Banning guns will never work, just like the War on Drugs won't. Both ventures are destined to fail, and only feed a festering black market, while at the same time disarming the law-abiding and preventing them from using the most effective means of self-defense.
Name:
Tom S.2007-04-16 19:26 ID:dLJegXtU
Look how China dealt with opium: Kill all users and sellers. No one wants to get near that shit now. Do that with coke and LSD and such, done. Problem solved.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-16 19:42 ID:co++Xkjr
And with negroes
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-16 19:55 ID:40lWm/nf
^Madman!
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-16 20:21 ID:aX110sI1
ban sick fucks instead? put them down at birth? drown them?
1.) You cant take away guns. it is protected by the constitution. automobiles kill more every year than shootings. but at least a gun has a safety switch.
2.) You cannot determine the state of a child's mind because it is "nurture over nature." so randomly killing babies might not be the best route. if you were to kill all those who abuse children in any way. that would not lead to as many screwed up minds. and thus you have a better society.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-17 23:07 ID:q/2s73Bw
>>7
Correct. Apart from the idea that killing is the only form of punishment.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-17 23:27 ID:hYPAwoBH
>>7
your constitution is over 200 fucking years old you stupid yank. that section of the constitution was written when the US did NOT have a standing army or law enforcement. now you have 20+ military divisions (navy, air, army) and 300+ law enforcement agencies.
perhaps it's time to write a new constitution?
fuck amerikans are dumb. learn your own fucking history and stop relying on other to fill in the blanks for you. okay?
don't make me shoot you in the face next time...
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-17 23:35 ID:q/2s73Bw
>>9
You hate the constitution because it allows people the freedom of speech and the right to bear arms. Human rights which impede the rise of communism and other systems of tyranny.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-17 23:54 ID:hYPAwoBH
>>10
no. i hate you. for being so fucking dumb as to repeat the same old ad nauseum all nra fuckers spout.
go to washington (ask a nigger where it is). head to the library of congress. read the constitution.
now tell me. when was the last time the british invaded?
go hang yourself. but be an hero first. i need to watch more fucked up amerikans on tv tonight anyway.
lets assume that i have no creativity and i follow everything by the book. i would first report you to the law because you threatened my life. then i would report you to your teacher because you cannot spell Americans. it is 200 years old but it is still valid. now when you learn to spell and come up with a constitution that is fair, reliable, credible. you must also rewrite every law to be square with your constitution. then and only then should you open your mouth and presume to tell me that am any less educated or credible than yourself.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-18 0:33 ID:24RoYtgU
>>13
i hope you arent for real... oh please dont be fucking real!
You are just a dumb backwater limey faggot, a RELIC from a dead empire. You have no ANSWERS. You don't understand the fundamentals of the constitution...you just don't get ANYTHING.
"when was the last time the british invaded?"
WHO CARES!? The bearing arms thing isn't about outside invading forces, it's about an armed populace that can reasonable resist tyranny if it rears it's ugly head. I have a right to protect myself, I don't give a fuck what some PACIFIED european shitlog has to say about it.
FUCK OFF. You have no right to tell us how to live our lives. You lost the revolutionary war and now we're the strong nation on the planet....GET OVER IT.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-18 17:13 ID:OSmw7urN
>>22
I believe he said in another post he was American.
Name:
sumarugatu2007-04-18 19:05 ID:iRL7LSuB
Agreed but... Americans and the English live in completely different societies. so pacifism to one is violent to the other. but the right to bear arms is in the American constitution. meaning that you cannot argue about it with the English and come to any sort of conclusion.
so you love watching dumbfucks trying to guess where you're from? are.....are you beating off right now? do you seriously think it makes a fucking difference? you could be from DC and your argument would still stink like shit
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-19 3:21 ID:w0yAclJl
banning is silly
what america needs is some real solid gun control
these where legally owned weapons
over 200 million legally registered guns with a population of 300 million
jesus fucking christ
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-19 3:24 ID:SR3cmop3
world without guns = SPARTAAAAA
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-19 3:30 ID:au4Rhs/q
whut?
only 2/3 of america has gun?
i demand moar firearms for america!
>>29
you do know what a limey is dont you? who the foolish fuckwit then? oh u so funny. >>32
i demand nukes for all amerikans. just hurry the fuck up and kill each other will ya's
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-19 17:08 ID:ZVZ1ooub
>>11
>>There hasn't been an invasion in over 200 years, so that must be conclusive evidence that there will never be one in the future. mmmMMMm cock sure tastes great.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-19 18:50 ID:Bf22YWee
>>30 >>32
He said 200 million registered guns. The other 200 million are unregistered.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-20 4:07 ID:9ApxvGrt
>>35
nukes are good for that. be happy with nukes i say.
Name:
Anonymous2007-04-20 19:34 ID:fs2jOLp6
>>37
Depending on a weapon you don't dare use is not in your best interest. Build armies, keep firearms, don't take any shit.