Now that she realized what she slipped out, she is going to deny being the author of the above posts (quite convenient since she doesn't use a trip-code). She also attempted to silence me by offering an apology for my silence and by telling me to ,,calm down''.
Now you can see her frantically bumping unrelated threads to cover up her mistake. Remember kids, if someone declares oneself righteous and constantly accuses everyone else around of things they aren't guilty of, they're probably just projecting.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-26 21:46
You say this, but sexism and feminism are indeed really just two edges of the same cube. I don't see any contradiction nor conflagration here.
>>2
Feminism is the negation of sexism. As someone else put it, it's the radical idea that men and women are equal.
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-26 21:51
>>3
I think it's more helpful to think of these concepts as vectors in an n-dimensional space rather than using a scalar metaphor. In fact the history of nomenclature for each field betrays this.
>>9
We're just working with definitions here. The ultimate goal of feminism is gender blindness in society. Sexism is discrimination based on gender, which means that you see gender and act differently depending on the gender. Therefore, the two are mutually exclusive. Do I need to draw you a diagram?
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-26 22:00
>>10
Spell your goddamned posts correctly, please.
>>19
See >>1: Now that she realized what she slipped out, she is going to deny being the author of the above posts (quite convenient since she doesn't use a trip-code).
>>18
Note that I'm not referring to humour or stereotype mockery, only to dealing with strangers in society. You know, just basic respect.
>>26
Calm down, i'm not discriminating against anyone.
WYPMP
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-26 22:16
>>27
Why do you assume I'm male, then? A female (especially a transgender one) would be offended at your assumption that all minus one posters on this board are male.
Then again, nobody gives a fuck about offending anyone on an anonymous humour board.
>>34
My demands:
(1) Immediately stop posing as a feminist -- it is shameful and harmful to actual feminists.
(2) Take a discrete maths class (I'll find you some links if you want me to) -- this will help you construct proper logical arguments and discern flaws in your opponents' arguments.
(3) Use your newfound logic to reconsider your entire stance on gender -- you might have been hurt in the past (by a few males, probably), and now you're clinging onto feminism as a way to rationalize your vengeful and sexist attitude. If the past damage was too extensive, seek therapeutic help to restore your ability to deal with gender issues logically.
You may consider performing the optional therapeutic part of (3) in parallel with (2).
I never posted anything sexist, it was YOU posing as me.
WYPMP
Name:
Anonymous2012-06-26 22:57
>>43
I never posed as you (aside from a few days ago as an obvious mockery), you were sexist yourself and you are being sexist right now by assuming all readers of this board minus one are male.
>>45
You see to be unresponsive to logic. Switching tactic:
FUCK OFF AND DIE YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT I FUCKING HATE YOU AND EVERYONE HERE HATES YOUR ANNOYING FUCKING GUTS. YOU ARE THE WORST ANNOYANCE HERE SINCE THE JEW SPAMMER AND I HATE YOU WITH EVERY FIBRE OF MY BEING. I WISH YOU DIE SLOWLY OF A RARE, PAINFUL AND INCURABLE DISEASE SO THAT I MAY PISS ON YOUR GRAVE AND DEFACE YOUR TOMBSTONE. FUCKING DIE.
A female (especially a transgender one) '>implying transgender is an actual thing
Holy fuck my sides. A male is a male, a female is a female, by birth only. Only a fag would ever seriously believe such a concept.
Just kidding guys, I'm actually a homofeminine jewnigger male by birth who desperately wishes he was female and that people would ever seriously view me as a female even though no one ever will.
I've been watching youtube videos on team management and noticed that all of them share the same feature: if there is a rational/hysterical pair, the hysterical child-like person will always me male while the adult rational manager is always female.
>>101,105
No FFP-san! I eat your pussy and you suck my dick! Fair enough! <3
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-01 9:34
what a cunt!
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-01 13:46
Of course you don't suck dicks. You're probably a virgin girl with a neckbeard.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-01 14:14
Turns out, ,,Feminist Female Programmer'' is in fact a female exists.
Now that she realized thaw she slipped out, she is going to dyne binge the author of the above spots (quiet convenient since she nodes't sue a trip-coed). She also attempted to license em by offering an apology fro my license and by telling em to ,,clam down''.
Now you can see her frantically bumping unaltered dearths to cover up her mistake. Remember disk, if someone declares oneself righteous and constantly accuses everyone lees around of nights they near't guilty of, they're probably just projecting.
>>111
You accidentally put in female when you meant male, however from the other grievous input errors in your post this is readily apparent for the accomplished reader. For the viewers at home though this specific error needs to be pointed out to avoid misinformation.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-01 17:44
>>115
DECIPHERING DA MESSAGE IS LEFT AS AN EXERCISE FOR DA READER.
>>138
That was sexist. Don't lower yourself to her level!
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-02 4:14
Feminism is a collection of movements aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, and social rights for women. In addition, feminism seeks to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist is "an advocate or supporter of the rights and equality of women."
Um, what? You want to eradicate inequality by focusing on only one group? How exactly does that work? What about privileges females have over males? Are those irrelevant? Are you going to plug your ears then scream "LA LA LA THEY DON'T EXIST LA LA LA WATCH YOUR PRIVILEGE LA LA LA"? Whoever gave that definition on Wikipedia must be a fucking retard. Die in a fire.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-02 4:30
>>137
You can't fool me. I know the answer's Phosphorus!
>>142
Human species has two genders only!
2012, and most people still don't think about sexual harassment as a crime, there's a significant difference between salaries, and a lot domestic violence as well.
And the worst part: freedom. Successful guy have good jobs, nice cars and are single with lots of fuckfriends. A successful woman just need to marry a successful guy.
If you switch the behaviour, both will be a fuck-and-forget, but the guy will be called the smart, and the girl, whore.
And you can't say that everyone in engineering, computing or IT believe in women's skills. While in other fields of natural sciences, this segregation is less likely to occur.
Things have improved, surely. But just enough to allow a new wave of people like you discrediting feminism. I would say fuck you, but you would like it anyway.
Just to not break the habit: Love you FFP-san! Hard kisses on your pussy!
I wasn't discrediting feminism, I was discrediting the retards who define feminism as only taking care of cissexual women. This view is based on the mathematically unsound notion that eradicating male-over-female privilege yields equality; eradicating female-over-male privilege is also necessary, yet feminism can't do that (according to the above definition) because it doesn't concern itself with female-over-male privilege. In fact, it doesn't concern itself at all with cissexual-over-transexual or heterosexual-over-homosexual privilege, and its definition leaves open to interpretation whether those things ,,are okay''. I'd rather define feminism simply as gender-blindness.
>>145
Fuck your transniggerianfaggotstra you piece of shit ashkenazi homo. You're a man, you will always be a man, no amount of pity partying you do will ever make you considered female as you were born with and have a penis. You're more disgusting than the sexist feminist pigs.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-02 13:28
Human species has two genders only!
This is wrong. Gender is more of a continuum rather than something binary. Look at all the retarded transsexuals on /soc/ if you think otherwise.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-02 13:30
>>148
I am cissexual, white, heterosexual, and non-Jewish. Gender is merely a social construct; feminism is the radical notion that the only time ,,gender'' comes into play is when finding a mate (unless you're bisexual/pansexual, that is).
no amount of pity partying you do will ever make you considered female
There's plenty of examples of people for whom a genetic mutation or hormonal disorder caused them to manifest a different biological gender than the DNA-prescribed one. By your definition of male (person with a penis), a MtF transsexual who has had the actual dick-becomes-pussy operation is a female. Look at it this way: it doesn't cost you anything to use the desired pronoun when speaking with a transgender person. They aren't asking you to give up on making discriminatory jokes on your dear /prog/, nor do they ask you to mate with them; all they ask is the respect to have their new gender recognized when you talk to them. Is that a lot to ask?
FFP is gone all of a sudden but now the jew spam is back. How come!
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-02 14:52
Is that a lot to ask?
Yeah, considering it's a lot to ask for you cocksmokers to understand biology and reproduction. ``Gender is a social construct'' that's some lelzy shit right there you kike. You can try and say you aren't a subversing kike agent all you want, but the fact is: all this bullshit new age attempt at making gender anything other than biology is just a subverting tactic to make goyim birthrates plummet from the males losing their ability to fertilize, leaing goy women with no one but the jews and niggers to reproduce with.
>>145
Ok, if you don't like the wikipedia definition, change it, it's just a classical definition from another era. Nowadays most (if not all) feminists very supportive to other sexual identities, but gender-blindness may sound strange to common people.
>>149
Biological gender is one thing, gender identity is another.
>>150
Remember that even for heterossexuals the mating part could be extincted, and old developed countries have negative population growth.
>>154
You're missing the point here Sir.
This just happens because a lot of people want to control behaviour of others, want the freedom to disobey, to insult and do whatever they want, even if breaking freedom of others.
If everyone gave respect as a favor, we would have good AI working by now. Does it hurt to do it?
And for complaining about female privileges: a quite frank fuck you. Do you think they even get close to match all the violence, humiliation and disrespect that many women receive without a chance to defend themselves?
There's also the cases where girls get raped, even by their own relatives, and some parents discover it and do nothing about. "No, you'll create a family war", "No, if you father know it he'll kill your uncle", "Liar, grandpa would never do that!".
People are insane, and falling for mass media (not only your usual tv and spam, lol) easily. You do the same and call yourself a programmer? Read SICP.
You can only be a third gender if you were born an hermaphrodite.
If you have testicles you naturally produce 60x more testosterone than any empowered woman and you're male no matter how much you'd like to deny.
Since the beginning of time Females from the working class always had to work, be it as a housewife, in farms or taking care of children, as nurses, teachers, secretaries, a shitload of functions really.
It was just a bunch of privileged high class women who ironically refused to work came up with feminism, they want to take away all the characteristics of the male gender without any of the responsibilities.
Females were always equals as far as the law goes and voting was denied to the majority of the population anyway.
>>157 but gender-blindness may sound strange to common people.
But its simplicity and correctness make it so beautiful!
Remember that even for heterossexuals the mating part could be extincted, and old developed countries have negative population growth.
I was referring to sexuality, not reproduction (certainly not in this overpopulated world). Sexual preferences tend to be hardwired in the brain, so it's unlikely I'd ever come to be sexually aroused by someone who adorns a penis.
This just happens because a lot of people want to control behaviour of others, want the freedom to disobey, to insult and do whatever they want, even if breaking freedom of others.
You might have me violently agreeing or disagreeing with you here depending on whether you consider free speech to be more important than the right not to be offended (which, frankly, doesn't exist). On a more practical level, it's a good thing to let the illogical shitheads speak freely because we can tear down their logic one by one; if free speech were to be threatened, they'd just retreat in some darknet stormfront-like forum which I would, ironically, probably help build myself in the interest of freedom of speech and thought. Then again, I might be completely off and you're just referring to >>154 publicly being an inconsiderate ass to people outside the binary (that is, manly men and girlish girls).
>>159
Just because the situation improves a bit, the criticism just starts.
Since ancient times on patriarchal societies, women were used just as breeders, they should marry "what" their families had chosen and the profiting positions were obviously denied to them: monarchies, clerics and armies. In the greater context of our history it was not until very recently, with the technological development needs, that they were used to do industrial work for less money because of their apparent weakness.
Damnit, people live for some decades and think that everything before is a boring stay in kindergarten.
>>158 And for complaining about female privileges: a quite frank fuck you. Do you think they even get close to match all the violence, humiliation and disrespect that many women receive without a chance to defend themselves?
Wait wait wait, are you actually saying that female privilege doesn't matter because male privilege is a lot heavier? Is that what you're saying?
A=B iff A≤B and B≤A
You can't have gender blindness if there's privilege on either side. Only a fool would claim otherwise.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-02 15:57
>>161
Fag, men didn't have a chance in marriage either, women don't go to army because they are FUCKING DEAD WEIGHT they can't develop muscles as fast as a male no matter how much you deny. Look it up.
>>160 simplicity and correctness make it so beautiful
Totally agree, but you still need to think. People don't like to do it though.
Sexual preferences tend to be hardwired in the brain
It's not easy to say this. Society effects on individuals ARE strong. In different environments you can get different results.
(about free-speech)
Damn, this is the most controversial part. You can really convince dumb people of your convictions, but they are dumb enough to not recognize figures of speech, separate verbal and physical offenses, etc. They slowly turn them to "preventive actions": last month two drunken brothers were holding each other when going home and one was killed, because attackers believed they were a gay couple. THIS is not acceptable.
Where education isn't sufficient (almost everyone in every situation) free-speech is DANGEROUS and should be done with care! With more than enough care you can raise an nazi army from your peaceful neighboorhood. It's why censorship still exists.
>>163
I see, for you the army is just a lot of gorillas carrying bedrocks up the hills. Every soldier is on the limits of human body development and could easily win any olympic game.
But NOT. Soldiers have just a minimum training covered by the armies. If they're sent to die anyway, armies will spend more on reusable support equipment and cut expenses on personnel.
>>164
Cut the crap! I am obviously immature enough to be discussing on a weird anonymous board (after so many years wasted), but still don't have any means to silence people here.
>>165 Damn, this is the most controversial part. You can really convince dumb people of your convictions, but they are dumb enough to not recognize figures of speech, separate verbal and physical offenses, etc. They slowly turn them to "preventive actions": last month two drunken brothers were holding each other when going home and one was killed, because attackers believed they were a gay couple. THIS is not acceptable.
Neither is it acceptable to impose censorship on everyone due to the ignorance and malignancy of a few.
Where education isn't sufficient (almost everyone in every situation) free-speech is DANGEROUS and should be done with care!
Wrong. Democracy says the majority dictates. If you're not careful about educating your majority and you end up with a massive amount of shitheads, censorship won't stop the lynching. Nothing will.
Oh yes and please note that the said shitheads (which are hopefully a minority) will act defensively when encountering free speech-limiting laws, thereby increasing animosity and hatred. When you put a noose around an animal's neck, you don't expect it to go less violent.
>>167
I can't say there are few ignorants.
Democracy is the worst method of oppression, because it's accepted. And any controlled majority is as good as a dictatorship anyway.
People consume away their freedom. Give their privacy for 2 cents of services. Give their money to stabilize banks. It's why there's an American way of life, why people don't learn functional programming, why technology just helps to enslave people instead of relieving them from repetitive work.
>>169 It doesn't work anymore.
What doesn't? Stating the logically obvious?
>>170
You do realize that it's freedom of thought and expression that got us to this point, right? Taking it away because some people don't think like you seems like something they would do. I know I'll do anything in my power to protect even the largest shithead's right to express their stupidest opinion; fixing wrong with more wrong doesn't work. You can't just change the system, you need to educate people into understanding exactly why the system is bad, then let them change it.
Name:
FFP2012-07-02 22:48
thank you for your support guys :)
WYPMP
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-02 23:32
>>177
You haven't got mine you illogical little piece of shit.
>>176
I don't know exactly what is the point you're talking about. Of course there is freedom of thought and expression, but just for ones following acceptable norms.
Why will you educate the people, if they're giving all to you? It's easier and more profitable just to teach people to buy your tons of unnecessary products and pay a fraction to the few who develops them (you researchers and engineers). Now you can develop a nice marketing agenda and the other ungifted people will start to blame every thing other than this system. "Jews/niggas/fags/chicanos/etc... are ruining this country!"
The original purpose of every single city doesn't matter any more.
>>182 Of course there is freedom of thought and expression, but just for ones following acceptable norms.
You don't understand freedom of thought and expression. Fuck off and die, you little Nazi shit. Let me guess, cryptography should also be banned and privacy abolished so that minorities are protected, right?
Why will you educate the people, if they're giving all to you? It's easier and more profitable just to teach people to buy your tons of unnecessary products and pay a fraction to the few who develops them (you researchers and engineers). Now you can develop a nice marketing agenda and the other ungifted people will start to blame every thing other than this system. "Jews/niggas/fags/chicanos/etc... are ruining this country!"
Capitalism is shit. Also, most humans are shitty and illogical, thereby prone to discriminatory idiocies. Like you.
Two teaspoons of fuck you at morning, thanks! ^_^
A gallon of fuck off and die you little illogical piece of shit.
Maybe because I'm one ;__;
You know I don't care anyway, an anonymous board is awesome. I can give apologies without hurting my pride. Wait... I don't have any, hahahahahaha!
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-03 2:06
>>192
You're speaking like a nazi fucking retard that values not offending people over freedom of speech and thought.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-03 2:29
>>168
No, you're just continuing to miss the point.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-03 2:39
>>195
Fine, if you weren't silencing, then what is your point?
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-03 2:40
Look at those liberal bigots. You can't do that, that's immoral, can't say that, immoral. Moral, moral everywhere.
And concerning their own pedophile weeabooism issues they seem to have a lot of self-indulgence. It's immoral to say ``nigger'' or to wear real fur but it's ok to fuck little children.
Name:
FFP2012-07-03 3:04
I feel like I dont want to be a feminist anymore. Fuck.
WYPMP
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-03 3:05
>>198
You never were. Feminism is not female sexism.
>>207
Hooray! *grabs dick* *suck FFP-san clit*
I love you FFP-san! ^_^
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-03 16:39
>>196
The point is there is no going between A and B, there are beyond disjoint, they are exclusive-complete. And they exist in this way due to biological nature and not because of ``social construct''.
A male will always be a male, no amount of tucking, make-up, wigs, slutclothes, crying, surgeries, or manufactured chemicals will ever actually make a male a female because no one born male will ever have eggs of their genetic material to be fertilized or a womb to incubate them in, among other things such as NOT ACTUALLY GOING THROUGH YOUR ENTIRE LIFE FROM ITS VERY INCEPTION AS AN ACTUAL FUCKING FEMALE. The fact anyone at all, let alone so many males, have the audacity to believe that you can just go "oh i'm totally a female now teehee" and expect anyone else to do the same is nothing but a DISGRACEFUL INSULT to the female gender.
Cutting off your penis or trying to deny its existence does not a female make, it makes you nothing more than a disgusting freak and I FUCKING REITERATE: nothing more. Cry all you want, but it's the only view people will ever have, and you'll also be rightfully viewed as a little faggot for crying over it. Even if to your face they pretend to believe it to be nice, when you're not around you're only referred to as a complete freak of nature who should be kept away from children.
As a gay man, I take positive representations where I can get them. Any time a same-gender relationship is portrayed in a positive but very real light benefits us all. The same can be said of Linux, which, much like being gay, will likely remain a minority OS in the a world that seems married to proprietary software, and never really "come out of the closet" and be truly ready for acceptance the desktop. But anytime we can get some good press, it helps us all. I'm a big fan of Ubuntu (even over Mac!) and I'm proud that Dell has taken a stand and acknowledged that some of us are different, and thats ok.
Except they can't fertilize an egg and produce offspring.
You'd think people who read a board about programming would have the utmost consideration for FUNCTIONALITY, where the hell did you come fresh from? Obviously you aren't a local. Your girls are nothing more than B', the nonfunctional subset of B, just like cockslicing males are A' the nonfunctional subset of A.
Let's hear these ``scientific'' jokes about the real truth of the matter, I'm always up for more amusement.
Not being able to excite anyone.
You're too minimalistic.
produce offspring ... utmost consideration
You shouldn't be programming then.
2012
ignoring cryogenics and in vitro fertilization
LOL
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-05 1:45
fuck you FFP-san ^_^
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-05 2:39
>>219 Not being able to excite anyone
The fuck are you even talking about. Functionality not being paramount
You shouldn't be programming then. cryogenics and in vitro
So cryogenics and in vitro are going to give a FtM sperm of their genetic code? Or a MtF eggs of their own genetic code? Hahahaha, how? Continually and purposefully at this point (obviously), you miss the point entirely. That or you have no clue what either of those two things are.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-05 2:44
>>217
Why would you want to produce your own offspring? Surely you don't think your genes are any superior than anyone else, and this planet certainly doesn't need extra humans on it. Just adopt you pieces of shit.
>>221 Functionality being paramount
You're kidding, right?
Oh I see, you work for MS.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-05 4:50
>>222
You got nuffin' on me, pop eye. Like I buy that. My body tells me to reproduce and I listen to it, because a) I trust my body, and b) my body trusts me. I've developed this trust by not chopping off my genitals like the typical 4chan lunatics do. You can't fool me; I'm too clever to fall for your tricks. Go re-think your life, no-peni.
>>222
It's funny because I can't tell if you are ironically posting the very exact subversive jew spinstrel song that is what leads to kids seriously believing in this trans shit or if you're just a resident kike.
the problem is that a man watched violent, child-themed porn on a Delta flight and NO ONE CARED.
WYPMP
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-06 5:09
>>234
OH NO, LAPTOPS ARE CONTRIBUTING TO THE DOWNFALL OF THE CIVILIZATION AS WE KNOW IT! IF WE DON'T STOP THE TREND, 200% OF THE POPULATION WILL BE PAEDOPHILES BY 2015. SUBMIT EVERYONE TO COMPUTER SEARCHES! BAN PRIVACY! BAN CRYPTOGRAPHY! BAN HUMAN RIGHTS! DO IT FOR THE POOR DEFENCELESS CHILDREN!
What the fuck does WYPMP means and why are feminists so shit. Always playing up the victim card and trying to belong to a minority even though women make up over 50% of the world's population.
There are more women then men right now, every source confirms it.
Name:
Turbonerd2012-07-06 10:36
I lol'd so hard that 17 dicks came out of my mouth at once
>>244
Because feminists are jews and the majority of feminists are actually males who got rid of/hide their reproductive organs and decided that this somehow means they should be considered female.
So long as dumb niggers everywhere support and/or tolerate this concept (which your pathetic attempts at brushing it off with trollcalling is included, you jews are the real subversive trolls), the battle to right your wrongdoing will have to continue.
>>248
You're speaking to a senior, watch your place midget /prog/rider. >>249
You've got it wrong, to begin with, and at least give it more than a -2/10 effort on the meme card if you're gonna bump and act like you're saying anything worthwhile or relevant to discussion, dumbfag. At least >>250 played off of your complete failure with some creativity (read: thought). Alternatively, get the fuck back to >>>/reddit.com/r/brandom/ 66please99
>>239
I am constant as the north star and I will devour your weak human corpse.
Name:
2382012-07-06 23:03
For me, females who don't submit to their male owners are nothing but prey.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-06 23:24
I hate how when females get into the workforce the first thing they do is make sure they go around changing everyfucking thing to their tastes like they own the place.
Like the fucking putrid cunts they are. They should've never been given the right to work. It's disgusting work is already pretty bad as it is.
>>265
Foolish cowards. If you had any guts you'd use your real names. *forks every one of you spineless weasels in the ass* Either way, more food for me.
Boy, that FFP really bites. Why don't she try to be an ordinary feller like me, who keeps to myself? I don't know nothin' 'bout feminism or privileges. All I know is I likes lemon puddin', so why not be like that, FFP?
>>3
No, feminism is a type of sexism. Feminism is the proliferation of pro-female sexism in opposition to pro-male sexism. The opposite of feminism, and sexism, is fairness.
However attractive the sound bite definitions of 'feminism' may be on paper, feminism in practice proves that it is every bit as sexist.
>>284 However attractive the sound bite definitions of 'feminism' may be on paper, feminism in practice proves that it is every bit as sexist.
Generalizing, the larger issue that you are pointing out here is that anti-discrimination groups sometimes tend to discriminate themselves. Applying Sturgeon's Law to the set of members of such a group, it comes as no surprise that the majority of their actions will be fucktarded and illogical.
The gender blindness interpretation of feminism is logically sound (and probably the only valid interpretation); just because one declares themselves to be a feminist doesn't mean they are one. The fallacy you are committing is that you are judging a idea/theory based on the actions of the group that claims to follow it.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-11 15:44
>>95,98
How far are you into your discrete maths classes? Need any help?
i'm not being a shithead and i dont need to follow that asshole's advice.
WYPMP
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-13 0:21
>>291
You are a fucking shithead and that person is a gentleman and a scholar.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-13 5:22
I'll my privilege in your anus.
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-13 6:11
>>293
Don't you hate it when you a word in the middle of a sentence ?
Name:
Anonymous2012-07-13 8:52
>>294
I read that correctly the first time I read this thread.
When I came back to it just now and read quickly, I render the sentence as "Don't you hate it when you PUT a word in the middle of a sentence?"
I'm not certain what to make of that.