Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

[challenge] facial recognition software

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-25 21:11

10 BTC will be awarded to the contestant who writes the best facial recognition software that detects Jews, preferably ``in Lisp'' but not as a requisite. Must have >70% success rate. Code shall be submitted with a receiving address.

Contest ends Apr 30, 2013, at which point submissions will be evaluated by the benefactor(s) of said 10 BTC.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-25 21:18

IHNBT.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-25 21:22

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-25 21:23

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>

int main()
{
    srand(time(NULL));
    int jew = rand()%10;
    if (jew < 7)
        printf("jew\n");
    else
        printf("goy\n");
}

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-25 22:31

The BTC guy sure loves hard challenges.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-25 22:32

>>5
10BTC are 300USD. This is no small deal.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-25 22:48

>>5
I made the challenge about a program that writes new code, but otherwise I have not talked about bitcoins, nor is this my challenge. I also have no idea what the exchange rate is.

hard challenges
Well it has to be, otherwise I might actually have to pay someone or risk painting the reputation Anonymous as a flake. Too bad for >>1, he chose something that isn't either provably non-computable or so incredibly hard that decades of research has gotten nowhere. The hardest part of this challenge might be getting the statistical data of what a jew face looks like. Otherwise, while not trivial, it is a matter of apply (mostly) existing research into facial recognition. Or you could ignore all that ivory tower shit and just create a huge neural network and hire a thousand Indians to train it for you, but that might be a little slow.

I don't think anyone is going to take the effort to create such a project until the prize rises to about 1,000BTC though.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-26 4:52

in case of being rejected from gsoc, i may consider your offer

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-26 7:18

>>7
I made the challenge about a program that writes new code, but otherwise I have not talked about bitcoins
That one mentioned bitcoins. Are you going senile or did you just forget?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-26 7:27

>>6
300USD is a lot to you?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-26 7:39

>>10
I'm unemployed. So 300USD would be worth killing for.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-26 8:07

>>1
facial recognition software that detects Jews
1. You need a good photo-into-3d converter
2. A database of Jewish feature (like skull curvature and hair texture)
3. Some things, like skin light response (Jews have darker skin) would require good photosensors.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-26 14:04

>>11
I'll give you 500$ to kill yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-26 15:38

>>11

Don't wait for >>13


perl -e "print ('$' x 500)"


There you have

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-26 18:41

3. Some things, like skin light response (Jews have darker skin) would require good photosensors.
Most Jews I know look as white as an American.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-26 20:38

>>15
so not at all?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-26 20:46

>>16
You saying murricans are not white, nigger hymie?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-26 20:56

yes

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 8:16

>>15

LOL...

America is white?

LOL

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 8:21

Yeah., is laughable. America has mostly mixed race. Just look at the people in Brazil or Argentina or Chile. And Peru has more 'inca' blood in their people.

As for the USA, i don't give a shit.

Name: ESF 2013-02-27 8:24

By 2015, facial recognition in the USA will not be necessary. We will only laser scan you, and identify you. You will not be able to escape, since you will be successfully tracked. Test trials have already begun on New York. New Hampshire is next, then D.C..

I have posted this technology months ago. You can search our archive for them.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 13:04

LASERS ARE MAGIC

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 13:54

>>20
Fuck off Canadian shithead.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 14:41

>>21
Where is this searchable /prog/ archive?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 14:56

>>24
Its called Google

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 15:21

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 15:35

God says...
C:\TEXT\DARWIN.TXT

ribution are
explicable on the theory of migration, together with subsequent
modification and the multiplication of new forms.  We can thus understand
the high importance of barriers, whether of land or water, in not only
separating but in apparently forming the several zoological and botanical
provinces.  We can thus understand the concentration of related species
within the same areas; and how it is that under different latitudes, for
instance, in South America, the inhabitants of the plains and m

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 15:38

>>26
Isn't that Xarn's project? How can you possibly trust it?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 15:47

>>28
Why wouldn't you trust it?

>>27
Why aren't you laughing and outshiposting Mentishit, tdavis-kun?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 15:47

>>28
Back to /b/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 15:55

>>29
I did not like him. I do not trust him.

>>30
Fuck off, idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 15:58

>>31
It's a search engine. You're a moron.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 16:09

>>32
Yet I search for `nigger' and the first result is from 2012. This makes no sense and is clearly wrong. Like all things the incompetent Xarn makes, it is unreliable. I would be very surprised if it ever worked right in the first place.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 16:32

>>33
It also pisses me off how it doesn't allow you to sort by date.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 17:01

>>33
Search engines sort by algorithmic relevancy rather than by smelling what you wanted to see, news at 11.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 17:03

>>35
Hi there, Xarn.

I love you.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 17:06

Talk about shitskinned people. Xarn was a champion. Disgusting socialist.

Name: !Rmk.XarnE2 2013-02-27 18:08

>>36
Hello.

As far as >>34 is concerned, the main reason I didn't add sorting is because Whoosh gets pretty slow when you try to massage things. At one point it did have sorting, and query spelling corrections, and an index over thread titles, and the average query took ten seconds.
World4search is supposed to be a soft (as in not-very-useful except casually) search engine anyway; if you want more control, scrape /prog/ with any of the half-dozen scrapers available and maintain your own database.

If you think you can improve things, the code is available. Submit patches, or fork it, or write your own. People have been asking for a /prog/ search engine for years, though, and nobody ever bothered to write one; to me, that suggests that you, >>33, aren't capable of it.

Name: >>34 2013-02-27 18:48

>>38
Oh. Okay. Thank you for everything.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 18:54

Xarn is only building a database of your IPs, idiots.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List