Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Golang

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 1:38

People have been recommending Go to me a lot lately. How good is it? How does it compare with D? Is it really the C++ killer and the solution to all our problems, or is it all a bunch of hype?

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 1:41

Jews are trying to trick you there. They just want you to waste your time on learning useless joke technologies while they keep the right tools for themselves. That's how they eliminate you as a potential concurrent.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 1:44

Jews! LOL!!

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 2:16

>>1
Other than it being BSD licensed, its kinda shit.
Think of it as what was apparently meant to be a Erlang killer with the whole CSP thing to compete with Erlang's actors, but is actually a compiled python-with-braces that expects things to be written in a particular C-like fashion, plus an apparently flawed GC that runs out of memory eventually in the 32-bit version. It throws errors for a lot of pointless things where warnings would be more appropriate (importing a package you aren't using yet is an error, writing a variable and not reading it yet elsewhere is an error). I'm not sure if even Ada is this bad.

D doesn't throw away half of the C syntax for the hell of it and seems more multi-paradigm, in effect D is a cleaned up C++. D was also around for a lot longer and was originally derived from a commercial C++ compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 3:30

Or you will be sent to GOOLANG to rot

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 3:57

Just use Symta. It's the Abelson killer.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 4:55

C++ killer
That would be Objective-C.

http://www.tiobe.com/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 5:29

Go is too much opinionated and bondage for me.
D is way more liberal.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 12:39

>>8
Faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 14:20

>>9
Conservative in self-denial

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 15:07

>>4

I've looked at D as well and it seems like the more mature and useful of the two. All the complaints I've heard about D are from clinically insane Go users who say stuff like "it has too many features" or "it's too general purpose." (wat) The DMD compiler has worked really well for me, a lot better than gcc has, while the Go stuff is just a big buggy mess, and takes up far more space on my hard drive than D.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 15:16

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 15:17

my problem with go is that they aren't fixing the little bugs. 3 years and only 3 releases. Not 3 new versions either, but 3 mere subversions. Pisses me off

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 15:26

>>12

I blame the jews

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-17 15:34

>>6
>abelson killer

I LOVE IT

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 23:46

restoring...

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List