You often like to posit that the reason for your not using tripcodes, is that anyone of a reasonable firmness of mind can distinguish the "real" you because of the intelligence, wit and "wow" factor contained in every one of your posts.
I ask this: why use a name at all? The main advantage to anonymity is that every post is judged by its content, not its poster. You might argue that you are attempting to gain a reputation of excellence in posting, in which case you should really look around you and find some other faggy forum to spread your AIDS, since the only person who doesn't think you're an idiot is 4tran, who just wants some nookie.
>>40
Failure to provide evidence of your assertions means automatic failure of your side of the argument. You need to bring MOAR to the message board than ego and testosterone and stupid.
once again, it seems you've failed to even recognize what my argument is. i'd be thoroughly impressed if you could state my assertion. :*( :*( :*( :( :*(
Hey, I know this isn't /r/, but does anyone have the know-how to make me a script or something for opera that hides all of redcream's posts so I can browse in peace? In b4 some stupid argument over why X browser is better than Y browser.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-27 20:33
Who the FUCK is RedCream and WHY the FUCK has he been posting on the same BBS for 4 years? FUCK!
>>40
I contend that YOUR argument is flawed. And in the end it will turn out that I am right. Take a fucking logic class. No really. Tell the teacher that and come back to me. I have a 4.0 gpa in several high level logic courses, I know what I'm talking about.
would you honestly like for me to tell a logician "someone is using a fallacy (negative proof) as their argument, and so i believe their argument form is invalid." and expect them to disagree? because that's my argument, and no logician is going to disagree with it. again, it's fairly clear that you don't understand what i'm saying, despite it being entirely straightforward and simple.
>>46
I like to annoy little boys like you. But if you know how long I've been poasting to 4chan, then doesn't that imply that you've been READING 4chan for that long? Is there something wrong with poasting for years, but not with reading?
Irony much? Be careful with setting rules, lest they apply equally to you.
Of course, we could set a RedCream Rule: Whatever RedCream does is wrong as long as he does it. Others are free to do as they wish, since they aren't RedCream. That should cover it ... and is about the speed of how Western Civilization acts, now. Just replace "RedCream" with "the working class", and you have it.
God Damn, AssCream! Don't you get it yet? Why don't you prove that what is in your head is real, fuck stick! All you do is hand us ammunition to facilitate your own destruction! You are a defeatist! You want your own self-immolation! You want to DIE! It's this degree of self-disrespect that plagues a great majority of the human race, hence war. I'll prove you wrong, you are a human, NO? You have a brain, NO? You are a shitty devil, YES? If you answered these to your advantageous perception you are all that I have described. BOOM, who's the bitch now? And Booya to >>40 for a super-fuck-tastic reply! Red is nothing more than a child, with the supreme knowledge and infallibility of a child. Hence his chronic retardism. He actually believes cause he's above the age of 18 he has the ability to surpass his peers. When he remains a child all the while. RedCream has no origin, he probably hates himself so much it comes out in conversation with his parents that's probably why he still lives at home or in a shelter and posts here from the public library or his little messy bedroom. "Did you make your bed today, RedCream?" "Did you clean up your room like mommy said to yesterday, RedCream?" Please provide some evidence of your supreme knowledge, but do so with a firmer understanding that we don't really give a shit. Oh, wait, you already did, within this entire thread. My bad.
>>57
You're so addled with religifaggotry that you don't even understand that you head is chock-full of shit already. THAT's why you claim to not see any. I still took a shit in your head, although getting my meager loaf in there with all the rest is a bit of a feat.
Wow, that's pretty funny! I shit you not! I really had a laugh at that last one. You may not be as childish as you make yourself out to be. You've got the humor and the understanding of what it means to confront the ego and get ideas past it into the repressed part of the brain. Using humor definately works wonders. Hehhehe. But the real humor comes when I finally decide to dump the dirt on your head when you find yourself deep in a hole you just dug yourself. Don't think your in it right now? Good, that's the way I win. For you to remain ignorant of your current standing and for me to simply kick in the dirt and walk away. I just get a kick out of reading RedCream's posts, they get my brain thinking, It's kinda like coffee in the morning. Keep up the good work, Red!
何やってんだいよ、お前？分から無いんだいよ! 良いん、だぜ？この、バ～カ野郎、クソカギ、すこんど野郎ひたちぶり！”ギブ、ギブ、マジでギブ!” ”Give, give me what? Come on! What the fuck are you trying to say? If you're going to give me something just do it! *BANG* TIME TO LIVE FOREVER, BABY!" ーレヴィ ”ブラックラグーン”
C'mon RedCream challenge me. If not everyone here will witness you being a chickenshit all throughout 4chan.org. Please? I do realize that only chickens don't fight in battles where they see a victory of the war. "What are you afraid of, RedCream" I already know. You keep attacking me through this little forum but you've lost track of where I truly am because I'm already inside the walls of your mind. Please be distracted by my inane attempts and self-satisfaction and please, continue to be badgered into these assenign attempts at destroying any resemblance of what it means to be you. "I love doing that." Patiently awaiting your reply RedJizz, it's your move? You already know I can't beat you, right? Good, I'm not even here, right? I don't exist, right? hehehe, Lucifer=1; RedCream=-1. : ) Anyone wanna play? I'm just a wittle child, I can't be beaten, I don't know anything about reality, c'mon beat me at my own game. :P
>>60
I'm tired of constantly dealing with never ending trails of fucking shit so I will accept any challenge you pose. I have no idea what you intend to prove but if it'll shut circumcised dicks like you up...
>>64
Hey! How did you know I had a circumcised dick? Hentai, Sukebe!
So, Red"" would like to be challenged by a no-class, unemployed, still lives with his mom at 29, broke as all hell, no-account braggart? Ok : ) I'll state the rules first.
Rule 1) You must perform your own research and may not use a third-party as a source for absolute concrete evidence. If the information is publicly printed, you must first collect the information and then inquire a fellow scientist to prove it to you via a mathematical or scientific method and HOW they did so, I want to see the WORK!!!
Rule 2) YOU MUST log all data and correspondance discovered whether it contributes or disputes the initial summary of the experiment.
Rule 3) You will have only as much time as YOU yourself deem necessary, but this time must be stated within the initial summary of the experiment, and may not be less than one week or longer than our remaining expected lifespans.
Rule 4) You will report your entire findings within your own thread of your choosing within the /SCI/ board by no later than 11:59pm the final day of your experiment.
Rule 5) You must have an initial summary, the experiment and all data, references and correspondance retrieved, as well as a final conclusion whether the sum of the data and correspondance collected amounts to a FINAL EVIDENTIAL conclusion or needs further investigation and research; to that, you must then state a secondary summary of where, who, what, why, how you would like to observe and collect data and correspondance from as is the same requirement with the initial summary should lack of evidence lead to a non-conclusion or continuation.
Rule 6) Any negligence of these rules will count as a disqualifying STRIKE against your character and credibility as a scientist.
Rule 7) You may use any source to FURTHER your research, but NOT as a means of a firm conclusion.
If you are up to it, I'll do the same, I'll even let you choose the topic, but be forewarned any topic you choose has to be concluded by BOTH of us. Decline this challenge, and you shall be deemed by your own CHOICE, a chickenshit within the 4chan.org community. And via this challenge, I will be held and bound by the same rules I have instructed with equal means and opportunity. Are you prepared? Are you willing? Do you accept or decline this firm and applicable challenge, RedCream?
>>64 is a clone. I don't have to do ANYTHING to retain my superior position. The problem is with YOU. YOU are making the outrageous and frankly absurd claims about a deity. Having made those claims, the onus is upon YOU to produce EVIDENCE.
And you just don't fucking HAVE any evidence. That's the fatal point in all your malarkey. You made religious claims, and failing to support them with EVIDENCE, your position was AUTOMATICALLY invalidated.
I look into the sky, and I just don't see this Big Bearded Jewfag that you religifucks claim is there. Well, tell me where to point a telescope to see this astronomically-sized deity and then I'll start to concede your point. In fact, point out the coordinates of these "heaven" and "hell" places, too, since you religifags like to invoke them as if they were real places. Also, point out ANY evidence collected by ANY instruments that show this "soul" you religifucks like to blather on and on about.
Look, it's really simple: YOU make the absurd claims, so YOU have to produce the EVIDENCE that convinced YOU in the first place. And that evidence had better be fucking OUTSTANDING since your claims are outrageous and require very solid proof therefore.
Carl Sagan is figuratively "rolling in his grave" that people like you were allegedly produced by any school system whatsoever.
If you need some time, I'll understand. You have until 11:59pm pacific standard time on May 5th, 2008 to accept or decline. Failure to do so will brand you by the scientific community and the 4chan.org community forum as a chickenshit scientist-wanna-be. To better clarify the above, YOU and YOU ALONE must come up with a viable Topic, deadline, and initial summary for us both to equally work from. Failure to do this is a result of the aforementioned consequences. Like I said, RedCream, given time, you'll show everyone how easily it is to tarnish your own name, character, and credibility. This results will be posted all over the net from web-pages, to journalist websites, to advertisements, to newgroups, to forums, to chat room and the like. So please, do the sensible thing and give up now while you still have TIME.
Wow, just wow. You sir are a fucking moron. >>64,>>58,>>56,>>67 is the same troll as >>48. He has been goading you the whole time. Your idea is stupid because I doubt a dipshit like you would put any real effort into it.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-29 22:02
Well, that settles it then. RedCream's is SOL. RedCream=Chickenshit, can't wait to see this on the 10 o'clock news.
Name:
Anonymous2008-04-29 22:02
Well, that settles it then. RedCream's is SOL. RedCream=Chickenshit, can't wait to see this on the 10 o'clock news.
Damn! I was hoping to get some good research put in toward an end, but well, such is the way of ignorance. I'm guessing that RedCream doesn't attend any sort of church function, read any religious texts, study human history where any religion is involved, or asks people of the same. You sir have no genuine interest in the happenings of the human race, it is so as evidenced by your inability to be interested in your own life, evidenced by all your obligatory reactions towards the very childish and non-hurtful words I post as a result of the aforementioned ignorance. Boy, I wish proving and giving evidence of RedCreams own ego, ignorance, and inability to utilize human sensory perception outside of his "cave" as it were to him was the experiment, oh wait...maybe...hmmm...?
Ok, RedCream. This is your final test of intellect that can easily be proven or disproven; describe to us what the color red smells and tastes like. *passes LSD to RedCream under the table*
Stop acting like you've won when you have NO REASON to justify it. You have been reacting to clone the whole time you fool. If you actually want to do this then I'll accept your challenge. I choose the topic to be: the Effect of Race on Intelligence.
*patiently awaiting response* Did you know that you make yourself out to be a retard by answering assenign questions issued by an ass? Did you know that by ignoring a direct attack on your ego you "escape" the attack and thereby repress it to the extent that you become ignorant of it. Confront my ignorance and thalt shalt become ignorant, ignore my ignorant attempt to attack your ego directly, and take the chance that maybe I WILL BECOME YOU! HAHAHAHAHAHA IGNORANCE WINS!!!!!
I believe that this AnOnYmOuS 2U is suffering from an acute form schizophrenia and mild neurosis co-tangent to Psychotic Compulsions to render his vast and expansive "truth" as it were upon the meek, such as RedCream.
I believe that this RedCream is a scientific pillar of our fair community as well as a magnificent standard ever expressed by any human being. He will have no issue what-so-ever in completing an easy task.