Looks to me like it's just a better Vala, since Vala is infested with the GTK+ GObject shit all over. Although Vala is compiled to C and Ceylon will run on the JVM (GC is shit guy need not apply).
>>4
I really hope that image boards will be back up soon. My I suggest you leave now and annoy people with your shitposting somewhere else? Like /r/programming, for example?
Name:
Anonymous2011-11-14 12:33
>>4
>POSIX
>Not the defacto OS
>C++
>Not the defacto language
>OpenGL
>Not the defacto library
>QT 4
>Not the generic widget toolkit
>>7
I'm not >>5, I wouldn't grace retarded replies like >>4 with a direct comment.
Name:
Anonymous2011-11-14 15:59
when it is released, will run under the Java Virtual Machine.
Why does every software business want to be Oracle's patent bitch? Why must everything run on that glorified p-code shit.
Name:
Anonymous2011-11-14 16:02
>>11
Because the Jewish academia has brain-washed the last couple of generations of university graduates into thinking that the Virtual Machine is more important than the underlying hardware.
Name:
Anonymous2011-11-14 18:42
>>11,12
Because they want it to work on as many platforms as possible with minimal monetary effort.
In the ENTERPRISE world everything costs money, especially more and new code.
Name:
Anonymous2011-11-15 1:22
>>13
Not if you use LLVM. Redhat is stupid for not using LLVM.
Name:
Anonymous2011-11-15 1:44
fuck that.
>on the JVM, looks like Java, same object model.
clojure or abcl are the "Java Killer."
>inb4 SBCL (Python) is the Java Killer
Name:
Anonymous2011-11-15 1:55
Why does the JVM suck so much. Why does it have to be controlled by Oracle who doesn't give a damn for supporting functional languages.
>>14
Java is far more mature than LLVM. >>12 Jewish academia ... more important than the underlying hardware.
Citation needed.
Name:
Anonymous2011-11-15 2:03
I do like the [i]improved[i] switch construct and I am intrigued by the union types.
Name:
Anonymous2011-11-15 4:54
Java's portability is overrated though, the official JRE only has Windows (NT), Solaris, Linux, Apple ports, I think the BSDs run JVM in Linux binary emulation (yo dawg). A large part of those billions of devices run KVM on shit phones formerly everywhere non-Japan and now probably in the third world. Java of most sorts isn't available on Wiis (but JavaScript and Flash is), iOS. WinCE requires a VM from some third party or apparently PersonalJava if you like binary archeology. Dalvik Android is in shit with Oracle, or something so who knows what will happen there.
OTOH, Since the 1% likes free stuff to leverage their manufacturing they probably stuck busybox into everything now. Shell scripts and perl are probably overtaking Java for the title of Run EverywhereTM.
It is after all, the olde faithful analytical engine that runs on top of another analytical engine. Gentlemen responsible of machine transcriptions ensure all computerable requisitions be prefixed by CAFEBABE.
>>51 >>49
Stay awake in English class next time kid.
I told you to learn a better language right after telling you C# was shit, being a MS fanboi is shit and trying to pull the `LOL BUT IT NOT JUST MS' Mono bullshit is shit as well.
If you think I referred to Mono as a language than you yourself either don't understand what Mono is int he first place to realize what I meant or you have terrible reading comprehension
Either way go back to whatever hellish imageboard you came from and shit post on there instead of here.
Name:
Anonymous2012-01-13 21:29
>>1 What do you think of Red Hats take on Java/C#?
Yet another curly-brace piece of shit, as we didnt have enough already.
shared interface
Yeah! They added more keyword bloat.
>>53
Where'd you get all that about Microsoft? The only mentions I've picked out in this thread seem to be made by you, or someone equally spastic.
Anyway, Mono runs pretty much everywhere and appears to be less stack-hungry than .Net too. Either way, both CLR implementations are fairly efficient and have some good languages, acceptable GC performance (latency vs. throughput), decent interop and support TCO.