Why are blacks so stupid?

This is a real question btw.

1) poverty
2) they created and live in a subculture that does not value education

>>2
those are consequences. i.e. they're poor because they're stupid. their culture sucks because they're stupid.

and why are blacks stupid? well its bcuz jesus died for european man only, not for afrikan nigra

>>3
Please learn how to spell.
Also, is Condoleeza Rice stupid? I'm pretty sure that what you get in a whole year, she earns in one week.
Oh and I'm not black. I'm just not a fag like you guys.

>>4
She does not satisfy the 1) and 2) proffered by >>2.

And whites are stupider than azns. Could we stop with all the race discussion already? It's getting boring.

>>1
Genetics. The race is just slightly less smart in average. Small variations in IQ can have dramatic impact on a large scale country. See how they had as much time as the rest to develop, and they often had much better natural conditions (favourable weather, awesome natural resources, oil, diamonds, food grows on trees faster than you can rip a fart, etc.), and they managed to fail every single country they control. If they had been smarter, they would have enslaved the whites and taken control of the world, or at least they would have prevented the whites from slaving them by kicking their asses through strategy and wise usage of their superior resources, but they didn't.

They also live in nigger cultures (note that nigger is a culture, not a race) which value crime over education, and are poor, indeed, but these features, which help their stupidity, are also a consequence of their stupidity.

Umm, for the longest times in ancient civilizations all groups of people thought of themselves as different "races" or nations, african/egyptians/(black or lightsh black) did enslave europeans if they had to. Nations enslaved other nations and there didnt seem to be the idea that one continent and hue of skin is smarter than the other, but rather as just being naturally self centered and thinking of everyone else as inferior. So.... global events go back and forth. The invention of gunpowder gave the europeans who were always fighting amongst each other (hence more military traditions and experience) to decide and try and take over everything they could since they hated their shithole cold and foggy swamplands. Did you ever learn about the medieval ages in Europe? I wouldnt say that Whitey was smarter in those times, id say the Muslims that saved the ancient knowledge and kept it going were more advanced at the time. Your idea of superiority is only relative to the itty bitty shit you know. Hope this helps a little. Keep discussing. These race discussions are so silly i think

>>8
Black :p

Egyptians weren't really black. Sorry, you can't claim their success as your race's.

Also, muslims just invaded Europe, and took what they could. They used that knowledge to become the smelly terrorists they are today (though they're today not much different from what they were back in the times, it's just that Europeans got more civilized).

Whites' intelligence reached a minimum in the middle age, when they were obsessed with religion, but fortunately, that faggotry now only exists in America and third-world countries.

Also, you think Europe is cold, foggy and swampy. It goes to show what you know about us. Yet blacks like you risk their lives to come here by boat, to steal our resources, take our jobs and live on welfare. And even if you manage to steal from us, it won't change the fact blacks are genetically a bit less smart on average.

I'm sure you'll call discussing intelligence associated with genetics "racist", yet you wouldn't say it's racist if I acknowledge blacks jump and run better than whites. Of course, it's only racist when whites win. But at the end of the day, you're still a nigger, and I'm European.

anyone who pretends their isnt pronounced statistical differences between ethnicities within the US is voluntarily being ignorant.  they exist.  that doesn't mean that they are directly related to the race though, and it's really more the case that the differences are socio-economic, and the ethnicities tend to be strongly socio-economically divided.  culture also has much to do with it.

if you've ever been in an inner city area or worked with really poor kids, you know usually they don't really have high expectations or much of an education, regardless of skin color.  though there tends to be more blacks there than any other (at least in the NE), and you can look to history for how they got there.

fetal alcohol syndrome

I think 50 Cents has it

Why were European medieval peasants so stupid?

>>7
Favorable weather?  If anything, they had crappy weather.  Tropical weather = tropical diseases.  Want some malaria/ebola?

Natural resources like oil aren't even useful without industrial technology.  That's a late development advantage.

The nigger culture you complain about is an American thing.  Real Africans are not niggers

>>8
Thanks for the historical background.

>>13
As >>9 calls it, "faggotry".

Scientific Fact: The neurons of a white brain are 56% less efficient than those of other races.
Scientific Fact: Whites committed over 98.7% of the crimes in history.
Scientific Fact: Whites have the most mentally ill people, in absolute numbers, even though they are the smallest ethnic group in the world!
Scientific Fact: Whites have the weakest genes. Dark genes are always dominant over the recessive, weak light genes.
Scientific Fact: 15% of the white genes are pig genes, 30% are ape genes and 4% are dog genes. No other race has more than 3% animal genes. Blacks have no dog genes at all. Asians have no pig OR dog genes. Arabs have the lowest amount of animal genes, at 1.2%
Scientific Fact: Eating the brains of whites makes you dumber. This is called koro.
Scientific Fact: Whites poop more than other races.
Scientific Fact: Ancient white people used to eat their own children. They thought that this would bring them luck. It is thought that this behavior comes from the high amount of pig genes in whites.
Scientific Fact: Whites are on average 700% less productive than other races.

>>15
phail

You can define "weak genes" as "recessive genes", but that's a terrible definition.  The work "weak" has a connotation of inferiority or failure.  Blue eyes may be a recessive gene, but there's no evidence that it's "weak".

How do you even define % of _'s genes are _ genes?  How much they have in common?  All humans have ~ 99% in common with chimpanzees and some 50% in common with a banana.

It's kuru, and it was spread among aboriginal Australians.  White man is not involved.

If you're going to bring in scientific facts, bring in true ones.

>>16
good job missing obvious satire

>>13
Why were European medieval peasants so stupid?
Because their rulers were so smart. They came up with a system where even smart people would be fucked up and have no chance of being something to change it. They called this "religion". Religion has fucked with Europe and we used to be faggots about it, but now that time is over. In fact, now only third world shitty muslim terrorirst countries, as well as Amerifags and third-world countries are religious monkeys.

>>14
Favorable weather?  If anything, they had crappy weather.  Tropical weather = tropical diseases.  Want some malaria/ebola?
How come China, Japan's Okinawa, and other countries with tropical weather are doing so much better?

Natural resources like oil aren't even useful without industrial technology.  That's a late development advantage.
What about countries such as Guinea where food grows everywhere without any maintainance at all? People don't starve there because food is free, but they're still a shithole of a country. How do they manage to? If Europe had free food they'd have taken advantage of it and we'd be even richer.

The nigger culture you complain about is an American thing.  Real Africans are not niggers
Agreed, but then Africans have a tendency to start wars over completely retarded things such as hey that fag over there is tutsi and I couldn't fucking tell the difference because they're just two blacks but no, they have to kill each other.

>>15
Scientific Fact: Whites have the weakest genes. Dark genes are always dominant over the recessive, weak light genes.

having 6 fingers and huntington's diseases are dominant traits. does that make them good?

Scientific Fact: Whites poop more than other races.
thats because we HAVE food.

Scientific Fact: Whites have the most mentally ill people, in absolute numbers, even though they are the smallest ethnic group in the world!

Thats because we have doctors who can identify the mentally ill. Unlike you.

Scientific Fact: Whites committed over 98.7% of the crimes in history.
Because we have recorded history

>>18
>Because their rulers were so smart. They came up with a system where even smart people would be fucked up and have no chance of being something to change it. They called this "religion". Religion has fucked with Europe and we used to be faggots about it, but now that time is over. In fact, now only third world shitty muslim terrorirst countries, as well as Amerifags and third-world countries are religious monkeys.

Mostly correct. Now what these morons can't seem to understand is that the same thing goes for the sandcountries.
Their reasoning is:
Why were religious Europeans fucked up? Because they were religious.
Why are religious Arabs fucked up? Because they are Arabs.

>>16,19
Get over yourself. If this was about any race but your own you'd be loling hard. Learn to laugh at yourself.

niggers will be niggers

>>19
I loled so hard.

Not to mention those aren't 'scientific facts'. If whites committed 98.7% of all crimes, its probably because we have laws. Complaining about Darfur? Slavery is legal there!

>>20
Why were religious Europeans fucked up? Because they were religious.
Why are religious Arabs fucked up? Because they are Arabs.
No, I don't hate arabs. I very much like the atheist, rational ones who got the fuck out when they could and are hiding somewhere, just being normal people. What I hate is muslims (islamic believers), i.e. the murderous terrorists.

You guys are all fucking retarded, both you white and black supremest fags. The truth is, we're all equally fucked up on average. You can keep telling yourself that you're 'race' is superior to make yourself feel better if you want to, but what the fuck have YOU done? 

race is absurd, there is no such thing

>>25
agreed, skin color is a really bad indicator of genetic similarity ; it just happens to be the most visible.

>>18
Yes... December snow in Shang Hai/Bei Jing, China = tropical weather... gj

The Guinea case takes the cake lol.  They got pwnt.

>>19
ROTFLMAO

>>20
whoa, whoa... a) I'm not black b) I'm not angry in any way.  I'm just trying to raise the standard of evidence used.

>>24, 26
Truth

>>27
Yes... December snow in Shang Hai/Bei Jing, China = tropical weather... gj
Hello? China is big fucking huge. The south of it is tropical. Same goes for Japan, which is tiny but quite vertically laid out, and goes from lots of snow in Hokkaido to tropical weather in Okinawa.

>>25
Race does not conform to a strict definition nor there's a well defined line separating them, but that doesn't prevent it from existing, just like clouds.

However, I agree that race is just one indicator. I could run statistics and maybe I find out that blonde girls are indeed stupider, or anything like that. But what we know for sure with the data we have right now is that countries ruled by blacks are always doing like shit, blacks got lower averages in IQ tests, and they aren't well known for having brilliant minds.

Just like it's acceptable to say blacks tend to excel over other races at something such as running, it's acceptable to say whites and Asians tend to excel over other races at something such as intelligence. If you think you can speak good of blacks vs. the rest, but you cannot say anything good of whites vs. the rest, you're a politically correct faggot and regardless of your race (probably white) you need to die so the human species improves.

>>28
The reason so many African countries fail is because of the white countries dominating them economically and militarily. They have done for years and they're not likely to stop any time soon.

There is no reason to believe black people have lower intelligence on average, besides, the variance between individuals is bound to be far greater than the variance between races, so arguing that blacks are stupider on average is meaningless.

>>23
Good.

>>24
True. Most racist are basement dwellers anyway.

>>27
It's about whites actually. But when you see something as ridiculous as that you're not supposed to reply seriously, it's not like the person who posts it believes it himself.

>>28
Sorry, but if a category has no definition then it's useless.

>But what we know for sure with the data we have right now is that countries ruled by blacks are always doing like shit

You need to take history in perspective. If Obama gets elected and America becomes a third world country then you might have something.

>blacks got lower averages in IQ tests
IQ is BS anyway.

>they aren't well known for having brilliant minds.
I'll read that as: I happen to not known of any smart blacks.

>If you think you can speak good of blacks vs. the rest, but you cannot say anything good of whites vs. the rest
It's not about the race, it's about what you're comparing. If you can give me data that indicates whites are better at a physical activity than black then I see no problem.

Intelligence, however, is
-Measured in IQ test. Nevermind that intelligence is a broad subject that can't be expressed in a single number, the test are just retarded. I'm not just talking about the internet tests either.
-Too much influenced by culture. More than any physical activity.

>you're a politically correct faggot and regardless of your race (probably white) you need to die so the human species improves.
PC fags are pretty harmless (except maybe to your sanity). Bigots are a bigger problem.

>>29
The reason so many African countries fail is because of the white countries dominating them economically and militarily.
You can't use that excuse forever, especially when white countries are wasting so much money aiding them. Besides, why aren't they doing the same to us? They had even more time. They could take advantage of us in the middle ages, or even before. Yet they didn't.

>>30
Sorry, but if a category has no definition then it's useless.
It does. If it has black skin, thick hair, fat lips and fat nose, it's black. In case of doubt, look at parents.

You need to take history in perspective.
And I do. Time ran, and whites did some things blacks did not. We are living the consequences.

IQ is BS anyway.
You can argue that it's not representative of one's true intelligence, but it's a series of practical exercises which blacks tend to do slightly worse.

I'll read that as: I happen to not known of any smart blacks.
No, I do know at least two blacks who are pretty smart, just like my smarter white friends. But there's no blacks among Einstein, Sussman, McCarthy, Hawking, Ramon y Cajal, Edison, Steele, Euler, Da Vinci, Gauss, Darwin, Bohr, Schrodinger, ... ... ...

If you can give me data that indicates whites are better at a physical activity than black then I see no problem.
Why not at a mental activity? One you can easily measure with an exam, such as numerical skills? From kids educated in the same schools? Those are invalid, too? What new and amazing excuse will you come up with not to compare what you fear comparing because you already know the result and feel bad about it?

PC fags are pretty harmless (except maybe to your sanity). Bigots are a bigger problem.
Some bigots I'd kill as well. I'd be an equal opportunity dictator.

>>31
>It does. If it has black skin, thick hair, fat lips and fat nose, it's black. In case of doubt, look at parents.
This isn't even an answer. Go back and read what I typed.

>And I do. Time ran, and whites did some things blacks did not. We are living the consequences.
Bad countries get worse, not better. You honestly think that if you were given authority over a hellhole then after some time it would be BETTER?

>You can argue that it's not representative of one's true intelligence
And I do.

>But there's no blacks among Einstein, Sussman, McCarthy, Hawking, Ramon y Cajal, Edison, Steele, Euler, Da Vinci, Gauss, Darwin, Bohr, Schrodinger, ... ... ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_inventors_and_scientists
Take your pick. As an aside, since when does wikipedia use the bullshit term african-american.

>Why not at a mental activity?
-Measured in IQ test. Nevermind that intelligence is a broad subject that can't be expressed in a single number, the test are just retarded. I'm not just talking about the internet tests either.
-Too much influenced by culture. More than any physical activity.
>One you can easily measure with an exam, such as numerical skills? From kids educated in the same schools?
Link please.

>Some bigots I'd kill as well. I'd be an equal opportunity dictator.
Hell, there is no reason to kill docile bigots either. Let them be retarded, what do I care? You only need to worry when they become violent.

How do I quote here by the way?

>>31
Also, have a look at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotype_threat.

>>28
Yes, both countries possess a diverse range of climates.  However, do note that it is the northern regions that are more powerful/advanced historically.

>>29
The standard deviation within a given race being larger than the difference in the average of 2 races does not render the issue completely meaningless, but it does lower the meaningfulness of racism.  Given a randomly chosen black man and a randomly chosen white man and instructed to bet on which one has the higher intellect, you're still statistically better off betting on one of them.  You're not guranteed a win, but you will have a statistical advantage over someone who bets on the other one.

>>30
I like feeding the trolls.  It makes the board moar interesting.

If the current definition of race is ill defined, then we need a better definition of race, such as what >>31 defined, but that is also incomplete.

IQ tests, like all standardized tests obviously have their biases, but we lack something better.  There are SATs and GREs, but one could always argue that the rich man bought his kid a private tutor and the poor child had malnutrition.

>>31
Who is "us"?  White people?  White people did oppress white people in the middle ages!  See the "european peasants" referred to earlier.  If "they" = blacks, then tropical diseases is the reason they didn't oppress white people; they can barely keep themselves alive.

Yay for equal oppurtunity lol

>>32
SAT math?

I just ate a bucket of cookie dough. I love being a fat american and not a starving swollen bellied nigger.

GOD BLESS AMERICA

Today's culture idolizes black people for being stupid criminals and most of them like to live up to that.

"The liberals have encouraged the development of "Black studies" programs in the schools and then have smiled patronizingly when Blacks have gone off on wild and nutty "Black history" tangents: for example, their claim that the ancient Egyptians and Carthaginians were Blacks. They even claim that the Greek queen of Egypt, Cleopatra, was Black.

In fact, the latest craze among "Black history" enthusiasts is a curriculum called the "African-American Baseline Essays."

Courses based on this curriculum teach students in our public schools that not only were the ancient Egyptians Negroes, but that they were great scientists and inventors, who developed quantum mechanics and the theory of evolution and built airplanes, which they used to fly around the pyramids for business and pleasure . . . until, of course, the evil Europeans appeared on the scene and enslaved them and stole their inventions.

They're actually teaching such things to children in the public schools in Milwaukee and a number of other cities, and it's beginning to make the liberals a little uncomfortable. To the liberals, Blacks are above reproach. So how to tell them that they're on a self-destructive course with Ebonics and their Black Egyptian aeronauts?"

http://natvan.com/free-speech/fs973b.html

>>37
Hey, you teach Creationism too, right? It's not like anyone takes your schools serious anymore.

>>38
No, he didn't.

He is dead, but when he was alive he was a physicist.

I'm surprised that a physicist would be so paranoid/angry.