>>23
Good.
>>24
True. Most racist are basement dwellers anyway.
>>27
It's about whites actually. But when you see something as ridiculous as that you're not supposed to reply seriously, it's not like the person who posts it believes it himself.
>>28
Sorry, but if a category has no definition then it's useless.
>But what we know for sure with the data we have right now is that countries ruled by blacks are always doing like shit
You need to take history in perspective. If Obama gets elected and America becomes a third world country then you might have something.
>blacks got lower averages in IQ tests
IQ is BS anyway.
>they aren't well known for having brilliant minds.
I'll read that as: I happen to not known of any smart blacks.
>If you think you can speak good of blacks vs. the rest, but you cannot say anything good of whites vs. the rest
It's not about the race, it's about what you're comparing. If you can give me data that indicates whites are better at a physical activity than black then I see no problem.
Intelligence, however, is
-Measured in IQ test. Nevermind that intelligence is a broad subject that can't be expressed in a single number, the test are just retarded. I'm not just talking about the internet tests either.
-Too much influenced by culture. More than any physical activity.
>you're a politically correct faggot and regardless of your race (probably white) you need to die so the human species improves.
PC fags are pretty harmless (except maybe to your sanity). Bigots are a bigger problem.