4chan's Position on the Issues!

   ~-=The Political Survey=-~


Abortion - Pro choice, or pro life?

Free Speech - For, or against (restrictions)?

National ID card - For, or against?

More Immigration/Border Control -  For, or against?

Gun Rights/Self Defense Rights - For, or against?

Pornography Legalization - For, or against?

Prostitution Legalization (in a controlled setting to restrict transmission of STDs) - For, or against?

Patriot Act - For, or against?

Privacy Rights - For, or against?

NSA Domestic Spying - For, or against?

Seat Belt Laws - For, or against?

Drug Legalization (other than alcohol & cigarettes) - For, or against?

Generally speaking, more laws - For, or against?



Tax-Funded Programs: 

Social Security - For, or against?

Welfare - For, or against?

War in Iraq - For, or Against?

Tax Money for U.N. Funding - For, or against?

Corporate Welfare - For, or against?

General Spending, taxation, and Government Programs - More, or less?


In order of whom you like MOST, to whom you like LEAST, list candidates in the 2004 election, and put in parentheses the party/ticket they ran under. 

Example:  Michael Badnarik (Libertarian)


In order of which party you like MOST, to which party you like LEAST, list the political parties known to you. 

Abortion - Pro choice, or pro life?

Pro choice

Free Speech - For, or against (restrictions)?

For Free Speech

National ID card - For, or against?

Against

More Immigration/Border Control -  For, or against?

For

Gun Rights/Self Defense Rights - For, or against?

For

Pornography Legalization - For, or against?

For

Prostitution Legalization (in a controlled setting to restrict transmission of STDs) - For, or against?

For

Patriot Act - For, or against?

Against

Privacy Rights - For, or against?

For

NSA Domestic Spying - For, or against?

Against

Seat Belt Laws - For, or against?

Against

Drug Legalization (other than alcohol & cigarettes) - For, or against?

For

Generally speaking, more laws - For, or against?

Against



Tax-Funded Programs:

Social Security - For, or against?

Against

Welfare - For, or against?

Against

War in Iraq - For, or Against?

Against

Tax Money for U.N. Funding - For, or against?

Against

Corporate Welfare - For, or against?

Against

General Spending, taxation, and Government Programs - More, or less?

Less


In order of whom you like MOST, to whom you like LEAST, list candidates in the 2004 election, and put in parentheses the party/ticket they ran under.

Michael Badnarik (Libertarian)
Michael Peroutka (Constitution Party)
George W. Bush (Republican Party)
Ralph Nader (Reform Party)
David Cobb (Green Party)
John Kerry (Democratic Party)


In order of which party you like MOST, to which party you like LEAST, list the political parties known to you.

Libertarian Party
Constitution Party
Republican Party
Green Party
Democratic Party

Abortion - Pro choice, or pro life?

pro choice

Free Speech - For, or against (restrictions)?

against

National ID card - For, or against?

whut? no idea what this is

More Immigration/Border Control -  For, or against?

for

Gun Rights/Self Defense Rights - For, or against?

against

Pornography Legalization - For, or against?

against

Prostitution Legalization (in a controlled setting to restrict transmission of STDs) - For, or against?

against

Patriot Act - For, or against?

whut? no idea what this is

Privacy Rights - For, or against?

for

NSA Domestic Spying - For, or against?

against

Seat Belt Laws - For, or against?

against

Drug Legalization (other than alcohol & cigarettes) - For, or against?

against

Generally speaking, more laws - For, or against?

against



Tax-Funded Programs:

Social Security - For, or against?

whut? no idea what this is

Welfare - For, or against?

against

War in Iraq - For, or Against?

against

Tax Money for U.N. Funding - For, or against?

against

Corporate Welfare - For, or against?

against

General Spending, taxation, and Government Programs - More, or less?

less

In order of whom you like MOST, to whom you like LEAST, list candidates in the 2004 election, and put in parentheses the party/ticket they ran under.

Segata Sanshiro
Snacks
Moot
Hitler
Ken Kutaragi


In order of which party you like MOST, to which party you like LEAST, list the political parties known to you.


Party Van
Party Hard
Nigger Innis
Hitler
Ken Kutaragi

life, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, for, against (Not really a fair poll question), for, for, against, against, against, for, against, against, less

George Bush (Republican)
David Cobb (Green)
Michael Badnarik (Libertarian)
Ralph Nader (Reform)
Walt Brown (Socialist)
A pig pile of dogshit (Crapitalist)
John Kerry (Democratic)

Constitution Party
Republican Party
Libertarian Party
America First Party
US Marijuana Party
Green Party
Labour Party
Reform Party
Socialist Party
Prohibition Party
Communist Party
American Nazi Party
Democratic Party

>>1
In my first post, the wording regarding FREE SPEECH is kindof fucked up and might confuse people. 

When you answer, put in something more like: 

Free Speech Restrictions - For, or against

Pro-Choice
Free Speech BUT promoting violence in pub. is not acceptable
No ID Card
More border control
Pro self-defense
No porn legislation
Pro prostitution legalization
No Patriot Act
Pro Privacy Rights
No Domestic Spying
Pro seat-belt laws
Pro drug legalization
Less Laws

Pro Social Security
Against current welfare system
No War in Iraq
Pro U.N. funding
No corporate welfare
Less gov. spending


Michael Peroutka (Constitution Party)
Michael Badnarik (Libertarian)
Ralph Nader (Reform Party)
John Kerry (Democratic Party)
David Cobb (Green Party)
George W. Bush (Republican Party)
Ralph Nader (Reform Party)

Constitution Party
Libertarian Party
US Marijuana Party
Democratic Party
Republican Party
Green Party
Reform Party
Labour Party
Socialist Party
Communist Party
America First Party
Prohibition Party
American Nazi Party

Abortion - Pro choice, or pro life?

Pro choice

Free Speech - For, or against (restrictions)?

For, no restrictions other than slandering of specific living inviduals

National ID card - For, or against?

Against, totally

More Immigration/Border Control -  For, or against?

For, but restrictions should be based on wealth of immigrant

Gun Rights/Self Defense Rights - For, or against?

For, totally

Pornography Legalization - For, or against?

For, totally

Prostitution Legalization (in a controlled setting to restrict transmission of STDs) - For, or against?

For, totally

Patriot Act - For, or against?

Against, totally

Privacy Rights - For, or against?

For, totally

NSA Domestic Spying - For, or against?

Against, totally

Seat Belt Laws - For, or against?

Against

Drug Legalization (other than alcohol & cigarettes) - For, or against?

For, totally

Generally speaking, more laws - For, or against?

Against

Tax-Funded Programs:

Social Security - For, or against?

For if can be done without being tax heavy(impossible)

Welfare - For, or against?

For if can be done without being tax heavy(impossible)

War in Iraq - For, or Against?

Against

Tax Money for U.N. Funding - For, or against?

Against, totally

Corporate Welfare - For, or against?

Against, totally

General Spending, taxation, and Government Programs - More, or less?

Less


In order of whom you like MOST, to whom you like LEAST, list candidates in the 2004 election, and put in parentheses the party/ticket they ran under.

Michael Badnarik (Libertarian)
Michael Peroutka (Constitution Party)
George W. Bush (Republican Party)
John Kerry (Democratic Party)

In order of which party you like MOST, to which party you like LEAST, list the political parties known to you.

Libertarian Party
Constitution Party
Democratic Party
Republican Party

http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/stories/0712edbarr.html

Thank god for John Bolton! 

He deserves a round of applause, people! Thumbed his nose at the U.N., and adamantly defended our constitutional right to keep and bear arms!

Hmm, I wonder what might have happened if Gun Grabber Gore or Kerry got to pick the U.N. ambassador?


http://volokh.com/posts/1152314168.shtml

>>8 Fail for irrelevance, win for truth. SAGE SAGE SAGE!

Abortion - Pro choice

Free Speech - For

National ID card - Against?

More Immigration/Border Control -  Neutral

Gun Rights/Self Defense Rights - For

Pornography Legalization - For

Prostitution Legalization (in a controlled setting to restrict transmission of STDs) - For

Patriot Act - (strongly) Against

Privacy Rights - For

Abortion - Abortion is only allowed past 4 months of pregnancy.

Free Speech - No restrictions.

National ID card - Citizens should be free to get ID cards if they want.

More Immigration/Border Control -  Border control should be absolute. Immigration should be severely restrictied with countries that do not share our values and should be completely free with countries that share our values. Immigration will be completely banned when the first signs of over-population occur.

Gun Rights/Self Defense Rights - No restrictions. The police budget will increase to further cover crime-prevention and create services that people can be free to use to help deter crime.

Pornography Legalization - Pornography without conscious uncoerced consent is illegal. Beyond this, no restrictions.

Prostitution Legalization (in a controlled setting to restrict transmission of STDs) - Prostitution without conscious uncoerced consent is illegal. Passing an STD is considerred grievous bodily damage and punishable under the law. Prostitutes will have to react to this.

Patriot Act - Patriot act will be repealed.

Privacy Rights - A person is responsible for his/her privacy, if this is impeded by force then the perpetrator can be charged with a crime. People charged with a crime can choose whether the police may search their property, they will be reminded that their decision may be used against them in a court of law.

NSA Domestic Spying - Domestic spying will be open and reviewable by the public. The absolute border control and militarisation will make the need not to reveal possible terror cells etc.. unecessary.

Seat Belt Laws - People should be free to wear seat belts or not. Parents who's children die due to not wearing seat belts may be prosecuted for criminal neglect. The automotive industry must by law to reveal to the public the safety of their vehicles.

Drug Legalization (other than alcohol & cigarettes) - All drugs will be legalized. Drugs will be considerred poisons and chemical weapons by the police. Users will be hospitalised and have to pay for their treatment when they are rehabilitated unless they can prove they were forced to take drugs. Anyone who forces others to take drugs will be considerred a felon.

Generally speaking, more laws - The first priority is the preservation of justice and liberty as they are co-dependant. Where the 1st priority does not apply, the less laws the better.



Tax-Funded Programs: 

Social Security - Only for those below the age of 16. There will be small information based programs aimed at getting people under the age of 21 into work. The police will also provide social-security like programs aimed at helping the victims of crime and educating the public about the situation in their local area.

Welfare - Only for those below the age of 16. Minimum wages laws will be decided through the democratic process (as with everything else, but I disagree with minimum wage laws on principle and know they are necessary to a certain degree even though they corrupt the economy so my views on minimum wage are more malleable).

War in Iraq - When we have fulfilled our pledge to turn Iraq into a democracy we will leave.

Tax Money for U.N. Funding - It will be considerred part of the military budget aimed at preventing war and mercantilism across the globe. If the UN does not perform this task the funding will be decreased.

Corporate Welfare - The economy will be completely free-market based. Coorporate welfare will be considerred misappropriation and the perpetrators will face a prison sentence and have to pay back the money they lost.

General Spending, taxation, and Government Programs - The first priority is the preservation of justice and liberty etc..

Abortion - Pro choice. It's not my fucking body, it's theirs.

Free Speech - For.

National ID card - Against. (Y HELO THAR ORWELLIAN SOCIETY)

More Immigration/Border Control -  For, for now.

Gun Rights/Self Defense Rights - For.

Pornography Legalization - For.

Prostitution Legalization (in a controlled setting to restrict transmission of STDs) - For, and tax the shit out of it.

Patriot Act - Against.

Privacy Rights - For.

NSA Domestic Spying - Against in principle, but what they're doing now isn't spying. It's just shitty information collecting.

Seat Belt Laws - For.

Drug Legalization (other than alcohol & cigarettes) - For, and tax the ever loving shit out of them.

Generally speaking, more laws - Dunno, this is ambiguous.



Tax-Funded Programs:

Social Security - For, but for the love of god, reform it.

Welfare - Against.

War in Iraq - For.

Tax Money for U.N. Funding - Against.

Corporate Welfare - For, to an extent.

General Spending, taxation, and Government Programs - MUCH MUCH MUCH less.

>>9
Posted in the wrong section by accident.  Calm down. 

>>Gun Rights/Self Defense Rights - For, or against?

LOL.  Good work conflating those two concepts, Yank.  The NRA Psyopsaganda Division are getting a raise today!

>>Immigration should be severely restrictied with countries that do not share our values and should be completely free with countries that share our values.

that's the dumbest shit i've heard from a conservative in the last two days.

>>14
They aren't as different as you are trying to make out.  It's hard to defend yourself from some aggressors without firearms, especially if you are physically disabled, are a woman, or just plain weak. 

>>15
1+1=3
Therefore making a statement alone doesn't mean you are right.

>>14
Name Calling And Labeling.
Irresponsible Sweeping Generalizations.
>>15
Inadequate Proof For Assertions.

>>18
Inadequate Proof For Given Analysis.

>>19
So supremely stupid I think I might go and shoot myself in the face.

The statements made in >>18 are as factual as they get, it's like saying "grass is green". What the fuck am I supposed to do? Tell you which facts you should have used to prove a point which has no facts to back it up?

Well done for a succesful troll.

>>20
Inadequate Proof For Assertions.

Opinions are not facts. Grass is not green because it is grass, it is green because it is green. You fucking underage faggot, gtfo my 4chan.

>>21 Don't use 'faggot' in a derogatory manner. It is below humans, and it is pathetic.

>>22

Shut the fuck up, Xel. This is 4chan. This is how we do.

>>They aren't as different as you are trying to make out.

a firearm is not required for self-defence.

i support the right to self-defence insofar as it's a valid legal excuse to prosecute justice effectively.  i do NOT support self-defence in that 'oh, we'll i can buy glocks from my local fucking k-mart so if that negro chap comes for my telly it's BLAMMO-TIME'.  that doesn't preserve society, it erodes it.

framing the idea of self-defence solely in terms of guns is symtomatic of a gun culture, and it's disgusting.

>>24
Self-defense without gun is like hunting with melee weapon. Can be done, but it will likely get you killed or atleast hurt.

>>25

see what >>24 is talking about, guys?

>>26 Yeah, he makes some sense. The odd thing is, harder gun legislation doesn't improve situations. So is it a cultural thing or something?

>>27
Makes sense? Self defense without gun is very dangerous, especially if the opponent is armed and in 90% cases your average thug has atleast knife. We live in modern age and we have effective tools so why not use them? I don't support death penalty(infact I support lesser penalties), but I support CITIZEN'S(not goverment) right to use deadly force when defending themselves, their family or their property. Death penalty is bad, but citizens shooting criminals in self defense is good thing and it has been proved to reduce crime. It's modern natural selection and I see nothing wrong with it. Violent criminal or robber has chosen his path and that means he should be ready to get shot too. It's true they choose that path typically out of desperation, but no-one forces them.

>>24
So someone is about to start killing everyone in a cafe and you don't have a gun. What do you do?

Gun control issue:

It has been shown that the higher incidence of suicide and accidental death in homes with fire arms is more than double the incidences where the guns are used for self defence. Hard to argue that they should be used for self defence when they're more likely to blow your kids head off than blow off an intruder's head. So you argue that you're safer with your guns than the average. Fine, how do you suggest preventing the idiots? pass a test to bear arms? you'll find some formidable opposition to that one. anyway, some 20ish percent of children whose parents thought their kids didn't know they had a gun, knew, and had taken it out. Hard to hide things from kids.

Death penalty:

The death penalty has not been shown to reduce the incidence of 1st degree murder in the states that use it. In fact, the murder rates are higher on average in those states. The whole arguement for the death penalty is that it sends a stronger message to would be murderers than lesser punishment. This has not been shown to be the case, therefore the arguement collapses.

>>30 That's some intersting shit. But isn't it good that children of careless parents die. The gene pool can only take so much stupidity. I already knew that thing about capital punishment, but it is always good to spread the word.

>>31 you're pretty heartless. Why not just start a movement for artificial selection and clean up the gene pool once and for all?

>>32 I was trying to put a positive spin on something sad, like MTV or Gibson...

>>31
True. If your kid kills himself it's time to look in mirror and ask "What I did wrong?" instead of blaming tools.

>>30
It's very stupid to hide guns from kids. Why not teach them gun safety and handling? Hell, I got my first .22 when I was 10, but oh well I lived in healthy family and had healthy childhood. Not like these modern wacko parents...

>>32
That would be more humane than letting the human race go stupid (and all the war and poverty caused by it) or letting stupid people die.

We must implement artificial selection now!

You fucking dipshits.  If your kid is that mystified by guns, and is dumb enough to stare down the barrel and pull the trigger, well fuck you.  Don't ban MY guns because you don't know how to fucking parent your dumbass kids. 

People complain that the 'right wing' is always trying to ban pornography, and put fines on television shows for saying stuff like 'fuck' on the air because stupid parents don't know how to parent their kids. 

Well oh really? How about stupid 'left wingers' who don't know how to teach their kids about firearms, and how to NOT kill themselves when they use them? 

It's pretty fucking easy people.  Just don't point it at anything you don't want to kill.  If you are dumb enough to shoot yourself with a gun by accident, well fuck you, society doesn't need people that are that stupid in it. 

>>37 Speaks the truth, it's about parenting (or lack thereof).

The solution is less blanket solutions for the whole populace (also known as laws), and less of a "one size fits all" attitude.   

>>We live in modern age and we have effective tools so why not use them?

you wouldn't happen to be on 4chan's staff, would you?

those morons like to use things they haven't any need for too, like overkill servers and report functions.

>>39
Actually I'm on staff in another chan and there we have very lax policy. Everything that's legal is allowed and administration doesn't do anything else, but remove illegal content and ban offenders.