FAO: Red Cream

You often like to posit that the reason for your not using tripcodes, is that anyone of a reasonable firmness of mind can distinguish the "real" you because of the intelligence, wit and "wow" factor contained in every one of your posts.

I ask this: why use a name at all? The main advantage to anonymity is that every post is judged by its content, not its poster. You might argue that you are attempting to gain a reputation of excellence in posting, in which case you should really look around you and find some other faggy forum to spread your AIDS, since the only person who doesn't think you're an idiot is 4tran, who just wants some nookie.

I'm obviously so full of copypasta that I fail to be lame.

LOL I HAVEN'T SEEN GOD therefore HE DOESN'T EXIST
SYLLOGISMMMMMMMMMMMM

>>1
I ask this:  Why are you so uncomfortable with the idea of choice in using a name?

Choices in a choice-environment never need justification.  In addition, your narrow world-view on how to use 4chan is particularly sophomoric and immature.

>>3
NO ONE HAS SEEN THIS "GOD".  Since this "god" is supposed to be all-mighty and pervasive, then there MUST be some evidence.  But there's NO evidence.  NONE WHATSOEVER.  And you know what you call something that produces no fucking evidence?  "NON-EXISTENT."

RedCream if you cant see the evidence all around you then maybe you should open your eyes.

>>4
I'm not certain what you've managed to infer about my "narrow world-view", but I just gave you at least one major advantage of not using names within a forum such as this. I'm wondering what benefit you think there is in using a name.

>>5
Dipshit, my eyes ARE open since I'm using a message board.  "Visual cues" -- have you ever heard of them?  You're only dodging the requirement for EVIDENCE.  You have a list of stupid fucking things (like "existence" and "beauty") which are NOT evidence.  Your alleged "god" allegedly made burning bushes and parted waters.  You alleged "god" is an anthropomorphic intelligence that is everywhere.  Such an entity should be producing anthropomorphic evidence at furlongs per fortnight.  So ... provide those CLEAR pieces of fucking evidence or STFU about your immature delusion.

>>6
You already outlined the benefit when you said:

"a reputation of excellence in posting"

The issue here is that you do NOT accept that as a benefit.  Yet I do.  And I hardly need to get your approval for it.  I have no time to handle the deep denials of the masses for their particular biases on matters immaterial.

(And you're only proving my point, by the way, by treating me as the original RedCream.)

I'm the original RedCream and I dropped that handle ages ago in order to watch all the clones and their antics in my name.

@theist:
Please enlighten us as to what exactly our "closed" eyes are suppossedly missing.

>>1
I resent your claim.  In particular, men (eg RedCream) lack a certain orifice known as a vagina.

>>7
You claim "I have no time to handle the deep denials of the masses for their particular biases on matters immaterial", yet you constantly lambaste people about their belief in non existent entities.  I believe non existent entities are by definition, "immaterial".

>>7
I do accept it as a benefit, but I clearly pointed out that it's something you are evidently not acheiving. All I want is the reason for your using a name, there's no need to get defensive and assume that I'm trying to insult or outwit you. If "a reputation of excellence in posting" is your reasoning, contrary to the overarching opinion on this board, then I'm fine accepting that your egotism outweighs your desire for your posts to be red non-judgementally.

I enjoy these little message boards, they make me laugh. What's funny is when I read about people being angry because of other people's complex illusion-based allusions utilized by the ego center that defends the shadow of the mind from full-frontal shots (no pun intended, but still...visual imagery is highly enjoyable) I enjoy being human and I won't deny it, in fact, it's my weapon against ignorance. I not only use it against other people's absurd comments like, "What are you afraid of?" where I answer oh-so-calmly, "I'm afraid your fear-tactics are useless against me. But something good did come of this little chat, I now know your weakness. Be afraaaaaaiiiiiddd." But seriously, all forms of rage and anger are actually focused upon the individual that expresses these emotions because they are actually repressing certain human qualities they find distasteful to themselves and for someone to exhibit those distasteful human traits...well, you need only read about it in history class. I find the Inquisition, and the references to the sands of the Colosseum in Rome to be exemplary forms to better amplify my point. Oh yeah, my faith is based upon the intangible, for what better material for an idea to reside within. Remain anonymous, remain ambiguous, remain intangible and you shall be perceived only by reactions for even your actions will be a lie purched high on the tongues of profits (some pun intended, I need my humor too). When I complete my faithbuilding, all hell will break loose in an attempt to discover the creator of this small work of fiction, but to everyone's amazement, no one's there. No name, no body, no history, no lies, no truth's, only the idea will remain. This will be based upon the idea that all men and women are equal in stature set apart from others only by their own minds, and this will be the time of The Awakening. This event shall be marked by an escalation in self-awareness within the human condition. All manner of people shall respond violently to change as it is within their own minds that they are safe while evidently they are completely exposed and vulnerable. I know this from my own personal experiences and based on that information sculpted into a finer form of understanding as this understanding is the basis of all life and existence throughout the w(hole) of eternity. d'ja like that pun? Me too. I am but a humble transmitter of the happenings that occur around us. These things are here, we need only open our eyes to see, but first we must allude ourselves that we have eyes to see. Religion is the answer, but what is the question? Perhaps science? ...and don't even think ov turning this into some scientology experiment. I wouldn't tarnish the nature of this experiment with a sour name such as scientology, such a name used in conjunction with followers' actions is hypocrisy in the extreme conjoined with all the repressed human activities that comprise the darker side of our nature. You need but look at the devistation left in their wake to notice that they are uniting to overwhelm, but what are dividing to conquer? What are their chaos tactics? If anyone finds this offensive, good, it's meant to be a dangerous idea at least you would recognize it for that, some feel angry but don't do anything at all, just lounge around behind a desk like I'm doing right now. Get it?

>>10
I choose my battles.  I have no time for some retarded attempts to get me to post anonymously.  I DO have time to counter the religifaggotry of our culture.

>>11
No, you clearly confuse your opinion with what's true.  That you continue to engage me, illustrates how wrong you are.  You accept me as RedCream, hence my name works.  End of story.

Remember, truth is not just a matter of majority opinion, especially when that majority opinion is based upon the lower order of desires.  Truth is true regardless of how many people believe otherwise.  That's why evidence is so crucial.  People find it harder to continue believing in stupid things once evidence is brought into the contrary.

>>13
Truth is perception.
If you haven't learned this by now then you need to an hero.

>>14
Perceive yourself 12 feet into the air, and then I'll cede your point.

Since perception is what you kow-tow to, then my perception is that I'm right.  End of story, yet again.

Do ANY of you know how to present a point and support that point with evidence?  It's like talking with 3rd graders in here.  I pwn you and pwn you again, yet you just keep on squawkin' like you weren't completely PWNT.  The song is the same:  REDCREAM WINS AGAIN.

>>15
Are you just stupid? My argument isn't that you can't be distinguished from your clones, but that using a name is disadvantageous to you.

>>16
Your argument is specious and unproven.  The stupidity here is yours, in continuing to insist that your assertion is correct, when it's merely an offshoot of your own preferences.  What you prefer is irrelevant.  The general truth is that preferences produce desired results, hence, why would they even be called "preferences"?

REDCREAM.  WINS.  AGAIN.

You'd think that you fools would have gotten tired of my PWNG you with such regularity.

>>15
Well, MY perception is that you're WRONG!!
And being that everyone knows I am better than you in every concievable way, I WIN!!!!

you still haven't disproven god, fallacy cream.

>>18
Your perception only affects your reality.  FAIL.  My use of a name will quite simply continue.  PERIOD.  You don't even have to grasp this truth.  What matters is that the truth exists and has force regardless of how you feel about it.

>>19
This "god" you speak of should be dropping clear evidence left and right.  But you have ZERO evidence for it.  In fact, NO ONE has any evidence for this "god".  Therefore that "god" thing doesn't exist.

Don't like that conclusion, buttmilker?  Just bring EVIDENCE to the table to support your contrary assertion.  Of course, you can't do that, since you're looking for evidence for something that doesn't fucking exist.  But keep the faith, babybrain.  The world always needs a village idiot to shit on, and in this case, YOU'RE IT.

Gawd DAYUM, you Westerners are drop-dead dumb.

P.S.  REDCREAM.  WINS.  AGAIN.

>>20
WESTERNERS??  WESTERNERS???

That proves it, once and for all!

RedCream is BLACK!  

I say he is Uzbek.

>>20
i'm just sayin' your argument sucks.  you've been relying on the same logical fallacy for years now.  it still hasn't magically become a valid argument when you type it with random capitalization, and i'm still not theist, i just enjoy pointing out every time you use the same retarded and flawed argument.  i think we've had this tacit agreement ever since you came to science and math that you'd put down some bullshit, i'd tell you it was wrong, and we both pretend that you're not a troll.

Redcream would be my hero if he didn't use the the word 'pwnt'. 12 year olds use the word 'pwnt' when playing halo, no one else. It's on par to saying 'lol' in real life.

All right! I'm up for a challenge, mr or mrs RedCream. I have already perceived where your arguments are based, your ego. The funny thing is that the ego get's all its orders from the ID, the ID get's directions from the Repressed portion of the brain, and all that information is derived from, YUP you guessed it! Those darned desires you were yapping about. You shouldn't argue with ignorance in the first place, you'll only end up just as knowledgeable. The fact that I'm confronting your ego means you'll probably respond with some assinign excuse, may do some whinning, and probably end up with your tail between your legs holding your fist in the air screaming to deaf ears about how right you are. Who really gives a flying fuck about your half-baked, retarded, childish, misanthropic, decadent, misdemeanor, crack-whore loving butt-licker. I just love using childish remarks to a child, they get soooo upset. Pff. Take that ya shitty devil!

Redcream is a dipshit. He tries so hard to be edgy and it ends up looking pathetic.

RedCream is BLACK! Not just shitnigger BLACK, either. I'm talkin' BLACK like the BLACKEST of all nigrazoids.

>>24
Oh, gee, let me see now:

1. The weakness in my argument is logical quirk.
2. The weakness in your argument is that YOU HAVE NO FUCKING EVIDENCE.

Dude, what a fucking moron you are, since #2 trumped #1 all over the fucking place.  You have to produce evidence for your assertions, or you're WRONG.  When you depart from evidence to establish an assertion, you automatically FAIL.

Once again, EVIDENCE establishes what is TRUE.  Without evidence, what you say is at least subject to high levels of dismissal.  And when it comes to things which SHOULD BE highly evidentiary, then the conclusion is inescapable:  YOU'RE WRONG.

Once again, come back with fucking EVIDENCE, and you can redeem your argument.  But without it, you're just another buck-toothed religitard who confuses hopes and dreams with fucking REALITY.  These assertions of "gods" are extremely outrageous and SCREAMINGLY REQUIRE EVIDENCE.

EVIDENCE!  EVIDENCE!  EVIDENCE!  What the fuck is WRONG with you religitards, where you not only see no need for evidence, but you are completely comfortable with the wholesale absence of any evidence whatsoever?  You may as well believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, since what you believe is so foolish, immature, and outrightly and provably WRONG.

>>26
That's not even a challenge.  You have no fucking EVIDENCE.  Therefore you AUTOMATICALLY failed.

>>25
Hey, I say "lol" in real life (I've had death threats, but that's besides the point).

>>26
You really like your text walls and Freud.  Why are you assuming that Freud is right?

>>29
You have given us all the EVIDENCE we need to see that you are a BLACK NIGRAZOID.

OMG, RedCream! You are going down! It's time to do some serious bitch slapping! You ask for evidence, but how do you provide evidence to someone who won't use their eyes to see, won't use their ears to hear, won't use their skin to feel, just sits around all day coming up with more "I have to be right therefore everyone else is wrong" bullshit; just grow the fuck up and realize you don't have all the answers cause you a fucking human too you scum sucking bottom feeder! Pop your mom's tit out of your mouth and get a fucking life you sad piece of shit. Here someone is pouring out some genuine feelings and all you do is Boast about your PERFECT FLAWLESS KNOWLEDGE, who's really sounds pathetic here, hmm? Keep on asking yourself, if you even know what a question really is, "How do I find out something when I know everything?" Cha-ching...The answer is...*Hands microphone to RedCream*

*me sitting with fingers crossed* "Please dodge the question, please dodge the question, please dodge the question..." Awaiting either a dodge or non-reply...:P

OMG, that first thread, >>1! Nailed Creampuff, I mean RedCream a good one! The "wow" factor meaning, "Wow, a new low for the human race; thanks redcrust". I love name calling, it rousts the ego and forces the false-god from his hiding place and as soon as he sticks out his mighty sword, a small dagger, I simply assist him with his self-impaling rhetorical nonsense and snappy*shitty* non-sequitors. :P Come on...RedShit, come out and play...we don't want to hurt you...honestly...:)

Redcream is using CAPITALIZED words at RANDOM places. Chances ARE that he's an ASPIE.

It's amazing that you turd burglars are still luxuriating in having no evidence for your beliefs.  We're not talking about flawed evidence or perfect knowledge.  We're talking about you having ZERO evidence and NO knowledge.  You're pretending you're adjusting some racing engine and are discussing the minutae of achieving performance, when you don't even have a vehicle to work on in the first place.  FUCKING POSUERS.  You're so wrong that it's painful to even watch ... but like a terrible auto accident, one is compelled to watch despite the horror.

REDCREAM.  WINS.  AGAIN.  Such WIN is the natural result of having command of the facts and the logic to put those facts together to determine TRUTH.

HAHAHA, DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS

My WIN results from drinking Brawndo, the Thirst Mutilator.  PROVE ME WRONG

>>29

see though, there is no weakness in my argument, because my argument has and will continue to be that your argument is flawed.  i have never argued for the existence of god in a thread with you.  i've only ever pointed out that your argument is flawed.  i don't care whether or not god exists.  i just tell you that you're wrong every time.  i tell you why you're wrong every time.  i'm right every time.  and every time, you point to my post, pretend i'm some redneck bible thumper, and dismiss my post because i haven't provided evidence of god, which is 1) completely unfuckingrelated, and 2) one aspect of your chronic retardism.

huggles.

>>31

You make saying 'lol' in real life a good thing. Its bad enough on the internet, but in real life?

Request underage b& for this prick please

>>40
Failure to provide evidence of your assertions means automatic failure of your side of the argument.  You need to bring MOAR to the message board than ego and testosterone and stupid.

Cry moar, fuckfag.

>>42

once again, it seems you've failed to even recognize what my argument is.  i'd be thoroughly impressed if you could state my assertion. :*(     :*(      :*(    :(        :*(

>>36
>ASSPIE

fix'd

Hey, I know this isn't /r/, but does anyone have the know-how to make me a script or something for opera that hides all of redcream's posts so I can browse in peace?  In b4 some stupid argument over why X browser is better than Y browser.

Who the FUCK is RedCream and WHY the FUCK has he been posting on the same BBS for 4 years? FUCK!

>>41
I'm 21, and headed to graduate school, so no underage b& for me.  I don't care if I'm a prick or not; there are more important things.

>>40
I contend that YOUR argument is flawed.  And in the end it will turn out that I am right.  Take a fucking logic class.  No really.  Tell the teacher that and come back to me.  I have a 4.0 gpa in several high level logic courses, I know what I'm talking about.

>>48

IMPLY THOSE CONCLUSIONS!

>>48

would you honestly like for me to tell a logician "someone is using a fallacy (negative proof) as their argument, and so i believe their argument form is invalid." and expect them to disagree?  because that's my argument, and no logician is going to disagree with it.  again, it's fairly clear that you don't understand what i'm saying, despite it being entirely straightforward and simple.

>>48
If I may hazard a guess, I smell a clone.  I suspect that >>42 is the real RedCream.

>>46
I like to annoy little boys like you.  But if you know how long I've been poasting to 4chan, then doesn't that imply that you've been READING 4chan for that long?  Is there something wrong with poasting for years, but not with reading?

Irony much?  Be careful with setting rules, lest they apply equally to you.

Of course, we could set a RedCream Rule:  Whatever RedCream does is wrong as long as he does it.  Others are free to do as they wish, since they aren't RedCream.  That should cover it ... and is about the speed of how Western Civilization acts, now.  Just replace "RedCream" with "the working class", and you have it.

>>51
Your suspicions are correct.

>poasting (x2)

God fucking damn it.

God Damn, AssCream! Don't you get it yet? Why don't you prove that what is in your head is real, fuck stick! All you do is hand us ammunition to facilitate your own destruction! You are a defeatist! You want your own self-immolation! You want to DIE! It's this degree of self-disrespect that plagues a great majority of the human race, hence war. I'll prove you wrong, you are a human, NO? You have a brain, NO? You are a shitty devil, YES? If you answered these to your advantageous perception you are all that I have described. BOOM, who's the bitch now? And Booya to >>40 for a super-fuck-tastic reply! Red is nothing more than a child, with the supreme knowledge and infallibility of a child. Hence his chronic retardism. He actually believes cause he's above the age of 18 he has the ability to surpass his peers. When he remains a child all the while. RedCream has no origin, he probably hates himself so much it comes out in conversation with his parents that's probably why he still lives at home or in a shelter and posts here from the public library or his little messy bedroom. "Did you make your bed today, RedCream?" "Did you clean up your room like mommy said to yesterday, RedCream?" Please provide some evidence of your supreme knowledge, but do so with a firmer understanding that we don't really give a shit. Oh, wait, you already did, within this entire thread. My bad.

>>55
I'm taking a yeasty, firm shit into your head at this very moment.  Ummmm!  How pleasant it is to pinch out such a loaf!

Don't like it?  THEN LEAVE.

Hmm, sorry I didn't receive any shit on my end. You may want to check your briches. *Hands toilet paper to RedCream*

>>57
You're so addled with religifaggotry that you don't even understand that you head is chock-full of shit already.  THAT's why you claim to not see any.  I still took a shit in your head, although getting my meager loaf in there with all the rest is a bit of a feat.

Wow, that's pretty funny! I shit you not! I really had a laugh at that last one. You may not be as childish as you make yourself out to be. You've got the humor and the understanding of what it means to confront the ego and get ideas past it into the repressed part of the brain. Using humor definately works wonders. Hehhehe. But the real humor comes when I finally decide to dump the dirt on your head when you find yourself deep in a hole you just dug yourself. Don't think your in it right now? Good, that's the way I win. For you to remain ignorant of your current standing and for me to simply kick in the dirt and walk away. I just get a kick out of reading RedCream's posts, they get my brain thinking, It's kinda like coffee in the morning. Keep up the good work, Red!

何やってんだいよ、お前？分から無いんだいよ! 良いん、だぜ？この、バ～カ野郎、クソカギ、すこんど野郎ひたちぶり！”ギブ、ギブ、マジでギブ!” ”Give, give me what? Come on! What the fuck are you trying to say? If you're going to give me something just do it! *BANG* TIME TO LIVE FOREVER, BABY!" ーレヴィ ”ブラックラグーン”

C'mon RedCream challenge me. If not everyone here will witness you being a chickenshit all throughout 4chan.org. Please? I do realize that only chickens don't fight in battles where they see a victory of the war. "What are you afraid of, RedCream" I already know. You keep attacking me through this little forum but you've lost track of where I truly am because I'm already inside the walls of your mind. Please be distracted by my inane attempts and self-satisfaction and please, continue to be badgered into these assenign attempts at destroying any resemblance of what it means to be you. "I love doing that." Patiently awaiting your reply RedJizz, it's your move? You already know I can't beat you, right? Good, I'm not even here, right? I don't exist, right? hehehe, Lucifer=1; RedCream=-1. : ) Anyone wanna play? I'm just a wittle child, I can't be beaten, I don't know anything about reality, c'mon beat me at my own game. :P

request changing /sci/ to /red/

AND I FAP TO CLUB WINX PORN

>>61
OFFICIAL NOTICE
Request denied.

>>60
I'm tired of constantly dealing with never ending trails of fucking shit so I will accept any challenge you pose.  I have no idea what you intend to prove but if it'll shut circumcised dicks like you up...

>>64
Hey! How did you know I had a circumcised dick? Hentai, Sukebe!
So, Red"" would like to be challenged by a no-class, unemployed, still lives with his mom at 29, broke as all hell, no-account braggart? Ok : ) I'll state the rules first.
Rule 1) You must perform your own research and may not use a third-party as a source for absolute concrete evidence. If the information is publicly printed, you must first collect the information and then inquire a fellow scientist to prove it to you via a mathematical or scientific method and HOW they did so, I want to see the WORK!!!
Rule 2) YOU MUST log all data and correspondance discovered whether it contributes or disputes the initial summary of the experiment.
Rule 3) You will have only as much time as YOU yourself deem necessary, but this time must be stated within the initial summary of the experiment, and may not be less than one week or longer than our remaining expected lifespans.
Rule 4) You will report your entire findings within your own thread of your choosing within the /SCI/ board by no later than 11:59pm the final day of your experiment.
Rule 5) You must have an initial summary, the experiment and all data, references and correspondance retrieved, as well as a final conclusion whether the sum of the data and correspondance collected amounts to a FINAL EVIDENTIAL conclusion or needs further investigation and research; to that, you must then state a secondary summary of where, who, what, why, how you would like to observe and collect data and correspondance from as is the same requirement with the initial summary should lack of evidence lead to a non-conclusion or continuation.
Rule 6) Any negligence of these rules will count as a disqualifying STRIKE against your character and credibility as a scientist.
Rule 7) You may use any source to FURTHER your research, but NOT as a means of a firm conclusion.

If you are up to it, I'll do the same, I'll even let you choose the topic, but be forewarned any topic you choose has to be concluded by BOTH of us. Decline this challenge, and you shall be deemed by your own CHOICE, a chickenshit within the 4chan.org community. And via this challenge, I will be held and bound by the same rules I have instructed with equal means and opportunity. Are you prepared? Are you willing? Do you accept or decline this firm and applicable challenge, RedCream?

*C'mon RedCream's Ego, C'mon RedCream's Ego, O-Myou-Myou-Myou-Myoun (rubbing hands together)*

>>64 is a clone.  I don't have to do ANYTHING to retain my superior position.  The problem is with YOU.  YOU are making the outrageous and frankly absurd claims about a deity.  Having made those claims, the onus is upon YOU to produce EVIDENCE.

And you just don't fucking HAVE any evidence.  That's the fatal point in all your malarkey.  You made religious claims, and failing to support them with EVIDENCE, your position was AUTOMATICALLY invalidated.

I look into the sky, and I just don't see this Big Bearded Jewfag that you religifucks claim is there.  Well, tell me where to point a telescope to see this astronomically-sized deity and then I'll start to concede your point.  In fact, point out the coordinates of these "heaven" and "hell" places, too, since you religifags like to invoke them as if they were real places.  Also, point out ANY evidence collected by ANY instruments that show this "soul" you religifucks like to blather on and on about.

Look, it's really simple:  YOU make the absurd claims, so YOU have to produce the EVIDENCE that convinced YOU in the first place.  And that evidence had better be fucking OUTSTANDING since your claims are outrageous and require very solid proof therefore.

Carl Sagan is figuratively "rolling in his grave" that people like you were allegedly produced by any school system whatsoever.

If you need some time, I'll understand. You have until 11:59pm pacific standard time on May 5th, 2008 to accept or decline. Failure to do so will brand you by the scientific community and the 4chan.org community forum as a chickenshit scientist-wanna-be. To better clarify the above, YOU and YOU ALONE must come up with a viable Topic, deadline, and initial summary for us both to equally work from. Failure to do this is a result of the aforementioned consequences. Like I said, RedCream, given time, you'll show everyone how easily it is to tarnish your own name, character, and credibility. This results will be posted all over the net from web-pages, to journalist websites, to advertisements, to newgroups, to forums, to chat room and the like. So please, do the sensible thing and give up now while you still have TIME.

Wow, just wow.  You sir are a fucking moron.  >>64, >>58, >>56, >>67 is the same troll as >>48.  He has been goading you the whole time.  Your idea is stupid because I doubt a dipshit like you would put any real effort into it.

Well, that settles it then. RedCream's is SOL. RedCream=Chickenshit, can't wait to see this on the 10 o'clock news.

Well, that settles it then. RedCream's is SOL. RedCream=Chickenshit, can't wait to see this on the 10 o'clock news.

Damn! I was hoping to get some good research put in toward an end, but well, such is the way of ignorance. I'm guessing that RedCream doesn't attend any sort of church function, read any religious texts, study human history where any religion is involved, or asks people of the same. You sir have no genuine interest in the happenings of the human race, it is so as evidenced by your inability to be interested in your own life, evidenced by all your obligatory reactions towards the very childish and non-hurtful words I post as a result of the aforementioned ignorance. Boy, I wish proving and giving evidence of RedCreams own ego, ignorance, and inability to utilize human sensory perception outside of his "cave" as it were to him was the experiment, oh wait...maybe...hmmm...?

Ok, RedCream. This is your final test of intellect that can easily be proven or disproven; describe to us what the color red smells and tastes like. *passes LSD to RedCream under the table*

Stop acting like you've won when you have NO REASON to justify it.  You have been reacting to clone the whole time you fool.  If you actually want to do this then I'll accept your challenge.  I choose the topic to be: the Effect of Race on Intelligence. 

If you want to back down then now is your chance.

*patiently awaiting response* Did you know that you make yourself out to be a retard by answering assenign questions issued by an ass? Did you know that by ignoring a direct attack on your ego you "escape" the attack and thereby repress it to the extent that you become ignorant of it. Confront my ignorance and thalt shalt become ignorant, ignore my ignorant attempt to attack your ego directly, and take the chance that maybe I WILL BECOME YOU! HAHAHAHAHAHA IGNORANCE WINS!!!!!

OMG, are you serious? Please state your Initial Summary then.

hang on, I've got to put some laundry in. Five minutes please. *Hungry to get started on such an arguous and detailed assignment*

Chh...like fagcream is gonna come up with a decent summary, please girl-friend.

I believe that this AnOnYmOuS 2U is suffering from an acute form schizophrenia and mild neurosis co-tangent to Psychotic Compulsions to render his vast and expansive "truth" as it were upon the meek, such as RedCream.

I believe that this RedCream is a scientific pillar of our fair community as well as a magnificent standard ever expressed by any human being. He will have no issue what-so-ever in completing an easy task.

The Best of Luck!

Hey RedCream. How about I base my evidence on Neopolaton Icecream?

I realize that when I confront your ego that I instigate a challenge on a rudamentary emotional level. But, really, WTF is taking so god damned long. Jeez, it doesn't take me this long to write a freakin' novel, come on already! State your Initial Summary and please make it good, i wouldn't want to be board out of my mind with pathetic attempts at an "easy out" such as your past statements have granted you.

Typical evasion behavior from "AnusInU".  He has no evidence to back up his religious assumptions, so he stalls, deflects, and in general acts like a little kid who was caught looking at porn.

>>81 etc.
YOU made the outrageous assertions.  YOU are claiming that this "god" exists.  Provide EVIDENCE for this "god" thing or admit by default that it doesn't fucking exist.

P.S.  It's also amusing that you can't tell a difference between me and a cloan.  Sad.  But then, you're just here to amuse yourself with your religifaggotry.

No, don't tell you're going to welch on this challenge, oh mighty and knowledgeable RedCream. I was already getting prepared for a grand adventure, don't disappoint everyone now. Whether you're a clone or the real thing, the credibility and character behind the name RedCream is at stake, what are you going to do about it?

You still have until May 5th, 2008 @ 11:59PM PST to post your decision regarding my challenge. Whether or not I post rediculous pontifications and rhetorical non-sequitorial statements, rants and ignorant antics in response to the same is poor excuse to evade the aforementioned challenge. Please take this time to consider your self-image, your character, and your credibility if not in your peers minds at least within your own. I will not back down, I will gowd you in eventually. You will succumb to your own ignorance, so please give up now while you still have TIME.

I'm still awaiting your response to the Scientific Experimental Challenge with the Initial Summary containing a deadline, a topic, and an axiom or paradox as to a public or personal point of view, along with a postulated outcome from performance of said experiment. If you still wish to utilize the Topic of: the Effect of Race on Intelligence or another. You still have time to modify or complete the Initial Summary. It won't be final until we both accept it after I review and consider your Initial Summary proposal as a viable means for experimentation. I do believe that "The Effect of Race on Intelligence" is a viable topic and an interesting one at that, but without the remaining information the proposal is still up for revisement. You still have plenty of time...please don't concede right at the start; it's no fun to kick around a chickenshit anyway.

>>84
What the hell are you trying to do?  Do you want him to accept your challenge or to give up while he still has time?  You can't have both.

Come on...think about context, >>86, my win isn't only one victory, there are two points at work here. The victory of the initial battle for the moment and the victory to come at the end of the war. Try to keep up, will ya.

hmm, yet another day slips by without an answer...what are you doing, RedCream? Are you ignorning my challenge which is conflicting your ego to no end at the moment or are you investigating and writing a viable Initial Summary for us to agree upon? Oh, I hope your cheating. Yes, create your own initial summary and attempt to have a somewhat decent and revealing look at the topic. Do try to remember, I am unemployed. I'm being paid by the government for every hour that I'm alive to look for work. This experiment would simply be a two-fold act in securing that future potential, or having you ignore me completely or cheat would benefit me as well. I'm not as smart as you make me out to be, dear RedCream. But you're doing a hell of a job making a fool out of yourself...Don't go doing me any favors now, ya hear! I don't intend on Reciprocating any of your goodwill activities or jestures whether they are good or not. I'm just gonna take the viable towards promoting potential and simply thank you for your generous donation, sorry you don't get a receipt to claim on taxes either...: )

AnOnYmOuS 2U is the hero/heroine(lol) of 4chan
finally someone puts RedCream in his/her place

Maybe I'm just an old softy, but I like to think there's a little bit of RedCream in all of our sphincters...

>>67
Wow, not using tripcodes sure is convenient.

I thought tripcodes can easily be faked by copy/paste.

I posted some more of my rhetorical nonsense here: http://dis.4chan.org/sci/#2
if anyone's interested. And realistically, how big of an ego does someone have to have to think they can win, by default, in the request to put forth scientific data of ideologies, hypotheses, beliefs, faith, and religious information that has no ability to be measured by our scientific methods (as far as I know); which is supposed to be interpretted with a bit of context and symbology not as literal translation. There isn't any science to conversation, but that's something we as humans are striving for and still come up with consistent mis-interpretations due to "lack of a better WORD" or symbol to adequately describe within the confines of our LIFE-SPANS. If I had to use descriptive words to describe my ideas as I do, I would have a book by the time I'm done. Oh wait, that's how people write books isn't it? Come up with a small idea and build it up through involvement, investigation, communication, cooperation, research, experimentation and personal perspective conclusion (meaning where one stands on the topic as of that point in time). Anyway, I'm going to cut it short here for today, I need to get some sleep. I'll continue to write here as long as I come up with personal perspective epiphanies. -_-.zzz

>>93
original redcream=AnOnYmOuS 2U
new redcream=imposter

>>94
AnOnYmOuS 2U

>>96
me.

Ah jeez, why would I take up a name that's tarnished by its previously associated duche bag of a dismembered human cadavor left in a plastic container in the desert sun over a few months (ew, liquidy) While I post on here as an Anonymous poster, I utilize the AnOnYmOuS 2U to distinguish myself from an average poster, at least at the start. I'll hopefully gain respect via my postings, and maybe I won't need a name to be distinguished; perhaps just an idea (see "V for Vendetta" for further details). It's not that I'm disfigured, but how often do you get genuine people on who want to unify themselves with other? Do you find yourself or others performing acts, or initiate conversations that lead to the seperation or the relationship at whatever stage it's at? Kind of interesting concept I stumbled across, and that's the reason I state it hear. It's no different then when I find something out at a job and tell everyone involved about what happened and what I did to settle the argument or clean up the mess. It's about unification with the human race by realizing the distinguishing characteristics of everything and everyone by isolating the characteristics while understanding that all of these characteristics are what make up the whole of the individual or object. The thing is, people aren't considered the sum of their parts unless their ideas, feelings, and being are all taken into account. I realized this when I converse with others, they are desperately trying to find someone, anyone who will listen and be interested in them, but sometimes I find that some people like that are doing so because they won't with themselves. It's hard to distinguish until they begin to disrespect you and themselves; that's the indicator of who the person really is. The ego of any individual won't care about such things; only acts of self-preservation and pride through victory. By understanding this about ourselves what may come from our interactions with others and perhaps even to the extent with animals? It's a huge and arguous idea attempting to bridge the gaps between each other. I'm going to utilize the methods from this to design a valid form of communication, I'm going to document my findings; I will form my own beliefs from utilization of this and co-existing ideas that will unify all forms of religion, because all forms of religion are based off of human understandings and ideas! : ) It's a strange world we live in. I want to know everything I can about it before the end comes, as it is already in the works so too should I be in performing the research behind my ideas. Anyone who takes up these ideas and performs their own will utilize other forms of understandings from their own points of view and come to their own conclusions and understandings, and yes, with my flexible religion and form of communication it will in some way bridge the gap between our understandings, at least that is my hope, my dream, my adventure. And with no further words for this forum, I bid you adew and I shall post here some time later. If you have some questions for me post them within this thread, I'll check back occasionally and see if I can assist or offer any suggestions if you come to a cross-roads or a snag of conflict. Good Luck! Ganbatte kudasai, ne! (do your best, ok!)

I've noticed that RedScam has stopped attempting to ask for proof and evidence of an idea before it's gone into practice. What a joker. RedCream, are you going to accept or decline the scientific challenge? Come on, any researchable topic, any viable deadline, any viable intent. Come on, I'm dyin' over hear. Well?

>>98
KAKU GLASSES must have
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-e2n0F1L8s

RedCream has already proved a point by having you faggots agonize over his double niggardry

>>100, do you mean that tickle in my penis? Thank you btw.

RedCream!!!!! Prove the existence of the Choice and Action of Energy.

Just as a casual observer of the conversations between AnOnYmOuS 2U and RedCream, it sounds to me like RedCream is suffering from narcisistic rage towards his mother and father for bringing him into this world that belittles him so...and for the ego-destroying life he/she/it leads...my guess is that he spends his nights playing MMORPGs till his fingertips hurt and he has nothing left to do but lock his bedroom door and masturbate till his hand falls asleep, all the while thinking about how much he hates his mother and how he longs for the touch of a non-rubber woman...my advice, get a life, get a girlfriend, get laid, and give up the argument that you've had with AnOnYmOuS 2U because he has already won. Your ego just hasn't allowed you to recognize that.

As it has been proven that RedCream's Ego is infinitely infantile, his intelligence must suffer greatly therefore to add but a granual that may put him above the intellect of an ameoba I humbly offer the definition of narcicism:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Narcissism

Please read the definitions in their entirety -meaning: the whole page-

And to other observers of RedCreams beguiled attempt at defending his/her innane ability to see past the self constructed center of of his/her universe, I'm sure the after reading the current posts he/she just might be compelled to enamoure of him/her-self, and resolve to experience lust for his/her own self by manifesting his/her own Nature, A.K.A. stroking their Ego with self encouragment of successes, in the cow-herd, and enjoy them to his/her Ego's desire. Just remember Red, stay away from the bulls for they may wish to return the gesture, unless thats your intention.....

>>101
>>102
>>103
>>104
>>105
SAME PERSON

no 4tranny, AnOnYmOuS 2U and I are two different people.... However, his form of logic is shared by many other puppetires thru-out this theater we call life. Some people even use it without ever really understanding the logic behind their success. Everyone in the world sees these people each and every day, on some days that same person hands you your Pay-Check.... Think about it.

>>1-108
Same person.

>>105
wtf

>>105
tl;dr version: RedCream makes shit up to give him an excuse to feel good about himself.

redsatual is a dandilyon-crown wearing pansy who thinks he's smart to the point of complete and utter ignominae. To him, that is bliss, it is his heaven. For anyone of us to attempt or even think or speak to that contradiction, hell hath no fury like a woman scorn. :P

>>111
thats mean Anon, I like it.... To everyone else, AnOnYmOuS 2U and I are indeed 2 different people... in fact we're friends, have been since high school. that too is a factor in us having the same understanding of certain logics, so please try to keep up...

btw RedCream has yet to respond, perhaps he's in the pasture?

>>112,>>113
Same fag.

WTF!? Is it so hard for you people to accept that there is other people out there that share a common logic, and that you now deal with two  people instead of one and thereby resort to infantile name calling?

>>114
Or perhaps you hold a hatred for homosexuals do to a personal longing for the taste of penis in your mouth? Do you secretly desire one of your friends after seeing him in the locker-room during gym class so long ago? Or is your own Ego so fragile that the thought of another human being understanding a type of logic unreachable by you makes you quake in your lil lace panties? When the sting goes away perhaps you'll have a more intelligent thing to say other then childish name calling, hmmmm? 

Alright RedCream and the rest of the masses here on 4chan, are you all ready 4 the real kick in the teeth? Here it is, first if you all will refer to >>82 whereby RedCream states "YOU made the outrageous assertions.  YOU are claiming that this "god" exists.  Provide EVIDENCE for this "god" thing or admit by default that it doesn't fucking exist." Now refer to >>37 where he further states "REDCREAM.  WINS.  AGAIN.  Such WIN is the natural result of HAVING COMMAND OF THE FACTS and the LOGIC to put those FACTS together to DETERMINE truth." And lastly refer to >>40 wherein AnOnYmOuS 2u states clearly "i have never argued for the existence of god in a thread with you.  I've only ever pointed out that your argument is flawed.  I don't care whether or not god exists." Long after that you have continued to assert yourself as the winner in the god argument with someone who was not arguing about god with you! Well Red, you asked AnOnYmOuS 2u for evidence but I bring it to you instead. The sad thing is that you have DEFEATED YOURSELF BY NOT EVEN KNOWING WHAT THE ARGUMENT HAD BECOME!! HaHaHa!! And worst of all, you didn't even know you where doing it! 
REDCREAM. LOOSES. FATALITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"WAIT!! WHATS THAT SOUND!? OH YA, ITS JUST REDCREAMS EGO SHATTERING TO DUST!"

BTW, your welcome AnOnYmOuS 2u. Redcream has now been proven to be the ignorant fool that he is and we can all live in the bright light of his shame, until the next ignorant ass rears his ugly head and splatters his shit all over 4chan!!

I bet your 4.0 gpa and your apparently wasted years of "high level logic classes" never prepared you for your own self defeat, ayy RedCream? I do so hope it hurts Red, cause your ignorance has given me one hell of a headache.

But wait, fellow 4chan'ers, I must apologize, for AnOnYmOuS 2u is right in the fact that you can't fight ignorance and RedCream is apparently oblivious to the obvious and his reign of shame and narcissistic paranoia may live on a little longer.....

Hey, RedCram, Rule 34 this waflsnak!

RedCram -> Rule 35, FAIL
RedNuts -> Waflsnak
RedFuQ  -> Go rest your harbl on a mouse trap
RedCrust-> FTW, get rickrolled by a rickroll, sukl a newfag's fag, and finally perform your famous goatse trik :P* <-btw, this means U buttlikr.

ETHEREAL

Swift shimmering shadow steps silently; saddened, still softly severing serenities, slicing sympathy staggering sturdily; suffering sarcastic solace. Never noticing naïve naiads nor narrows nor necrotic nethers nestled nearby; naughty neutral nocturnal nexus nevertheless normally nostalgic notions; noteworthy nemesis neo neurotic neuralgia. Exceptional effervescing elemental ephemeral entity experiencing euphoria everlasting eternally eschew evermore, Ethereal

Hey! Is that poem about RedCrema?

If I were educated as either 4tran, RedCream, or A2U, I'd make a tripcodeless moniker as well and start posting insightful, witty, spur of the moment type replies. But I'm not. Damn.

It's called conversation.

>>125, if you want the secret to conversation that's easy. Assume the Position:
...That the other person is right and that you are wrong.
...Now, continue listening to learn what the other person is actually saying.
...When you can see the other person's point of view, and what they are actually saying via context, then await for them to ask your opinion. This is known as conversational transference. If you are able to get this down. Your pov will change, you will have interests you didn't know you could have, your life will change. But only if it is your choice and if you choose to reinforce it with action. Good luck with your endeavors, be what they may.

>>125
"If I were educated as either 4tran, RedCream, or A2U"

>educated as either 4tran, RedCream, or A2U

>educated
>A2U

lol

>>128
Your comprehension of sarcasm is far beyond that of any mere mortal.

>>127
I said educated, not intelligent. I don't have the knowledge to comment as fluently on math and the scientific method as some of you do.

Here's a few things that might interest you that have pulses:
All of these vid's have one thing in common, what are they?
"Humor"
-Mr. Wuhl's: Assume the Position 101 & 201 (history is pop culture)

"Documentaries"
-America: Freedom to Facism (IRS, Federal Income Tax, Federal Reserve, Cost of the Dollar, Global Economy, RFID chip)
-What the Bleep Do We Know? (Science of human developmental habits, emotions, thought processes, biological workings, and quantum mechanics)
-An Inconvenient Truth (Al Gore, an eye on global warming)
-WalMart: The High Cost (Documentary of the terrors of WalMart)

"Films"
-Patch Adams
-Peaceful Warrior
-Saw I-IV
-Revolver
-The Insurgents
-eXistenZ
-Fight Club
-Pay it Forward

>>119
lrn2distinguish trolls

Well, after RedCream's fiasco with the double-ended-dildo getting lost over the weekend at the beach; we finally decided that maybe a trip to a sex shop would be the way to celebrate our cumming out party. Oh, he was so into it. He loved getting his butt pulled apart until one arm could easily go in and out. We even got our pictures taken...sorry, he's all mine, girlfriends! He really loves to take my big cock up his pooper, but doesn't really like it when I fill his ass with my milky cum. He says it gives him diarrhea, but I tell him that's the best part. He gets to spray me down with his enormous amount of shit, mmm, it's so tasty too! Cum and shit aught to be patented. But Red's grown distant lately. I think he's gone over to the dark side of the sex industry getting fisted and fucked by donkey's. I feel so jealous sometimes, but oh well, it's his life. *sigh*