'cause free web host always place PHP as the only scripting engine, and they are sold lies by their peers. What you can do to help eliminate this, is to make a rebuttal of PHP, and provide free hosting, with a link to the rebuttal.
Recall, this is the same snake oil ENTERPRISES are sold with. Which is why we still have useless things as .NET, Transact-SQL, SAP ERP, Oracle RDBMS, cPanel, iOS SDK, Microsoft Windows, Mac OS, etc.
I will continue to use PHP because a good framework eliminates security holes. The rest of the bad things are just subjective nitpicking (isset() has no underscore while is_null() does, holy motherfuck)
Pointing out the fact that it's an inconsistent language with bad bugs is subjective nitpicking? I thought that was the objective definition of a bad language. My bad...
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 7:55
>>16
Pointing out inconsistency is subjective nitpicking, yes.
Name:
172013-08-17 7:55
>>16
But what are the bad bugs you are referring to?
Python, PHP, Perl, JavaScript, and Ruby are all shit imo. I don't like working with any of them. It would be nice to see an expressive language that could be translated to clean, idiomatic, modern PHP code as PHP is provided by most hosts.
And you do not need me to repeat what you already know. Pointing out inconsistency is subjective nitpicking
LOL, so "3 + 4 == 3 - 4" is subjective nitpicking because it inconsistent? Contradictory much, hipster?
>>36
it returns false as expected, is there something wrong with that?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 18:56
>>27 clean, idiomatic, modern PHP code
Next you'll be asking for a compiler that translates good languages to ``clean, idiomatic, modern x86 code'' when the real problem is using KIKE SHIT like PHP and x86 in the first place.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 18:57
>>36
No, I'm still waiting for you to demonstrate a bug. All you've done is give me links. I'm not clicking on them.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 18:59
>>39 I'm not clicking on them.
Good choice. JIDF agents are on here phishing for IP addresses of the goyim.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 19:01
>>40
And they are pretending to hate their pet language to make it more believable!
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 19:03
>>40
I'll tell you a secret, because I trust you.
I know ALL the IP addresses in the world. Seriously.
Am I fucking 1337 or what?
>>37
That is if I am evaluating if (7 == -1). What I meant is: 3 + 4 3 - 4
+ == - ?
Pointing that inconsistency in expression, if inherent in the language, is zher definition of subjective nitpicking (false sense reality or facts that should just be accepted because zhe can't find justification for). And everyone here is demonstrating the obvious, PHP is purposely built to be inherently faulty, which is not the definition badly designed language, but malware or computer contaminant, specifically a Trojan horse.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 19:16
PHP is purposely built to be inherently faulty,
why
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 19:19
>>43
I don't know if I'm trolling or if you're trolling anymore.
>>39
You use a mouse/joystick/touchscreen to select details on a page?
>>40
Yeah, 'cause proxy servers don't actually exist, and no one archives pages online on some server in case the server fails and people do not actually want visit the pages. Worse yet, your IP is not shared, and it has all your identifying information on the location you are on. So you are so totally screwed.
>>41
Um, since when are languages designers bipolar?
>>52
hai, the web server usually calls me, the php engine, to run the poorly written script without cross checking. I usually have to guess what he wants, or crash trying.