/newpol/ - "The South Shall Rise Again" soon

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-04 8:21

At some point in the future some group of faggots will try to force the North American Union upon us. I think that's when the South will secede again. At least, that happening would make history a little more interesting, don't you think?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-09 17:09

>>33
private schools cost more but are not better - esp. in science where the best schools are nearly all public institutions. seriously, the best science education is had at schools like Cal-Berkley, Michigan, Wisconson, Texas, et. al. again dumbfuck anonymous is shown to be mentally deficient.

walmart is the biggest corp in the world and sells nothing but cheap chinese crap, like date-rape toys your kids. the companies running the schools will collude to produce a crap education for max profit. maybe you should take a business course or better yet, shut the fuck up because you're a moron.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-09 17:32

>>38
RedCream is anarchist type I think.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-09 17:33

>>38
RedCream is an anarchist type I think.

Name: Guierrmo Sanchez 2007-11-10 19:17

Poster #1 is why the South, "WILL NOT SUCCEED". Also the same reason why they lost the Civil War.

Uneducated and lazy "folks" who care nothing about anything except "being slave owner/ racist" and "talking crap about how the south will rise again."

What do they say on the internet; no picture or not true, or something like that.

This North American Union has been in progress for years, the west coast, mid west, and the east coast see that. The voters know what is going on, but yet, "the south will rise again states, aren't noticing anyting other than who won the futball game tween Lcu and Alebama".

All I say to the south is; you lost one war, in your country, keep hiding so you aren't exposed to losing another one.

The south are always talking but of course, no action. You make those that fought in the Civil War (and in the American Revolution also), feel pretty stupid for protecting someone as you.

http://www.halturnershow.com/AmeroCoinArrives.html

www.freedomtofascism.com/
http://stevequayle.com/
http://stevequayle.com/index1.html
http://www.infowars.com
www.prisonplanet.com
www.loosechange.com

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 14:15

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-15 3:35

Ron Pauls stance:

"After reading about Ron Paul's record-breaking fundraising day a couple of weeks ago, then seeing it touted in a recent Daily op-ed, I was concerned. Paul and his views lie on the fringe; it's never a good sign for social stability when fringe candidates get so much support," whines Baimel.

Ron Paul's views lie on the fringe ? Absolute bullshit. It seems that Baimel has unfortunately thrown thousands of dollars at a political science degree in vain - and I - the University dropout - am going to have to give him a proper education.

Ron Paul's central "fringe view" as Baimel would have it, is his anti-war stance. The Texas Congressman is the only Republican candidate to advocate an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, indeed, he is the only truly anti-war candidate of the frontrunners from either party.

Is being anti-war a fringe view in late 2007? Let's take a look at the polls .

NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll

"In general, do you approve or disapprove of the job that George W. Bush is doing in handling the situation in Iraq?"
Disapprove - 68%
Approve - 28%
Not Sure - 5%

"All in all, considering the costs to the United States versus the benefits to the United States, do you think the war with Iraq was worth fighting, or not?"
Not worth it - 63%
Worth it - 35%
Unsure - 2%

CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. Oct. 12-14
"Do you favor or oppose the U.S. war in Iraq?"
Oppose - 64%
Favor - 34%
Unsure - 2%

Ron Paul is the only frontrunner from either party that has advocated an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Is this a fringe view? No - it's the majority view in America today, as every single poll attests to, yet Baimel's major in political science seemingly doesn't teach him how to do a Google search.

The rest of Baimel's piece is riddled with gross inaccuracies. He attacks Kucinich for supporting the impeachment of Bush and Cheney, another "fringe" sentiment according to Baimel.

Wrong again.

A new poll out today from American Research Group finds that 55% of voters believe that George W. Bush has abused his powers in a way that rises to the level of impeachable offenses. 52% of voters believe that the same is true of Vice President Dick Cheney.

******Last time I checked, 55% was a majority , not a fringe viewpoint
************

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-16 3:35

The south will have to suceed, or will it be called a mental institution. When those take over American, they will then look at all the dead bodies who fought for America and realize that, it was the south who were the only ones that didn't do anything about it.

Probably hid behind and under, whatever they could find. And since history repeats itself, the slave owners of the past, will now be the slaves of the future.

The funniest thing is that the rest of america, wont give a dame about the south, (since the didn't give a damn), when it counted.

The south will rise again, yeah right, cowards!!!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-16 6:43

>>47
Remember the Alamo.

"The South Shall Rise Again" soon

1 Name: Anonymous 2007-11-04 8:21

41 Name: Anonymous 2007-11-09 17:09

42 Name: Anonymous 2007-11-09 17:32

43 Name: Anonymous 2007-11-09 17:33

44 Name: Guierrmo Sanchez 2007-11-10 19:17

45 Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 14:15

46 Name: Anonymous 2007-11-15 3:35

47 Name: Anonymous 2007-11-16 3:35

48 Name: Anonymous 2007-11-16 6:43