Christ/libfags denying cognitive racial gaps

Ideology (lying) aside, is it because we're talking about people who, deep in their hearts, believe that human thought is a consequence of souls rather than neural computation? Since all souls have the same (magical, ill-defined) properties, clearly everyone is really alike, and differences in performance must be the result of social influences?

souls aren't equal
read the fucking bible

>>2
I didn't say souls are equal. I said that Christfags/libfags believe intelligence as a consequence of souls is perfectly malleable, because it ... eh, forget it, just read OP again. If you don't understand that then you're not worth debating with.
And reading the Bible once was enough.

saaage

boring

Niggers are literally not fully human. They haven't evolved much at all in the last 100,000 years or so (at least). Meanwhile, Whites and Asians have rapidly evolved in just the last 50,000 years (roughly) from Nigger Apes into the explorers, scientists, and other civilization-builders that you see today.

There are just as many arguments in the opposite direction from Christians, that certain races, namely Jews, have corrupted and demonic souls.

Christians love Jews, are you kidding me? You can't turn on a religious TV channel without some preacher blubbering all over some rabbi from Israel, talking about the Promised Land and the Second Coming...

>>8
Christians don't love jews.  christians want jews to take over the 'holy land' and make isreal whole again.  they think when this happens the rapture will occur (and the jews will be as fucked as all the other non-believers).  these people are not highly evolved/intelligent/worthwhile and are a big part of the 'problem'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_of_Ham

same crazy person from earlier on

>>1 is correct but I would go further.

White liberal guilt is a direct consequence of Christianity's doctrine of "original sin."  Christianity is a memetic weapon of mass destruction that teaches false humility and self-hatred, enmasculating and destroying every society where it is permitted to take root.

>>12
Chrisatians believe pride is a sin, so they tell uppity negroes not to run around screaming "BLACK PRIDE".

"The South African native is probably the one impossible person to train in the entire world — he is probably impossible by any human standard."
 
–L. Ron Hubbard, PAB No. 119, 1 September 1957, as published

This from the nutjob that created the church of scientology.

"…the African tribesman, with his complete contempt for truth and his emphasis on brutality and savagery for others but not for himself, is a no-civilization."

–L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology: The Fundamentals


So the stormfrontfags might really be scifags.

>>14-15
1) Obama, probably your hero, has said far more racist things.
2) I can't see how anyone might disagree. We have empirical data (crime rates and IQ test results) proving him correct. It's even more obvious now when you look at the shithole South Africa is.
3) You do know who the 'native' South Africans are, right? The fucking Bushmen. This racial group has the lowest IQ and is by far the stupidest on Earth at the moment. No one but the most ignorant libfag could disagree: The Bushmen are subhuman. Their race (Khoisan) is the fucking oldest on earth: Y-haplogroup A (recently out-of-Africa mythologists even say it's the Y-chromosome Adam) and mtDNA haplogroups L1d/L1k.
4) You're off-topic.
In before I'm a scientologist, because the libfag can only debate through self-deception.

>>16
Wow. The lack of intelligence in this post is astounding.

You know what, I'm all in for the extermination of people with low IQ - on one condition, the GROUPS with the low average IQ won't be executed en masse, the stupid ones among them, the majority, will be killed while the intelligent ones will remain - but, the people in the "intelligent" groups who are actually retarded too get killed. But, of course, no stormfag would endorse this as the average IQ there is probably around 60

Ron Hubbard was a genius.

>>16
same crazy person

>>17
Wow. The lack of intelligence in this post is astounding.
If by 'this post' you meant your own post, then I'd have to agree.
You know what, I'm all in for the extermination of people with low IQ - on one condition, the GROUPS with the low average IQ won't be executed en masse, the stupid ones among them, the majority, will be killed while the intelligent ones will remain - but, the people in the "intelligent" groups who are actually retarded too get killed.
What good do you think that will do in the short run?
But, of course, no stormfag would endorse this as the average IQ there is probably around 60
I'm all for eugenics, but in a more sensible way.
I'm also not a stormfront member, but I'd be willing to bet they're, on average, smarter than you, given your ignorance.

So, Mr. Individualist faggot, would you mind telling me how are you willing to make your brilliant plan work for the benefit of Bushmen, a racial group whose average IQ is, well, 54. Say we set a threshold of IQ at 100 (I assume that's what you meant by 'intelligent', if more than my example is even better and yours more retarded -- if only White nations would start an eugenics-by-extermination program, well, China will rule over us soon), and we kill all those below it. A very, very small percentage of 'elite' Bushmen survive. They mate with the remaining Bushmen. Their few offspring, like in all traits, regress to the mean of the population in intelligence (54). We kill the remaining Bushmen in the next round of the game. Game over for Bushmen. Even if kill off all below the IQ of 70 they're simply going to get wiped out in very little time, before shifting the mean in any way is possible.

Anyway, I don't really want this kind of shit going on, because even they fucking deserve a piece of this earth, where they should be left alone. I'm not into genocide. I was just illustrating how stupid you are. You can't see the forest (groups) from the trees (individuals). Both matter in traits, and so your meritocracy system fails. Even stormfront members, which you deem as stupid for some reason so let's assume they are, will have their offspring regress to the mean of the White population (100), so they're better off than most Blacks.

In before excuse for not knowing/mentioning anything about regression to the mean in all traits.
>>18
Not many people can get a modern day religion going, so I'd have to agree. A genius of the mad variety.

>>19
>>16 is the same with, er, >>16? Very insightful!

>>20
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

lern2genetics, retard.

>>20
Of course, it should be added that the self-contradiction in this post is hilarious in addition to the retarded notion of "genetics" this pathetic moron holds too. Sad, indeed... I think you should hang at stormfront more, that's the place where people with your kind of ignorant moronic perception of the planet reside.

>>20
I facepalmed so hard I broke my fucking nose, I'm bleeding all over now thanks a lot faggot.

>>22-24
Do you think that if you post three times, you somehow disprove anything I said in my post?
Re: genetics.
When I say all traits regress to the mean, it's obvious that the traits with a polygenetic inheritance pattern (as opposed to single alleles such as blood types ABO) are the ones I'm talking about. But even if we're talking about other traits, since there is no regression, because the 'mean' is always the same, it's not wrong to say for all traits.
Next, that the Bushmen would die in the second sweep is correct. Do the maths yourself, while keeping in mind their low population.

Way to dodge my points in the post. You should go to revleft or other far leftist websites, they enjoy these kind of debates there.

>>25
lol@failed highschool biology


I was the one who posted one of those replies, but let's stop for a moment and believe the retarded bullshit you just told us (which, any educated person can point out to be irrelevant), now can you please tell me how in your retarded scheme moronic whites like you survive if the extermination he mentioned was carried out?

Not to mention, I see that you are ignoring facts and the arguments you can't reply to, and repeating pseudoscientific bullshit like most other retarded faggots who go on "DURRR HURRR LEFTIZSTS HURRRR", way to fail in every possible way imaginable, faggot.

>>26
Let's see.
lol@failed highschool biology
Smear, no actual point or rebuttal made.
I was the one who posted one of those replies, but let's stop for a moment and believe the retarded bullshit you just told us (which, any educated person can point out to be irrelevant)
Smear, no actual point or rebuttal made.
now can you please tell me how in your retarded scheme moronic whites like you survive if the extermination he mentioned was carried out?
Simple. Unless his extermination plan involves killing people below a ridiculously high IQ, I'll be fine. Whoops, smear, no actual point or rebuttal made.
Not to mention, I see that you are ignoring facts and the arguments you can't reply to,
Let's see what they are:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
lern2genetics, retard.
Of course, it should be added that the self-contradiction in this post is hilarious in addition to the retarded notion of "genetics" this pathetic moron holds too. Sad, indeed... I think you should hang at stormfront more, that's the place where people with your kind of ignorant moronic perception of the planet reside.
I facepalmed so hard I broke my fucking nose, I'm bleeding all over now thanks a lot faggot.
Facts and arguments, LOL!
and repeating pseudoscientific bullshit like most other retarded faggots who go on "DURRR HURRR LEFTIZSTS HURRRR", way to fail in every possible way imaginable, faggot.
Smear, no actual point or rebuttal made.

I request an actual rebuttal to what I said (unless, of course, you are a left-wing faggot who doesn't have a clue in which case you are welcome to announce it).

-2+2=5!!!!
-wrong
-BAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWW NO ONE IS WASTING HIS TIME TO DISPROVE MY RETARDED CLAIMS STEMMING FROM MY EXTREME IGNORANCE

>>28
It is alleged that I made some contradiction. So all you left-wing faggots have to do is quote the two passages and say 'contradiction lol' (or, better yet, explain why you think so).
But no, instead you swerve more:
-BAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWW NO ONE IS WASTING HIS TIME TO DISPROVE MY RETARDED CLAIMS STEMMING FROM MY EXTREME IGNORANCE
This is mere proof of my win. Also, didn't you just say:
>I see that you are ignoring facts and the arguments you can't reply to
Now:
NO ONE IS WASTING HIS TIME TO DISPROVE MY RETARDED CLAIMS STEMMING FROM MY EXTREME IGNORANCE
Interesting, indeed.

>>29
>This is mere proof of my win.

Butthurt much?
Not to mention, great job taking excerpts from several posters.

Well, you are simply retarded beyond oblivion, so it shouldn't be expected for you to understand, but to put it simply, regression to mean DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY, and even if it did, the retarded whites - like yourself, as you have proved once again, would still die. Come back when you pass your high school biology course.

lol@lol
butthurt libfag stormfag
BAWWWWW
lol lol lol

>>30
Not to mention, great job taking excerpts from several posters.
The people who think I'm wrong made contradictory statements when viewed as a whole. I did ask you, 'didn't you just say [...]' so I didn't imply it was you.
but to put it simply, regression to mean DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY, and even if it did, the retarded whites - like yourself, as you have proved once again, would still die.
Regression to the mean does not work which way? I merely said it regressed to the population's mean.
You seem to be the idiot if you think that if you exterminate all people below a certain IQ, you then radically shift the mean, LOL.

If it's so painfully obvious to you that I'm wrong, cite me and explain why anything I said is wrong. Especially on regression to the mean. Stop avoiding the issue.

>>32
Again, way to fail, even in nitpicking. I guess this is why you so vehemently stick to your ignorant notions, as this imaginary scheme would certainly get you in the list.

Yeaah, I have to spend time to disprove your notions caused by your ignorance, because you can't google and/or learn, riiight. Enjoy your self-contradiction and retardation.

Also, way to ignore the second point mentioned three times now. It's turning from funny to sad.

The funny thing is, extermination plans involve the use of people who themselves are on the low end of the scale.

In more general terms, any plans to use genocide to improve society, just makes society WORSE.  That should have been obvious, but given the incredible lack of education in the common American, the result is not surprising.

You all can go back to your collective racism, now.  At least it keeps you retards off the streets.

>>34
Thank you, captain obvious for this awesome rephrasal.

>>33
Thank you, your distinct lack of counterarguments just proves once more my arguments are solid.
>>34
Extermination being the only possible outcome of publicly acknowledging that niggers are stupid is only in the self-delusional mind of the leftist. I merely said that, as he is for, killing the stupid persons in every racial group (but not the racial groups themselves), if we apply the same standards to everyone, will end up quickly killing off some racial groups.

>>36
Knowledge of racial stupidity does NOT lead inexorably to extermination.  Apparently the concept of life and liberty are lost on you.

Please keep replying.  It is a great comfort to us to know that you're inside and typing away furiously on a computer ... which just means that you're OFF THE STREETS.

>>37
I think you ought to read again.

>>38
Extermination is NOT the only possible outcome.  I think you need to recognize your own biases and mental disorders.

>>39
I said:
Extermination being the only possible outcome of publicly acknowledging that niggers are stupid is only in the self-delusional mind of the leftist.
Extermination being the only possible outcome [...] is only in the self-delusional mind of the -> leftist <-.

>>39
tl;dr version of thread: Some libfag brought up a scientologist quote of Bushmen being intellectually inferior to infer that 'racists = scientologists lol' and I agreed due to their having a median IQ of 54, which is extremely low. Then he started talking about exterminating non-intelligent individuals but not non-intelligent racial groups. And about me supposedly dying in such a sweep. I disagreed with the genocide idea, and I told him that groups like the Bushmen would get exterminated quickly if we do as he says.

>>36
ahh the retard again ignores what is said, and lives on his delusions I feel really sad about someone as retarded and ignorant like you, who probably has a minimum wage job or something and his life's achievement is having pale skin, as that is only how you could ignore facts that is everywhere around you and go into the stormfag delusions, against every sentient thought in this planet.

Every racist is a retarded tool who tried to feel better about the fucking sorry state of life he is in with his race, examples are mostly around BAAAWWWW I FAIL BECAUSE I PAY FOR THE WELFARE OF NIGGERS AND I WORK IN FAST FOOD BECAUSE OF A JEWISH COMPLOT, THE FIRST ONE FAILS FOR HAVING A LOW AVERAGE IQ AND THE SECOND FAILS FOR HAVING A HIGH AVERAGE BAAAAAWWWWWWW I'M SO RETARDED I CAN'T COMPREHEND ANYTHING DIFFERENT

>>40
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

I HADN'T SEEN THAT OH WOW

The 'leftists' introduced racial cleansing? No matter how ignorant and retarded you are, you should know the truth about this, pathetic loser. Realize your self-delusions.

in b4 the clinically retarded organism cites the example which was fabricated as an example against the views of these retards   as "this is what they believe".

>>41
Finally, is it something common among you retarded organisms to think you are always talking to the samefag?

Not to mention, it's sad to see you still ignoring science in favor of your failed comprehension of high school physics. Someone should conduct a test for denizens of stormfront etc. - if this is any indication, you would be head-on with the bushmen, and additionally you fat losers wouldn't stand a  chance against a bushmen. It's lose/lose for you losers, who claim "superiority"... Funny, really.

>>42
Your lack of arguments is duly noted. Keep on failing.
>>43
The 'leftists' introduced racial cleansing?
I really can't understand how anyone can misunderstand what I said. I'm bewildered, really. I said that leftists immediately mention extermination and claim the moral high ground by being against it whenever inequality is discussed, despite extermination not being the outcome of inequality (actually, it's moreso partly of equality). That's to be expected, though, with the lack of arguments they have.
>>44
You have yet to point out where I'm wrong. Your delicious tears give me sustenance.
Not to mention, it's sad to see you still ignoring science in favor of your failed comprehension of high school physics.
failed comprehension of high school physics.
Excellent. Now I fail high school physics too? Your leftists are an embarrassment.

>>44
>>43
>>42

YHBT HAND

ITT: Perpetual baw continues

>>45
Wow, good job at STILL not giving a reply, for the fourth time now. I really wonder, though - whether you are too retarded to see it, or if you do see it, but you are too butthurt to accept it??

>>48
Oh wow. Are you really pretending there was something I need replied to? I don't care about the smear. Keep crying libfag.

>>49
Irony much, retarded loser? I explicitly stated it twice and pointed towards it another two times, I would expect even someone who was so moronic that he couldn't comprehend how simple genetics worked would have seen it by now. Anyways, enjoy your low IQ and denial which fuels your way of "thinking".

>>50
Fucking quote it then, I read the thread again and they're just empty allegations of my having a low IQ and being a stormfront member. The only thing close to a statement was:
but to put it simply, regression to mean DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY, and even if it did, the retarded whites - like yourself, as you have proved once again, would still die.
I asked you (?) to be more specific, and then you (?) said:
Yeaah, I have to spend time to disprove your notions caused by your ignorance, because you can't google and/or learn, riiight. Enjoy your self-contradiction and retardation.
Was that you, and your way of stating something *explicitly*?
Enjoy your constant failure.

same racist megalomaniac shitstorming the board

>>51
I thought you couldn't see that part. Now that I see that you in fact are not getting it, then I'm sorry, I can't do anything for someone that stupid, it really is clear. Well, it was nice exposing your ignorance and retardation, bye.

>>53
"It DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY. I'm not actually going to say relevant things about it supposedly not working that way, like why it doesn't work that way or how it should work, so that I get corrected or make my opponent retract his claims, I'm though going to spam the thread for a while to smear my opponent."
You're the only one who exposed his ignorance and retardation. Good riddance, faggot. Though if you truly have a point to make (which I highly doubt), actually make it so that I'll explain why you're a retard.

>>54
Sad, really, taking out the part he was supposed to reply to. Then again, if I was THAT retarded maybe I would do something like that too, I don't really blame you, it isn't your fault - but hey, maybe your offsprings would "regress to the mean", huh?

>>55
Your habitual mendacity is sad. If you have some rebuttal to make to what I said, do it. If not, say you haven't and get it over with. It's getting kind of boring. Yet nothing out of the ordinary when it comes to the left.

>>56
Irony much, retard who STILL HASN'T REPLIED? Come back when you learn how to retort, or better yet, come back when you can formulate intelligent thought, so things like your pathetically sad whining won't happen again.

>>57
Fine, I'll reply: Your invisible argument is wrong. Your turn.

>>58
You are a retard who himself quoted the "invisible" argument -at least check what you post yourself- which was logically and scientifically correct, but then again if you could understand any of these, you wouldn't be a drooling racist moron, right?

>>58
cry more

>>59
>>60
You claimed it 'doesn't work that way.' That isn't a real fucking ARGUMENT unless you justify why it is so. I know libfags have low standards for everything, but that really doesn't cut it here.

>>61
Wow, how can you fail more? You are still there, and not at the part which was stated explicitly?

Firstly, the "does not work that way" could be solved with a simple google search, it is a problem of being factually wrong and nothing can fix your ignorance on that.

Secondly, even IF things worked in the retarded way you thought it did, stupid whites like you would still die, a part which you repeatedly ignored.

Now, was there something else you wanted to fail on with your tiny brain?

>>62
Wow, how can you fail more? You are still there, and not at the part which was stated explicitly?
Now I know what I repeatedly ignored! An insult: that I'd die because I'm a stupid White. LOL. Was that your argument? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Firstly, the "does not work that way" could be solved with a simple google search, it is a problem of being factually wrong and nothing can fix your ignorance on that.
I'll respond with a quote from a book:
Moreover, its teachings are believed to have the conclusiveness of scientific laws. In other words, to its adherents Marxism-Leninism represents a science, and those who oppose it are regarded by them as absolutely and demonstrably wrong.
Is that what you mean by 'does not work that way'?
Either tell me what it is so I can address your misconceptions or admit you're lying or wrong. It's becoming idiotic by now.
Secondly, even IF things worked in the retarded way you thought it did, stupid whites like you would still die, a part which you repeatedly ignored.
Stupid Whites dying is the point of killing stupid people, your supposed dream. About my dying, rest assured that isn't so, but that has nothing to do with regression to the mean being very, very likely to bring all remaining Bushmen in the danger zone, given we kill everyone below 100.
Now, was there something else you wanted to fail on with your tiny brain?
I think you've failed enough for the both of us.

>>63
I see that you took my advice, and are indeed crying more, but this part got me most.

>Moreover, its teachings are believed to have the conclusiveness of scientific laws. In other words, to its adherents Marxism-Leninism represents a science, and those who oppose it are regarded by them as absolutely and demonstrably wrong.

I thought this no one read retarded crap like that, but of course there are always people stupider than the stupid author. Also, congratulations on your quoting skills, "a book" - then again, I shouldn't expect much literacy from someone that ignorant.

>>63
Biology is adhered as a science by its followers, but to retards like you it is "absolutely and demonstrably wrong", I guess was your point by the way. Just for the kicks, can you explain how average human height increased in your sad and pathetic comprehension of "regression to mean"?

>>63
Congratulations on keeping up with your epic failure.

Hmm so in an imaginary scheme which had the point of making the most intelligent of all people survive rather than picking among races, killing stupid people of intelligent races and saving the intelligent of stupid races was the norm, yet one of these is "irrelevant" while the second would be destroyed, applying the same "regression to mean" mechanics (which, is simply not like that, even Galton's original research didn't imply that). Nope, you are the epitome of fail - keep ignoring facts and repeating the same retarded bullshit, I guess that is how you can cope with the failure you call yourself. Really, really sad.

ITT: Idiots with no lives vs. idiots with no brain.

>>63
I see that you are an adherent of 2+2=5, and are claiming it's debatable...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_Heaven

It's in Wikipedia, therefore it is FACT.

>>69

Mutable/changable fact but still FACT. (yes i know that's your point)

what a shitty thread

fucking americans and their grasp of "politics".