Return
Styles:
Pseud0ch
,
Terminal
,
Valhalla
,
NES
,
Geocities
,
Blue Moon
.
Pages:
1-
D > Go > C++
1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-11 14:03
Discuss.
C > *
< LISP
2
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-11 14:19
Java < *
> C++
3
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-11 14:19
Is this supposed to be parsed right-associative or left-associative?
4
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-11 14:40
>>1
1: error: 'C': inavid identifier
1: error: syntax error: '<'
1: error: you're a `faggot'
5
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-11 14:41
center-associative
6
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-11 15:27
>>1
Are you implying that Go is good at anything. Pig disgusting google products
7
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-11 15:29
>>6
I'm implying that everything is better than C++. Go is pure crap, but D is a really nice language.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-11 15:42
Pretty much, though I don't think Go is targeting quite the same use cases. Actually, exactly what is Go supposed to be good for? It has lightweight threads, I guess.
9
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-11 16:01
I'd rather use C++ than use useless languages like Go and D.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-11 21:38
D is an obvious improvement over C. Just look at the lingerie industry.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 20:53
<-- check em dubz
Don't change these.
Name:
Email:
Entire Thread
Thread List