Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Anonix part VI

Name: ANONIX MEME FAN 2009-04-08 15:03

How are things progressing? I haven't heard any news in a while so I'm dreading that this project is turning out to be vaporware.
Know that there are many of us who would one day like to run your operating system! Please don't give up!

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:21

lol, I just noticed that they haven't implemented ls. I might throw them a bone and do it later

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:23

>>1
Link please

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:24

>>1
I know you're desperately trying to force that meme so that if someone else finally makes the same ``joke'' you can tell him something that may surprise him, but it's not working. Instead, you just look kind of sad.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:24

wait, anonix has vi now?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:29

>>3
http://rechan.eu.org/
>>4
I know you're desperately trying to force that meme so that if someone else finally makes the same ``joke'' you can tell him something that may surprise him, but it's not working. Instead, you just look kind of sad.
>>5
They wish

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:29

°o/

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 15:39

rechan is full of spam, and they're not even trying to clean it up. anonix is dead.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-08 22:40

>>8
That's too bad

I much prefer beating a live horse

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 0:54

>>2
Anonix `ls´ doesn't implement bloat such as listing files.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 0:58

``ls'' is unscientific and redundant. Why would you want to print a list of files in your program?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 1:18

alias ls='echo *'

Name: HAHAHaruhi !6mHaRuhies 2009-04-09 3:11

We're too busy. I hope the situation will change in a few weeks.

Meanwhile, enjoy the current release:
http://rechan.eu.org/misc/anoncoreutils-20080617-2.tar.bz2
and the latest files from the repository:
http://rechan.eu.org/misc/anoncoreutils/

>>2
Know an efficient way of recursing directories in conformance with POSIX H, L, and P options that doesn't blow up on directory graphs containing cycles? The guy doing cp ran into that problem the last I heard.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 3:38

>>13
there is no -P. also, recursively listing subdirectories with -R only follows symlinks with -L, not with -H:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/ls.html
-R
Recursively list subdirectories encountered. When a symbolic link to a directory is encountered, the directory shall not be recursively listed unless the -L option is specified.

and i'd say that anyone stupid enough to use -L and -R together without considering the consequences deserves to have it blow up.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 3:45

>>13
Just store a stack of (device,inode) pairs for each ancestor and check for duplicates whenever you follow a link.

>>14
Yes, I'm sure POSIX only included -L because their stupid.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 3:48

>>14
also,
The ls utility shall detect infinite loops; that is, entering a previously visited directory that is an ancestor of the last file encountered. When it detects an infinite loop, ls shall write a diagnostic message to standard error and shall either recover its position in the hierarchy or terminate.
POSIX says how to make it not blow up.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 3:54

>>14
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/cp.html
If the -P option was specified, cp shall copy any symbolic link specified as a source_file operand and any symbolic links encountered during traversal of a file hierarchy, and shall not follow any symbolic links.

Also, I think -R and -L together should perform an graph traversal, but that might be a little difficult.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 5:57

So what is this Anonix? A system developed by Anonymous? What does it provide what Linux/Mac/Windows doesn't have except another license?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 6:07

>>18
So far it has several shell utilities, whereas Linux has none.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 6:11

>>19
Not a real answer to my question, furthermore, Linux has.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 6:16

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 6:26

>>21
Thanks!

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 8:06

Get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out get out

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 8:32

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 8:37

>>24
needs moar Xarn

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 22:44

>>18
Some of the Anoncoreutils are several times faster than GNU's implementations, and all of them are certainly smaller. On the old REchan there were several threads that benchmarked Anoncoreutils vs GNU coreutils, but those have since been lost. Wouldn't be too hard to reproduce the results though.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 22:46

>>26
For example what?

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 23:05

>>25
moar

*Cringe*

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 23:07

>>27
I remember someone saying that GNU md5sum or sha1sum was much slower than the Anoncoreutils equivalent.

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 23:14

>>29
was

Name: Anonymous 2009-04-09 23:23

>>30
is

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-21 12:20

2009-05-21 Awaken by Cudder

Rise from your sleep(), and prepare yourselves for some upcoming projects -- both proposed by The REchan Management (whose full name carries a connotation that some may find unpleasant), and you, the users!

The beast moves.  ^__^

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-21 20:16

I would have contributed if didn't . Anoncoreutils fails equally as GNU.

>>29
When I use an md5sum program, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless help screens and cursor positioning code!

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-21 20:20

>>33
I would have contributed if didn't have a stupid name. Anoncoreutils fails equally as GNU.

Name: HAHAHaruhi !6mHaRuhies 2009-05-21 23:08

>>32-34
We have some other (hopefully interesting) projects lined up for you guys besides A/X and ACU. What they are exactly I can't say right now, but they are SICP-related.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-21 23:29

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-22 2:26

I don't think that subbing SICP lectures with animu subs is something people do in reddit or digg.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-22 3:52

>>37
That gives me an idea.
The SICP lectures should have those subtitles that change colour as they're spoken - that way you can sing/lecture along with the sussman.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-22 4:12

>>38
THE SUSSMAN does kind of lecture a bit fast compared to Abelson. It's a bit easier to follow Abelson in the videos. This is not a bad idea.

Name: Anonymous 2009-05-22 4:16

>>36
We're teaching 1950s japan how to program?  How will we send the files?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List