>>6
It's extremely scientific. It's the ultimate biologically dividing factor.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-27 21:02
>>7
Because it tells people how to behave. If gender didn't exist (or at least it wasn't pervasive to the point of being perceived as a defining characteristic of an individual), we'd have a lot less macho dipshit males and weak emotional females, and a lot more mathematically-minded scientists.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-27 21:03
>>8
That's sex, notgender. Gender is the social bullshite that people attach to sex.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-27 21:06
>>9
Wrong. Even if we were blind to gender, women would still be physically weaker and more emotional, and males would still be physically stronger and better suited for applications of the mind and analytical thinking.
>>11 Even if we were blind to gender, women would still be physically weaker and more emotional, and males would still be physically stronger and better suited for applications of the mind and analytical thinking.
Prove it scientifically. Good luck finding a large sample of people untainted by gender. Also, suppose that indeed, on average, females are worse at maths than males; the fact that mathematical intelligence follows a normal distribution means that still many females are better than many males at maths.
>>8
Biological sex isn't as straightforward as you think it is.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-27 21:28
>>13
Universal claims in natural speech is not a true universal claim a la logic. It is intellectually dishonest to suppose that he would be using the formal definition, and attacking the argument on that basis, as you did, is a strawman.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-27 21:40
>>17
If it's just a correlation, it's worthless and it's illogical to tell people they're not supposed to be smart or good at something.
>>17
You're attacking >>13 for alleged intellectual dishonesty but letting >>11's slide and committing your own.
>>9's claim was that without gender policing, we'd have more scientists (which is true), which >>11 ``attacked'' by saying that even without gender policing, there would still be differences between the sexes.
It is >>11 who cast his own comment as a universal claim, because if it wasn't, it wouldn't be relevant to >>9's original comment. In actual fact, of course, it was a deliberate red herring.
You're disregarding that because you want to agree with his thesis and aren't really interested in an intellectually honest discussion; that's also why you're trying to derail it with your Wikipedia appeal to fallacy.
>>9
Not my fault women are weak enough to act like society/TV tells them to.
I'm a 35yo overweight neckbeard who masturbates to Touhous, is a virgin and single. You think I give a shit? No, because I'm not some sort of retard who thinks ``gender'' is the reason I'll never be ``successful''. I'm not making up some bullshit gender for people like me either.
Go fuck a gay niggerkike.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-28 7:30
>>22
I didn't blame every single issue in society on it. In your case, your being a failure of a human being has nothing to do with gender.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-28 8:09
Maybe girls are like girls because they are girls, maybe the same is true for boys, transsexuals, eunuchs and faggots too. What if the frankfurt school is trolling everyone?
>>21
You are that or just plain a jew, either way, and for all intents and purposes, you're just a subversion agent kike, fuck off back to >>>/r/geekfeminismwiki/, hymie.
>>31
Reddit hates women and minorities. Those things don't have to go together, but they just happen to there. All of this recent misogyny and anti-Semitism is coming from Reddit.
>>36
Were you dropped as a child? Why the fuck would Jews be anti-Semitic?
Redditors hate Jews because it was fashionable to hate on Israel (for good reasons) a few years ago and Stormfront used the opportunity to control the conversation on Reddit. And because Redditors are feebleminded bandwagon-hoppers, they've now out-Stormfronted Stormfront.
All while maintaining they're progressive and egalitarian as shit, of course.
>>22,28 Not my fault women are weak enough to act like society/TV tells them to. I never said I hated women I make enough money (...) you got your priorities wrong.
lol k.
>>35 /prog/ has always hated women out of a mixture of the ``edginess'' of doing something supposed politically incorrect, which has actually been condoned for centuries, and of actual neckbeardly hate.
If anything, now that said brand of edginess has become passe it's that such misogyny is being denounced. As it should.
>>38
So you're saying I hate women because I know they watch TV?
I don't understand your last quote, though. I like lemon pie but I'm not going to devote my life to lemon pies, and the fact lemon pies are in a lower part of my priority pyramid doesn't mean I hate them.
>>39 /prog/ has always hated women out of a mixture of the ``edginess'' of doing something supposed politically incorrect
What? You must be the only one who does that. There are legitimate reasons for /prog/'s misogyny, including ``the girl i liked rejected me'', ``i'm autistic'' or Leah quality code.
>>39 /prog/ never really had an exceptionally strong opinion on women before misogyny became a Reddit meme.
Look at the early threads about Leah: they're obviously not exactly friendly, but they're not nearly as infantile as the current bullshit. They're full of edgy sexual jokes, but they attack Leah, not explicitly all women.
>>40 ``lel be friendly please XD''
The things Reddit has been in the news for recently:
1. /r/jailbait coverage on Anderson Cooper and outrage after pedophiles and their subreddits got.
2. /r/creepshots, which didn't even get banned until days after even the BBC covered the story (and its dozens of offspring subreddits still haven't been).
3. Rising up to defend a literal pedophile sex offender and crying about how he got fired from his job after Gawker (and the NYT and the BBC) published his real name.
Reddit believes some ridiculous things about itself, but even they no longer have any illusions that they're a welcoming, inoffensive community.
Racial slurs (at least, ``nigger'' and ``kike'') get you banned from Stormfront. Any subreddit trying to ban them would be seen as lhitlerally worse than SRS.
>>45
Of course not, but still, the maladjustedness of the worst of those characters makes me suspect of /jp/ expatriates more than anything.
>>43
I don't know what /prog/ you read, but I remember that when the word "woman" was, rarely, posted before, it resulted in a series of the least-ironically sounding derogatory comments about how they're inferior to men and some fucked up ``life advice'' as to how to live without them or some shit. Like paying whores.
And then there's the creepy otaku crap which we know are jokes. Mostly.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-28 16:03
>>12 gender and sex are synonymous
Not so. I have gender, but I've never had sex!
>>50
How's this for a nuanced phrasing, then: there's always been some 4chan-style misogyny, but the misogyny currently here is of a different nature and identical to the bullshit going on on Reddit.
4chan misogyny used to be much more low-key than Redditry. Though current /b/ seems to be Reddit 2.0.
PS: women have smaller brains even after accounting for body size. also, more white matter (the shit that transfers brain signals) and less gray matter (the shit that does the actual thinking)
Want to be a le contrarian rebel against society's norms? Here are some issues for you to preach on the internet!
- America is evil (and fat--don't forget to say that)
- Women are inferior
- 9/11 was part of an orchestrated attempt to elevate Israel to a world superpower
- Jews are destroying Western civilization
- Niggers are inferior
- Islam is actually a great religion
- Faggots should be hung in the streets
>>56
- America's United States' government is evil
- Women Gender is shit
- 9/11 was part of an orchestrated attempt to elevate Israel to a world superpower was probably a ploy to get an excuse to invade the Middle East for COOL FREE PETROLEUM
- Jews people who don't understand civil rights are destroying Western civilization
- Niggers are inferior just humans with black skin
- Islam is actually a great religion is shit
- Faggots should be hung in the streets Consensual sexual activity is a protected civil right, and thus none of anyone's fucking business
>>60
Redditors think of themselves as more gay-friendly than most people. That's not the same thing. They also think they're liberal atheists.
Reddit is brogressive more than anything else. The support gay rights to the extent that conservatives don't, but they'll still happily call everyone faggots and whine about pride parades.
In the same way that they oppose the burqa not because it is sexist, but because they are racists.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-28 18:46
>>64
There is no contradiction between using the word ``faggot'' and defending gay rights.
>>69
No they can't, for the same reason they can't sign contracts.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-28 19:22
>>70
Pointless laws. Back in Roman times children were sold into slavery all the time. That's way worse than taking a cock up the bum. You are just a moralist.
>>65
That's pretty much what >>64 said in the first place. There is, however, a contradiction between being ``gay-friendly'' and using homophobic slurs, no matter how many stand-up comedians pretend otherwise.
>>71
No, I'm a civil rights activist, and children are simply too dumb and immature to sign contracts or give consent for sexual activity. I'm not talking about ``grey area'' 17.8 year olds here, I'm really talking about clueless snivelling 10 year olds.
That's way worse than taking a cock up the bum.
Using a similar logic, cutting off both of your hands is way worse than just cutting a finger, so you should be okay with having the latter forced upon you.
>>80
Whether I am jewish or not (incidentally, I am not) bears no significance as to the validity of my arguments. Only a illogical racist retard would claim otherwise.
>>81
Freedom of expression is what allows you to spew your retarded bullshit on a public textboard. If you want to be a right-less slave, why don't you go to North Korea.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-28 19:59
>>76
Sally rents a flat downtown. She meets run aways on the street and lets them crash at her place. Some of these run aways are teenagers that were kicked out when they came out to their parents. Sally also calls people ``faggot'' when she is angry.
>>82 Yes, yes I do. The same way that calling you a nigger doesn't make me a racist because words are not magical and intent is really what matters.
Intent matters, but so does the basic empathy to realise what words mean to people, you entitled manbaby.
How the fuck is appropriating a slur that applies to a specific group of people and repurposing it to mean ``anything generally bad'' not fucked up in the intent department, anyway? It's not the same as using those slurs against members of that group, but it's still saying ``members of that group are self-evidently undesirable, so it makes sense to use words that refer to them as a generic insult''.
You sound like you've lived a life full of privilege and completely devoid of introspection. I genuinely hope you're only a teenager, because if not, that's fucking embarrassing.
>>83
Biologically, it can easily be shown that females aren't ready to reproduce before the age of 12-14 years old, when their periods begin. The situation can be inferred to be similar for males.
Mentally, (save a few mathematical geniuses) they're not logical enough to fully asses the medical and social issues of sexuality, nor do they have the information required (or the capacity to comprehend it) to take such a decision.
>>85
Yes. Your imaginary Sally has serious problems with unchecked privilege. The existence of cognitive dissonance does not absolve people of all sins.
>>87 (save a few mathematical geniuses)
Mathematical insight and emotional maturity have fuck-all to do with each other. Don't weaken a self-evidently strong position with bullshit.
On that topic, menarche is not the same as sexual maturity either.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-28 20:12
>>87
Human frequently engage in sex for pleasure. Why would reproduction capability be a good measure for a minimum age to have sexual contact?
nor do they have the information required
What information is required?
It's not the same as using those slurs against members of that group, but it's still saying ``members of that group are self-evidently undesirable, so it makes sense to use words that refer to them as a generic insult''.
That's your dumb interpretation, fagshit. See, I called you fagshit. Does it mean I have anything against homosexuals? No.
You sound like you've lived a life full of privilege and completely devoid of introspection.
That's it, die in a fire. Come back when you've understood ad hominem.
>>89 Your imaginary Sally has serious problems with unchecked privilege. Definitely, we must make laws to stop these evil thought-criminals from uttering words that offend some people and to even things out.
>>93
Look, I know that for an stubborn and emotionally stunted douche this must be hard to understand, but sometimes you say things for people to prod people into reflecting about the world and their relationship to it, like when you start on hyperbolic ramblings about thought-crime and what not.
One of such things is reminding people of their privilege as to let them think about why they are saying dumb-ass shit devoid of any consideration for their fellow human beings, such as that people oppressed and persecuted should just take the slurs used to marginalize them like a champ, because they come from the mouth of someone who claims to understand them.
After many repeated scannings, I managed to extract the following statement:
NEGATION(people oppressed and persecuted should just take the slurs used to marginalize them like a champ, because they come from the mouth of someone who claims to understand them)
If this is what your intended argument was, then my response would be as follows:
Please connect this statement to your proof of:
If one says the word ``faggot'', they are homophobic.
>>97
Which wasn't my argument, I just said that it made you inconsiderate and cruel.
But, if you ask so, my argument would be as follows: the fact that if one proffers statements which continue to cement the hopelessness of homosexual people, an oppressed people, then the act is homophobic. If one does so consciously, then one is homophobic.
>>95 Look, I know that for an stubborn and emotionally stunted douche this must be hard to understand
Oh, the irony.
but sometimes you say things for people to prod people into reflecting about the world and their relationship to it, like when you start on hyperbolic ramblings about thought-crime and what not.
Yes, and abstractions can be good or bad.
One of such things is reminding people of their privilege
Which is a shitty abstraction because it encourages further discrimination.
saying dumb-ass shit devoid of any consideration for their fellow human beings, such as that people oppressed and persecuted should just take the slurs used to marginalize them like a champ, There is no such thing as the right not to be offended. If you think words are magical and get all uppity about them, it's your fucking fault. Calling you a faggot references a different meaning of faggot that has less to do with sexual orientation and more with being an annoyingly vociferous cretin. If a homosexual is offended because I called you a faggot based on the fact that you are an annoyingly vociferous cretin, then it's their problem for not understanding that words may have more than one meaning.
because they come from the mouth of someone who claims to understand them.
But it's okay to use them if you're part of the poor persecuted minority because ``you understand''. That's discrimination.
>>98 But, if you ask so, my argument would be as follows: the fact that if one proffers statements which continue to cement the hopelessness of homosexual people, an oppressed people, then the act is homophobic.
Prove it, faggot. Tell me how my words magically oppress people at a distance.
>>99
The lesson here is that not all discrimination is equal. Like how minors are discriminated against on a myriad of activities, for sound reasons.
And yes, you, as an outsider, are being discriminated on the use of slurs against an oppressed class because it was oppressed by outsiders, like, by definition.
Besides, we aren't talking of a legal right here. We are talking about mindful coexistence. Come on, you can get it.
>>99 There is no such thing as the right not to be offended.
It's interesting how you entitled fuckwits always turn ``you're an asshole for doing X'' into ``doing X should be against the law''. You're so terrified of coming to realise what a shitty person your unexamined privilege has made you that you've turned it into a desperate victim complex.
Calling you a faggot references a different meaning of faggot that has less to do with sexual orientation and more with being an annoyingly vociferous cretin.
Except that you're doing this because you associate ``annoyingly vociferous cretin'' Do you think ten-dollar words make you look more sophisticated? with stereotypes about homosexuals. You missed the entire point of that Louis CK skit.
The problem here isn't everyone else for understanding what words mean; it's you for dishonestly pretending your private supposed meaning is universal and dominant. It's entitlement at its most whiny and infantile.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-28 21:25
Homosexuality is objectively immoral because it is a self-destructive behavior.
It is self-destructive because anal sex is unhealthy due to the fact that the anal tears caused by penetration are infected by the fecal matters of the receiver of the penis. This contamination of the blood stream causes a plethora of diseases.
The same is also true for oral sex, which has now been shown to cause mouth cancer in rates exceeding tobacco. Plus, the tears of the penis caused by the teeth can also result in infection to the receiver of oral sex.
Masturbation is the most healthy of the sexual practices of homosexual, but it is not completely safe since hands are one of dirtiest places on the body which can cause infection to the penis. Also, masturbation is often accompanied by the other sexual acts mentioned bellow. The only way for homosexuality to be acceptable would be for the homos to solely engage in mutual masturbation after having decontaminated the body parts involved (hands, penis).
Homosexuals account for a disproportionate number of hepatitis cases: 70-80% in San Francisco, 29% in Denver, 66% in New York City, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal, and 26% in Melbourne.
37% of homosexuals engage in sadomasochism, which accounts for many accidental deaths. In San Francisco, classes were held to teach homosexuals how to not kill their partners during sadomasochism.
41% of homosexuals say they have had sex with strangers in public restrooms, 60% say they have had sex with strangers in bathhouses, and 64% of these encounters have involved the use of illegal drugs.
Depending on the city, 39-59% of homosexuals are infected with intestinal parasites like worms, flukes and amoebae, which is common in filthy third world countries.
The median age of death of homosexuals is 42 (only 9% live past age 65). This drops to 39 if the cause of death is AIDS. The median age of death of a married heterosexual man is 75.
This is why homosexuality is for the most part objectively immoral.
And I completely agree with this statement. The difference is in the intention. Faggot is a word that homophobes use to do what you described. But if one uses the word faggot, they may not be using the word with the same intention. If someone hears them use the word faggot, and in the context, interprets their use of the word as for the oppressive intention, then that is unfortunate. But it is still nothing more than a misunderstanding.
To clear the misunderstanding, the speaker can clarify that they do not intend to use the word faggot in the same way used by homophobes. Another is for the listener to give the speaker the benefit of the doubt, until further evidence of their intent becomes apparent. I find the later to be reasonable. Don't make a judgment on a person until you have enough information to confirm the judgment. If you jump to conclusions, then you are responsible for the erroneous judgment.
>>109 To clear the misunderstanding, the speaker can clarify that they do not intend to use the word faggot in the same way used by homophobes.
``I didn't mean that he was awful for being gay, I just meant that he was awful, and indicated this by calling him a name that suggested he was gay!''
>>112
It is tiresome. And you should know that I agree with you. I wasn't talking so much about what is the right or wrong things to do and say, but just the ambiguous nature of words and communication.
>>102 And yes, you, as an outsider, are being discriminated on the use of slurs against an oppressed class because it was oppressed by outsiders, like, by definition.
Accept discrimination for bogus reasons? No thanks.
Besides, we aren't talking of a legal right here. We are talking about mindful coexistence. Come on, you can get it.
Of course, I wouldn't publicly use words like faggot or nigger because homophobes and racists could interpret their usage as a confirmation of their ass-backwards beliefs. But if I'm among friends who are all convinced anti-homophobes, there's nothing wrong with using the word faggot as a pejorative term unrelated to homosexuality since there's no possibility of misinterpretation.
>>106
I didn't know that because I told my friend over encrypted messenger that I think ``My Little Pony is gay'', it's going to make a lot of homosexuals angry and frustrated.
>>107 It's interesting how you entitled fuckwits always turn ``you're an asshole for doing X'' into ``doing X should be against the law''.
When a lot of people think that ``you're an asshole for doing X'', there's an imminent danger that doing X will become illegal. And I really really hate it when people try to curtail my essential rights, such as that to absolute freedom of expression.
You're so terrified of coming to realise what a shitty person your unexamined privilege has made you that you've turned it into a desperate victim complex.
I reject your idiotic abstraction. Try to reformulate your bullshit without it, or shut the fuck up.
Do you think ten-dollar words make you look more sophisticated?
Die in a fire, cretin.
You missed the entire point of that Louis CK skit.
Which one? I guess I missed that one.
it's you for dishonestly pretending your private supposed meaning is universal and dominant.
As mentioned above, I wouldn't use this kind of word when speaking to a general audience since they wouldn't understand the correct meaning.
>>112
Well, I disagree with you, and think you are an idiot.
>>115
No, pejoratively it's still shit. Maybe if you used it devoid of such connotations, I'm not sure. But you ain't.
And the freeze peaches aren't in any real danger here, we can police behavior as a community and that allows for more fluidity than just putting it in the hands of the actual police.
You are still a stubborn and self-important asshole, by the way.
>>120
More shitspam is not the solution to a shitspam problem.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-28 23:10
I hate kikes.
During discussions on the Internet we often face a sense of discomfort. It seems that your opponent calls himself a Russian, and his user name is "indigenous-primordious-true-Rus", but the feeling that you talk to a hater of Russia and the Slavs still doesn't leave. You quickly look through the blog of this "true Rus" and exactly, photos of Israel, friends - Jews and/or national minorities. Yes, again your intuition was correct - he is a Jew, who tries to play Russian for social reasons.
On the other hand, many have little experience dealing with Jews, and that a person is Jewish, they will notice only if this particular Jew's name is Haim Israelevich Rabinovsky, and his exterior is decorated with vulture-like hooked nose and a sharp dog-ears. And even then they will think that he is not a Jew, but an Armenian. Look, for example, at Okudzhava, many years he called himself a Georgian, but then he considered it more profitable to start proudly shouting about his true ethnicity. It is even harder to determine ethnicity on the Internet, where you can't see a person you talking with, so I present you the Jewish Communication Code:
1) Jews are enraged by only the mention of their nationality. The words "Yid" and "Kike" acts on the Jews like a red rag on a bull. Use these words a couple of timesin the comments and look at the opponent's reaction. Exasperated the Jews are easily recognizable by their writing style, full of blatant small poisonous echidna sarcasm sickening.
2) There are a few words from which Jews begin to writhe like a vampire in the sun. They are - Dezionisation, Genetics, Race, Nationalism, <your_country_name>, <your_nation_name>, <your_great_historic_leaders>. Positive statements about <your_nation_name>, <your_race_name> and <your_great_historic_leaders> (kings, Bismarck, Stolypin, etc.) immediately leads to the fact that a Jew begins like a monkey throwing shit, trying disparage your nation.
3) A Jew will defend any crime committed by other Jews. So it is enough to mention any Jewish crime, such as the Holodomor, the atrocities of the Polish Jews, looting of Weimar Germany, or the bombings of the Gaza Strip in Palestine by incendiary phosphorous bombs, which led to the deaths of hundreds of innocent children, and the identity of your companion will become clear as daylight. The Jew will start with foaming at the mouth protecting the Jewish criminals, while a decent person will judge.
4) the Jews are forbidden to praise Gentiles (non-Jews), and to condemn their tribesmen. A Jew will never condemn the bloody butcher Trotsky, but will always find fault in Solzhenitsin or Stolypin. A Jew will never praise Russian artist Vasily Mikhailovich Vasnetsov or Paul Viktorovich Ryzhenko, but will always praise his own people - defective-potboilers like Chagall, Kandinsky and Malevich. A Jew will never say a good word about the Slavic composers, but will always praise a decadent-Jew Vysotsky, a petty rhymer Joseph Brodsky and degenerative chernushnik Kafka. The Jews have megalomania and inferiority complex at the same time. "A Jew praises only other Jews" - Russian proverb.
5) The Jews often use the expression-stamps like "this/your country", "compared to the civilized nations", "from an objective point of view," "universal values", "every nation has the right to its own villains", "quote was taken out of context", "there are good Jews too", "you, Russians, blame anyone but yourself", "Jews are the conscience of humanity", "anti-Semitism is a diagnosis", "anti-Semitism is a barometer of evil in society", "history does not tolerate the subjunctive" and so on. To the term "nationalism" the Jews prefer the term "anti-Semitism" to throw dust in your eyes and to disguise their position of intruding aliens, invaders, lying that "Jews are hated just for being Jews." Faithful Jews write "G-d" instead of "God."
6) Denial of "Holocaust" makes the Jews insane, because the "Holocaust" is the main idol of the Jewish mythology, akin to the Jew Jesus Christ in Christianity. Jews love to say that the "The Sacrifice of Holocaust cancels the sacrifice of Jesus." "Holocaust" brings the Jews incredible income, at one time reparations from Germany accounted for most of Israel's GDP, while Poland pays the Jews even today.
7) The Jews often practice NLP techniques, based on the substitution of terms ("Clearing" in the language of Scientologists - another Jewish religion). For example sort of agreeing with you a little bit, a Jew will try to tend your opinion to his side, and then again a little bit. And so Jew pulls straws out of a haystack. Pinned, a Jew will begin defending Jewish nation, that yes, there are some bad Jews, like Stalin or Trotsky, but he and his relatives are "good Jews." In Russia the Jews introduced after the revolution the Itallian word "Hebrew", censuring the original word "Yid" (which became sullied with evil) - a good example of a successful NLP practice.
8) The Jews show unusual loyalty to the trans-national corporations and globalization, advertising products of a foreign countries, being xenopatriotes or just rootless cosmopolitians.
9) Multiculturalism is a sacred cow of the Jews, as it allows them to cooperate national minorities agains host nation to reclaim the living space. Therefore, loyalty to multiculturalism spiced with the rejection of monoethnicity indicates that your opponent is a typical Jew.
10) Sore spot of the Jews is their own identity. Tell the person that ethnic, racial Jews have went extinct a long time ago, and today Jews are just a Talmudic sect called "Zionists", whose members are a rabble set of random bloods, for the Judaism is determined by the mother, and the Jewish women are known to be whores. Continue by recalling that the Ashkenazi Jews (majority of the Jews) are not the biblical Semites, but in fact Turkic Khazars, who adopted Judaism as a cargo cult. Finish with a modern thesis that the Jews are biorobots bred out of various semitic tribes by Egyptian priests to weaken the enemies of Egypt.
11) The easiest way to tell if you opponent Jewish is to ask him directly. If the answer is negative, then clarify by asking what makes your opponent, for example, a Slav. If it turns out that he is some cosmopolitian unihuman or just a half-bred garbage, then he is loyal to the Jewish cause and may be considered a shabbos-goyim. The Jews are usually married to Jews and/or have a circle of friends made of the Jews and national minorities.
>>119 No, pejoratively it's still shit. Maybe if you used it devoid of such connotations, I'm not sure. But you ain't.
Prove it, prove that I'm doing something bad by using the word faggot pejoratively if the message receivers aren't homophobic.
And the freeze peaches aren't in any real danger here, we can police behavior as a community and that allows for more fluidity than just putting it in the hands of the actual police.
That made me laugh way more than it should have. I disagree, if you manage to convince enough mouthbreathing retards that words are magical and that some words should never be uttered by some people, the right to free speech is endangered.
You are still a stubborn and self-important asshole, by the way.
When your civil rights (including free speech) are threatened from every direction, being stubborn about them is justifiable. As for the ``self-important asshole'' part, fuck off and die, ``please''.
>>126 When your civil rights (including free speech) are threatened from every direction
This is what Redditors really believe. Fuck off back to your neckbeard clan.
>>56
Shalom! >>78
Agreed >>86
Check your nigger privilege, jew. >>95 >>96
Samejew, and also the only one who doesn't understand them. >>107
Holy shit the irony. >>119
Shalom!
>>135
Boy, you're as dumb as a vampire with a garlic fetish.
You're about as sharp as a wet bag of oatmeal.
If you spoke any more your tongue would get sunburnt.
If you were any more small-minded I could sell your head as a keychain.
Ya hear hear me boy? Are ya gettin' me son?
>>136
Hymie, you're as jewish as an ashkenazi with a shoah fetish.
You're about as human as a wet bag of snake oil.
If you lied any more your fake death toll would reach infinity.
If you were any more evil-minded I could sell your head as a chewtoy.
Ya hear hear me hymie? Are ya gettin' me kike?
gender is partially biological reality, and partially cultural norms that serve various useful social functions. most women don't have the temperament to be mathematically-minded scientists; they're empathizers and not systemizers. pretty sure that whatever weird social engineering projects you advocate for wouldn't change that.
>>140 most women don't have the temperament to be mathematically-minded scientists
Absolutely, because simply by accepting the gender of ``woman'', you must abide by the cultural norms attached to it, which includes being emotional and bad at maths. This bears no significance, however, on the female sex.
this is dumb humanities shithead semantics bullshit
This is a programming board, if you're not pedantic about your definitions then you don't belong here.
Girls are delicious.
Nothing like eating a pink pussy
Damn now i'm horny
Also, Lisp is a good programming language
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-30 10:38
>>108
Just out! The act of living is self-destructive and will, by it's very design, result in an unavoidable death!
Ladies and gentlemen, clearly the source of all this self-destructiveness is heterosexual reproduction, the cause of all living, would you not agree?
I never said women were bad at mathematics; IIRC most research shows there's not much of a difference in aptitude. however, they are extremely bad at economics:
this is probably mostly because they just don't give a shit about it, because, like I said, they're empathizers and not systemizers. it's a key difference in temperament that's likely at least partially biological in origin, even if cultural factors reinforce it.
>>154 it's a key difference in temperament that's likely at least partially biological in origin, even if cultural factors reinforce it. Prove it.
>>155 Gender and sex refer to literally the same exact thing. A male who is trans is still a male in the fields of both gender and sex.
No, if they are transsexual their gender (woman) and sex (male) no longer match. If the physical transformation is sufficiently convincing, people wouldn't even be aware that the person who is perceived as a woman (gender) is male (sex).
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-31 15:01
>>156
The undetectable tranny is a rarity. It costs quite a bit to get it all done. Still a man, genderwise and sexwise.
Name:
Anonymous2012-10-31 15:57
i'm a 21 year old virgin. i will discover sex this year. I MUST
**YOU HAVE BEEN VISITED BY LE TOP LEL OF COMEDY GOLD** POST THIS IS 3 threads or lose your sides!
░░░░░░░▄▀▀▀░▄▄▄▄░░░▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄░▀
░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀░░█
░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▄░░░░░░░░▄▄░░░░░▀▄
░░░▄▀░░░░░▄▀▀▀█▄░▀░░░░▄▀▀▀██▀▀▄░░░░░▀
░░▄▀░░▄▄░░▀▀▀▀████▀░░░▀▄▄▀▀▀▀▄█░░░░░░█
░▄▀░▄▀█░░▄▄░░░░░░░█░░░░░▄▄▄░░░▀▀░░░░░░█
▄▀░░█░█░▀░░▀▀▄░░░░░█░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀▀▄░░░░░█
▀▄░░▀░█░░░▄░░░░░░▄▀░░░░▀▄░░░▄▄░░▀▄░█░▄▀
░░▀▄░░░░█▀▄░░░░░▀█░░░░▀▀░█▄▀▄░█░░░█░█
░░░░█░░█░▀▄▀▄▄░░░░▀▀▀░░░▄█▀░▄▀█░░░░▄
░░░░░█░░█░▀▀▄░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█░▄█▀▄▀░░░░░
░░░░░█░░▀▄▄░░▀█░░░█░░▄▄▀▀▄▄█▀░░░░▀
░░░░▄▀░░░▀▄▀▀▄░▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▀▀▀▄▀░░░░▀
░░░▄▀░░░░░░▀▄░█▄▄▄▄▀▀░▀▄▀▀░░░▄▀▀
░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄█▄▄▀▀░░░░▄
░░█░░░░░░▀▄▄░░░▄▄▄▄▄▄▀░░░▄▀
░░█░░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
░░░█░░░░░░▀▀▀▀▀░░░░▄
░░░▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀
Name:
Anonymous2013-12-03 23:57
**YOU HAVE BEEN VISITED BY LE TOP LEL OF COMEDY GOLD** POST THIS IS 3 threads or lose your sides!
░░░░░░░▄▀▀▀░▄▄▄▄░░░▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄░▀
░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀░░█
░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▄░░░░░░░░▄▄░░░░░▀▄
░░░▄▀░░░░░▄▀▀▀█▄░▀░░░░▄▀▀▀██▀▀▄░░░░░▀
░░▄▀░░▄▄░░▀▀▀▀████▀░░░▀▄▄▀▀▀▀▄█░░░░░░█
░▄▀░▄▀█░░▄▄░░░░░░░█░░░░░▄▄▄░░░▀▀░░░░░░█
▄▀░░█░█░▀░░▀▀▄░░░░░█░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀▀▄░░░░░█
▀▄░░▀░█░░░▄░░░░░░▄▀░░░░▀▄░░░▄▄░░▀▄░█░▄▀
░░▀▄░░░░█▀▄░░░░░▀█░░░░▀▀░█▄▀▄░█░░░█░█
░░░░█░░█░▀▄▀▄▄░░░░▀▀▀░░░▄█▀░▄▀█░░░░▄
░░░░░█░░█░▀▀▄░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█░▄█▀▄▀░░░░░
░░░░░█░░▀▄▄░░▀█░░░█░░▄▄▀▀▄▄█▀░░░░▀
░░░░▄▀░░░▀▄▀▀▄░▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▀▀▀▄▀░░░░▀
░░░▄▀░░░░░░▀▄░█▄▄▄▄▀▀░▀▄▀▀░░░▄▀▀
░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄█▄▄▀▀░░░░▄
░░█░░░░░░▀▄▄░░░▄▄▄▄▄▄▀░░░▄▀
░░█░░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
░░░█░░░░░░▀▀▀▀▀░░░░▄
░░░▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀