans: NO, fuck YOU! *revolts.*
NATO: NO, fuck YOU all! *invades.*
NATO: Hello, fellow subjects. You are now a liberated democracy.
Libyans: Nigger-nigger-nigger-nigger...
NATO: WTF? Stop acting like fucking niggers!
Libyans: FUCK you! Nigger-nigger-nigger-nigger...
NATO: No, fuck YOU! *kills people for fun and sport.*

Thank you for that.

that's not what happened, it is also lame and unfunny

>>1
Turn off you racial filter. Lybians don't say nigger nigger nigger. They are actually rather decent people, unlucky enough to live above an oil reserve.

>>4
No, they probably don't ACTUALLY say "nigger-nigger", but I don't speak nigger speak. Is "bix nood" better?

Yes, the libyans are probably the most decent ones in this war, but that isn't saying much, because while Gaddafi shows how incapable a nigger is to instate democracy, he also tried to do it in nigger country, imposing it a non-authoritarian system on niggers.

Niggers left without authoritarian control or without the constant threat of punishment or death, will run around raping women and stealing bikes. These savages can't handle democracy.

>>5
Gaddafi's attempt for a free society didn't work, not because of the lybian people's inability to live democratically, but from gaddafi's mania for centralized controll. The lybians have not changed, they wanted a free society and they still do. They will just have to try once more but hey, this is how it always is. Isn't it?

It's not like the western world is actually democratic and this is starting to show.

>>3
It was appallingly racist, but it WAS funny.

>>7
meh, doesn't resonate with me, libyans just aren't full nigger

Nigger-nigger-nigger-nigger

libyans aren't niggers at all you retarded children. Just because It's "pc" to call nigger animals "africans" doesn't mean all of africa is niggers.

>>10
You're racist. The achievements of North Africans should be mixed up with those of Sub-Saharan Africans so blacks can claim the achievements of the ancient Egyptians and Arab colonial activities in Africa like Timbuktu. You're racist. It is racist to believe the Sahara desert exists. You're racist.

http://www.africanholocaust.net/news_ah/language%20new%20reality.htm#sub

Racist.

>>10
Also, you're a racist. Sorry.

>>11
>>12
welp, i will donate all my savings to the naacp, dont slander me plz!!!

>>13
You're still racist and should keep giving more.

>>13
http://resistracism.wordpress.com/2008/04/05/why-i-hate-white-anti-racists/

Nigger-nigger-nigger-nigger

>>6
>Gaddafi's attempt for a free society didn't work, not because of the lybian people's inability to live democratically, but from gaddafi's mania for centralized controll. The lybians have not changed, they wanted a free society and they still do.
Nope. By the time Gaddafi came to power Libya was a really barbaric society, for example, the way they treated women was awful - and Gaddafi spend almost 40 years to change that (Quite successfully for a muslim country, although he made many enemies among radical islamists for that). There is no "mania for centralized control" - authoritarian way of ruling, not democracy, is the only way to keep peace and maintain status quo in a society that consists of bedouin tribes.
Gaddafi is not *evil* dictator at all - he rejected connections with terrorists, stopped his nuclear programm and spent lots of moneys on trying to turn Libya into prosperous industrial country.
The rebels are mostly immigrants and radical islamists - first ones dislike the socialist regime, where they have to actually work to earn moneys and the second ones dislike Gaddafi for being not that religious enough. And they openly admit they have terrorists among them. So we want to replace quite a good guy Gaddafi with "democratical" bunch of terrorists and fanatics that would turn the country into the second Somali?

>>17
Gaddafi spend almost 40 years to change that
I would argue this was inevitable in a technologically progressing society anyway, Gaddafi just claimed the credit and may have actually impeded progress by stifling economic growth by oppressing entrepeneurs and taxing the population into the ground to support his police state and lavish palaces.

Power and evil go hand in hand, if you want power you have to tread on other people, while it is true that you need power to do good and it is justified to tread on other people to obtain this power for the greater good this is not always the case. Gaddafi had the potential to become a Suharto figure, a dictator who oversaw the progress of his country and stepped down when the educated middle class expressed genuine discontent and need for change, he made the conscious decision not to do this instead embarking on some bizarre crusade to ingratiate himself among the western capitalist classes.

>>18
>Gaddafi just claimed the credit
You probably don't realize how traditional society works. The tribes of bedouins do not like technological progress at all - they are perfectly content with their lifestyle. On the other hand they like waging wars on each other.
You can't just go and start progressing in such a society without bloodshed. Gaddafi did manage to maintain peace for 40 years, because he has managed to gain respect of all of the tribes. They consider him the sheikh of sheikhs.
>taxing the population
It is a socialist country. They have free healthcare, education, etc.
>lavish palaces
He has 1 palace in the centre of Tripoli, where he lives and works and 1 bedouin tent, where he lives when he travels somewhere. Not unbearable for economy at all.
>oversaw the progress of his country and stepped down when the educated middle class expressed genuine discontent
Where you saw discontent from middle class in Libya? The only the main groups rebelling are: poor immigrants from other african countries, radical muslims and one savage tribe of berbers.
If Gaddafi would step down that would mean infighting between tribes. But who cares - he is dictator, hurr, we must spread democracy, durr!

>>18
>Power and evil go hand in hand, if you want power you have to tread on other people, while it is true that you need power to do good and it is justified to tread on other people to obtain this power for the greater good this is not always the case.
You know who was the absolutely selfless politic, who did everything for his own nation? Hitler!

>>20
And for that, jewish hollywood produces slander in a film 10 times a year.

Lol, I see you've been busy chatting with Gaddafis cyberforces while I was away. There are no greater trolls than government employed trolls ordered to spread propaganda.

>>19
Even if all bedouins are luddites, Gaddafi is a benevolent dictator and free healthcare and education means decent healthcare and education, it still doesn't change the fact that other societies have gone from backwards agrarian societies to technophillic industrialized societies without a socialist dictator.

88% of the population are urbanized and the revolts were triggered by the wave of pro-democracy protests sweeping neighbouring Egypt and Tunisia mainly in major cities, they were not started by poor immigrants with no time or resources for this sort of thing, religious fundamentalists or nomadic tribesmen who live nowhere near the rebel strongholds in urban areas on the coast, they may have joined in later but they were not the cause or a significant proportion of the movement.

>>20
I said it wasn't always the case, I'm not saying it's a good thing either. What is good however is to accept the truth, if someone doesn't want to accept that getting into power means being evil then either they won't do what is necessary to get into power and fail in their little quest or they will fail to place limitations on themselves and end up being evil.

>>23
>it still doesn't change the fact that other societies have gone from backwards agrarian societies to technophillic industrialized societies without a socialist dictator.
Point me out other industrialized societies in this region. Egypt is a tourist country and depends on foreign imports. Tunis is an agrarian country.
>pro-democracy
The rebels commited lots of crimes against peacuful local population. That's hardly democratic.
Plus, Gaddafi is proposing now to make democratic elections (with foreign observers to ensure it is truly democratic) to show that he is still supported by majority of the nation, but the rebels seem to dislike the idea.
>poor immigrants with no time or resources for this sort of thing
Of course, they have! They have time for that sort of thing. How can a bunch of stupid rednecks miss an oppurtunity to stop working and instead express their discontent by crushing, looting and shooting everything?
>resources
Those revolutions were financed by europe and usa
>religious fundamentalists
Then how do you explain that rebels are oppressing women on their territories, order local population to pray 5 times a day and openly admit that they have terrorists among their ranks?
>nomadic tribesmen who live nowhere near the rebel strongholds in urban areas on the coast
The berbers (or to specify, libyan amazigh tribe) are not nomadic - they have settlements in the western part of Libya near the Tunis border, thus allowing armed bandits from Tunis to cross the borders freely.

I am SICK of Libya and even sicker of Obama and NATO lying about it. "Enforce a no-fly zone" my ass. They have boots on the ground and are shelling non-aircraft facilities and government buildings.

And the fucking leftist media is totally OK with hiding this new WAR from the people and quietly downplaying it.

Fuck Libya; no matter who wins there, we'll still get a shit nation ran by an Islamic regime that lives to fuck the west.

SPREAD THE FAIL WHALE

▄██████████████▄▐█▄▄▄▄█▌
██████▌▄▌▄▐▐▌███▌▀▀██▀▀
████▄█▌▄▌▄▐▐▌▀███▄▄█▌
▄▄▄▄▄██████████████▀

War is the naked face of modern liberalism. I am not talking about the phantom liberalism that the equally liberal "conservative" media moguls whine about, I am talking about the true reality of modern western liberalism. The counterpoint that rose up to compete against communism and shored up its domestic economies by subsidizing production via the military industrial complex. Socialism lite, all the benefits of overt socialism, but with a different name and a shiny happy face forever turned away from the bloodletting it requires to survive in its current state.

It will never stop. We had the proxy wars, now we have blowback, tomorrow we will have further unrest as new players emerge and vie for influance such as China and vaccuums are created and filled in a never ending cycle of popular war.

tl:dr get used to it, this is how the modern world operates.

>>27
>The counterpoint that rose up to compete against communism
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Are you fucking clueless? Modern liberalism IS communism, these "liberals" were fucking soviet supporters and sympathizers at the very least.

>all the benefits of overt socialism
There are no benefits of socialism.

>"conservative" media moguls
I dnno what reality you live in but fox news is the ONLY "conservative" media. All the rest are heavily leftist.

>>28
Lol, wow. You should educate yourself. You clearly have no clue what liberalism is.

>>29
It's communism plain and simple. They can't get away with most of their garbage, but the funding sources and the people involved are all the same(jews)

>>30

I pity you for your delusions.

>>29
If your particular definition of liberalism is well known, why did you need to explain it?

Nigger-nigger-nigger-nigger

hey, i had to write a report on this shit for work.

short more PC version
This will of course be a sweeping generalization for all of that area so don't fucking freak.

White man: Trade with us and shit... or else. Oh also you belong to us now
Arabs: um... sure whatever
White man: Oh by the way I'll be taking all of your stuff and imposing our ways on you
Arabs: No fuck you -independence movements-
White man: oh fine have your shit back. Here take this democracy, it comes free with our unspecified motives! ...just ignore those.
Arabs: No we have had enough white people shit... go away we don't want anything to do with you or anything you represent.
Qadafi and similar despots: Excellent... um... so we president now
Arab: whatever, as long as you're one of us...
Qadafi: Oh by the way I'll be taking all of your stuff and imposing MY ways on you
Arabs: ah...fuck

and then it joins on to OPs post