Project Ceylon

What do you think of Red Hats take on Java/C#?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceylon_Project

Looks to me like it's just a better Vala, since Vala is infested with the GTK+ GObject shit all over. Although Vala is compiled to C and Ceylon will run on the JVM (GC is shit guy need not apply).

Will this be the Java killer?

>>37
Clojure is a shit language, not a Lisp.

clojure is shit
Java is shit
c# is shit
Ms fanbois are absolute shit
*vm is shit
GC is shit
enterprise is shit
Most of you are shit

Why do we need another JVM-based language that tries to fix Java when we already have C#, the best language?

C# is just as shitty.
Gtfo ms fanbois


Mono is pure horse shit as well so fuck off and learn a better lang

>>44
``NO, you faggot''

>>45
Go back to whatever hellish imageboard you came from and take your shitty memes with you.

Why do we need another Semitic language that tries to fix Aramaic when we already have Hebrew, the best language?

Why do we need another Sepples language that tries to fix Algol when we already have Haskell, the best language?

>>44
No, it's not quite as bad. It's still horrible for most of the same reasons though.

P.S. Mono isn't a language.
P.P.S. IHBT

>>49
He never said mono was a language you dumb fag. Learn to fucking read you stupid piece of shit.

>>50
It sure reads like it. Potty mouth.

>>51
Then learn to read you retarded piece of shit.

>>51
>>49
Stay awake in English class next time kid.

I told you to learn a better language right after telling you C# was shit, being a MS fanboi is shit and trying to pull the `LOL BUT IT NOT JUST MS' Mono bullshit is shit as well.

If you think I referred to Mono as a language than you yourself either don't understand what Mono is int he first place to realize what I meant or you have terrible reading comprehension

Either way go back to whatever hellish imageboard you came from and shit post on there instead of here.

>>1
What do you think of Red Hats take on Java/C#?
Yet another curly-brace piece of shit, as we didnt have enough already.

shared interface
Yeah! They added more keyword bloat.

>>53
Where'd you get all that about Microsoft? The only mentions I've picked out in this thread seem to be made by you, or someone equally spastic.

Anyway, Mono runs pretty much everywhere and appears to be less stack-hungry than .Net too. Either way, both CLR implementations are fairly efficient and have some good languages, acceptable GC performance (latency vs. throughput), decent interop and support TCO.

>>55
What don't you understand about MONO IS SHIT?

Yes we know it's cross-platform, I already acknowledged that, IT'S SHIT

Go learn a real language faggot.

>>56
Yeah. Like Lisp.