Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

lol amerifags

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-06 10:43

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgWz_HYtqoM&mode=related&search=

Lol @ Amerifags & their guns.  Its all fun and games until someone gets hurt:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk8syX2b-zQ&mode=related&search=Liberal%20Parody%20Clip-Show%20Guns%20Right%20Wing%20Soldier%20of%20Fortune%20NRA%20National%20Rifle%20Association%20Insufferable%20Industries
Where is your gun culture leading you now America? How many more people have to die before you will adopt a sensible, comprehensive solution to your gun violence problem?

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-06 10:49

Fail more faggot, Virginia Tech was a LIBERAL-approved GUN FREE ZONE where people could not protect themselves. Also, the chink coming to the U.S. is also due to butthurt liberals changing our immigration policy in 1965. You are a gigantic eurofaggot.

This thread is now about blaming liberals for Virginia Tech.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-06 10:57

>>2 Wow you are dumber than your average gunfag.  You see a school getting shot up and your immediate reaction is:  \"hmm, I think the solution is to give guns to everyone lolz dumb libfags.\"

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-06 10:58

Also, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/21/us/21guns.html
He shouldn't have been able to buy a gun and that wouldn't have interfered with the 2nd Amendment.
Who did are liberals (baaaaawww let's have gun free zone so people would die more easily), who I hold responsible for not allowing the students to defend themselves from the crazy chink who's not supposed to be here.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-06 10:58

>>3
Hahahahahaha. OH WOW it was a gun free zone. That helped, didn't it libfag?

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-06 11:13

lol 'gun free zones.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7pGt_O1uM8

Tired of gun violence? Set up your own 'gun free zone.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7pGt_O1uM8

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-06 13:30

>>4
shut up baaawfag

Name: RedCream 2007-10-06 14:56

All you gun-grabbers have to do is repeal or counter the Second Amendment, which requires that you first amend the US Constitution in the first place.  Get your proposed amendment through the House and Senate, and get at least 38 states to sign it, and like fucking MAGIC, it will be true.

Wha?  What's that?  You say that that's too much work for you, and you prefer to rely on activist judges to enforce unconstitutional laws?  Yes, that seems to be about your speed, Libfag.

THE FUNNY THING IS, LIBERALS STILL WONDER WHY THEY'RE HATED.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-06 19:29

Oslo Norway has a per capita rape ratio 6 times higher than that of New York City.

Name: RedCream 2007-10-06 21:01

So what?  Norwegians have always been rapemeat.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 9:59

>>10
Most eurofags are rapemeat.  The exception to this rule is the Swiss.  Eurofags often don't even have the right to own the tools they need to keep themselves from BECOMING rapemeat.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 10:40

>>9
That's because Norway is full of Muslims.

Also, Guns should be banned.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 13:33

>>12
Gun bans don't reduce crimes, armed responsible citizenries reduce crime.  See Switzerland.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 15:08

Norgay is Nekro Ducks of Sathanas.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 15:57

>>13

gun bans reduce crime, see japan.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 16:03

>>15
LOL.
http://www.davekopel.com/2A/LawRev/Japanese_Gun_Control.htm

Also, chinks have a lot less testosterone than Whites and niggers. Perhaps gun control is good for them, but Switzerland has essentially the same crime as Japan (even less I think), so your point is moot.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 16:07

>>15
A European example would be to compare the violent crime levels of the United Kingdom, which has very strict rules against gun ownership, with Switzerland, which has fully automatic assault rifles in 14% of homes. [1] According to the British Home Office, Switzerland had a homicide rate per 100,000 of 1.2 average over the years 1999-2001, which is less than England & Wales at 1.61, although Scotland is higher at 2.16, while Northern Ireland - with its historically exceptional conditions - is at 2.65. The latter compares with the Republic of Ireland (with similar gun control laws to the UK) at 1.42. [2]

   1. http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/66/03_findings.pdf
   2. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/tables/weaponstab.htm

Fail.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 16:08

>>17 here, oops, wrong links:

1. http://guncite.com/swissgun.html
2. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/hosb1203.pdf

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 16:28

hey bantards, in your theoretical gun ban, would police and military still have guns?

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 16:41

>>19
Of course they want authorities to have guns and the rest to be fucked -- they're aiming for a fucking socialist bloated nanny state that would take care of everyone from cradle to grave. Personal responsibility is a joke to them.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 17:33

what would be the point of banning guns if the police are going to have them? If the police carry guns then so will criminals - its called escalation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 17:55

What would be the point of banning guns if the criminals aren't going to hand them in? If the police don't carry guns then criminals will still use their guns and without fear - it's called the real world.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 19:54

so let me get this straight, you can compare two countries if it is in favour of no gun regulation, but not if it is in favour of gun regulation. Good thing we got that set straight.

lulz gunfags

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 20:31

>>23
So let me get this straight, you actually brag about the government running your life to the extent that you have no right to bear arms, eurofag?

Also, Switzerland is about as low as Japan at crime rates and they have guns and more crime-prone minorities than Japan. Total win, gtfo.

lulz nannystatefags

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 20:35

>>23 Also, you ignored the whole article I linked to. It's ok, I didn't expect more from you.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 22:15

Obviously guns make it easier to kill people, however I prefer to live in a world where a disabled or elderly person is just as capable of defending themselves as their attacker.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-09 5:22

http://www.gunowners.org/fs0404.htm
More guns = less crime.  We should encourage gun ownership, not discourage it.  Imagine how much the rape rate would fall if we passed a national law mandating that ALL females keep and bear arms for protection (such as a small handgun). 

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-09 5:55

>>27 that article is bs and biased. lulz.
"The 2000 report shows that the crime rate in England is higher than the crime rates of 16 other industrialized nations, including the United States."
Even if the crime rate was higher, I'd still prefer to have my wallet stolen then to be shot in the face.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-09 7:21

>>28
http://www.reason.com/news/show/28582.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1440764.stm

Gg libfag.  Even Dan Rather (lol) says you are wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-09 8:05

>>28
 1.It would be easier to steal your wallet if you were shot in the face first. As long as you're a willing victim you have to accept whatever they do to you.
 2. England is not the United States. We didn't receive our rights from the government(crown), we granted the government certain powers "in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense and promote the general welfare".
 3. If you don't trust your citizens with a gun why would you trust them with a vote?

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-09 9:03

>>30
1. True, but what is your point are you saying guns are good because they make commiting robberies/theft easier? They aren't going to shoot me in the face if they don't have a gun. no guns = no face shooting. And don't say it isn't possible - they're already talked about Japan.

2. ok

3. If 1 in a 1000 people who own guns accidentally shoot someone, that's a lot worse than 1 citizen in a 1000 making the ``wrong'' vote.

I think guns are disgusting.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-09 9:25

>>29 maybe you missed something:

"Except for murder and rape Britain has overtaken the US for all major crimes".

suprisingly I'd rather have the other things done to me rather than murder. Rape is ok too, as long as it's a hot woman.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-09 10:34

"I think guns are disgusting."
haha wtf

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-10 2:37

>>32
I'm sure woman on man rape in which the man was attracted to the woman is virtually unheard of.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-10 2:39

>>31

"They aren't going to shoot me in the face if they don't have a gun. no guns = no face shooting."

Yeah, because if we ban something it means nobody will have it, right? (see: drug war)

Name: Haruko 2007-10-10 3:44

Then it's hilarious

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-10 4:15

>>35 ideally yes, practically no but we can reduce the amount of guns massively depending on the controls put in place. making the chances of me being shot in the face approach 0%.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-10 4:47

>>37
No you can't.  Criminals will still get guns.  Even if you COULD, it doesn't matter because nobody in America supports libfags like you.  Guns will likely never be banned in America to the extent you want.  Sux2bu libfag.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-10 9:09

Gun ban wont happen in america because of the right to bear arms in the constitution.

Name: liberal 2007-10-10 9:14

>>39
We'll see about that.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-10 10:22

>>38 (>>37 here)
It doesn't sux to be me, it rocks to be me because guns are banned where I live. I'm not even a liberal, whatever that means.

Name: RedCream 2007-10-10 10:23

>>40
We ARE seeing about that, libfag!  MOAR states have passed concealed carry.  Washington DC's unconstitutional gun ban was repealed.  The advance of the sensible right wing continues.  And ... we've had a long string of right-wing judges empaneled.  All that anti-gun, activist judging is coming to a fuckin' END.

If you libfags would have just obeyed the US Constitution, then you might have stayed in power.  But, you fucked that document, you fucked America, and then you got fucked yourself.  DIDJA ENJOY IT?

Name: RedCream 2007-10-10 10:29

>>41
It "rocks" since you live in an area where the US Constitution is shunned?  DO TELL!

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 4:49

>>40
Gun bans will not only NOT happen in the USA (at least at the Federal level) because of the constitution, they also won't happen because gun ownership is so widespread in the USA.  I view this as a good thing.  Sux2bu libfags. 

Gun culture > libfag agenda.

>>41
The fact that the government doesn't entrust the people with the freedom to keep and bear arms where you live says something about the people there.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 6:15

Guns lead to fucked up shit. True.

But no guns also leads to fucked up shit.

A student in my World Geology class submitted a story that was more or less like this.

some asshole: "No guns. Let's declare martial law"

Citizen: "Fuck that! *Reaches in an empty gun holster* Oh shit!"

Citizen 2:"It's okay, we'll do some form of peaceful protest or vote or something..."

asshole 2: "PATRIOT ACT+HR6166,BITCHES!"

Citizen 3: "We didn't read iether of those, they're like a million pages. Fill me in?"

Asshole: "Basically, as of now, you say anything I don't like, you're a terrorist. You go to court and be found not guilty, and we can still legaly hold you for life, just because we feel like it"

Citizen 3: "Oshitson wut do wii do lol?!"

Citizen 2: "Lol i dunno"

Citizen 1: "It's citizen 4's fault. If we had guns we could rebel or something. Oh well."

Citizen 4: "Fuck you."

Citizen 5: "I tould you this was gonna happen >.>"

The odds of such a thing happening are slim beyond belief, but better safe than sorry.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 6:43

>>45
Exactly.  The Second Amendment was meant to diminish the likelyhood of that scenario.  It is a -safeguard.-

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 6:57

>>45 >>46

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it."
-- Thomas Jefferson, 1791

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-15 5:38

there's no way u can convince me that u need a gun in ur home, ESPECIALLY if u have children.  guns only escalate the violence and make things more dangerous

Name: RedCream 2007-10-16 2:42

>>49
Being disarmed in America not only invites abusers, but the keeping and bearing of arms is affirmed in the US Constitution.  Regardless of what you feel, in order to stop the keeping and bearing of arms, you MUST amend the US Constitution.  Get crackin'!  You have to pass a resolution in both the House and Senate, and then you need at least 38 state legislatures to agree.

Name: RedCream 2007-10-16 2:43

>>49
In other words:  We don't need to convince you.  Your agreement with our gun ownership is not a requirement for said ownership.  If you don't like that, then CHANGE THE US CONSTITUTION!

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-16 3:54

>>49 & >>50
Did you mean to direct those comments at >>48? Rofl.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-16 3:59

>>49 It is much easier and more effective mind you to pass gun control law after gun control law and just bleed the Second Amendment to death with paper cuts than it would be to assemble a political force great enough to muscle through a constitutional amendment through the legislature.   Plus, after we get Hillary Clinton in the white house, we will be able to cancel out the effects of the Bush court-appointees with appointees by Hillary - appointees that will support our reasonable efforts to curb gun violence.  Maybe we can get another attorney general like Janet Reno who will reverse the 'individual rights' interpretation of John Ashcroft while we're at it. If it saves one life it will have been worth it.

Name: RedCream 2007-10-16 4:09

>>52
Banning guns like that doesn't save net lives.  The lives supposedly saved from a lack of keeping and bearing can't compare to the lives lost to people being victimized by gun-toting thugs who never have much of a problem getting guns in America no matter WHAT laws exist to stop their proliferation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-16 4:38

>>53
Let's look at this logically then. Obviously my statistics are not very accurate, but they illustrate that there are alternatives.

Ban guns.
Per year per 100000 people...
Expenses: $10000000
Deaths due to retards shooting themselves in the liver: 1
Deaths due to criminals using guns: 10
Deaths due to lack of self-defense: 100
Total: 111

Don't ban guns.
Expenses: $0
Deaths due to retards shooting themselves in the liver: 10
Deaths due to criminals using guns: 100
Deaths due to lack of self-defense: 10
Total: 120

As you can see 9 more people are dead because there is no gun ban, but if you look at the reasons why there are 9 more people dead it is obvious that lack of education is responsible.

Don't ban guns and educate people on gun safety and usage.
Expenses: $0
Deaths due to retards shooting themselves in the liver: 1
Deaths due to criminals using guns: 40
Deaths due to lack of self-defense: 1
Deaths of criminals in firefights: 10
Total: 42 civilians, 10 criminals.

As you can see proper firearm usage has led to a deterant reducing attempted violent crimes by half and improved the ability for people to defend themselves, it has also made it less likely for retards to shoot themselves. The world is a better place due to the simple application of analytic reasonning.

Name: sage 2007-10-16 7:35

>>54
I say we ban libfags' free speech so I won't have to read this kind of total fucking nonsense.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-18 6:15

>>54
fagget

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-18 8:31

>>55
>>56
I'm not a liberal you stupid assholes! I'm pro-gun!

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-24 22:06

guns pwn

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-24 22:09

guns aren't the problem.  there's plenty of countries (canada) where gun ownership is widespread but gun crime is not.  take you nanny state and GTFO

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-25 15:13

If you really think you'll be safer when everyone has a gun then you're a total idiot. As simple as that. If you believe else, then you've been cheated. Poor you.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-25 16:07

>>60
I'll be safer if I have a gun.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-25 23:23

http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187
http://www.steamwin.org/index.php?num=4187

These links are meme-as-fuck in /v/

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-26 10:56

>>1
Post this in /k/ i'm sure the haven't heard this before
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -