BBUNTU

BROTHERS AND SISTERS

i say we come together as one, and -under the cover of dark- unite to give birth the most awesome force ever seen on the face of this planet. i am talking of course about ...

BBuntu.

we're all just sitting here doing nothing, why don't we all do something useful with our time and create a linux distro for anon! we need to have automatic porn downloading, integrated program for visiting the chan. to keep the code clean i say we drop all language support: english is good enough!

what does anon think?


UNITED AS ONE
DIVIDED BY ZERO
F T W !!!!!

in b4 you can't do this: i have 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH UBUNTU AND WE JUST BASE SOURCE ON THAT MKAY?

tl;dr pllleeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaassssssssseeeeeee read my post

This has been atttempted three times before. What makes you think a fourth time will succeed? I just think that IHBT.

>>1
Christ you're thick.

>>1
You stupid fuck, get out of here.

I for one am filled with joy to see this spawn from my practically autonomic use of unnecessarily emphatic BBcode styles in a shell command I posted earlier.  Bravo.

>>3
Is this a reference to my post that contained the line``My God, you are a cretin.''?

>>6 no, gtfo.

　D A D D Y　　C O O L

　　　　/＼＿＿_／ヽ
　　 ／''''''　　　'''''':::::::＼
　 . |（●）,　　　､（●）､.:|　＋
　　|　　 ,,ﾉ(､_, )ヽ､,,　.::::|　　 　
. 　 |　　 ｀-=ﾆ=- '　.:::::::|　+
　　 ＼　　｀ﾆﾆ´　 .:::::／　　　　　+
,,.....イ.ヽヽ、ﾆ__ ーーノﾞ-､.
:　 　| 　';　＼_____ ノ.| ヽ　i
　 　 |　　＼/ﾞ（__)＼,| 　i　|
　 　 ＞　　 ヽ. ハ　 | 　 |｜

　D A D D Y　　C O O L

　　　　/＼＿＿_／ヽ
　　 ／''''''　　　'''''':::::::＼
　 . |（●）,　　　､（●）､.:|　＋
　　|　　 ,,ﾉ(､_, )ヽ､,,　.::::|　　 　
. 　 |　　 ｀-=ﾆ=- '　.:::::::|　+
　　 ＼　　｀ﾆﾆ´　 .:::::／　　　　　+
,,.....イ.ヽヽ、ﾆ__ ーーノﾞ-､.
:　 　| 　';　＼_____ ノ.| ヽ　i
　 　 |　　＼/ﾞ（__)＼,| 　i　|
　 　 ＞　　 ヽ. ハ　 | 　 |｜

　D A D D Y　　C O O L

　　　　/＼＿＿_／ヽ
　　 ／''''''　　　'''''':::::::＼
　 . |（●）,　　　､（●）､.:|　＋
　　|　　 ,,ﾉ(､_, )ヽ､,,　.::::|　　 　
. 　 |　　 ｀-=ﾆ=- '　.:::::::|　+
　　 ＼　　｀ﾆﾆ´　 .:::::／　　　　　+
,,.....イ.ヽヽ、ﾆ__ ーーノﾞ-､.
:　 　| 　';　＼_____ ノ.| ヽ　i
　 　 |　　＼/ﾞ（__)＼,| 　i　|
　 　 ＞　　 ヽ. ハ　 | 　 |｜

　D A D D Y　　C O O L

　　　　/＼＿＿_／ヽ
　　 ／''''''　　　'''''':::::::＼
　 . |（●）,　　　､（●）､.:|　＋
　　|　　 ,,ﾉ(､_, )ヽ､,,　.::::|　　 　
. 　 |　　 ｀-=ﾆ=- '　.:::::::|　+
　　 ＼　　｀ﾆﾆ´　 .:::::／　　　　　+
,,.....イ.ヽヽ、ﾆ__ ーーノﾞ-､.
:　 　| 　';　＼_____ ノ.| ヽ　i
　 　 |　　＼/ﾞ（__)＼,| 　i　|
　 　 ＞　　 ヽ. ハ　 | 　 |｜

　D A D D Y　　C O O L

　　　　/＼＿＿_／ヽ
　　 ／''''''　　　'''''':::::::＼
　 . |（●）,　　　､（●）､.:|　＋
　　|　　 ,,ﾉ(､_, )ヽ､,,　.::::|　　 　NOW THIS THREAD
. 　 |　　 ｀-=ﾆ=- '　.:::::::|　+　　 IS VERY COOL.
　　 ＼　　｀ﾆﾆ´　 .:::::／　　　　　+
,,.....イ.ヽヽ、ﾆ__ ーーノﾞ-､.
:　 　| 　';　＼_____ ノ.| ヽ　i
　 　 |　　＼/ﾞ（__)＼,| 　i　|
　 　 ＞　　 ヽ. ハ　 | 　 |｜

gtfo

>>12
Agreed

DADDY'S NEVER GONNA STOP ROBBIN' FROM TELEPHONE BOX

Awful, just awful.

There isn't enough sage in the world for this thread.

>>17
Actually there is because the post limit is 1000.

http://rigelseven.com/dqn/title/Bridge_1.mp3

Daddy Cool.

Come guys, stop feeding the troll.
It's obvious when you think about it.

Non capital i's
Uses stupid phrases like ``MKAY'', DIVIDED BY ZERO, tl;dr
Text Speak.  F T W !!!!!
All caps.
i have 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH UBUNTU AND WE JUST BASE SOURCE ON THAT MKAY?
5 years?  That's a blantent lie.  Anyone that spends that much time with OS development would be smart enough to have proper capitalization.  Why would we need a new distro anyhow?  It's utterly pointless.

tl;dr pllleeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaassssssssseeeeeee read my post
Shut up and get a life.  You sound like your less then 12 years old the way you type out your sentences.

In short,
gtfo.

>>20
hax my anus

What is with everyone forgetting their sage?

>>22
I never forget it, this bumping was to piss >>20 off.

>>23
hax my anus

>>24
hax me, anus

I already working on bbsh

>>23
The right way to do it would be:
>>20
YHBT

By the way, I really appreciate the quality trolling found in >>1. It is not trolling us, but /pr/, and probably REchan which will suck until Cudder delivers pics

lol gusy this is so great!!!11!

it can has be anon!!

install tor for great jsutice and epic winnn!!!!

*helds up spor|<()*

*holds up mutant xkcd spork ^___________________^* (wwwwww

xkcd lol :)

"i just won the game" ha

BBanto

PPantso

http://lulznix.org/

>>35
That is just a bloaty version of Ubanto

We need to rewrite the GNU Coreutils and the Lunix kernel in BBcode for speed and portability

>>35
Two no-content forum posts in March, nothing since.

Oh, but check out all they've produced!

http://lulznix.org/downloads

>>37

http://repo.or.cz/w/4chanprog.git?a=tree;f=coreutils;h=bb8cde36984526efcf6d233829f0e44120d3c1a1;hb=HEAD
http://rechan.eu.org/misc/anoncoreutils

Thus I conclude that Anoncoreutils is currently in the lead.

>>38

#1 in useless copies of decades-old programs

>>37

                 ....                  
                ?O+++.                 
               .++++++                 
               =?+++++                 
               =??++++                 
               :?????.                 
                ?????.                 
              .?????????               
             .???????+~+?.             
             ?????????????             
            .?????????????.            
             ??.:??~:$+???.            
             ?,Z,?+,MZ,????.           
           =~??~?????=,??I??.          
          .?I?????===?+?????I.         
           +I??7?II?????777~           
            .???????====????.          
           .??==========+????.         
           ??============?????..       
         .???====?========??????       
        .???==============+?????:      
        +??================?~????.     
       .??+=================??????     
       ???==================??????.    
      ????==================??+???.    
      ??I?==================??????.    
     .?==?==================????I?.    
    .??===??==============?=?????==    
.????======??$===========?+=?7I?===.   
.?=========+???==========?+=========,  
 ??=========+?==========I??===========.
.??+=========?I=======?????==========. 
.??????======??????????????=====??.    
    ~????????????..   ..???+++??.      
        ..??I7.          .7???.                    
 _           _           _                      
| |         | |         (_)                     
| |    _   _| |_____ __  ___  __  ___  _ __ __ _
| |   | | | | |_  / '_ \| \ \/ / / _ \| '__/ _` |
| |___| |_| | |/ /| | | | |>  < | (_) | | | (_| |
|______\__,_|_/___|_| |_|_/_/\_(_)___/|_|  \__, |
                Lulznix.org Download Readme __/ |
                                           |___/

Here you will find info about our releases. Hopefully you will find what you need here.


____ _  _ ____ ____ ____ _  _ ___
|    |  | |__/ |__/ |___ |\ |  | 
|___ |__| |  \ |  \ |___ | \|  | 
Current Stable Release:     0.0.0

___  ____ ___ ____
|__] |___  |  |__|
|__] |___  |  |  |
Current BETA Release:         0.0.0

____ _    ___ 
|  | |    |  \
|__| |___ |__/
27/12/2007:             0.0.0

>>40
shoutz to cudder

>>38
Ah, finally I'll get to see the code these faggots wrote.
Time to ridicule:
anoncoreutils/cat.c:
line 5: dereferencing NULL pointer
line 9: no check of the return value
line 22: never closing the file stream
Three problems in a 40 lines code. I'm surprised; I was expecting more.
Alas, the real problem is that you claim to have implemented the cat described by POSIX; a false claim.
Regardless, let us look further other code.

anoncoreutils/sync.c:
line 2: void main() is not valid.

But some real FAIL bugs:
anoncoreutils/sleep.c
sleep m1
^ FAIL
sleep x1
^ FAIL

>>42
I believe they are for a single system configuration.  Thus portability is not an issue.

>>43
Nonsense. These are real bugs, not "portabily" bugs. (whatever that is supposed to mean)

>>44
It means that if they run as they are they do not need to be changed.  (Actually, I didn't read your post at all, I just saw the keywords ``void main'' and ``POSIX.'')

>>45
It means that if they run as they are they do not need to be changed.
No, they don't.

>>42
The false POSIX claims make me RAGE.  Is it supposed to be some kind of joke or what?

LULZNIZ

>>47
I think they're just some excited college kids. You know the kind.
Fucking ignoramus

>>42
- argv is guaranteed to not be null. short-circuit evaluation will skip second dereference if first one was
- return value doesn't need to be checked -- if buffering can't be turned off then it can't, ``no use crying over spilled milk''.
- all open files are closed when it exits

>>42 is even worse than anoncoreutils people

What the fuck is Anoncoreutils supposed to be?

>>52
It's where you write broken versions of the simplest GNU tools so that your Linux system (the only thing it can run on) will be only 99% GPL.

>>52
Lurk moar.

>>50
- all open files are closed when it exits
Irrelevant.  It will need to open an arbitrary number of files before that time, and it could easily run out of descriptors.

Also,
[code]$ for i in *.c; do cc -o /dev/null $i -ansi -pedantic; done
cat.c: In function ‘main’:
cat.c:43: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
chgrp.c:15: error: syntax error before ‘do_chgrp’
chown.c:18: error: syntax error before ‘do_chown’
md5sum.c:2: warning: ISO C90 does not support ‘long long’
md5sum.c:110: error: syntax error before ‘/’ token
md5sum.c:110:28: error: too many decimal points in number
md5sum.c:117: error: missing terminating ' character
md5sum.c:120: error: syntax error before numeric constant
md5sum.c:120: error: conflicting types for ‘memset’
md5sum.c:120: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
md5sum.c:124: error: conflicting types for ‘W’
md5sum.c:22: error: previous declaration of ‘W’ was here
md5sum.c:124: error: invalid initializer
md5sum.c:124: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
md5sum.c:125: error: conflicting types for ‘W’
md5sum.c:22: error: previous declaration of ‘W’ was here
md5sum.c:125: error: invalid initializer
md5sum.c:125: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
md5sum.c:126: error: conflicting types for ‘md5round’
md5sum.c:33: error: previous definition of ‘md5round’ was here
md5sum.c:126: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
md5sum.c:126: error: syntax error before ‘/’ token
mkdir.c: In function ‘main’:
mkdir.c:62: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
mkfifo.c: In function ‘main’:
mkfifo.c:39: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
rmdir.c: In function ‘main’:
rmdir.c:30: error: ‘verbose’ undeclared (first use in this function)
rmdir.c:30: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
rmdir.c:30: error: for each function it appears in.)
sha1sum.c:2: warning: ISO C90 does not support ‘long long’
sha1sum.c:65: error: syntax error before ‘/’ token
sha1sum.c:65:28: error: too many decimal points in number
sha1sum.c:72: error: missing terminating ' character
sha1sum.c:75: error: syntax error before numeric constant
sha1sum.c:75: error: conflicting types for ‘memset’
sha1sum.c:75: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
sha1sum.c:79: error: conflicting types for ‘W’
sha1sum.c:15: error: previous declaration of ‘W’ was here
sha1sum.c:79: error: invalid initializer
sha1sum.c:79: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
sha1sum.c:80: error: conflicting types for ‘W’
sha1sum.c:15: error: previous declaration of ‘W’ was here
sha1sum.c:80: error: invalid initializer
sha1sum.c:80: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
sha1sum.c:81: error: conflicting types for ‘sha1round’
sha1sum.c:33: error: previous definition of ‘sha1round’ was here
sha1sum.c:81: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
sha1sum.c:81: error: syntax error before ‘/’ token
sync.c: In function ‘main’:
sync.c:2: warning: return type of ‘main’ is not ‘int’
touch.c: In function ‘main’:
touch.c:108: warning: initializer element is not computable at load time
touch.c:108: warning: initializer element is not computable at load time
tty.c: In function ‘main’:
tty.c:8: warning: ISO C forbids omitting the middle term of a ?: expression
whoami.c: In function ‘main’:
whoami.c:5: warning: return type of ‘main’ is not ‘int’
[/code[

>>53
Made me laugh at the failure that is Lulznix/Anonix/Whatever.

>>54
Needs to suck less cock.

>>56
see http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1210044469/358

>>55
/* @cat.c */
/* NOTE: GNU's cat will not cat a file into itself. Should we check for this?
   Possibility of infinite loop here. POSIX doesn't specify what happens if
   standard input happens to be standard output (cat to temp. file and then
   write that to the output? don't write what was already written?) */
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>

#define CATBUF_SIZE 65536 /* increase this if you want OMG MOAR SPEED! */

char catbuf[CATBUF_SIZE];                                                 

int main(int argc, char** argv) {
 int uflag = 0, retval = 0, i = 1;
 FILE *input;

 if(argc>1 && !strcmp(*argv,"-u")) {
  uflag=1;
  retval=setvbuf(stdout,NULL,_IONBF,0);
  i++;
 }
 if(i>=argc) { /* catting stdin */
  input=stdin;
  goto cat_stdin;
 }
 while(argv[i]) {
  int l;
  if(strcmp(argv[i],"-")) {
   if(!(input=fopen(argv[i++],"rb"))) {
    fprintf(stderr,"%s: could not open %s: %s\n",argv[0],argv[i-1],strerror(errno));
    retval=1;
    continue;
   }
  } else {
   input=stdin;
   i++;
  }
 cat_stdin:
  if(uflag)
   retval|=setvbuf(input, NULL, _IONBF, 0);
  while(l=fread(catbuf,1,CATBUF_SIZE,input)) {
   if(fwrite(catbuf,1,l,stdout)!=l) {
    fprintf(stderr,"%s: error writing to stdout: %s\n",argv[0],strerror(errno));
    retval=1;
   }
  }
  if(ferror(input))
   fprintf(stderr,"%s: error reading %s: %s\n",argv[0],argv[i-1],strerror(errno));
  if(input!=stdin)
   retval|=fclose(input);
 }
 return retval;
}

>>50
- argv is guaranteed to not be null. short-circuit evaluation will skip second dereference if first one was
Presumably you meant argv[0], which is not correct.
argv[0] is guaranteed to be NULL when argc is 0.
From ISO 9899:1999 5.1.2.2.1:
- The value of argc shall be nonnegative.
- argv[argc] shall be a null pointer.
- return value doesn't need to be checked -- if buffering can't be turned off then it can't, ``no use crying over spilled milk''.
Can you guess in which situation buffering is not possible to be turned off?
- all open files are closed when it exits
cat a b c d e f g h i g k l m n o p q r t u v w x y z slow-device
See my point?

Presumably you meant argv[0], which is not correct.
Dude what.  Read it again.

>>57
Different people, just as pointless.

>>60
argv is of course guaranteed not to be a null pointer.
It's a pointer to pointers to char.
argv[0] may or may not be a null pointer, depending on the value of argc.
I suggest you learn some C, god damn retard.

>>62
unending facepalm

http://lulznix.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special:Allpages

>>65
http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/2748/46273659dm8.jpg

Expert UI development

>>66
Hey, I got the GUI page as a first random page!

>>58
I'd like to see you fags complain about THIS cat.

(USER IS A COMPLETE IDIOT FOR POSTING THIS)

>>68
this one is better:
#!/bin/sh

catstdin=true
ddcmd=dd

args=`getopt u $*`
if [ $? -ne 0 ]
then
 echo 'Usage: cat [-u] [file ...]'
 exit 2
fi
set -- $args
for i
do
 case "$i" in
  -u) ddcmd="dd bs=1";;
  --) break;;
 esac
 shift
done
shift

for file
do
 $ddcmd if=$file 2>/dev/null
 catstdin=false
done

if $catstdin
then
 $ddcmd 2>/dev/null
fi

>>70
I came.

~ $ cat /dev/sage

>>58
  if(i>=argc) { /* catting stdin */

While there is such a verb "to cat", it is not applicable to "stdin", as the meanings are of nautical origin:

  - to flog with a cat-o'-nine-tails
  - to hoist (an anchor) and secure to a cathead

Also note that the Unix "cat" is an abbreviation of "concatenate".

Also note that the Unix "cat" is an abbreviation of "concatenate".
It is short for "catenate", fool.

>>74
No it's not. See POSIX Vol II, Chapter 4:3.

>>74
$ man cat
CAT(1)                           User Commands                          CAT(1)

NAME
       cat -concatenate files and print on the standard output

SYNOPSIS
       cat [OPTION] [FILE]...

DESCRIPTIONConcatenate FILE(s), or standard input, to standard output.

>>74
Good Sir, I salute you!

>>75,76
YHBT

lol, dipshits

catenate and concatenate means the same fucking thing

>>73
it's a metaphor. cat is flogging stdin to get the bytes out of it.

HAX MY ANUS

>>80
4/10, good idea but next time try to flesh it up a bit. "HAX MY ANUS" by itself isn't a very original use of the meme.

HaX ^m_y Obanto Anus

>>81
It's a metaphor. cat is haxing my anus to get the bytes out of it.

Lain.

86 Name: Sgt.Kabukiman砧萠 2012-05-23 5:25

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy