FAO: Red Cream

You often like to posit that the reason for your not using tripcodes, is that anyone of a reasonable firmness of mind can distinguish the "real" you because of the intelligence, wit and "wow" factor contained in every one of your posts.

I ask this: why use a name at all? The main advantage to anonymity is that every post is judged by its content, not its poster. You might argue that you are attempting to gain a reputation of excellence in posting, in which case you should really look around you and find some other faggy forum to spread your AIDS, since the only person who doesn't think you're an idiot is 4tran, who just wants some nookie.

I'm obviously so full of copypasta that I fail to be lame.

LOL I HAVEN'T SEEN GOD therefore HE DOESN'T EXIST
SYLLOGISMMMMMMMMMMMM

>>1
I ask this:  Why are you so uncomfortable with the idea of choice in using a name?

Choices in a choice-environment never need justification.  In addition, your narrow world-view on how to use 4chan is particularly sophomoric and immature.

>>3
NO ONE HAS SEEN THIS "GOD".  Since this "god" is supposed to be all-mighty and pervasive, then there MUST be some evidence.  But there's NO evidence.  NONE WHATSOEVER.  And you know what you call something that produces no fucking evidence?  "NON-EXISTENT."

RedCream if you cant see the evidence all around you then maybe you should open your eyes.

>>4
I'm not certain what you've managed to infer about my "narrow world-view", but I just gave you at least one major advantage of not using names within a forum such as this. I'm wondering what benefit you think there is in using a name.

>>5
Dipshit, my eyes ARE open since I'm using a message board.  "Visual cues" -- have you ever heard of them?  You're only dodging the requirement for EVIDENCE.  You have a list of stupid fucking things (like "existence" and "beauty") which are NOT evidence.  Your alleged "god" allegedly made burning bushes and parted waters.  You alleged "god" is an anthropomorphic intelligence that is everywhere.  Such an entity should be producing anthropomorphic evidence at furlongs per fortnight.  So ... provide those CLEAR pieces of fucking evidence or STFU about your immature delusion.

>>6
You already outlined the benefit when you said:

"a reputation of excellence in posting"

The issue here is that you do NOT accept that as a benefit.  Yet I do.  And I hardly need to get your approval for it.  I have no time to handle the deep denials of the masses for their particular biases on matters immaterial.

(And you're only proving my point, by the way, by treating me as the original RedCream.)

I'm the original RedCream and I dropped that handle ages ago in order to watch all the clones and their antics in my name.

@theist:
Please enlighten us as to what exactly our "closed" eyes are suppossedly missing.

>>1
I resent your claim.  In particular, men (eg RedCream) lack a certain orifice known as a vagina.

>>7
You claim "I have no time to handle the deep denials of the masses for their particular biases on matters immaterial", yet you constantly lambaste people about their belief in non existent entities.  I believe non existent entities are by definition, "immaterial".

>>7
I do accept it as a benefit, but I clearly pointed out that it's something you are evidently not acheiving. All I want is the reason for your using a name, there's no need to get defensive and assume that I'm trying to insult or outwit you. If "a reputation of excellence in posting" is your reasoning, contrary to the overarching opinion on this board, then I'm fine accepting that your egotism outweighs your desire for your posts to be red non-judgementally.

I enjoy these little message boards, they make me laugh. What's funny is when I read about people being angry because of other people's complex illusion-based allusions utilized by the ego center that defends the shadow of the mind from full-frontal shots (no pun intended, but still...visual imagery is highly enjoyable) I enjoy being human and I won't deny it, in fact, it's my weapon against ignorance. I not only use it against other people's absurd comments like, "What are you afraid of?" where I answer oh-so-calmly, "I'm afraid your fear-tactics are useless against me. But something good did come of this little chat, I now know your weakness. Be afraaaaaaiiiiiddd." But seriously, all forms of rage and anger are actually focused upon the individual that expresses these emotions because they are actually repressing certain human qualities they find distasteful to themselves and for someone to exhibit those distasteful human traits...well, you need only read about it in history class. I find the Inquisition, and the references to the sands of the Colosseum in Rome to be exemplary forms to better amplify my point. Oh yeah, my faith is based upon the intangible, for what better material for an idea to reside within. Remain anonymous, remain ambiguous, remain intangible and you shall be perceived only by reactions for even your actions will be a lie purched high on the tongues of profits (some pun intended, I need my humor too). When I complete my faithbuilding, all hell will break loose in an attempt to discover the creator of this small work of fiction, but to everyone's amazement, no one's there. No name, no body, no history, no lies, no truth's, only the idea will remain. This will be based upon the idea that all men and women are equal in stature set apart from others only by their own minds, and this will be the time of The Awakening. This event shall be marked by an escalation in self-awareness within the human condition. All manner of people shall respond violently to change as it is within their own minds that they are safe while evidently they are completely exposed and vulnerable. I know this from my own personal experiences and based on that information sculpted into a finer form of understanding as this understanding is the basis of all life and existence throughout the w(hole) of eternity. d'ja like that pun? Me too. I am but a humble transmitter of the happenings that occur around us. These things are here, we need only open our eyes to see, but first we must allude ourselves that we have eyes to see. Religion is the answer, but what is the question? Perhaps science? ...and don't even think ov turning this into some scientology experiment. I wouldn't tarnish the nature of this experiment with a sour name such as scientology, such a name used in conjunction with followers' actions is hypocrisy in the extreme conjoined with all the repressed human activities that comprise the darker side of our nature. You need but look at the devistation left in their wake to notice that they are uniting to overwhelm, but what are dividing to conquer? What are their chaos tactics? If anyone finds this offensive, good, it's meant to be a dangerous idea at least you would recognize it for that, some feel angry but don't do anything at all, just lounge around behind a desk like I'm doing right now. Get it?

>>10
I choose my battles.  I have no time for some retarded attempts to get me to post anonymously.  I DO have time to counter the religifaggotry of our culture.

>>11
No, you clearly confuse your opinion with what's true.  That you continue to engage me, illustrates how wrong you are.  You accept me as RedCream, hence my name works.  End of story.

Remember, truth is not just a matter of majority opinion, especially when that majority opinion is based upon the lower order of desires.  Truth is true regardless of how many people believe otherwise.  That's why evidence is so crucial.  People find it harder to continue believing in stupid things once evidence is brought into the contrary.

>>13
Truth is perception.
If you haven't learned this by now then you need to an hero.

>>14
Perceive yourself 12 feet into the air, and then I'll cede your point.

Since perception is what you kow-tow to, then my perception is that I'm right.  End of story, yet again.

Do ANY of you know how to present a point and support that point with evidence?  It's like talking with 3rd graders in here.  I pwn you and pwn you again, yet you just keep on squawkin' like you weren't completely PWNT.  The song is the same:  REDCREAM WINS AGAIN.

>>15
Are you just stupid? My argument isn't that you can't be distinguished from your clones, but that using a name is disadvantageous to you.

>>16
Your argument is specious and unproven.  The stupidity here is yours, in continuing to insist that your assertion is correct, when it's merely an offshoot of your own preferences.  What you prefer is irrelevant.  The general truth is that preferences produce desired results, hence, why would they even be called "preferences"?

REDCREAM.  WINS.  AGAIN.

You'd think that you fools would have gotten tired of my PWNG you with such regularity.

>>15
Well, MY perception is that you're WRONG!!
And being that everyone knows I am better than you in every concievable way, I WIN!!!!

you still haven't disproven god, fallacy cream.

>>18
Your perception only affects your reality.  FAIL.  My use of a name will quite simply continue.  PERIOD.  You don't even have to grasp this truth.  What matters is that the truth exists and has force regardless of how you feel about it.

>>19
This "god" you speak of should be dropping clear evidence left and right.  But you have ZERO evidence for it.  In fact, NO ONE has any evidence for this "god".  Therefore that "god" thing doesn't exist.

Don't like that conclusion, buttmilker?  Just bring EVIDENCE to the table to support your contrary assertion.  Of course, you can't do that, since you're looking for evidence for something that doesn't fucking exist.  But keep the faith, babybrain.  The world always needs a village idiot to shit on, and in this case, YOU'RE IT.

Gawd DAYUM, you Westerners are drop-dead dumb.

P.S.  REDCREAM.  WINS.  AGAIN.

>>20
WESTERNERS??  WESTERNERS???

That proves it, once and for all!

RedCream is BLACK!  

I say he is Uzbek.

>>20
i'm just sayin' your argument sucks.  you've been relying on the same logical fallacy for years now.  it still hasn't magically become a valid argument when you type it with random capitalization, and i'm still not theist, i just enjoy pointing out every time you use the same retarded and flawed argument.  i think we've had this tacit agreement ever since you came to science and math that you'd put down some bullshit, i'd tell you it was wrong, and we both pretend that you're not a troll.

Redcream would be my hero if he didn't use the the word 'pwnt'. 12 year olds use the word 'pwnt' when playing halo, no one else. It's on par to saying 'lol' in real life.

All right! I'm up for a challenge, mr or mrs RedCream. I have already perceived where your arguments are based, your ego. The funny thing is that the ego get's all its orders from the ID, the ID get's directions from the Repressed portion of the brain, and all that information is derived from, YUP you guessed it! Those darned desires you were yapping about. You shouldn't argue with ignorance in the first place, you'll only end up just as knowledgeable. The fact that I'm confronting your ego means you'll probably respond with some assinign excuse, may do some whinning, and probably end up with your tail between your legs holding your fist in the air screaming to deaf ears about how right you are. Who really gives a flying fuck about your half-baked, retarded, childish, misanthropic, decadent, misdemeanor, crack-whore loving butt-licker. I just love using childish remarks to a child, they get soooo upset. Pff. Take that ya shitty devil!

Redcream is a dipshit. He tries so hard to be edgy and it ends up looking pathetic.

RedCream is BLACK! Not just shitnigger BLACK, either. I'm talkin' BLACK like the BLACKEST of all nigrazoids.

>>24
Oh, gee, let me see now:

1. The weakness in my argument is logical quirk.
2. The weakness in your argument is that YOU HAVE NO FUCKING EVIDENCE.

Dude, what a fucking moron you are, since #2 trumped #1 all over the fucking place.  You have to produce evidence for your assertions, or you're WRONG.  When you depart from evidence to establish an assertion, you automatically FAIL.

Once again, EVIDENCE establishes what is TRUE.  Without evidence, what you say is at least subject to high levels of dismissal.  And when it comes to things which SHOULD BE highly evidentiary, then the conclusion is inescapable:  YOU'RE WRONG.

Once again, come back with fucking EVIDENCE, and you can redeem your argument.  But without it, you're just another buck-toothed religitard who confuses hopes and dreams with fucking REALITY.  These assertions of "gods" are extremely outrageous and SCREAMINGLY REQUIRE EVIDENCE.

EVIDENCE!  EVIDENCE!  EVIDENCE!  What the fuck is WRONG with you religitards, where you not only see no need for evidence, but you are completely comfortable with the wholesale absence of any evidence whatsoever?  You may as well believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, since what you believe is so foolish, immature, and outrightly and provably WRONG.

>>26
That's not even a challenge.  You have no fucking EVIDENCE.  Therefore you AUTOMATICALLY failed.

>>25
Hey, I say "lol" in real life (I've had death threats, but that's besides the point).

>>26
You really like your text walls and Freud.  Why are you assuming that Freud is right?

>>29
You have given us all the EVIDENCE we need to see that you are a BLACK NIGRAZOID.

OMG, RedCream! You are going down! It's time to do some serious bitch slapping! You ask for evidence, but how do you provide evidence to someone who won't use their eyes to see, won't use their ears to hear, won't use their skin to feel, just sits around all day coming up with more "I have to be right therefore everyone else is wrong" bullshit; just grow the fuck up and realize you don't have all the answers cause you a fucking human too you scum sucking bottom feeder! Pop your mom's tit out of your mouth and get a fucking life you sad piece of shit. Here someone is pouring out some genuine feelings and all you do is Boast about your PERFECT FLAWLESS KNOWLEDGE, who's really sounds pathetic here, hmm? Keep on asking yourself, if you even know what a question really is, "How do I find out something when I know everything?" Cha-ching...The answer is...*Hands microphone to RedCream*

*me sitting with fingers crossed* "Please dodge the question, please dodge the question, please dodge the question..." Awaiting either a dodge or non-reply...:P

OMG, that first thread, >>1! Nailed Creampuff, I mean RedCream a good one! The "wow" factor meaning, "Wow, a new low for the human race; thanks redcrust". I love name calling, it rousts the ego and forces the false-god from his hiding place and as soon as he sticks out his mighty sword, a small dagger, I simply assist him with his self-impaling rhetorical nonsense and snappy*shitty* non-sequitors. :P Come on...RedShit, come out and play...we don't want to hurt you...honestly...:)

Redcream is using CAPITALIZED words at RANDOM places. Chances ARE that he's an ASPIE.

It's amazing that you turd burglars are still luxuriating in having no evidence for your beliefs.  We're not talking about flawed evidence or perfect knowledge.  We're talking about you having ZERO evidence and NO knowledge.  You're pretending you're adjusting some racing engine and are discussing the minutae of achieving performance, when you don't even have a vehicle to work on in the first place.  FUCKING POSUERS.  You're so wrong that it's painful to even watch ... but like a terrible auto accident, one is compelled to watch despite the horror.

REDCREAM.  WINS.  AGAIN.  Such WIN is the natural result of having command of the facts and the logic to put those facts together to determine TRUTH.

HAHAHA, DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS

My WIN results from drinking Brawndo, the Thirst Mutilator.  PROVE ME WRONG

>>29

see though, there is no weakness in my argument, because my argument has and will continue to be that your argument is flawed.  i have never argued for the existence of god in a thread with you.  i've only ever pointed out that your argument is flawed.  i don't care whether or not god exists.  i just tell you that you're wrong every time.  i tell you why you're wrong every time.  i'm right every time.  and every time, you point to my post, pretend i'm some redneck bible thumper, and dismiss my post because i haven't provided evidence of god, which is 1) completely unfuckingrelated, and 2) one aspect of your chronic retardism.

huggles.