Lack of SICP discussion is troubling
1
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-24 21:28
Hello /prog/ers the lack of discussion of SICP is troubling to me. Have visitors stopped reading/watching lectures? Have all the members gained complete understanding of said book/lectures?
Also what about SICM?
Let us make an effort to discuss these and other teachings of sussman's.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-25 2:36
Strange that you should make this thread, because I'm going to be taking a course in September that uses SICP.
I just started reading SICP and now I know why you guys were so addicte to getting others to read it. It's so fucking AWESOME , and to think I haven't even reached Satori yet.
12
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-25 4:05
>>11- san please keep us updated with your SICP studies.
13
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-25 5:19
14
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-25 5:23
>>13
It's always nice to see a bronzed, toned Sussman.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-25 6:00
>>13
I demand an explanation.
16
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-25 6:28
17
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-25 21:21
18
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-25 21:23
>>17
I'm pretty sure that's not an SICP wizard but a math wizard.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-25 21:44
20
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-25 22:42
i started reading SICM but you have to use an older linux or something to run the programs so i sorta got bored... installing some old debian distro on vmware now. damn /prog/
21
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-26 3:13
22
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-26 4:24
23
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-26 4:25
>>22
It's funny, because I'm considering doing so.
24
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-26 4:50
>>22
I tried, but the Scheme needed for the code wouldn't run. Too bad they based it on such a poorly specified language.
25
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-26 6:00
>>22
Not until I finish SICP Ultimate Edition.
26
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-26 6:40
Is there anywhere I can easily download the SICP and SICM texts in PDF/HTML/other format without having to crawl through the MIT site?
27
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-26 7:08
28
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-26 7:29
>>27
All the SICP PDFs I've seen so far were generated from spidering the MIT site, and hence contain such things as images instead of properly typeset equations, rather aliased figures, and other annoyances.
This anon is currently retypesetting SICP in PDF form.
29
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-26 8:23
Just ask MIT for the TE X source.
30
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-26 8:36
>>29
Like they would give it to him.
31
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-26 8:38
>>28
May we have a preview of your efforts?
32
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-27 3:09
>>31
http://rapidshare.com/files/125326538/sicp2.pdf.html
TOC hasn't been generated, nor has the format been finalized.
33
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-27 6:44
>>32
Looks great, keep up the good work as the saying goes.
34
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-27 7:33
>>32
You should make the linewidth smaller, so have less words on a line. Shorter lines reads much easier.
35
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-27 7:40
>>32
My only complaint is that it isn't finished. Can we get an ETA (Estimated Time of Arrival) on when it will be completed?
36
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-27 8:46
>>32
I like the vector graphics title page. The layout of the text is nice but needs a bit of work.
37
Name:
WOAH
2008-06-27 10:47
THE FORCED INDENTATION OF CODE
38
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-27 16:28
Hax my anus
39
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-27 17:43
>>34
You mean \hsize=15cm, just like the REAL book?
>>35
When I finish reading it.
>>36
Any T
E X wizards want to suggest macros for the major, minor, and subminor section headings? I've got the code listing thing almost figured out.
40
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-27 17:48
>>39
maybe someone could split the workload and /prog/ could do it as a group? Like when the harry potter book was leaked online.
41
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-27 18:23
someone make a git repository on github
42
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 16:17
>>40
Do you know how uncoordinated
/prog/ is?
43
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 18:42
>>42
/prog/ wrote Linux. True story.
44
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 20:06
>>43
If by ``/prog/'' you mean ``some wankers who think that Anonymous is something more than undisclosing one's name'', and by Linux you mean ``Anonix'', and by ``wrote'' you mean ``tried but failed to write'', then I agree.
45
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 20:35
>>40,43,44
Use spoiler, faggots
46
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 20:55
47
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 21:30
>>44
Why are you associating
my /prog/ with those morons?
48
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 21:37
>>47
Unfortunately, it's the other way around: they decided to associate themselves with
/prog/ .
49
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 22:05
50
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 22:07
51
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 22:47
>>48
The amount of whelm
/prog/ feels by them should tell you all you need to know.
52
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-30 0:29
SICP has too many words. If they edited a little harder it would be a great book.
53
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-30 1:06
54
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-30 13:52
55
Name:
Anonymous
2008-07-08 14:24
bumping SICP thread.
56
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-11 7:43
SICP retypesetting anon here, I haven't given up! I'm just spending more time doing the exercises and whatnot because they're interesting. This book is awesome.
Compare (before)
http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/1611/sicpoldtl0.png
with (after)
http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/3962/sicpnewgh8.png
57
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-11 8:23
>>56
Your efforts are much appreciated, good sir.
58
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-11 10:26
>>56
Damn, that is sexy as fuck. Eagerly awaiting the final release.
59
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-11 10:30
i was going to bump this thread to try and get a response from the typsetting anon. i'm eagerly awaiting the release as well.
60
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-11 11:17
DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX! DIX!
61
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-11 12:39
>>56
Please release the tex file for our further enjoyment when you're done. This is a work of art.
62
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-11 23:01
63
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-11 23:10
>>62
HAVE YOU RENEWED YOUR SICP MEMBERSHIP TODAY?
64
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-11 23:49
/\___/ヽ
(.`ヽ(`> 、 /'''''' '''''':::::
`'<`ゝr'フ\ + |(●), 、(●)、.:| +
⊂コ二Lフ^´ ノ, /⌒) | ,,,ノ(、_, )ヽ、,, .::::| >>63 if you payme enough i will give you access to a secret area of SICP ;)
⊂l二L7_ / -ゝ-')´ .+ | `-=ニ=- ' .::::::| + . http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/book/book.html
\_ 、__,.イ\ + \ `ニニ´ .:::/ +
(T__ノ Tヽ , -r'⌒! ̄ `":::7ヽ.`- 、 ./| .
ヽ¬. / ノ`ー-、ヘ<ー1´| ヽ | :::::::::::::ト、 \ ( ./ヽ
\l__,./ i l.ヽ! | .| ::::::::::::::l ヽ `7ー.、‐'´ |\-、
65
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-12 2:55
66
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-12 19:43
Can someone with the physical copy scan figures 2.9 through 2.14 and post them on /hr/ or something? The ones I have are rather low-res and pixelated, and they can't be vectored.
Current progress: 20%
67
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-12 21:15
I could do it tomorrow, if nobody else will.
68
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-12 21:17
69
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-13 22:32
70
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-14 1:26
>>66
I'm not
>>67, but I don't see a SICP thread in /hr/ so I'm assuming he hasn't delivered yet.
The problem with thick books is that it's hard to get clean scans without cutting them up, and thin paper doesn't combine with dark pictures on the other side well.
Still, nothing Photoshop and/or low standards won't fix.
Here's my (unedited) effort:
http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/sicpscans/
If someone else has the ability to do better, for the love of god do.
71
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-14 3:15
>>70
Thanks. Photoshop should definitely be able to clean them up and resize them (currently, ONE of those images is larger than the PDF of the entire book!)
Hmm... so it does look like
wave is vectorable. The best quality I had made it look otherwise:
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/7058/f29vv0.png
72
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-14 23:16
faggots, its obvious that most everyone in this message board is underage and has only written programs in visual basic
74
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 7:56
Typesetting anon here, something else I did before SICP:
http://rapidshare.com/files/137500404/haruhi-1.7z.html
75
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 8:47
>>72
what about
my everyone?
76
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 10:03
>>74
Thank you, typesetter anon! I already had the moon version, so now I can keep both open and use the translation as a reference when reading.
77
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 14:00
>>74
.7z
HAHAHA! Oh wow...
78
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 14:06
What is wrogn with 7z, apart from gay name?
79
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 14:16
>>78
``Let's use obscure archiving formats and force everyone to install some useless piece of software, just to save save asymptotically zero bytes in the progress'' is just another way to say ``OMG OPTIMIZED''.
80
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 14:21
>>79
Just as obscure as rar or zip.
Don't get me wrong, I do dislike 7z. I just don't know why.
81
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 14:26
>>80
Quiz: name one (1) desktop operating system from the last five years that doesn't have zip functionality built-in.
rar is just as moronic as 7zip, with the added flavour of 1337 w4r3z d00dz.
82
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 14:34
Even tar has lzma support nowadays.
83
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 14:36
7z isn't obscure like you think. It's widely used by the japs (aka Elevens).
Seriously, they even release HCG sets as 7z'ipped bitmaps.
84
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 18:41
7z is awesome and anyone who doesnt is a fag.
85
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-15 20:50
>>74
Creator: DeKTeX 3.141592-Anonix/R3
wat
86
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-16 0:35
>>81
RAR and 7z have built-in, standardised encryption. Unlike ZIP, where the way encryption is handled varies wildly across implementations.
87
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-16 8:34
>>86
There is no reason whatsoever to include any kind of encryption in an archiving format.
88
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-16 8:41
>>87
Sure there is. It's convenient.
89
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-16 8:42
>>84
--funroll-loops is awesome and anyone who doesnt is a fag.
90
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-16 8:43
91
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-16 9:04
>>90
let's pipe things LOL
convenient, not possible
92
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-16 11:04
lrn2java
93
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-16 23:44
>>91
Piping is very convienent
lrn2term or gb2GUI
94
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-17 0:23
95
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-17 0:42
96
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-17 3:10
>>7
"stallman and i worked on a program that does this and does what i do" where is this program that embodies the Sussman
Emacs psychiatrist
97
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-17 23:11
http://rapidshare.com/files/138129765/sicp.7z.html
Making progress, but the exercises are fun and I don't want to not do them ;_;
Maybe I'll take some time away from the project to... install OSx86.
98
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-18 2:57
>>97
Why not try Anonix instead?
99
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-18 4:12
>>98
maybe later when I feel like writing some C
100
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-18 6:42
>>99
That reminds me, I should try compiling the anoncoreutils on OS X.
101
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-18 7:51
>>100
I compiled the
anoncoreutils on OS X and my anus has never been more haxed! A+++
102
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-18 8:19
103
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-18 9:20
104
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-18 13:22
can we get the ``hyryst'' guy who always posts the /prog/ snake to post this to proggit when it's done?
105
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-18 23:13
>>102
Texinfo - GNU Documentation System
GNU
DO NOT WANT
106
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-19 6:39
107
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-19 8:05
>>105
Actually, Texinfo is quite nice,
is has sane browser (GNU Emacs)
and it's easy to convert
texi file
to html, dvi, pdf...
108
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-19 8:39
>>107
GNU Emacs
DO NOT WANT
109
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-19 14:23
Have you read your Production with Definition incomplete Numeration List today?
110
Name:
Anonymous
2008-08-19 15:20
>>107
What's the use of converting if all the figures got raped?
ASCII art in a PDF is as stupid as code in proportional fonts.
>>109
SICP uses love Representation language incomplete Imperfect speech.
Newer Posts