'cause free web host always place PHP as the only scripting engine, and they are sold lies by their peers. What you can do to help eliminate this, is to make a rebuttal of PHP, and provide free hosting, with a link to the rebuttal.
Recall, this is the same snake oil ENTERPRISES are sold with. Which is why we still have useless things as .NET, Transact-SQL, SAP ERP, Oracle RDBMS, cPanel, iOS SDK, Microsoft Windows, Mac OS, etc.
I will continue to use PHP because a good framework eliminates security holes. The rest of the bad things are just subjective nitpicking (isset() has no underscore while is_null() does, holy motherfuck)
Pointing out the fact that it's an inconsistent language with bad bugs is subjective nitpicking? I thought that was the objective definition of a bad language. My bad...
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 7:55
>>16
Pointing out inconsistency is subjective nitpicking, yes.
Name:
172013-08-17 7:55
>>16
But what are the bad bugs you are referring to?
Python, PHP, Perl, JavaScript, and Ruby are all shit imo. I don't like working with any of them. It would be nice to see an expressive language that could be translated to clean, idiomatic, modern PHP code as PHP is provided by most hosts.
And you do not need me to repeat what you already know. Pointing out inconsistency is subjective nitpicking
LOL, so "3 + 4 == 3 - 4" is subjective nitpicking because it inconsistent? Contradictory much, hipster?
>>36
it returns false as expected, is there something wrong with that?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 18:56
>>27 clean, idiomatic, modern PHP code
Next you'll be asking for a compiler that translates good languages to ``clean, idiomatic, modern x86 code'' when the real problem is using KIKE SHIT like PHP and x86 in the first place.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 18:57
>>36
No, I'm still waiting for you to demonstrate a bug. All you've done is give me links. I'm not clicking on them.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-17 18:59
>>39 I'm not clicking on them.
Good choice. JIDF agents are on here phishing for IP addresses of the goyim.