>>35
Unless you mean it was "inside," where something had to be removed to see it, or the coin was secured in such a way that it did not turn over, there is no such thing as a hidden side. To coins there's a head-side and a tail-side.
I contest that. The swastika is one of the oldest recognizable patterns in human semiotics, dating back to an ivory carving from around 10,000BC. It's spread and diffusion throughout the world, including its association with a variety of things, theologic and not, indicates its strength. The fact that some stuck up Germans used the symbol to solidify their leader's racial paranoia and hatred and, as is suggested in this thread, everything related to the offending culture does not give it strength. The resentment of the legacy of that said culture does not give it strength. The fact that cultures used it to reference deities or even the sun does not give it strength. It is just a strong symbol. Prior to that, and ignoring the vagaries of Islamic clashes with the Western world, I recall little in ways of putting down the strength of the symbol before its image was tainted moving towards the middle of the last century. It is the longest lasting of humanity's achievements - it only took 12000 years to screw it up - and people like you continue to muddy its fascinating existence by making it a symbol of some kind of conflict.
>>36
Kinda looks like a Buer, except that those are definitely suggesting beast heads and not hooves.