Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

[challenge] facial recognition software

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-25 21:11

10 BTC will be awarded to the contestant who writes the best facial recognition software that detects Jews, preferably ``in Lisp'' but not as a requisite. Must have >70% success rate. Code shall be submitted with a receiving address.

Contest ends Apr 30, 2013, at which point submissions will be evaluated by the benefactor(s) of said 10 BTC.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 19:07

>>40
Yeah, I bet he's a Jew who puts fluoride on our water and Ethernet cables. He also did 9/11 and HAARP.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 19:32

>>38
soft (as in not-very-useful except casually)
Well then it was an overwhelming success!

you, >>33, aren't capable of it.
Oh wow. You don't need to be a chef to tell that the soup is cold, idiot. Besides that, my shitty wget+grep script is far better than your piece of shit `search engine'.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 19:34

>>37
le stormfront meam xD

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 19:35

>>42
Literally fourteen years old.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 19:38

>>44
Are you trying to use `literally' as an intensifier?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 19:40

when all else fails, insult grammer

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 19:42

>>46
I'm new to this thread. Also it's not grammar, it's semantics. Misusing it demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the language you are trying to use and makes you look like an idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 19:48

>>47
The person who has never heard of hyperbole is criticising other people's use of language.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 19:50

>>42
Edgy, bro. Why are you on a programming board if you don't know how to program? Got lost on your way to the imageboards?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 19:52

>>42
someone's pride is a bit hurt?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 19:57

>>48
Please, tell me where the hyperbole is, and how >>46 is clearly not aimed at >>45. Or is >>44 supposed to be hyperbole? I don't see how “literally 14 years old” is supposed to not be taken, uh, literally.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:01

>>51
This is why you shouldn't be trying to lecture people about language.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:12

>>52
You truly are an enigma wrapped within a sphincter.
Please, assert your superiority further by muttering more vague, hand-wavy sentences.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:16

>>53
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole

Congratulations, you've successfully derailed what was looking like it could be an interesting topic.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:18

>>54
Not any of the retards arguing here, but did you really think this thread was going any place?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:20

>>54
I understand what hyperbole is, thank you friend. I just can't figure out what you thought was hyperbole in this thread.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:22

>>54
an interesting topic
software that detects Jews
/prog/'s finest

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:28

>>57
Not that. >>38.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:31

>>57
>le
>le imagereddits
xD

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:33

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:35

This thread made me realize /    / is not shit. It's just the post rates.

The shitposters/spammers usually have a fixed combined post rate of ~15 posts/day, but the regular posters have a wildly low post rate. The regular posters aren't even special people or experienced EXPERT PROGRAMMERS but they manage to make /    / amusing in (sometimes) unusual ways.

To summarize it all, we need you to [b][o]POST[o] MORE[/b].

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:39

>>21
Nah, you'll all be killed long before then.

>>45
Literally is literally an intensifier you dumb kike, go back to parasitespeak aka jubru.

>>47
Except you're the one with a fundamental non-understanding of the language, and you're the only one looking literally like a fucking idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:42

>>61
                                '
>still thinking that actual contributors don't shitpost
>2013


ISHYGDDT

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 20:48

>>63
Was that ironic shitposting? I couldn't really tell.

Name: sage 2013-02-27 21:11

>>64
It was in shitpost form, but the message was in earnest.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 22:13

>>65
You should have added some extra LEEEEELs then.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-27 23:49

/    / has no shit.
How do you post?
Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-28 0:31

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-28 14:46

>>44,49
You are both idiots. Especially >>49. How did you get that I can't program?

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-28 17:23

>>69
Easy. Here's the deduction trace of >>42:
You don't need to be a chef to tell that the soup is cold
I am not a chef but I can still tell that the soup is cold
I am not a programmer but I can still tell that the soup is cold

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-28 17:36

>>70
Well he misunderstood. I meant that just because I have never written a search engine proper with proper rankings for w4c does not mean that I can't recognize a shitty one as shitty.

Name: Anonymous 2013-02-28 18:42

Ahmed/Nikita's relentless shitspamming has changed /prog/. This is now /antisemitism/.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List