Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

girls

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 18:52

oh wow

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 19:19

sleazy vaginas

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 20:32

stinky smelly STD-ridden meat flaps

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 20:32

XY > XX

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 20:43


$ python
>>> "XY" > "XX"
True

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 20:48

Gender is unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 20:56

>>6
Why?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:01

>>6
It's extremely scientific. It's the ultimate biologically dividing factor.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:02

>>7
Because it tells people how to behave.  If gender didn't exist (or at least it wasn't pervasive to the point of being perceived as a defining characteristic of an individual), we'd have a lot less macho dipshit males and weak emotional females, and a lot more mathematically-minded scientists.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:03

>>8
That's sex, not genderGender is the social bullshite that people attach to sex.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:06

>>9
Wrong. Even if we were blind to gender, women would still be physically weaker and more emotional, and males would still be physically stronger and better suited for applications of the mind and analytical thinking.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:07

>>10
gender and sex are synonymous

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:13

>>11
Even if we were blind to gender, women would still be physically weaker and more emotional, and males would still be physically stronger and better suited for applications of the mind and analytical thinking.
Prove it scientifically.  Good luck finding a large sample of people untainted by gender.  Also, suppose that indeed, on average, females are worse at maths than males; the fact that mathematical intelligence follows a normal distribution means that still many females are better than many males at maths.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:15

>>11
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░
░███░░░░░░░░░█░█░███
█████░░░░░░░█░░░██░█
░░█░░░░░░░░█░░░░░███
░░█░░░░░░█████░░░░░░
░░▒░░█░██░░░░░██░█░░
░░▒░█░█░░█░░░█░░█░█░
▒▒▒▒▒██░░░░░░░░░██░░
░▒▒▒░░█░░█░░░█░░█░░░
░░▒░░░░█░░███░░█░░░░
░░░░░░░░█░░░░░█░░░░░

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:16

>>12
Their definitions are different, and you have yet to prove equivalence (which you can't, because of the existence of transsexuals).

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:17

>>8
Biological sex isn't as straightforward as you think it is.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:28

>>13
Universal claims in natural speech is not a true universal claim a la logic. It is intellectually dishonest to suppose that he would be using the formal definition, and attacking the argument on that basis, as you did, is a strawman.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:40

>>17
If it's just a correlation, it's worthless and it's illogical to tell people they're not supposed to be smart or good at something.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 21:40

>>17
You're attacking >>13 for alleged intellectual dishonesty but letting >>11's slide and committing your own.

>>9's claim was that without gender policing, we'd have more scientists (which is true), which >>11 ``attacked'' by saying that even without gender policing, there would still be differences between the sexes.
It is >>11 who cast his own comment as a universal claim, because if it wasn't, it wouldn't be relevant to >>9's original comment. In actual fact, of course, it was a deliberate red herring.

You're disregarding that because you want to agree with his thesis and aren't really interested in an intellectually honest discussion; that's also why you're trying to derail it with your Wikipedia appeal to fallacy.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 22:10

>>19
Optimize your quote, Ahmed.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 22:15

>>20
Ahmed would never participate in a feminist discussion, except maybe to call everyone ``shabbos goys who fell for the jew spinstrel song''.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-27 23:21

>>9
Not my fault women are weak enough to act like society/TV tells them to.

I'm a 35yo overweight neckbeard who masturbates to Touhous, is a virgin and single. You think I give a shit? No, because I'm not some sort of retard who thinks ``gender'' is the reason I'll never be ``successful''. I'm not making up some bullshit gender for people like me either.

Go fuck a gay niggerkike.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 7:30

>>22
I didn't blame every single issue in society on it.  In your case, your being a failure of a human being has nothing to do with gender.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 8:09

Maybe girls are like girls because they are girls, maybe the same is true for boys, transsexuals, eunuchs and faggots too. What if the frankfurt school is trolling everyone?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 11:19

>>22
Single virgin hates women and thinks he's edgy as fuck. How extraordinary.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 12:03

>>9
Do you have a single fact to back that up?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 12:04

>>26
The entire field of gender studies.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 12:06

>>23,25
I make enough money to live a good life. If your definition of ``failure of a human being'' means being single, you got your priorities wrong.

I never said I hated women, I just don't want to be in a relationship.

>>22
I didn't blame every single issue in society on it
Transsexuals and womyn do.

Name: VIPPER 2012-10-28 12:09

And this is the reason why /prog/ needs mods.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 12:15

>>21
You are that or just plain a jew, either way, and for all intents and purposes, you're just a subversion agent kike, fuck off back to >>>/r/geekfeminismwiki/, hymie.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 12:21

>>30
There's something I'll never understand.

Why does everyone bring up Jews when people talk about feminism, faggots, transgenders and anything ``gender'' related?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 12:22

>>33
Nice dubs, Ahmed!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 12:25

fuck off sandniggers

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 14:53

>>33
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 15:03

>>31
Reddit hates women and minorities. Those things don't have to go together, but they just happen to there. All of this recent misogyny and anti-Semitism is coming from Reddit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 15:03

>>35
But what does that have to do with Jews? Are redditards Jews?

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 15:07

>>36
Were you dropped as a child? Why the fuck would Jews be anti-Semitic?
Redditors hate Jews because it was fashionable to hate on Israel (for good reasons) a few years ago and Stormfront used the opportunity to control the conversation on Reddit. And because Redditors are feebleminded bandwagon-hoppers, they've now out-Stormfronted Stormfront.

All while maintaining they're progressive and egalitarian as shit, of course.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 15:09

>>22,28
Not my fault women are weak enough to act like society/TV tells them to.
I never said I hated women
I make enough money (...) you got your priorities wrong.
lol k.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 15:17

>>35
/prog/ has always hated women out of a mixture of the ``edginess'' of doing something supposed politically incorrect, which has actually been condoned for centuries, and of actual neckbeardly hate.

If anything, now that said brand of edginess has become passe it's that such misogyny is being denounced. As it should.

Name: Anonymous 2012-10-28 15:21

>>37
I thought Reddit was full of ``lel be friendly please XD'' retards, that's why I was asking.

Why the fuck would Jews be anti-Semitic?
There are plenty of self-loathing Jews.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List