Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-8081-120121-

Lack of SICP discussion is troubling

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-24 21:28

Hello /prog/ers the lack of discussion of SICP is troubling to me.  Have visitors stopped reading/watching lectures?  Have all the members gained complete understanding of said book/lectures?

Also what about SICM?

Let us make an effort to discuss these and other teachings of sussman's.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-24 21:33

SCIM.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-24 21:36

Read SICM

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-24 21:36

It's SICM

http://mitpress.mit.edu/SICM/book-Z-H-8.html

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-24 21:37

Didn't know about SICM. Thanks for that.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-24 21:40

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2726904509434151616

is related to SICM

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-24 23:22

"he's a son of a bitch"
"mathematical notation fundamentally sucks"
what is the Sussman saying for d in "d/dt"?
"stallman and i worked on a program that does this and does what i do"  where is this program that embodies the Sussman

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-24 23:23

HTDP TALK IN THIS THREAD

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-24 23:24

the only good part of SICP is the register machine

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-24 23:35

>>9
fail

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-25 2:36

Strange that you should make this thread, because I'm going to be taking a course in September that uses SICP.

I just started reading SICP and now I know why you guys were so addicte to getting others to read it. It's so fucking AWESOME, and to think I haven't even reached Satori yet.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-25 4:05

>>11-san please keep us updated with your SICP studies.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-25 5:19

http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/1636/sicpcl6.jpg

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-25 5:23

>>13
It's always nice to see a bronzed, toned Sussman.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-25 6:00

>>13
I demand an explanation.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-25 6:28

>>15
http://sovietrussia.org/code/src/1193641224285532.jpg ?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-25 21:21

i herd u liek wizards?

http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/5843/wizem5.gif

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-25 21:23

>>17
I'm pretty sure that's not an SICP wizard but a math wizard.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-25 21:44

>>18
ergo your wrong bitch

http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/9021/wiz1yt8.png

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-25 22:42

i started reading SICM but you have to use an older linux or something to run the programs so i sorta got bored... installing some old debian distro on vmware now. damn /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-26 3:13

>>17,19
Now, for the final result.

http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/6695/sicpcover512dpiul7.png

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-26 4:24

>>17-21
Read SICM

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-26 4:25

>>22
It's funny, because I'm considering doing so.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-26 4:50

>>22
I tried, but the Scheme needed for the code wouldn't run. Too bad they based it on such a poorly specified language.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-26 6:00

>>22
Not until I finish SICP Ultimate Edition.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-26 6:40

Is there anywhere I can easily download the SICP and SICM texts in PDF/HTML/other format without having to crawl through the MIT site?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-26 7:08

http://www.google.com/search?q=sicp+pdf

<.<

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-26 7:29

>>27
All the SICP PDFs I've seen so far were generated from spidering the MIT site, and hence contain such things as images instead of properly typeset equations, rather aliased figures, and other annoyances.

This anon is currently retypesetting SICP in PDF form.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-26 8:23

Just ask MIT for the TEX source.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-26 8:36

>>29
Like they would give it to him.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-26 8:38

>>28
May we have a preview of your efforts?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-27 3:09

>>31
http://rapidshare.com/files/125326538/sicp2.pdf.html

TOC hasn't been generated, nor has the format been finalized.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-27 6:44

>>32
Looks great, keep up the good work as the saying goes.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-27 7:33

>>32
You should make the linewidth smaller, so have less words on a line. Shorter lines reads much easier.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-27 7:40

>>32
My only complaint is that it isn't finished. Can we get an ETA (Estimated Time of Arrival) on when it will be completed?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-27 8:46

>>32
I like the vector graphics title page. The layout of the text is nice but needs a bit of work.

Name: WOAH 2008-06-27 10:47

THE FORCED INDENTATION OF CODE

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-27 16:28

Hax my anus

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-27 17:43

>>34
You mean \hsize=15cm, just like the REAL book?

>>35
When I finish reading it.

>>36
Any TEX wizards want to suggest macros for the major, minor, and subminor section headings? I've got the code listing thing almost figured out.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-27 17:48

>>39
maybe someone could split the workload and /prog/ could do it as a group? Like when the harry potter book was leaked online.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-27 18:23

someone make a git repository on github

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 16:17

>>40
Do you know how uncoordinated /prog/ is?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 18:42

>>42
/prog/ wrote Linux. True story.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 20:06

>>43
If by ``/prog/'' you mean ``some wankers who think that Anonymous is something more than undisclosing one's name'', and by Linux you mean ``Anonix'', and by ``wrote'' you mean ``tried but failed to write'', then I agree.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 20:35

>>40,43,44
Use spoiler, faggots

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 20:55

>>45
YHBT

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 21:30

>>44
Why are you associating my /prog/ with those morons?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 21:37

>>47
Unfortunately, it's the other way around: they decided to associate themselves with /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 22:05

http://rechan.eu.org/main.htm

wat

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 22:07

>>49
viral

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 22:47

>>48
The amount of whelm /prog/ feels by them should tell you all you need to know.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-30 0:29

SICP has too many words. If they edited a little harder it would be a great book.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-30 1:06

http://rapidshare.com/files/125998445/sicp2.pdf.html

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-30 13:52

Here, have an SICM PDF

http://213.250.55.85:8089/%28E%2DBook%20Physic%29%20Structure%20And%20Interpretation%20Of%20Classical%20Mechanics.pdf

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-08 14:24

bumping SICP thread.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-11 7:43

SICP retypesetting anon here, I haven't given up! I'm just spending more time doing the exercises and whatnot because they're interesting. This book is awesome.

Compare (before)

http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/1611/sicpoldtl0.png

with (after)

http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/3962/sicpnewgh8.png

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-11 8:23

>>56
Your efforts are much appreciated, good sir.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-11 10:26

>>56
Damn, that is sexy as fuck. Eagerly awaiting the final release.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-11 10:30

i was going to bump this thread to try and get a response from the typsetting anon.  i'm eagerly awaiting the release as well.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-11 11:17

DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX!

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-11 12:39

>>56
Please release the tex file for our further enjoyment when you're done. This is a work of art.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-11 23:01

http://img365.imageshack.us/img365/8292/sicprenewtx6.png

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-11 23:10

>>62
HAVE YOU RENEWED YOUR SICP MEMBERSHIP TODAY?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-11 23:49

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 /＼＿＿_／ヽ　　　　　　　　　　　
　　　 (.｀ヽ(｀＞ 、　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　／''''''　　　'''''':::::　　　　　　　　　　　
　　 　 `'＜｀ゝr'ﾌ＼　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　＋　　|（●）,　　､（●）､.:|　＋　　　　　　
　 ⊂ｺ二Lﾌ^´　 ノ, ／⌒)　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　|　　,,,ﾉ(､_, )ヽ､,,　.::::|　　　　　　　>>63 if you payme enough i will give you access to a secret area of SICP ;)
　　⊂l二L7_　/　-ゝ-')´　　　　　　　　 　　　　　　　.+　|　　 ｀-=ﾆ=- '　.::::::|　+　.　　　　http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/book/book.html
　　　　　　 ＼_　　､__,.ｲ＼　　　　　　　　　　　＋　　　　 ＼　　 ｀ﾆﾆ´　 .:::／　　　　+　　
　　　　　　　　(T＿_ノ　　 Tヽ　　　　　　　 , -r'⌒!￣ `":::7ヽ.｀- ､　　　./|　　.　
　　　　　　　　　ヽ￢.　　　/　ﾉ`ｰ-､ﾍ<ｰ1´|　 ヽ　| :::::::::::::ﾄ、 ＼　(　　./ヽ　　　　
　　　　　　　　　　＼l__,.／　　 　 　 i　l.ヽ!　|　　　.| ::::::::::::::l ヽ 　 ｀７ｰ.､‐'´ |＼-､　

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-12 2:55

http://jscheme.sourceforge.net/jscheme/main.html

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-12 19:43

Can someone with the physical copy scan figures 2.9 through 2.14 and post them on /hr/ or something? The ones I have are rather low-res and pixelated, and they can't be vectored.

Current progress: 20%

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-12 21:15

I could do it tomorrow, if nobody else will.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-12 21:17

>>65
Oh God I came

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-13 22:32

>>67
DO IT FAGGOT

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-14 1:26

>>66
I'm not >>67, but I don't see a SICP thread in /hr/ so I'm assuming he hasn't delivered yet.
The problem with thick books is that it's hard to get clean scans without cutting them up, and thin paper doesn't combine with dark pictures on the other side well.
Still, nothing Photoshop and/or low standards won't fix.

Here's my (unedited) effort: http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/sicpscans/
If someone else has the ability to do better, for the love of god do.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-14 3:15

>>70
Thanks. Photoshop should definitely be able to clean them up and resize them (currently, ONE of those images is larger than the PDF of the entire book!)

Hmm... so it does look like wave is vectorable. The best quality I had made it look otherwise:
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/7058/f29vv0.png

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-14 23:16

faggots, its obvious that most everyone in this message board is underage and has only written programs in visual basic

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 7:56

Typesetting anon here, something else I did before SICP:

http://rapidshare.com/files/137500404/haruhi-1.7z.html

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 8:47

>>72
what about my everyone?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 10:03

>>74
Thank you, typesetter anon! I already had the moon version, so now I can keep both open and use the translation as a reference when reading.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 14:00

>>74
.7z
HAHAHA! Oh wow...

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 14:06

What is wrogn with 7z, apart from gay name?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 14:16

>>78
``Let's use obscure archiving formats and force everyone to install some useless piece of software, just to save save asymptotically zero bytes in the progress'' is just another way to say ``OMG OPTIMIZED''.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 14:21

>>79
Just as obscure as rar or zip.
Don't get me wrong, I do dislike 7z. I just don't know why.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 14:26

>>80
Quiz: name one (1) desktop operating system from the last five years that doesn't have zip functionality built-in.

rar is just as moronic as 7zip, with the added flavour of 1337 w4r3z d00dz.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 14:34

Even tar has lzma support nowadays.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 14:36

7z isn't obscure like you think. It's widely used by the japs (aka Elevens).

Seriously, they even release HCG sets as 7z'ipped bitmaps.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 18:41

7z is awesome and anyone who doesnt is a fag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-15 20:50

>>74
Creator: DeKTeX 3.141592-Anonix/R3

wat

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-16 0:35

>>81
RAR and 7z have built-in, standardised encryption. Unlike ZIP, where the way encryption is handled varies wildly across implementations.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-16 8:34

>>86
There is no reason whatsoever to include any kind of encryption in an archiving format.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-16 8:41

>>87

Sure there is. It's convenient.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-16 8:42

>>84
--funroll-loops is awesome and anyone who doesnt is a fag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-16 8:43

>>88
lrn2unix

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-16 9:04

>>90
let's pipe things LOL

convenient, not possible

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-16 11:04

lrn2java

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-16 23:44

>>91
Piping is very convienent
lrn2term or gb2GUI

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-17 0:23

>>93
YHBT

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-17 0:42

>>94
HAND?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-17 3:10

>>7
"stallman and i worked on a program that does this and does what i do"  where is this program that embodies the Sussman
Emacs psychiatrist

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-17 23:11

http://rapidshare.com/files/138129765/sicp.7z.html

Making progress, but the exercises are fun and I don't want to not do them ;_;

Maybe I'll take some time away from the project to... install OSx86.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-18 2:57

>>97
Why not try Anonix instead?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-18 4:12

>>98
maybe later when I feel like writing some C

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-18 6:42

>>99
That reminds me, I should try compiling the anoncoreutils on OS X.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-18 7:51

>>100
I compiled the anoncoreutils on OS X and my anus has never been more haxed! A+++

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-18 8:19

http://www.neilvandyke.org/sicp-texi/

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-18 9:20

>>101
Apples‽

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-18 13:22

can we get the ``hyryst'' guy who always posts the /prog/snake to post this to proggit when it's done?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-18 23:13

>>102
Texinfo - GNU Documentation System
GNU
DO NOT WANT

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-19 6:39

http://www3.tranexp.com:2000/Translate/index.shtml?from=eng&to=eng&type=url&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmitpress.mit.edu/sicp

read and lol.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-19 8:05

>>105

Actually, Texinfo is quite nice,
is has sane browser (GNU Emacs)
and it's easy to convert texi file
to html, dvi, pdf...

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-19 8:39

>>107
GNU Emacs
DO NOT WANT

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-19 14:23

Have you read your Production with Definition incomplete Numeration List today?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-19 15:20

>>107
What's the use of converting if all the figures got raped?

ASCII art in a PDF is as stupid as code in proportional fonts.

>>109
SICP uses love Representation language incomplete Imperfect speech.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 6:17

>>106
Maybe I should typeset an SICP joke version... PDNL

First two chapters complete. Estimated progress 35%.
http://rapidshare.com/files/138705322/sicp.7z.html

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 6:50

>>108
Have you tried qemacs?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-20 14:01

>>112
queermacs? No thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-24 13:20

Bumpu for updates on SICP retypesetting Anon's progress. We love you.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-24 13:50

>>107
GNU Emacs sucks, hence the only way to browse it sanely is after it has been converted to HTML.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-24 20:46

I'M RMS
SON OF A BITCH VIM
VIM IS PIG
DO YOU WANT MODES?
DO YOU WANT EVEN MORE FUCKED UP KEY BINDINGS THAN I HAVE?
VIM IS PIG DISGUSTING
LINUS BENEDICT TORVALDS IS A MURDERER
FUCKING VISUAL INTERFACE

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 0:49

>>114
Finished 3.2

Taking a break to work on Anoncoreutils

http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/9272/191xv9.png

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 0:53

>>117
Anoncoreutils
what

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 9:00

>>117
YOU MEAN YOU WERE AN ANONIX GUY ALL ALONG

I don't know whether to love you or hax your anus anymore.

Name: Fixed 2008-08-25 11:40

THE ANONIX GUY

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 12:24

>>1

Seriously guys, I think you're going too far. I know it's stupid to tell this to Anonymous, but I wouldn't turn the respect we have for the Sussman into something he might not like if he saw it. And we're easily reachable via Google if you Google for Lisp-related stuff.

I see the Sussman as a super-hero, along with the Abelson. They're like Superman and Batman; the former is all about purity; the later is darker but gets the job done and does just as good a service to the world.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 15:53

>>118
Lurk moar.

>>119
What, I just joined them recently. Sounds fun. More interesting than copy-editing SICP, at least.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 16:24

>>122
He was referring to your ANONIX faggotry.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-11 15:57

>>111

Kind typesetting Anonymous, could you upload this again?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-11 16:01

>>124
I made a thread a month ago for just such occasions
http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1232475104

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 14:56

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman� 2012-05-24 6:25

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: bampu pantsu 2012-05-29 3:57

bampu pantsu
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -