Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Christ/libfags denying cognitive racial gaps

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-06 10:53

Ideology (lying) aside, is it because we're talking about people who, deep in their hearts, believe that human thought is a consequence of souls rather than neural computation? Since all souls have the same (magical, ill-defined) properties, clearly everyone is really alike, and differences in performance must be the result of social influences?

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-06 12:26

souls aren't equal
read the fucking bible

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-06 12:44

>>2
I didn't say souls are equal. I said that Christfags/libfags believe intelligence as a consequence of souls is perfectly malleable, because it ... eh, forget it, just read OP again. If you don't understand that then you're not worth debating with.
And reading the Bible once was enough.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-06 15:09

saaage

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-06 16:43

boring

Name: niggertits 2008-02-06 23:24

Niggers are literally not fully human. They haven't evolved much at all in the last 100,000 years or so (at least). Meanwhile, Whites and Asians have rapidly evolved in just the last 50,000 years (roughly) from Nigger Apes into the explorers, scientists, and other civilization-builders that you see today.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-06 23:25

There are just as many arguments in the opposite direction from Christians, that certain races, namely Jews, have corrupted and demonic souls.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-06 23:29

Christians love Jews, are you kidding me? You can't turn on a religious TV channel without some preacher blubbering all over some rabbi from Israel, talking about the Promised Land and the Second Coming...

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-07 16:43

>>8
Christians don't love jews.  christians want jews to take over the 'holy land' and make isreal whole again.  they think when this happens the rapture will occur (and the jews will be as fucked as all the other non-believers).  these people are not highly evolved/intelligent/worthwhile and are a big part of the 'problem'.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-07 18:52

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-07 19:11

same crazy person from earlier on

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-11 12:38

>>1 is correct but I would go further.

White liberal guilt is a direct consequence of Christianity's doctrine of "original sin."  Christianity is a memetic weapon of mass destruction that teaches false humility and self-hatred, enmasculating and destroying every society where it is permitted to take root.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-11 14:22

>>12
Chrisatians believe pride is a sin, so they tell uppity negroes not to run around screaming "BLACK PRIDE".

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 1:54

"The South African native is probably the one impossible person to train in the entire world — he is probably impossible by any human standard."
 
–L. Ron Hubbard, PAB No. 119, 1 September 1957, as published

This from the nutjob that created the church of scientology.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 2:09

"…the African tribesman, with his complete contempt for truth and his emphasis on brutality and savagery for others but not for himself, is a no-civilization."

–L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology: The Fundamentals


So the stormfrontfags might really be scifags.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 7:11

>>14-15
1) Obama, probably your hero, has said far more racist things.
2) I can't see how anyone might disagree. We have empirical data (crime rates and IQ test results) proving him correct. It's even more obvious now when you look at the shithole South Africa is.
3) You do know who the 'native' South Africans are, right? The fucking Bushmen. This racial group has the lowest IQ and is by far the stupidest on Earth at the moment. No one but the most ignorant libfag could disagree: The Bushmen are subhuman. Their race (Khoisan) is the fucking oldest on earth: Y-haplogroup A (recently out-of-Africa mythologists even say it's the Y-chromosome Adam) and mtDNA haplogroups L1d/L1k.
4) You're off-topic.
In before I'm a scientologist, because the libfag can only debate through self-deception.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 12:38

>>16
Wow. The lack of intelligence in this post is astounding.

You know what, I'm all in for the extermination of people with low IQ - on one condition, the GROUPS with the low average IQ won't be executed en masse, the stupid ones among them, the majority, will be killed while the intelligent ones will remain - but, the people in the "intelligent" groups who are actually retarded too get killed. But, of course, no stormfag would endorse this as the average IQ there is probably around 60

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 12:50

Ron Hubbard was a genius.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 14:06

>>16
same crazy person

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 14:29

>>17
Wow. The lack of intelligence in this post is astounding.
If by 'this post' you meant your own post, then I'd have to agree.
You know what, I'm all in for the extermination of people with low IQ - on one condition, the GROUPS with the low average IQ won't be executed en masse, the stupid ones among them, the majority, will be killed while the intelligent ones will remain - but, the people in the "intelligent" groups who are actually retarded too get killed.
What good do you think that will do in the short run?
But, of course, no stormfag would endorse this as the average IQ there is probably around 60
I'm all for eugenics, but in a more sensible way.
I'm also not a stormfront member, but I'd be willing to bet they're, on average, smarter than you, given your ignorance.

So, Mr. Individualist faggot, would you mind telling me how are you willing to make your brilliant plan work for the benefit of Bushmen, a racial group whose average IQ is, well, 54. Say we set a threshold of IQ at 100 (I assume that's what you meant by 'intelligent', if more than my example is even better and yours more retarded -- if only White nations would start an eugenics-by-extermination program, well, China will rule over us soon), and we kill all those below it. A very, very small percentage of 'elite' Bushmen survive. They mate with the remaining Bushmen. Their few offspring, like in all traits, regress to the mean of the population in intelligence (54). We kill the remaining Bushmen in the next round of the game. Game over for Bushmen. Even if kill off all below the IQ of 70 they're simply going to get wiped out in very little time, before shifting the mean in any way is possible.

Anyway, I don't really want this kind of shit going on, because even they fucking deserve a piece of this earth, where they should be left alone. I'm not into genocide. I was just illustrating how stupid you are. You can't see the forest (groups) from the trees (individuals). Both matter in traits, and so your meritocracy system fails. Even stormfront members, which you deem as stupid for some reason so let's assume they are, will have their offspring regress to the mean of the White population (100), so they're better off than most Blacks.

In before excuse for not knowing/mentioning anything about regression to the mean in all traits.
>>18
Not many people can get a modern day religion going, so I'd have to agree. A genius of the mad variety.

Name: sage 2008-02-14 14:30

>>19
>>16 is the same with, er, >>16? Very insightful!

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 16:11

>>20
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

lern2genetics, retard.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 16:15

>>20
Of course, it should be added that the self-contradiction in this post is hilarious in addition to the retarded notion of "genetics" this pathetic moron holds too. Sad, indeed... I think you should hang at stormfront more, that's the place where people with your kind of ignorant moronic perception of the planet reside.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 17:32

>>20
I facepalmed so hard I broke my fucking nose, I'm bleeding all over now thanks a lot faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-15 0:01

>>22-24
Do you think that if you post three times, you somehow disprove anything I said in my post?
Re: genetics.
When I say all traits regress to the mean, it's obvious that the traits with a polygenetic inheritance pattern (as opposed to single alleles such as blood types ABO) are the ones I'm talking about. But even if we're talking about other traits, since there is no regression, because the 'mean' is always the same, it's not wrong to say for all traits.
Next, that the Bushmen would die in the second sweep is correct. Do the maths yourself, while keeping in mind their low population.

Way to dodge my points in the post. You should go to revleft or other far leftist websites, they enjoy these kind of debates there.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-15 15:05

>>25
lol@failed highschool biology


I was the one who posted one of those replies, but let's stop for a moment and believe the retarded bullshit you just told us (which, any educated person can point out to be irrelevant), now can you please tell me how in your retarded scheme moronic whites like you survive if the extermination he mentioned was carried out?

Not to mention, I see that you are ignoring facts and the arguments you can't reply to, and repeating pseudoscientific bullshit like most other retarded faggots who go on "DURRR HURRR LEFTIZSTS HURRRR", way to fail in every possible way imaginable, faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 0:47

>>26
Let's see.
lol@failed highschool biology
Smear, no actual point or rebuttal made.
I was the one who posted one of those replies, but let's stop for a moment and believe the retarded bullshit you just told us (which, any educated person can point out to be irrelevant)
Smear, no actual point or rebuttal made.
now can you please tell me how in your retarded scheme moronic whites like you survive if the extermination he mentioned was carried out?
Simple. Unless his extermination plan involves killing people below a ridiculously high IQ, I'll be fine. Whoops, smear, no actual point or rebuttal made.
Not to mention, I see that you are ignoring facts and the arguments you can't reply to,
Let's see what they are:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
lern2genetics, retard.
Of course, it should be added that the self-contradiction in this post is hilarious in addition to the retarded notion of "genetics" this pathetic moron holds too. Sad, indeed... I think you should hang at stormfront more, that's the place where people with your kind of ignorant moronic perception of the planet reside.
I facepalmed so hard I broke my fucking nose, I'm bleeding all over now thanks a lot faggot.
Facts and arguments, LOL!
and repeating pseudoscientific bullshit like most other retarded faggots who go on "DURRR HURRR LEFTIZSTS HURRRR", way to fail in every possible way imaginable, faggot.
Smear, no actual point or rebuttal made.

I request an actual rebuttal to what I said (unless, of course, you are a left-wing faggot who doesn't have a clue in which case you are welcome to announce it).

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 6:09

-2+2=5!!!!
-wrong
-BAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWW NO ONE IS WASTING HIS TIME TO DISPROVE MY RETARDED CLAIMS STEMMING FROM MY EXTREME IGNORANCE

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 8:20

>>28
It is alleged that I made some contradiction. So all you left-wing faggots have to do is quote the two passages and say 'contradiction lol' (or, better yet, explain why you think so).
But no, instead you swerve more:
-BAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWW NO ONE IS WASTING HIS TIME TO DISPROVE MY RETARDED CLAIMS STEMMING FROM MY EXTREME IGNORANCE
This is mere proof of my win. Also, didn't you just say:
>I see that you are ignoring facts and the arguments you can't reply to
Now:
NO ONE IS WASTING HIS TIME TO DISPROVE MY RETARDED CLAIMS STEMMING FROM MY EXTREME IGNORANCE
Interesting, indeed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 8:32

>>29
>This is mere proof of my win.

Butthurt much?
Not to mention, great job taking excerpts from several posters.

Well, you are simply retarded beyond oblivion, so it shouldn't be expected for you to understand, but to put it simply, regression to mean DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY, and even if it did, the retarded whites - like yourself, as you have proved once again, would still die. Come back when you pass your high school biology course.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 8:44

lol@lol
butthurt libfag stormfag
BAWWWWW
lol lol lol

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 10:01

>>30
Not to mention, great job taking excerpts from several posters.
The people who think I'm wrong made contradictory statements when viewed as a whole. I did ask you, 'didn't you just say [...]' so I didn't imply it was you.
but to put it simply, regression to mean DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY, and even if it did, the retarded whites - like yourself, as you have proved once again, would still die.
Regression to the mean does not work which way? I merely said it regressed to the population's mean.
You seem to be the idiot if you think that if you exterminate all people below a certain IQ, you then radically shift the mean, LOL.

If it's so painfully obvious to you that I'm wrong, cite me and explain why anything I said is wrong. Especially on regression to the mean. Stop avoiding the issue.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 10:19

>>32
Again, way to fail, even in nitpicking. I guess this is why you so vehemently stick to your ignorant notions, as this imaginary scheme would certainly get you in the list.

Yeaah, I have to spend time to disprove your notions caused by your ignorance, because you can't google and/or learn, riiight. Enjoy your self-contradiction and retardation.

Also, way to ignore the second point mentioned three times now. It's turning from funny to sad.

Name: RedCream 2008-02-16 11:01

The funny thing is, extermination plans involve the use of people who themselves are on the low end of the scale.

In more general terms, any plans to use genocide to improve society, just makes society WORSE.  That should have been obvious, but given the incredible lack of education in the common American, the result is not surprising.

You all can go back to your collective racism, now.  At least it keeps you retards off the streets.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 11:31

>>34
Thank you, captain obvious for this awesome rephrasal.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 13:28

>>33
Thank you, your distinct lack of counterarguments just proves once more my arguments are solid.
>>34
Extermination being the only possible outcome of publicly acknowledging that niggers are stupid is only in the self-delusional mind of the leftist. I merely said that, as he is for, killing the stupid persons in every racial group (but not the racial groups themselves), if we apply the same standards to everyone, will end up quickly killing off some racial groups.

Name: RedCream 2008-02-16 13:58

>>36
Knowledge of racial stupidity does NOT lead inexorably to extermination.  Apparently the concept of life and liberty are lost on you.

Please keep replying.  It is a great comfort to us to know that you're inside and typing away furiously on a computer ... which just means that you're OFF THE STREETS.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 15:45

>>37
I think you ought to read again.

Name: RedCream 2008-02-16 16:05

>>38
Extermination is NOT the only possible outcome.  I think you need to recognize your own biases and mental disorders.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 16:50

>>39
I said:
Extermination being the only possible outcome of publicly acknowledging that niggers are stupid is only in the self-delusional mind of the leftist.
Extermination being the only possible outcome [...] is only in the self-delusional mind of the -> leftist <-.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List