Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Anonix part VI

Name: ANONIX MEME FAN 2009-04-08 15:03

How are things progressing? I haven't heard any news in a while so I'm dreading that this project is turning out to be vaporware.
Know that there are many of us who would one day like to run your operating system! Please don't give up!

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:21

lol, I just noticed that they haven't implemented ls. I might throw them a bone and do it later

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:23

>>1
Link please

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:24

>>1
I know you're desperately trying to force that meme so that if someone else finally makes the same ``joke'' you can tell him something that may surprise him, but it's not working. Instead, you just look kind of sad.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:24

wait, anonix has vi now?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:29

>>3
http://rechan.eu.org/
>>4
I know you're desperately trying to force that meme so that if someone else finally makes the same ``joke'' you can tell him something that may surprise him, but it's not working. Instead, you just look kind of sad.
>>5
They wish

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:29

°o/

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:39

rechan is full of spam, and they're not even trying to clean it up. anonix is dead.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 22:40

>>8
That's too bad

I much prefer beating a live horse

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 0:54

>>2
Anonix `ls´ doesn't implement bloat such as listing files.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 0:58

``ls'' is unscientific and redundant. Why would you want to print a list of files in your program?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 1:18

alias ls='echo *'

Name: HAHAHaruhi !6mHaRuhies 2009-04-09 3:11

We're too busy. I hope the situation will change in a few weeks.

Meanwhile, enjoy the current release:
http://rechan.eu.org/misc/anoncoreutils-20080617-2.tar.bz2
and the latest files from the repository:
http://rechan.eu.org/misc/anoncoreutils/

>>2
Know an efficient way of recursing directories in conformance with POSIX H, L, and P options that doesn't blow up on directory graphs containing cycles? The guy doing cp ran into that problem the last I heard.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 3:38

>>13
there is no -P. also, recursively listing subdirectories with -R only follows symlinks with -L, not with -H:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/ls.html
-R
Recursively list subdirectories encountered. When a symbolic link to a directory is encountered, the directory shall not be recursively listed unless the -L option is specified.

and i'd say that anyone stupid enough to use -L and -R together without considering the consequences deserves to have it blow up.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 3:45

>>13
Just store a stack of (device,inode) pairs for each ancestor and check for duplicates whenever you follow a link.

>>14
Yes, I'm sure POSIX only included -L because their stupid.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 3:48

>>14
also,
The ls utility shall detect infinite loops; that is, entering a previously visited directory that is an ancestor of the last file encountered. When it detects an infinite loop, ls shall write a diagnostic message to standard error and shall either recover its position in the hierarchy or terminate.
POSIX says how to make it not blow up.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 3:54

>>14
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/cp.html
If the -P option was specified, cp shall copy any symbolic link specified as a source_file operand and any symbolic links encountered during traversal of a file hierarchy, and shall not follow any symbolic links.

Also, I think -R and -L together should perform an graph traversal, but that might be a little difficult.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 5:57

So what is this Anonix? A system developed by Anonymous? What does it provide what Linux/Mac/Windows doesn't have except another license?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 6:07

>>18
So far it has several shell utilities, whereas Linux has none.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 6:11

>>19
Not a real answer to my question, furthermore, Linux has.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 6:16

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 6:26

>>21
Thanks!

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 8:06

Get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 8:32

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 8:37

>>24
needs moar Xarn

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 22:44

>>18
Some of the Anoncoreutils are several times faster than GNU's implementations, and all of them are certainly smaller. On the old REchan there were several threads that benchmarked Anoncoreutils vs GNU coreutils, but those have since been lost. Wouldn't be too hard to reproduce the results though.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 22:46

>>26
For example what?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 23:05

>>25
moar

*Cringe*

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 23:07

>>27
I remember someone saying that GNU md5sum or sha1sum was much slower than the Anoncoreutils equivalent.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 23:14

>>29
was

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 23:23

>>30
is

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-21 12:20

2009-05-21 Awaken by Cudder

Rise from your sleep(), and prepare yourselves for some upcoming projects -- both proposed by The REchan Management (whose full name carries a connotation that some may find unpleasant), and you, the users!

The beast moves.  ^__^

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-21 20:16

I would have contributed if didn't . Anoncoreutils fails equally as GNU.

>>29
When I use an md5sum program, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless help screens and cursor positioning code!

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-21 20:20

>>33
I would have contributed if didn't have a stupid name. Anoncoreutils fails equally as GNU.

Name: HAHAHaruhi !6mHaRuhies 2009-05-21 23:08

>>32-34
We have some other (hopefully interesting) projects lined up for you guys besides A/X and ACU. What they are exactly I can't say right now, but they are SICP-related.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-21 23:29

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-22 2:26

I don't think that subbing SICP lectures with animu subs is something people do in reddit or digg.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-22 3:52

>>37
That gives me an idea.
The SICP lectures should have those subtitles that change colour as they're spoken - that way you can sing/lecture along with the sussman.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-22 4:12

>>38
THE SUSSMAN does kind of lecture a bit fast compared to Abelson. It's a bit easier to follow Abelson in the videos. This is not a bad idea.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-22 4:16

>>36
We're teaching 1950s japan how to program?  How will we send the files?

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-22 4:24

>>41
Through the tubes, of course.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-22 4:53

The SICP lectures should have those subtitles that change colour as they're spoken - that way you can sing/lecture along with the sussman.
>> This is not a bad idea.
Ohoho.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-24 6:11

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-07 5:58

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-07 6:31

I feel CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED.  Where are the other chapters?

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!vzR1SbE7g/KHqrb 2009-08-07 21:33

>>44
...and this is why you can't trust Anonymous. That version is several months old already and you can still see lots of embarassing mistakes ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-07 22:56

>>46
Come now, the information wants to be free.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-08 0:03

>>47
Come now
I CAME

....Now what?

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-08 0:19

>>48
clean up your mess

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-08 2:48

Hax My Anonix

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-08 3:18

>>48
back to /b/, please

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-08 3:44

Questions for Cudder !MhMRSATORI

1 2008-05-02 02:41 Anonymous
    1. I heard you're a girl. Confirm/Deny?
    2. Can I hax your anus?

2 2008-05-02 02:57 Cudder !MhMRSATORI
    1. No.
    2. No. Fuck off back to 4chan's /prog/ with your retarded memes.


LOL, whois information fixed I see, gb2/rechan

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-08 4:13

>>40
By means of transdimensional FTP ofcourse.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-15 21:24

The Anonix POSIX Reference Implementation project aims to provide a public-domain, standards-conforming implementation of the functionality described in POSIX 2004, initially focusing on the shell and utilities but eventually encompassing an entire Operating System including a kernel. As with original Anonix, it is anticipated that APRI and GNU will coexist, along with any suitable kernel, at least until APRI is complete.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 0:27

whatever, you fruit

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 0:29

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 1:55

>>54
A simple coreutils project failed pitifully, so we'll just repurpose it to something much larger?  How is this a revival?  Where is all this code supposed to come from?  Is there even a sane way to submit it this time?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 3:18

>>57
Does it matter if there's any way to submit code? Nobody cares in the first place.

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!vzR1SbE7g/KHqrb 2009-11-16 3:42

>>57
HAHAHaruhi, who is currently managing the rather dead Anonix project, is irritated that w4lolitaKs' translation project in /jp/ is actually progressing, and has decided to try reviving it. All I know is, she's working on something.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 8:20

>>59
Wait, how is he still "managing" it?  Hasn't it been completely 100% dead for over a year?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 9:12

アノにクス バンプ

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 9:32

私の直腸を切り刻みなさい。

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 9:34

한국 여기 있었어요.
일본 상실했다.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 10:00

>>59
A project like this can be done with lots of people or lots of time. 

The time that's passed and the progress shows that you have no motivation to do it yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 10:25

>>60
In the same way people own plots of land but don't do anything with them.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 10:29

>>65
COMMIE COMMIE TRAITOR TO OUR COUNTRY

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 10:33

I would like to see another /prog/ collaboration, but I think it's obvious that it we would all lose interest after a week.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 10:38

>>67

Rewriting shit that doesn't need replacement is horrible busywork

I get enough of that at work, thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 10:40

>>68
I didn't specify a project and I didn't suggest we restart anonix, it was just some out-loud wishful thinking.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 10:41

>>67
Yes it would be nice, but I am so busy writing fibs that I couldn't possibly commit any of my time

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-16 10:42

>>70
Perhaps we could collaborate on a program to compute factorials sometime :)

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-05 2:44

Isn't Anonex the administrator of plus4chan?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-05 4:53

>>71
We should name it "Velox Ex Factor"

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:28

<-- check em dubz

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 1:07

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List