>>31
>It does. If it has black skin, thick hair, fat lips and fat nose, it's black. In case of doubt, look at parents.
This isn't even an answer. Go back and read what I typed.
>And I do. Time ran, and whites did some things blacks did not. We are living the consequences.
Bad countries get worse, not better. You honestly think that if you were given authority over a hellhole then after some time it would be BETTER?
>You can argue that it's not representative of one's true intelligence
And I do.
>But there's no blacks among Einstein, Sussman, McCarthy, Hawking, Ramon y Cajal, Edison, Steele, Euler, Da Vinci, Gauss, Darwin, Bohr, Schrodinger, ... ... ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_inventors_and_scientists
Take your pick. As an aside, since when does wikipedia use the bullshit term african-american.
>Why not at a mental activity?
-Measured in IQ test. Nevermind that intelligence is a broad subject that can't be expressed in a single number, the test are just retarded. I'm not just talking about the internet tests either.
-Too much influenced by culture. More than any physical activity.
>One you can easily measure with an exam, such as numerical skills? From kids educated in the same schools?
Link please.
>Some bigots I'd kill as well. I'd be an equal opportunity dictator.
Hell, there is no reason to kill docile bigots either. Let them be retarded, what do I care? You only need to worry when they become violent.
How do I quote here by the way?