Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

"The South Shall Rise Again" soon

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-04 8:21

At some point in the future some group of faggots will try to force the North American Union upon us.  I think that's when the South will secede again.  At least, that happening would make history a little more interesting, don't you think?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-04 10:30

>>1
The south will probably rise again in the form of Aztlanfags, the first to go to the concentration camps will be the liberals who enter on their own accord as part of a social initiative and willingly enter the gas chambers to prove they are not racist.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-04 11:42

The advantage to the South seceding back in the 1960s was that they had a reliable source of income in cotton.  That's no longer the case today.  In fact, they receive more funds from the federal government (roads, dams, schools) than they pay in taxes.

Name: Guiliani 2007-11-04 11:52

The south will never rise again.  They've forgotten the lessons of 9/11

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-04 12:02

Actually a secesion movement might occur even sooner than any situation concerning NAU.  If there's ever a serious attempt to remove the 2nd amendment the Southern states will go apeshit and secede.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-04 12:16

>>5
If the 2nd amendment is removed, and the South secedes, I'll go apeshit and move.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-04 18:54

The second amendment will NEVER be removed: Smith&Wesson, Glock, Heckler&Koch, and every other national and internation weapons manufacturer makes too much money selling their product to us to let that happen. Their lobbyists will bribe everyone in Congress they can to keep it from happening.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-05 16:40

SMACK A BITCH UP. CHAAAARBOK! SMACK A BITCH UP. CHAAAARBOK!

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-05 20:05

>>7
Because it is clearly about money and not beliefs held by our foredfathers which this country was built upon.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-05 20:36

>>9
Everything, no matter how innocuous the link, is related to evil capitalists or noble proletariats. The world revolves around the class system, in fact communist scientists discoverred the sun is a class system but this was coverred up by evil capitalists bribing scientists.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-05 20:57

I would think the evil capitalists would bribe the scientists to say the sun - nay, the entire universe was a class system as a way to justify what they are and what they do: If existence itself is a class system, then all class systems are natural extensions of reality and its only proper that the rich stay rich off the efforts of the poor.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-05 23:23

>>11
You'd think that but you'd be wrong.

Name: McPP 2007-11-06 0:02

I live in the North and I am sorry but if they start taking away rights I'll secede and carve out a piece of the country for myself. I don't understand how the government thinks it can just stomp its feet all over our civil right. I think I might move out of this country because of it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-06 1:15

>>2
And the more sensible among the Northerners will let Jesusland gag and sink under it's own stink.  We should have let them go the first time.  Let them pay the natural shunning consequences for their disgusting behavior.  The way it stands now they get to romanticize it.

If they want Biblical Law and Pat Robertson for Minister-In-Chief, I'm fine with letting them go to form their own little third world country.  Alabama?  Puhleeze.  Like it's worth anything.  Bye-Bye.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-06 3:15

There are way too many stupid people in the South for it 'rise again'.  Schools in the South continually churn out poorly educated idiots.  I live in TX, our schools are like no better than 45 nationally... I don't even want to think about among developed nations.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-06 8:43

>>15
Education in the South can be pretty had in some areas.  But suppose there was a secession.  The schools of the South wouldn't have to be hampered by the absurd governmental regulations our federal government currently imposes.  There would be the opportunity to create school choice and make private schooling a more realistic/affordable choice.  If anything I think the schools of the south would beat the national average within 5 to 10 years.  Seriously, any education is better than the bullshit the fed can produce.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-06 10:07

>>1
Good maybe we can nuke the bible belt then.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-06 14:10

>>16
Schools in the South suck not because of gov't regulations, but because the populace is unwilling to adequately fund education.  do not blame gov't for failings of the people.  Oh noez, property tax is too high!!!1 

and "school choice" is about being able to teach idiotic things like UNintelligent design, not quality education.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-06 14:58

>>18
You don't even know what you're talking about.  For one, property taxes in the south are low, much lower than in the north.  And if you actually think funding is a major obstacle for education you're retarded.  Countries all over the world provide their children with a better education that our, but with much less funding.

And school choice has nothing to do with what is taught in the class room.  It's about being able to choose what school your child goes to, rather than being forced to go to one or another based on what district you live in.  So say the school in your area is filled with unproductive niggers who make learning impossible.  With the current laws you have to options: send your kid to nigger school, or move to a better school district.  With school choice you can send your kid to a school where apes aren't always shooting at each other.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-06 22:17

Integration seems to have produced bad education, so disintegration must be worth a try.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-06 23:33

>>19
education is funded through property taxes, low property taxes = low funding.  thank you for making my point, now shut your fucking piehole.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-06 23:52

>>21
You still haven't refuted the point that other countries provide a superior education with less funding.  You must be a libfag, because you apparently think throwing money at something makes it better.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-07 0:50

Throwing people at the problem is the solution! Lots and lots of people!

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-07 0:54

Look, I go at a school with a bunch of goddamn niggers. Never once have I thought to myself, "Hmm, glad these niggers are here! I really learn so much more with them cackling and making beats on the table. I also like how all they do is ask stupid fucking questions that anyone with any kind of intelligence would know."

We should segregate schools into Human Beings and Niggers.
I'm not racist, I think a lot of black people are cool, even the wanna be gangsta ass black people. Niggers are a different species. Black people know the difference between civilized black people and niggers, just ask them.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-07 4:47

>>22
other countries don't have dumb fuck christians trying to prevent accurate science education.
other developed countries don't have the poverty of the US.  poverty = poor nutrition = poor mental development in children.
other countries have consistent quality of education, while we have a lot of variation.
other countries pay their teachers a good wage and respect them, attracting an overall better quality of teacher.  we don't in the US.

this seems to explain your lack of cognitive ability.  come back when you finish jr. high.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-07 5:06

>>25
Other countries don't have so many niggers and spics though.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-07 9:49

>>25
And guess what?!  None of those things will change if we allow our shitty federal government to control our schools (or any other aspects of our lives).  The government fails at everything it does, even simple shit like delivering the mail.

The reason our teachers suck is, as it stands they're practically guaranteed work.  If we didn't have bullshit like tenure teachers would actually be responsible for what they do in the class room.  They would have to really work and produce results to keep their jobs *gasp* like any other real job.  Of course, teachers won't work hard if there's no incentive, but with school choice there is incentive.  Amazing concept isn't it?  Teachers get paid more for producing students who aren't retarded.  Everyone wins.  faggot.

Name: Aryan 2007-11-07 10:30

The South SHALL rise again! We don't need you yankee bastards!

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-07 20:10

>>27
your lack of understanding on education is funny.  the only "guarantee" of work is in shitty inner-city schools that pay shit.

that school choice shit doesn't work.  can everyone go to the one or two good schools in a city?  no. 

the problem is that funding is based on local property taxes.  rich districts have good to great schools, poor districts have ok to shitty schools.  until that changes nothing else will matter.

dumbfuck ideologues like you that go around spouting bullshit you don't understand are a big part of the problem in this country.  do us all a favor and die.  take your family with you please.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-07 22:17

>>23
gb2 soviet russia

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-08 0:00

>>29
WRONG.  Rich school districts produce their fair share of idiots too, they just do it with a nice swimming pool in the gymnasium.

And no, not everyone can go to the same two schools.  More schools can be built.  And successful schools (those that don't suck cock) can use profits to expand.

And really the problem with this country is faggots like you who would rather just go along with the status quo.  For some strange reason you can't get it through your thick skull that the government fucking sucks at what it does and that it can't provide a decent education for anyone.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-08 2:32

>>31
well, when the status quo is considerably better than your dumbfuck idea, then yeah bring on complacency.  the reason I can't get your ideas through my "thick skull" is because you're wrong.  totally, completely, utterly wrong.  and a moron.

when corporations run schools (as you advocate) the profits go to shareholders, not the classroom.  that's how business works.  and when they don't turn enough profit they cut costs - which fucks the kids.  gov't not involved, so who's to stop them?  not the market when they ALL do it.  fuck the kids, sure!

let me repeat, corporations exist only to make money for their owners.  nobody, nothing else matters.  there is no place for morality in american business.

maybe if you thought for yourself instead of letting self serving pieces of shit on right wing(nut) talk radio do all the "thinking" for you, you wouldn't be made entirely of fail.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-08 12:51

>>32
Guess what faggot, when corporations try to make profit for their owners they try to make a better product/service than the next guy.  Competition creates a need to make your services better.  Toyota isn't successful because it screws people over, but because it strives to provide a better product than its competitors.

And for fucks sake, take a look at institutions of higher learning.  In terms of actual education, Private colleges > State schools.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-08 12:53

>>33
Reactionary fool.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-08 12:55

>>34
RedCream disguised at anonymous

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-08 13:20

>>35
Actually, it's Anonymous disguised as Anonymous.
Why would RedCream say that?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-08 14:52

>>36
RedCream disguised at anonymous
>>36
because you are a communist

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-08 16:49

RedCream is a fucking communist?
I thought he was a libertarian.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-08 20:36

>>38 no he is just human

Name: RedCream 2007-11-09 14:19

#38, the original RedCream must have left 4chan after a week or so.
All that's left are horrible impersonators which horribly at imitating his posting style.
Back then as I was the first to impersonate him I actually waded through the crap on his website and the posts on slashdot and kuro5hin.
Fucking losers.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-09 17:09

>>33
private schools cost more but are not better - esp. in science where the best schools are nearly all public institutions.  seriously, the best science education is had at schools like Cal-Berkley, Michigan, Wisconson, Texas, et. al.  again dumbfuck anonymous is shown to be mentally deficient.

walmart is the biggest corp in the world and sells nothing but cheap chinese crap, like date-rape toys your kids.  the companies running the schools will collude to produce a crap education for max profit.  maybe you should take a business course or better yet, shut the fuck up because you're a moron.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-09 17:32

>>38
RedCream is anarchist type I think.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-09 17:33

>>38
RedCream is an anarchist type I think.

Name: Guierrmo Sanchez 2007-11-10 19:17

Poster #1 is why the South, "WILL NOT SUCCEED".  Also the same reason why they lost the Civil War.

Uneducated and lazy "folks" who care nothing about anything except "being slave owner/ racist" and "talking crap about how the south will rise again."

What do they say on the internet; no picture or not true, or something like that.

This North American Union has been in progress for years, the west coast, mid west, and the east coast see that.  The voters know what is going on, but yet, "the south will rise again states, aren't noticing anyting other than who won the futball game tween Lcu and Alebama".

All I say to the south is; you lost one war, in your country, keep hiding so you aren't exposed to losing another one.

The south are always talking but of course, no action.  You make those that fought in the Civil War (and in the American Revolution also), feel pretty stupid for protecting someone as you.

http://www.halturnershow.com/AmeroCoinArrives.html

www.freedomtofascism.com/
http://stevequayle.com/
http://stevequayle.com/index1.html  
http://www.infowars.com
www.prisonplanet.com
www.loosechange.com

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 14:15

http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska
http://www.winzy.com/heyska

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-15 3:35

Ron Pauls stance:

"After reading about Ron Paul's record-breaking fundraising day a couple of weeks ago, then seeing it touted in a recent Daily op-ed, I was concerned. Paul and his views lie on the fringe; it's never a good sign for social stability when fringe candidates get so much support," whines Baimel.

Ron Paul's views lie on the fringe ? Absolute bullshit. It seems that Baimel has unfortunately thrown thousands of dollars at a political science degree in vain - and I - the University dropout - am going to have to give him a proper education.

Ron Paul's central "fringe view" as Baimel would have it, is his anti-war stance. The Texas Congressman is the only Republican candidate to advocate an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, indeed, he is the only truly anti-war candidate of the frontrunners from either party.

Is being anti-war a fringe view in late 2007? Let's take a look at the polls .

NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll

"In general, do you approve or disapprove of the job that George W. Bush is doing in handling the situation in Iraq?"
Disapprove - 68%
Approve - 28%
Not Sure - 5%

"All in all, considering the costs to the United States versus the benefits to the United States, do you think the war with Iraq was worth fighting, or not?"
Not worth it - 63%
Worth it - 35%
Unsure - 2%

CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. Oct. 12-14
"Do you favor or oppose the U.S. war in Iraq?"
Oppose - 64%
Favor - 34%
Unsure - 2%

Ron Paul is the only frontrunner from either party that has advocated an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Is this a fringe view? No - it's the majority view in America today, as every single poll attests to, yet Baimel's major in political science seemingly doesn't teach him how to do a Google search.

The rest of Baimel's piece is riddled with gross inaccuracies. He attacks Kucinich for supporting the impeachment of Bush and Cheney, another "fringe" sentiment according to Baimel.

Wrong again.

A new poll out today from American Research Group finds that 55% of voters believe that George W. Bush has abused his powers in a way that rises to the level of impeachable offenses. 52% of voters believe that the same is true of Vice President Dick Cheney.

******Last time I checked, 55% was a majority , not a fringe viewpoint
************

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-16 3:35

The south will have to suceed, or will it be called a mental institution. When those take over American, they will then look at all the dead bodies who fought for America and realize that, it was the south who were the only ones that didn't do anything about it.

Probably hid behind and under, whatever they could find.  And since history repeats itself, the slave owners of the past, will now be the slaves of the future.

The funniest thing is that the rest of america, wont give a dame about the south, (since the didn't give a damn), when it counted.

The south will rise again, yeah right, cowards!!!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-16 6:43

>>47
Remember the Alamo.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List