FAO: Red Cream

You often like to posit that the reason for your not using tripcodes, is that anyone of a reasonable firmness of mind can distinguish the "real" you because of the intelligence, wit and "wow" factor contained in every one of your posts.

I ask this: why use a name at all? The main advantage to anonymity is that every post is judged by its content, not its poster. You might argue that you are attempting to gain a reputation of excellence in posting, in which case you should really look around you and find some other faggy forum to spread your AIDS, since the only person who doesn't think you're an idiot is 4tran, who just wants some nookie.

>>24
Oh, gee, let me see now:

1. The weakness in my argument is logical quirk.
2. The weakness in your argument is that YOU HAVE NO FUCKING EVIDENCE.

Dude, what a fucking moron you are, since #2 trumped #1 all over the fucking place.  You have to produce evidence for your assertions, or you're WRONG.  When you depart from evidence to establish an assertion, you automatically FAIL.

Once again, EVIDENCE establishes what is TRUE.  Without evidence, what you say is at least subject to high levels of dismissal.  And when it comes to things which SHOULD BE highly evidentiary, then the conclusion is inescapable:  YOU'RE WRONG.

Once again, come back with fucking EVIDENCE, and you can redeem your argument.  But without it, you're just another buck-toothed religitard who confuses hopes and dreams with fucking REALITY.  These assertions of "gods" are extremely outrageous and SCREAMINGLY REQUIRE EVIDENCE.

EVIDENCE!  EVIDENCE!  EVIDENCE!  What the fuck is WRONG with you religitards, where you not only see no need for evidence, but you are completely comfortable with the wholesale absence of any evidence whatsoever?  You may as well believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, since what you believe is so foolish, immature, and outrightly and provably WRONG.