10 BTC will be awarded to the contestant who writes the best facial recognition software that detects Jews, preferably ``in Lisp'' but not as a requisite. Must have >70% success rate. Code shall be submitted with a receiving address.
Contest ends Apr 30, 2013, at which point submissions will be evaluated by the benefactor(s) of said 10 BTC.
>>5
I made the challenge about a program that writes new code, but otherwise I have not talked about bitcoins, nor is this my challenge. I also have no idea what the exchange rate is.
hard challenges
Well it has to be, otherwise I might actually have to pay someone or risk painting the reputation Anonymous as a flake. Too bad for >>1, he chose something that isn't either provably non-computable or so incredibly hard that decades of research has gotten nowhere. The hardest part of this challenge might be getting the statistical data of what a jew face looks like. Otherwise, while not trivial, it is a matter of apply (mostly) existing research into facial recognition. Or you could ignore all that ivory tower shit and just create a huge neural network and hire a thousand Indians to train it for you, but that might be a little slow.
I don't think anyone is going to take the effort to create such a project until the prize rises to about 1,000BTC though.
in case of being rejected from gsoc, i may consider your offer
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-26 7:18
>>7 I made the challenge about a program that writes new code, but otherwise I have not talked about bitcoins
That one mentioned bitcoins. Are you going senile or did you just forget?
>>10
I'm unemployed. So 300USD would be worth killing for.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-26 8:07
>>1 facial recognition software that detects Jews
1. You need a good photo-into-3d converter
2. A database of Jewish feature (like skull curvature and hair texture)
3. Some things, like skin light response (Jews have darker skin) would require good photosensors.
Yeah., is laughable. America has mostly mixed race. Just look at the people in Brazil or Argentina or Chile. And Peru has more 'inca' blood in their people.
By 2015, facial recognition in the USA will not be necessary. We will only laser scan you, and identify you. You will not be able to escape, since you will be successfully tracked. Test trials have already begun on New York. New Hampshire is next, then D.C..
I have posted this technology months ago. You can search our archive for them.
ribution are
explicable on the theory of migration, together with subsequent
modification and the multiplication of new forms. We can thus understand
the high importance of barriers, whether of land or water, in not only
separating but in apparently forming the several zoological and botanical
provinces. We can thus understand the concentration of related species
within the same areas; and how it is that under different latitudes, for
instance, in South America, the inhabitants of the plains and m
>>32
Yet I search for `nigger' and the first result is from 2012. This makes no sense and is clearly wrong. Like all things the incompetent Xarn makes, it is unreliable. I would be very surprised if it ever worked right in the first place.
Name:
Anonymous2013-02-27 16:32
>>33
It also pisses me off how it doesn't allow you to sort by date.
As far as >>34 is concerned, the main reason I didn't add sorting is because Whoosh gets pretty slow when you try to massage things. At one point it did have sorting, and query spelling corrections, and an index over thread titles, and the average query took ten seconds.
World4search is supposed to be a soft (as in not-very-useful except casually) search engine anyway; if you want more control, scrape /prog/ with any of the half-dozen scrapers available and maintain your own database.
If you think you can improve things, the code is available. Submit patches, or fork it, or write your own. People have been asking for a /prog/ search engine for years, though, and nobody ever bothered to write one; to me, that suggests that you, >>33, aren't capable of it.
>>38 soft (as in not-very-useful except casually)
Well then it was an overwhelming success!
you, >>33, aren't capable of it.
Oh wow. You don't need to be a chef to tell that the soup is cold, idiot. Besides that, my shitty wget+grep script is far better than your piece of shit `search engine'.
>>46
I'm new to this thread. Also it's not grammar, it's semantics. Misusing it demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the language you are trying to use and makes you look like an idiot.
>>48
Please, tell me where the hyperbole is, and how >>46 is clearly not aimed at >>45. Or is >>44 supposed to be hyperbole? I don't see how “literally 14 years old” is supposed to not be taken, uh, literally.
This thread made me realize / / is not shit. It's just the post rates.
The shitposters/spammers usually have a fixed combined post rate of ~15 posts/day, but the regular posters have a wildly low post rate. The regular posters aren't even special people or experienced EXPERT PROGRAMMERS but they manage to make / / amusing in (sometimes) unusual ways.
To summarize it all, we need you to [b][o]POST[o]MORE[/b].
>>69
Easy. Here's the deduction trace of >>42: You don't need to be a chef to tell that the soup is cold I am not a chef but I can still tell that the soup is cold I am not a programmer but I can still tell that the soup is cold
>>70
Well he misunderstood. I meant that just because I have never written a search engine proper with proper rankings for w4c does not mean that I can't recognize a shitty one as shitty.