Language Tiers
1
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 15:35
/g/ often does this — being a faggot, I thought I’d ask /prog/.
Which languages would you put in the following tiers:
• God
• Top
• Hacker
• Hipster
• Shit
Thank you, /prog/!
2
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 16:02
I got a better idea, lets put languages into catagories first, then you can tier them, because its full retard to say that C is in a higher tier than bash when they do entirely different things. I'll start
compiled
C
C++
D
Go
Ada
Delphi/Object Pascal
static VM
Java
C#
dynamic VM
Python
Ruby
Perl
Javascript
PHP
Lua
functional
Haskell
ML/Ocaml/F#
CL/Scheme/Clojure
Erlang
Scala
math
Mathematic
Matlab
APL
Fortran
3
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 16:02
Welcome to /prog/! Enjoy your stay.
• God
-
• Top
-
• Hacker
-
• Hipster
-
• Shit
- everything
4
Name:
VIPPER
2012-07-21 16:03
>>1
I love having to break this to you son, but /g/ is fucking shit.
Also there is the right tool for the right job.
Now get back there you shitty troll.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 16:07
>>2
compiled static vm dynamic vm
YOU ARE CONFUSING THE LANGUAGE WITH ITS IMPLEMENTATION YOU FUCKING TARD NOW GO BACK TO G AND CONTINUE TO THINK THAT LANGUAGES WITH IMPLEMENTATIONS THAT USE VIRTUAL MACHINES CANNOT ALSO USE IMPLEMENTATIONS THAT COMPILE TO NATIVE CODE.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 16:11
>>1
• God
'(Lisp)
• Top
'()
• Hacker
'()
• Hipster
'()
• Shit
(remove 'Lisp programming-languages)
And to think I used to be the ``Lisp is shit'' guy...
7
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 16:11
God
C, C++, Assembly
> Top
Javascript, Java, C#
> Hipster
Haskal , Go, D, Python, Ruby
> Shit
Lisp
8
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 16:16
fug what's going on
God
C, C++, Assembly
Top
Javascript, Java, C#
Hipster
Haskal , Go, D, Python, Ruby
Shit
Lisp
9
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 16:46
• God
Scheme, ML, Algol, Prolog
• Top
Common Lisp, APL, Ada, Python, Perl 6, Scala, Fortran
• Hacker
C, bash, Perl 5, Forth, PHP
• Hipster
Haskell, Go, D, JavaScript, Ruby
• Shit
C++, Java, Visual Basic
10
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 17:18
11
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 17:30
>>10
That's because he's a PHP programmer, he had to put it somewhere.
12
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 17:36
• God
Common Lisp, Scheme, Mathematica, APL, OCaml
• Top
Visual Basic 6, Fortran
• Hacker
C
• Hipster
Haskell, Go, D, JavaScript, Ruby
• Shit
C++, Java, Scala, Prolog, Perl 6, Perl, Python, COBOL.
Fast, simple, all-purpose
C, Common Lisp
Simple (to use, at least)
Python, Go, other lisps, {ba,z,}sh
Enterprise
Java, COBOL
VROOM VROOM
C++, Fortran
Convoluted
Ruby, Perl
Web-exclusive
PHP, JavaScript
Microsoft
Visual Basic.NET, C#
What the hell are you doing with that thing
Objective-C, Haskell, ASM
14
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 17:44
Is this what we've become?
15
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 18:05
Nice thread you got here, /g/.
16
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 18:15
>>5
youre wrong, how a programming language is implemented makes a huge difference. if that were not true then everyone would be using a single unified programming language and just porting the backend for different implementations. But that does not happen, because implementation affects what the syntax is able to do. This is like all the idiots on /prog/ who start threads announcing DUUUR PYTHON COMPILES TO C CODE WE DONT NEED C ANYMORE HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUR
this is also similar to the idiots who say "C++ is a great garbage collection language" lol
17
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 18:23
18
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 18:23
>>5
oh and btw, youre a fucking idiot, youre too stupid to even go to /g/, go back to /v/
19
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 19:14
that feel when you thought Go would be a decent C alternative, but then GC and no pointer arithmetic...why even call yourself a systems language?
20
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 19:16
EXPERT PROGRAMMERS
21
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 19:19
• God
Le PHP
• Top
Le PHP
• Hacker
Le PHP
• Hipster
Le PHP
• Shit
Not Le PHP
22
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 19:24
double dub
23
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 19:26
>>19
The designers of the language were very surprised to find that very few C and C++ programmers started to use their new language and that most of the current user base are mainly Python and Ruby programmers.
24
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 20:09
>>19
Because
EXPERT PROGRAMMERS don't want to lose the
huge time investiment spent in learning C/C++.
Anyway C fits a different segment, which is
NOT speed.
25
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 20:30
Lisp and assembly : God Tier
Everything else : Shit Tier
26
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 20:47
>
>>1-25
Fuck off
back to /g/ ,
``please" !
27
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 21:01
>>26
I disagree.
>>6,25 are clearly
EXPERT PROGRAMMERS .
28
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 21:08
>>27
then get a room and fuck them, you little faglord!
29
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-21 21:48
>>28
Fuck off back to /g/.
30
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-22 0:01
Since I mostly only program in C, I'd say:
• God
C
• Top
C
• Hacker
C
• Hipster
Python
• Shit
C
31
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-22 0:59
'
>implying there's any tiers besides LISP and shit
>2012
prime my dubs
32
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-22 1:43
Javascript tier:
Javascript
God tier:
undefined
Top tier:
undefined
Hacker tier:
undefined
Hipster tier:
Lua, Python, C
Lisp tier:
Lisp, Scheme
Shit tier:
everything else
33
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-22 2:31
Lisp is lisp.
34
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-22 9:14
• God
x86
• Top
C
• Hacker
C
• Hipster
Ruby
• Shit
Scheme
35
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-22 9:46
>>4
All you do is post telling people to go back to the imageboards.
When was the last time you actually contributed to a real programming thread?
Do you even program at all? Or are you only here to make ``lol /polecat kebabs/ and /backplate getgoes/ xDDD'' shitposts?
36
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-22 10:04
>>35
Do you even program at all? Or are you only here to make ``lol /polecat kebabs/ and /backplate getgoes/ xDDD'' shitposts?
How is programming related to this board?
37
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-22 14:43
38
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-22 16:20
>>10,11
PHP is Hacker tier only because there's no Hacked Together tier.
39
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-22 22:17
>>35
Why don't you go back to /g/ with OP?
40
Name:
Anonymous
2013-12-01 13:26
░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████████▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░▄▀▀▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀█████▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░▄██████░░░░░░░░░░░▀██░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░▐██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░███████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░
░░▐████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░
░░▐██████▌░░░░░▄▀▀▀▀▀▄░▀░▄▄▌░░░░░░░░░
░░░█▀▀███▀░░░░░░▄▀█▀░░░▐▄▄▄▌░░░░░░░░░
░░▐░▌▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▀░░░▌▀░▌░░░░░░░░░
░░░▌▐░░▌░░░░░░░░░░░▀░░░░▐░▐░░░░░░░░░░
░░░▐░▀▄▐░░░░░░░░░░░▌▌░▄▄░▐░▌░░░░░░░░░
░░░░▀█░▄▀░░░░░░░░░▐░▐▄▄▄▄▀▐░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░▌▀░▐░░░░░░░░▄▀░░▀▀▀▀░▌░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░▐░░░░░░░░░▌░░░▄▀▀▀▀▄▐░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░▌░░░░░░░░░▐░░░░░▄▄░░▌░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░█▀▄░░░▐░▐░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░█░█░▀▀▄░▌░█░░░▀▀▄▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█░░░▀▄░░▀▀▄▄█░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█░░░░░▀▄░░░░▀▀▄▄▄▀▐░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▐░▌▐░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░█░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░▌░▐▌▐░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░█░░░░░░░░░█░▐░▄▄▌░█▀▄░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░█▌▐░▄▐░░▀▄▀▀▄▄░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░▐░░░▀▄░░░▀▀▄▄░░░░
░░░░░░░▀▄░▄▀█░░░░░█░░▌░░░░▀▄░░░░░█░░░
41
Name:
Anonymous
2013-12-01 14:11
>>40
who are you quoting?
>>1,25
Back to /g/
faggots please
!