Have you ever used a Java application that doesn't spam stderr (or more likely, stdout) with exceptions when you try (and fail) doing the simplest of tasks?
Luckily I don't know Java very well, and I must be far from mastering that sucky way of programming.
If your program crashes and burns, you've already mastered java
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-08 20:34
ENJOY YOUR STD'S FAG
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-09 11:52
Yes. I'm a C programmer. So? I don't see a problem. I embraced my UNIX soul long ago and I am happy together with my compiler (who is a cute layered front/backend design!). We have a fucking lot of functions in and outside of the kernel and I am pretty compact and resource conserving.
But thanks anyway asshole. Go and beat off to your stupid garbage collection shit while I #INCLUDE <stdio.h> with my preprocessor.
>>4
And of course, you check for EINTR every time you make a system call, right? And you use properly boundary-checked buffering on each IO call, don't you?
I hate C because C code that actually works is 20% actual code and 80% error checking and recovery. The downside being, people don't usually write C code that works. They write poorly designed C code full of buffer-injection security holes that fails for no reason on SMP machines or big-endian architectures.
And I'm not even talking about memory leaks. (People like to badword garbage collectors, but it's funny to watch their own little allocation scheme get their program OOM-killed, if it hasn't segfaulted before).
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-10 7:03
>>1
Just redirect stdio or stderr to /dev/null
problem solved
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-10 7:21
I heard he sang a good song, I heard he had a style,
And so I came to see him and listen for a while.
And there he was this young boy, stranger to my eyes,
Strumming my pain with his fingers,
Singing my life with his words,
Killing me softly with his song,
Killing me softly with his song,
Telling my whole life with his words,
Killing me softly with his song.
I felt all flushed with fever,
Embarrassed by the crowd,
I felt he found my letters and read each one out loud.
I prayed that he would finish,
But he just kept right on strumming my pain with his fingers,
Singing my life with his words,
Killing me softly with his song,
Killing me softly with his song,
Telling my whole life with his words,
Killing me softly with his song
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-10 10:00
>>7
Oh, thanks, I will deploy that Scalable Enterprise Solution to all of my Java Enterprise Application Servers.
>>10
Nah, working with Scalable Enterprise Solutions nets me more than most if not all real programmers earn. Also, I can just sit on my ass and surf 4chan (and masturbate during lunchhours, just have to time it so the cleaning lady won't come by) all day without having to work one bit.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-10 14:40
>>11
Good. I thought you were one of those "real programmer" types lol. Java professionals are treated like royalty compared to those AIDS ridden C/asm elitists.
>>12
You're fired. And stop fucking the cleaning lady, she's got AIDS. Then again, you wouldn't know any better.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-11 16:47
[aa] ∧＿∧ ／￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
（ ´∀｀） ＜ Emma Nilsdotter is really the voice of britney spears!
／ | ＼＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿
/ .|
/ "⌒ヽ |.ｲ |
＿＿ | .ノ | || |＿＿
. ノく＿＿つ∪∪ ＼
＿（（＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿_＼
￣￣ヽつ￣￣￣￣￣￣ | |￣
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-11 18:34
>>15
Fuck I should have known once she told me she knew C and could read and write in binary. Oh well, at least they found a use for these kind of programmers.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-12 0:06
java fuckin rocks
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-12 0:53
your logic is retarded. dual core is better
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-12 2:27
brainfuck
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-13 15:18
Java sorta wins. a comiled program can run on any machine that has JVM, and if you code it well it wont error like that on you.
>>21
Languages that run on virtual machines were around decades before Sun Marketsystems started shoving the idea down our throats as if it were some amazing new thing.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-13 19:31
>>21
It would be a really nice feature if there existed a free working JVM with a decent standard library, so that you could compile it on any platform. But now, your precompiled Java binary runs on whatever platform Sun likes, and it does what Sun wants it to do. I don't dislike Java as a programming language. It's conceptually pretty nice. But the way Sun markets it is just loathable.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-14 10:42
>>24
Conceptually, it has to be the worst OO language ever, save for C++ if we don't use a garbage collector there.
>>46
Yeah, it's great to see the GNAA is giving Microsoft an excuse so they can say .NET is multiplatform, but they'll never be really compatible with Windows because Microsoft will change it every year, and if they manage to get rid of Java and stay alone with .NET, they'll sue Mono down since they no longer need it and don't want stuff to work on free OSes.
I got told once in an interview that C/Unix (yes, pronounced "seeunix") skills are nice, but we need people "that know the windows." Emphasis on the "." as if "knowing the seeunix" precluded one from knowing how to squeeze VB through a sieve and extract the rancid curds that result.
Name:
Anonymous2010-04-21 14:30
Saying that Java is nice because it works on all OSs is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
>>61
Not true. Plants and fungi don't poop, and only some kinds of animals do. Of these, the protostomes aren't likely to have very usable ani, so you're basically limited to deuterostomes.
You could conceivably use analogous structures like the sponge's osculum (provided the sponge is big enough), but I'm not sure you can call that anal sex. Indeed, in the case of the sponge in particular it might be oral sex, since osculum means little mouth.
>>62
Excuse me, but it is true that >>60 simplifies as >>61 implies1. The validity of >>61 does not supervene on the validity of >>60.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. insofar as ``everything'' is taken to mean all ``species'' and an ``anus'' is not had without the occasional need to ``poop''.
Name:
Anonymous2010-04-21 20:43
>>63
∃≠∀. >>60 said there are other species you can use it on, therefore that is at least one other species besides humans with an anus. That most definitely does not not imply that every other species has an anus, as >>61 says.
It may be the case, but it may also not be, as is indeed the case.
>>64
I took >>60 to be a general statement, but I also took >>61 to limit discourse to those other species that do have an anus. Either way, you completely forgot about continuing to sage, princess.
>>65
Your assumption about >>61 is completely unwarranted, though a case could probably be made that there is an ambiguity in >>60 that enables you to read it as being about all species. Natural languages suck.
>>66
Not really. It's perfectly acceptable to limit discourse in such a manner, and it is not specified. Without specifying that you can't really conclude either way without taking a liberty of some kind, which as you seem to realize is unavoidable in natural language. It's really no worse than the ambiguity in >>60.
Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy