/newpol/ - lol amerifags

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-06 10:43

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgWz_HYtqoM&mode=related&search=

Lol @ Amerifags & their guns. Its all fun and games until someone gets hurt:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk8syX2b-zQ&mode=related&search=Liberal%20Parody%20Clip-Show%20Guns%20Right%20Wing%20Soldier%20of%20Fortune%20NRA%20National%20Rifle%20Association%20Insufferable%20Industries
Where is your gun culture leading you now America? How many more people have to die before you will adopt a sensible, comprehensive solution to your gun violence problem?

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-10 10:22

>>38 (>>37 here)
It doesn't sux to be me, it rocks to be me because guns are banned where I live. I'm not even a liberal, whatever that means.

Name: RedCream 2007-10-10 10:23

>>40
We ARE seeing about that, libfag! MOAR states have passed concealed carry. Washington DC's unconstitutional gun ban was repealed. The advance of the sensible right wing continues. And ... we've had a long string of right-wing judges empaneled. All that anti-gun, activist judging is coming to a fuckin' END.

If you libfags would have just obeyed the US Constitution, then you might have stayed in power. But, you fucked that document, you fucked America, and then you got fucked yourself. DIDJA ENJOY IT?

Name: RedCream 2007-10-10 10:29

>>41
It "rocks" since you live in an area where the US Constitution is shunned? DO TELL!

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 4:49

>>40
Gun bans will not only NOT happen in the USA (at least at the Federal level) because of the constitution, they also won't happen because gun ownership is so widespread in the USA. I view this as a good thing. Sux2bu libfags.

Gun culture > libfag agenda.

>>41
The fact that the government doesn't entrust the people with the freedom to keep and bear arms where you live says something about the people there.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 6:15

Guns lead to fucked up shit. True.

But no guns also leads to fucked up shit.

A student in my World Geology class submitted a story that was more or less like this.

some asshole: "No guns. Let's declare martial law"

Citizen: "Fuck that! *Reaches in an empty gun holster* Oh shit!"

Citizen 2:"It's okay, we'll do some form of peaceful protest or vote or something..."

asshole 2: "PATRIOT ACT+HR6166,BITCHES!"

Citizen 3: "We didn't read iether of those, they're like a million pages. Fill me in?"

Asshole: "Basically, as of now, you say anything I don't like, you're a terrorist. You go to court and be found not guilty, and we can still legaly hold you for life, just because we feel like it"

Citizen 3: "Oshitson wut do wii do lol?!"

Citizen 2: "Lol i dunno"

Citizen 1: "It's citizen 4's fault. If we had guns we could rebel or something. Oh well."

Citizen 4: "Fuck you."

Citizen 5: "I tould you this was gonna happen >.>"

The odds of such a thing happening are slim beyond belief, but better safe than sorry.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 6:43

>>45
Exactly. The Second Amendment was meant to diminish the likelyhood of that scenario. It is a -safeguard.-

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 6:57

>>45 >>46

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it."
-- Thomas Jefferson, 1791

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-15 5:38

there's no way u can convince me that u need a gun in ur home, ESPECIALLY if u have children. guns only escalate the violence and make things more dangerous

Name: RedCream 2007-10-16 2:42

>>49
Being disarmed in America not only invites abusers, but the keeping and bearing of arms is affirmed in the US Constitution. Regardless of what you feel, in order to stop the keeping and bearing of arms, you MUST amend the US Constitution. Get crackin'! You have to pass a resolution in both the House and Senate, and then you need at least 38 state legislatures to agree.

Name: RedCream 2007-10-16 2:43

>>49
In other words: We don't need to convince you. Your agreement with our gun ownership is not a requirement for said ownership. If you don't like that, then CHANGE THE US CONSTITUTION!

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-16 3:54

>>49 & >>50
Did you mean to direct those comments at >>48? Rofl.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-16 3:59

>>49 It is much easier and more effective mind you to pass gun control law after gun control law and just bleed the Second Amendment to death with paper cuts than it would be to assemble a political force great enough to muscle through a constitutional amendment through the legislature. Plus, after we get Hillary Clinton in the white house, we will be able to cancel out the effects of the Bush court-appointees with appointees by Hillary - appointees that will support our reasonable efforts to curb gun violence. Maybe we can get another attorney general like Janet Reno who will reverse the 'individual rights' interpretation of John Ashcroft while we're at it. If it saves one life it will have been worth it.

Name: RedCream 2007-10-16 4:09

>>52
Banning guns like that doesn't save net lives. The lives supposedly saved from a lack of keeping and bearing can't compare to the lives lost to people being victimized by gun-toting thugs who never have much of a problem getting guns in America no matter WHAT laws exist to stop their proliferation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-16 4:38

>>53
Let's look at this logically then. Obviously my statistics are not very accurate, but they illustrate that there are alternatives.

Ban guns.
Per year per 100000 people...
Expenses: $10000000
Deaths due to retards shooting themselves in the liver: 1
Deaths due to criminals using guns: 10
Deaths due to lack of self-defense: 100
Total: 111

Don't ban guns.
Expenses: $0
Deaths due to retards shooting themselves in the liver: 10
Deaths due to criminals using guns: 100
Deaths due to lack of self-defense: 10
Total: 120

As you can see 9 more people are dead because there is no gun ban, but if you look at the reasons why there are 9 more people dead it is obvious that lack of education is responsible.

Don't ban guns and educate people on gun safety and usage.
Expenses: $0
Deaths due to retards shooting themselves in the liver: 1
Deaths due to criminals using guns: 40
Deaths due to lack of self-defense: 1
Deaths of criminals in firefights: 10
Total: 42 civilians, 10 criminals.

As you can see proper firearm usage has led to a deterant reducing attempted violent crimes by half and improved the ability for people to defend themselves, it has also made it less likely for retards to shoot themselves. The world is a better place due to the simple application of analytic reasonning.

Name: sage 2007-10-16 7:35

>>54
I say we ban libfags' free speech so I won't have to read this kind of total fucking nonsense.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-18 6:15

>>54
fagget

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-18 8:31

>>55
>>56
I'm not a liberal you stupid assholes! I'm pro-gun!

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-24 22:06

guns pwn

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-24 22:09

guns aren't the problem. there's plenty of countries (canada) where gun ownership is widespread but gun crime is not. take you nanny state and GTFO

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-25 15:13

If you really think you'll be safer when everyone has a gun then you're a total idiot. As simple as that. If you believe else, then you've been cheated. Poor you.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-25 16:07

>>60
I'll be safer if I have a gun.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-25 23:23

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-26 10:56

>>1
Post this in /k/ i'm sure the haven't heard this before

lol amerifags

1 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-06 10:43

41 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-10 10:22

42 Name: RedCream 2007-10-10 10:23

43 Name: RedCream 2007-10-10 10:29

44 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 4:49

45 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 6:15

46 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 6:43

47 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-14 6:57

48 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-15 5:38

49 Name: RedCream 2007-10-16 2:42

50 Name: RedCream 2007-10-16 2:43

51 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-16 3:54

52 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-16 3:59

53 Name: RedCream 2007-10-16 4:09

54 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-16 4:38

55 Name: sage 2007-10-16 7:35

56 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-18 6:15

57 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-18 8:31

58 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-24 22:06

59 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-24 22:09

60 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-25 15:13

61 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-25 16:07

62 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-25 23:23

63 Name: Anonymous 2007-10-26 10:56