The problem, OP, is that in modern society, the vast majority of children are utterly incapable of making that kind of decision on their own. Taking advantage of that fact is rape, plain and simple, regardless of "consequences".
That said, I will admit I am sexually attracted to little girls. It probably stems from my fucked up relationships growing up. Whatever. I tell myself that I would never do anything to a real child, that I can keep fantasy separated from reality, but if I were presented with the perfect opportunity to have consequence-free sex with a child, I know I wouldn't be able to control myself. That scares the shit out of me. Sometimes I catch myself looking at kids sexually in public places and I'm overwhelmed with shame and disgust. More often, though, I find the nearest restroom and fap.
>>7
So, what, you're implying that joy is an illegal consequence now?
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-24 17:24
age of consent ranges from 16 to 18 in the US
go fight for a "If there's grass on the field"-policy first before you talk about kiddie sex
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-24 18:03
Oddly enough, me and my uncle were talking about this yesterday
He's 26, not bad looking, in great shape and much more "hipper" than me. He said how he noticed how 16 year old girls look at him when he's out and about.
He even showed me a letter a girl wrote him. I can't recall exactly what it said, but it was something along the lines of "Don't tell anyone cause I don't want them to hurt you, I wanna hear your voice, etc I'm gonna be 17 on Friday'
So yeah, kids aren't innocent young white girls that need protecting.
>>10
Yeah, but that's not pedophilia. And there was once a time when it wasn't considered abnormal for a 26 year old male to marry or be engaged to a 16 year old girl. In the US, some states have the age of consent set at 16 so even though it would be frowned upon, it's not illegal.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-24 22:21
Pedophilia would be perhaps common, although still a bad idea. When girls get pregnant before 13-14, they have a fairly poor chance of surviving labor, as do their children.
I guess that's against OP's supposition, though. If there were no consequences of anything, no-one would do anything. Consequence doesn't mean "you in big trouble." It means something that follows from something else. So if there were no consequences, you wouldn't even bust a nut from sex with 13 y/o's.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-24 23:00
>>9
There are 14 y/o states. Viz. Jerry Lee Lewis.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-24 23:02
>>13
Jerry Lee Lewis is way older than 14. And he's more of a 'celebrity' than a 'state'.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 5:53
Obviously he means "no negative legal or social consequences", faggots.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 6:30
Maybe among darker skinned races.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 6:39
>>16
True, OP is probably a muslims. Islam is the religion of pedophilia.
They enjoy telling themselves that this was normal in those times, but it wasn't, before modern medicine most impregnated immature girls would die during childbirth.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 7:08
>>17
you can't impregnate pre-pubescent girls, you know
and jailbait was perfectly normal in europe as well
there's that diary of a mecrenary in the 30 years war where he wrote down how he grabbed himself a 14yr old after a siege and how he married several teens
fuck, how old were shakespeare's romeo and juliet? 14?
sex with with girls who reached puberty was awwwwright until like 1950
and it still is most countries anyway
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 7:27
>>18
14 is not 9, sex with girls who reached puberty was not alright, sex with girls that had finished puberty was alright and only when the community had made sure her partner would not leave her using religious indoctrination.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 7:47
>>19
i know for a fact that the german penal code raised the age of childhood (and thus age of consent) to 14 as late as the end of the 19th century
and the median of all european countries is also 14 as of now
your turn
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 8:00
>>20
I don't know that for a fact. Someone who's mind is corrupted by pedorage isn't exactly a reliable source. Also I just said Muslims believe it's ok to have sex with a 9 year old so I don't see what that proves other than how Germany was corrupted by muslim culture at one point in it's history.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 8:07
>>21
the source is "Sittlichkeitsverbrechen. Sexuelle Gewalt im Kaiserreich"
and your muslim story is flawed as any muslim will immediately tell you that aisha never had kids with muhammad
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 9:04
>>22
I don't understand what it is exactly you have proven. Do you think this proves a 9 year old is more likely to survive pregnancy and childbirth than a 21 year old?
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 9:11
>>23
9yr olds can't get pregnant
women are not fertile until shortly before their first period
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 13:55
>>24
Only partially true. There are reported cases of girls as young as five years old becoming pregnant. Just because most girls are infertile before their early teens doesn't mean all of them are.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-25 15:40
>>14
HAHA. JLL married his young cousin and youre more of an idiot than a dumb ass, but thanks for the laugh!!
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-11 1:06
Looking into the future, is it possible that the age of consent will rise higher than 18 in our lifetimes? Seems to be on an upward trend the last 100 years.. and with girls mentally maturing later in life.
I hope it doesn't happen.. by the time a girl is "legal", she'd already be fat and past her prime..
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-11 3:53
>>27
Age of consent is 16 in most places and that's about right, the only people who complain about it are kiddy fiddlers.
1 in 5 teens engage in sexting. In several cases this year, teens have been charged not only with possession of child pornography, but some are being charged with the MUCH WORSE crime of "manufacturing and disseminating" it. We're talking about cases where both parties are underage and of similar ages, with willing participants.
Try telling me that those kids deserve to have their lives ruined.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-11 21:15
>>29
Those kids deserve to have their lives ruined.
That wasn't so hard, now, was it?
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-12 0:57
>>29
Ok, how about this, only underage people can view underage porn, if you're a 40 year old obese manchild then tough shit, stay the fuck away from high school girls.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-12 7:28
>>32
How about a 40 year old man with nude pics of his wife that she sent him when they were 15?
If we don't prosecute them, those pictures could get on the internet and then their lives will be ruined!
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-12 14:11
>>33
who cares >>34
So? What really matters is the pedos remain butthurt and marginalised.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-14 10:00
>>17
The Jewish talmund also states explicitly that it is acceptable for a man to rape a female child.
The koran implies this for some by stating Muhammad married a 9 year old, but this really means nothing significant. You are simply projecting your own dirty dirty mind onto it.
Marriage in the ancient world came down to nothing more than property rights over women for the most part. It diddn't mean you would be copulating with them. They even had arranged marriages with children in Europe *ghasp* I know.
Then again, I am sure you must be really well versed in the marriage traditions of ancient desert tribe merchants from the east.
tl;dr, take a hike you dirty kike.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-14 21:50
>>38
Marriage I don't have a problem with, it was the fact he felt the need to consummate it even though he was a warlord with a harem full of hot 35 year olds that disturbs me.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-15 0:21
>>39
again, you are projecting your own vastly different culture on another and making ungrounded assumptions.
first off, we don't know what act would consummate a marriage in the pre-islamic arabian desert tribes of late antiquity. To make the logical assumption that this english language translation and interpretation of the book, applied it in the context of the time and culture in which we live, written so long ago and taking it as fact is too much of a leap in logic.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-16 6:07
>>40
Of course, the thing is my culture is superior which means I'm right.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-16 10:02
Terrorsim is... - "The war of the common man". It's the response to unlegal wars, endless exploitation and ethnic cleansing. Therfor we should all fear terrorism as a rising star of poor power.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-16 12:19
>>41
"my culture is superior"
your 'culture': "jesus tells me scientists who say mcdonalds is bad are fascist communist socialists"
i'm curious as to what is predominantly Western 'culture'. The west stopped having culture ever since it was replaced with marketing everything to maximize profit.
so yes, by your own standards, if you prioritize living in a world stuffed full of comfort and convenience, that's fine, but some people have better goals in life.
>>43
I'm not the person you're having this discussion with, however I agree. Hell, I lean towards libertarianism, and even I can agree that McDonald's is terrible. But if people wish to screw up their health, body and wellbeing from consuming it, by all means let them.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-18 6:25
>>43
Cool strawman bro.
>but some people have better goals in life.
Like what? "Consummating" their marriage to a 9 year old? Real advanced culture there hajji. >>44
Only trailer/ghetto trash eat fast food everyday, I haven't eaten at McDonalds for years but I believe it's an important element of our culture, it's good to know it's there, to know that for 1000s years the majority of the population and most of the world still today live in poverty but if I wanted to I could get stuff myself full of burgers and fries in a heartbeat.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-23 18:00
>>40
make the logical assumption that this english language translation and interpretation of the book, applied it in the context of the time and culture in which we live, written so long ago and taking it as fact is too much of a leap in logic.
try telling that to all the muslims now; you're essentially saying they cannot understand their religion. Remember, not all muslims speak arabic and live in mecca. If we accept the religion of Islam, to understand it, we must be take the translation as fact. Or at least i think so.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-25 1:00
>>47
And what i am saying is, to take the translation as fact, you must first at least sufficiently translate it.
For the reasons i stated above, the common English translation of much of the Koran is quite simply a gross misstranslation, and even after considering that, an irrelevant detail considering the cultural context in which a man ignorant of the history of societies and civilizations in the region (such as, what a marriage would have constituted to a desert dwelling tribal pagan merchant from the orient during late antiquity, as i had stated).
Truly, almost nothing in the books but what is most plainly stated and clearly translated can indeed be taken as fact. This is done for pretty much all religions. I guess, extrapolating from what you imply, nobody may have a true understanding their old faith. But it has become so common this fact is almost acceptable now, no?