Christ/libfags denying cognitive racial gaps

Ideology (lying) aside, is it because we're talking about people who, deep in their hearts, believe that human thought is a consequence of souls rather than neural computation? Since all souls have the same (magical, ill-defined) properties, clearly everyone is really alike, and differences in performance must be the result of social influences?

>>39
tl;dr version of thread: Some libfag brought up a scientologist quote of Bushmen being intellectually inferior to infer that 'racists = scientologists lol' and I agreed due to their having a median IQ of 54, which is extremely low. Then he started talking about exterminating non-intelligent individuals but not non-intelligent racial groups. And about me supposedly dying in such a sweep. I disagreed with the genocide idea, and I told him that groups like the Bushmen would get exterminated quickly if we do as he says.

>>36
ahh the retard again ignores what is said, and lives on his delusions I feel really sad about someone as retarded and ignorant like you, who probably has a minimum wage job or something and his life's achievement is having pale skin, as that is only how you could ignore facts that is everywhere around you and go into the stormfag delusions, against every sentient thought in this planet.

Every racist is a retarded tool who tried to feel better about the fucking sorry state of life he is in with his race, examples are mostly around BAAAWWWW I FAIL BECAUSE I PAY FOR THE WELFARE OF NIGGERS AND I WORK IN FAST FOOD BECAUSE OF A JEWISH COMPLOT, THE FIRST ONE FAILS FOR HAVING A LOW AVERAGE IQ AND THE SECOND FAILS FOR HAVING A HIGH AVERAGE BAAAAAWWWWWWW I'M SO RETARDED I CAN'T COMPREHEND ANYTHING DIFFERENT

>>40
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

I HADN'T SEEN THAT OH WOW

The 'leftists' introduced racial cleansing? No matter how ignorant and retarded you are, you should know the truth about this, pathetic loser. Realize your self-delusions.

in b4 the clinically retarded organism cites the example which was fabricated as an example against the views of these retards   as "this is what they believe".

>>41
Finally, is it something common among you retarded organisms to think you are always talking to the samefag?

Not to mention, it's sad to see you still ignoring science in favor of your failed comprehension of high school physics. Someone should conduct a test for denizens of stormfront etc. - if this is any indication, you would be head-on with the bushmen, and additionally you fat losers wouldn't stand a  chance against a bushmen. It's lose/lose for you losers, who claim "superiority"... Funny, really.

>>42
Your lack of arguments is duly noted. Keep on failing.
>>43
The 'leftists' introduced racial cleansing?
I really can't understand how anyone can misunderstand what I said. I'm bewildered, really. I said that leftists immediately mention extermination and claim the moral high ground by being against it whenever inequality is discussed, despite extermination not being the outcome of inequality (actually, it's moreso partly of equality). That's to be expected, though, with the lack of arguments they have.
>>44
You have yet to point out where I'm wrong. Your delicious tears give me sustenance.
Not to mention, it's sad to see you still ignoring science in favor of your failed comprehension of high school physics.
failed comprehension of high school physics.
Excellent. Now I fail high school physics too? Your leftists are an embarrassment.

>>44
>>43
>>42

YHBT HAND

ITT: Perpetual baw continues

>>45
Wow, good job at STILL not giving a reply, for the fourth time now. I really wonder, though - whether you are too retarded to see it, or if you do see it, but you are too butthurt to accept it??

>>48
Oh wow. Are you really pretending there was something I need replied to? I don't care about the smear. Keep crying libfag.

>>49
Irony much, retarded loser? I explicitly stated it twice and pointed towards it another two times, I would expect even someone who was so moronic that he couldn't comprehend how simple genetics worked would have seen it by now. Anyways, enjoy your low IQ and denial which fuels your way of "thinking".

>>50
Fucking quote it then, I read the thread again and they're just empty allegations of my having a low IQ and being a stormfront member. The only thing close to a statement was:
but to put it simply, regression to mean DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY, and even if it did, the retarded whites - like yourself, as you have proved once again, would still die.
I asked you (?) to be more specific, and then you (?) said:
Yeaah, I have to spend time to disprove your notions caused by your ignorance, because you can't google and/or learn, riiight. Enjoy your self-contradiction and retardation.
Was that you, and your way of stating something *explicitly*?
Enjoy your constant failure.

same racist megalomaniac shitstorming the board

>>51
I thought you couldn't see that part. Now that I see that you in fact are not getting it, then I'm sorry, I can't do anything for someone that stupid, it really is clear. Well, it was nice exposing your ignorance and retardation, bye.

>>53
"It DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY. I'm not actually going to say relevant things about it supposedly not working that way, like why it doesn't work that way or how it should work, so that I get corrected or make my opponent retract his claims, I'm though going to spam the thread for a while to smear my opponent."
You're the only one who exposed his ignorance and retardation. Good riddance, faggot. Though if you truly have a point to make (which I highly doubt), actually make it so that I'll explain why you're a retard.

>>54
Sad, really, taking out the part he was supposed to reply to. Then again, if I was THAT retarded maybe I would do something like that too, I don't really blame you, it isn't your fault - but hey, maybe your offsprings would "regress to the mean", huh?

>>55
Your habitual mendacity is sad. If you have some rebuttal to make to what I said, do it. If not, say you haven't and get it over with. It's getting kind of boring. Yet nothing out of the ordinary when it comes to the left.

>>56
Irony much, retard who STILL HASN'T REPLIED? Come back when you learn how to retort, or better yet, come back when you can formulate intelligent thought, so things like your pathetically sad whining won't happen again.

>>57
Fine, I'll reply: Your invisible argument is wrong. Your turn.

>>58
You are a retard who himself quoted the "invisible" argument -at least check what you post yourself- which was logically and scientifically correct, but then again if you could understand any of these, you wouldn't be a drooling racist moron, right?

>>58
cry more

>>59
>>60
You claimed it 'doesn't work that way.' That isn't a real fucking ARGUMENT unless you justify why it is so. I know libfags have low standards for everything, but that really doesn't cut it here.

>>61
Wow, how can you fail more? You are still there, and not at the part which was stated explicitly?

Firstly, the "does not work that way" could be solved with a simple google search, it is a problem of being factually wrong and nothing can fix your ignorance on that.

Secondly, even IF things worked in the retarded way you thought it did, stupid whites like you would still die, a part which you repeatedly ignored.

Now, was there something else you wanted to fail on with your tiny brain?

>>62
Wow, how can you fail more? You are still there, and not at the part which was stated explicitly?
Now I know what I repeatedly ignored! An insult: that I'd die because I'm a stupid White. LOL. Was that your argument? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Firstly, the "does not work that way" could be solved with a simple google search, it is a problem of being factually wrong and nothing can fix your ignorance on that.
I'll respond with a quote from a book:
Moreover, its teachings are believed to have the conclusiveness of scientific laws. In other words, to its adherents Marxism-Leninism represents a science, and those who oppose it are regarded by them as absolutely and demonstrably wrong.
Is that what you mean by 'does not work that way'?
Either tell me what it is so I can address your misconceptions or admit you're lying or wrong. It's becoming idiotic by now.
Secondly, even IF things worked in the retarded way you thought it did, stupid whites like you would still die, a part which you repeatedly ignored.
Stupid Whites dying is the point of killing stupid people, your supposed dream. About my dying, rest assured that isn't so, but that has nothing to do with regression to the mean being very, very likely to bring all remaining Bushmen in the danger zone, given we kill everyone below 100.
Now, was there something else you wanted to fail on with your tiny brain?
I think you've failed enough for the both of us.

>>63
I see that you took my advice, and are indeed crying more, but this part got me most.

>Moreover, its teachings are believed to have the conclusiveness of scientific laws. In other words, to its adherents Marxism-Leninism represents a science, and those who oppose it are regarded by them as absolutely and demonstrably wrong.

I thought this no one read retarded crap like that, but of course there are always people stupider than the stupid author. Also, congratulations on your quoting skills, "a book" - then again, I shouldn't expect much literacy from someone that ignorant.

>>63
Biology is adhered as a science by its followers, but to retards like you it is "absolutely and demonstrably wrong", I guess was your point by the way. Just for the kicks, can you explain how average human height increased in your sad and pathetic comprehension of "regression to mean"?

>>63
Congratulations on keeping up with your epic failure.

Hmm so in an imaginary scheme which had the point of making the most intelligent of all people survive rather than picking among races, killing stupid people of intelligent races and saving the intelligent of stupid races was the norm, yet one of these is "irrelevant" while the second would be destroyed, applying the same "regression to mean" mechanics (which, is simply not like that, even Galton's original research didn't imply that). Nope, you are the epitome of fail - keep ignoring facts and repeating the same retarded bullshit, I guess that is how you can cope with the failure you call yourself. Really, really sad.

ITT: Idiots with no lives vs. idiots with no brain.

>>63
I see that you are an adherent of 2+2=5, and are claiming it's debatable...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_Heaven

It's in Wikipedia, therefore it is FACT.

>>69

Mutable/changable fact but still FACT. (yes i know that's your point)

what a shitty thread

fucking americans and their grasp of "politics".