Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

The US is not very dense

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-30 16:51

Many countries make use of space by cramming people into buildings, subways, public transportation, small apartments, skyscrapers, trains, tiny automobiles, etc.  Yet the US continues to take up more space per person rather than more persons per space.  SUVs and personal vehicles over buses and subways. Apartment buildings, homes, offices and condos that are built short and take more space per unit.  Roads and utilities that stretch for miles.  Huge space between buildings dedicated to parking lots and lawns, or just unused land left to be paved over in the future.  If it were Asia, everything would be like New York. 

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-30 16:53

Lets see what happens when the oil runs out.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-30 16:54

We'd use alcohol and other fuel like South America.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-30 18:30

>>1  so we have less population per square mile in the us.. so what??   even is you count onlin inhabitable sq miles(not desert etc.) so what.  are you saying we should have a higher population for how much land we have to be fair to the rest of the world.  we behave the way we do with transportation etc because we are spread out. and part of the nature of that is we have become accustomed to being spread out and don't like to be crammed into little cities.  it's our style.  we can afford it.  if china had our population they would probably have a fraction of the economic problems they have now.  our high resorces to population ratio is why are economy does so well. how when we have failures we tend to recover well.  we don't all use public transportation because we have enough roads we don't have an abolute need.  if everyone in china had a car the problems would be astronomical true.  however america isn't china.  our nation is built on those that came before hand just as there's is built  by those that came before them.  but our situations are totally different.  It is asia's fault asia has it's population.  america didn't go over there, fuck everything in site and leave the entire population pregnant every year.  they are fuking and having children and causing their population problems, not us.  are you an american.  do you ride the bus every day.  to you own a vehicle.  do you spend money on luctury goods such as tv.  you have a fucking computer and you are telling us not to be greedy, the last i checked a pc was luctury.  why don't you take the money you spent on that and feed some homeless guy for a few months.  that will give you the warm fuzzy feeling that you get from this without us haveing to listen to you bitch.  get used to the way our nation is, because it won't change unless it needs to, and it doesn't need to any time soon.    when we run out of oil we will switch to a new mode of power.  you really think the oil companies plan on going out of business when the oil runs out.  you think the car companies plan on no longer making cars when oil runs out.  you think our entire economy from electric, heating, cooling, transportation companies, etc plan on going out of business when oil runs out.  do you plan on rolling over and dieing when oil runs out.  do you plan to simply cease to exist.  no life will go on, and we will get on with our insugnifficant lives just like everyone else has whenever things have happened thoughout history.  If you really want the reality of the oil crisis to hit us you have a very siple thing you can do.  it is your responsibility and duty to make us stop using oil by making sure that there is no oil left for us to use.  take all the money you earn, buy oil, and burn it.  stop those damn asshole that can afford suvs from using it.  burn it all yourself so they can't have it.  that way it will all be gone and they will have to switch to a new fuel all the sooner.  and you can make sure to burn it all in low smog vehicles too, so as you limit the amount of damage you do to the atmosphere.  Just shut the fuck up and leave the lifestyle that i live and can afford alone.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-30 18:35

Well at least public education is working.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-30 18:46

>>5 whats that supposed to mean??

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-30 18:52

>>6 i didn't bother with really good grammar as i don't give a fuck it's an internet post and doesn't really matter.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-30 21:51

>>4
jesus christ in a fiddleswibbler, have you ever heard of paragraphs?

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-30 21:56

Yeah, but my specialty was never english.  i was was better in history and science

Name: Mr. Paragraph 2006-05-30 22:01

>>4
np;dr

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-30 23:56

>>4 nobody can come up with a real response apparently.  they are afrraid to just call you the nazi bastard that you are.

Name: Mr. Paragraph 2006-05-31 0:25

>>11
He didn't use paragraphs. Maybe you could be so kind as to put them in so I can be botherred to read it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-31 5:21

>>4
one day america will be overpopulated. it's only coming. people are being born at a more rapid rate and dying at a slower one.

pay attention, idiot.

america's still young. we have lots of time to fuck up, and thus far we haven't fucked up TOO bad, but we're getting there. but seeing as things are going, i don't think we'll have to worry about that. our government will decide what we can and cannot do, either way.

our country is great now, but how long will it last?

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-31 12:15

>>13

     Acutally the birth rate of america is slowing down, and the average age at which people have children is raising.  the problem is this is an average over the last ten years.  the poor are actually having more children sooner, where as middle class is haveing fewer children latter in their life.  i wonder which class is more intelligent.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-31 15:41

>>14
i think that's because standards are being raised too high thanks to the media and women's rights. rather than a male being able to court a female as per usual, males are forced to go to extremes to prove themselves to women, who will most likely turn out to be lesbains anyway when it's all said and done. whatever happened to going up to someone, asking them to a movie, and taking them out? now you get bitched at for opening a door for someone. and females, being fickle, are impossible to please.

nothing we can do, 4chan. we're doomed.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-31 18:46

White people are going to be a minority in a little while. Bush wants to let in 125-something (some ridiculous number) million immigrants in through 'earning citizenship/guest worker/etc' programs over 20 years. He's going to let in 11 or so million right now with his 'earning citizenship' program. Sorry, that's not 'amnesty' that's 'earning citizenship.' Wow, I guess even CLINTON was more honest when he just called it amnesty. Those silly presidents, one-upping each other.

White people aren't having babies. Slated to become a minority in the UK by 2100 apparently, if current trends continue. A minority in the US by 2050.

Nobody cares a damn about white people. We were the native seed 'United Statesians' and now we are going to be displaced.

Goody Goody. Oops, forgot, I guess I'm a nazithatwantstokillsixmillion jews because I mentioned that white people might have a damn vested interest in maintaining the character, ancestry and culture, of their people.

Name: Anonymous 2006-05-31 18:56

>>16

       Yes you are right nobody cares about whites.  i am white and i don't care about whites.  regardless of what race is having the troubles the troubles will be the same.  people bitch "we have to do something about the black, hispanic, etc poor" where there are white poor as well and we do just as little to help the white poor as we do those of other races.  i have never seen a racist food bank or homeless shelter have you??  the nation will have the same problems regardless of the race that has them.  IT DOESN'T MATTER.  this post has nothing to do with american racial tension anyways.  it has to do with people bithcing because their nation was overpopulated because they fucked too much and had to many children for their amount of land and resorces the past few generations and it is all americas fault.  come on people where is your bitching??

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-01 3:23

>>4

tl;dr

>>14
>>15
No, go back to Human Geography 1010.

The reason is simply that children are fucking expensive. To Middle class people, children are a fuckin liability, an expense. You only want them for that warm fuzzy feeling, and spending money on your bitch daughters ipod isn't worth that feeling, so middle class people have less kids.

For poor people, children are an asset. You can use them to help  around the house, and work. You don't need to send them to school, cause...well...Jimmy will probably die because of the lack of medical care. In lesser developed countries, children are useful.

But in America and Europe...fuck kids. They complain too much.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-01 3:49

>>15
>>18

neither one of you is facing the point, the reasons that you pointed out weren't class specific.  if it were because of confusion of sexual desire and men not being able to approach women it would be all over.  And people are still having sex in all social classes so children should still happen.  and most middle class are couples, childless couples.  if it were about being to expensive the middle class would have more children than the lower class, being they have more income.  Children are a liability and expensive. but why are the poor having so many in that case.  we aren't in the third world where children create income for the parents.  in fact for the poor the reasons to have children are next to nonexistant.  the exception being if you are on welfare, because they do increase your income because the govenment gives you more money for them.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-01 5:55

>>17


You don't need to have many children when you are letting in more immigrants. Look, white population around the world has been decreasing, much like the Japanese population, because they have gotten so civilized that everybody wants to have a quality life for their children, so they only have a few. Some are preoccupied with our culture of self-indulgence, so they have absolutely none. Our 'regional population' increasing has to do with non-natives. It has to do with 11 million immigrants coming over illegally, and millions more coming over legally over the years. Bush wants to bring in over a 100 million (from Mexico) over the next 20 years with the legislation he's proposing, or so I've been told.

That also means that white people are going to be a minority in the U.S. by then, and since white people will be a minority in the UK by 2100, we'll be the first people to not fight back against our own genocide.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-01 8:03

>>20

Our own genocide? Who cares. People are people are people are people. White, black, purple. Who gives a fuck. Just mix in with all the other races and hand over your damned racial pride because guess what ladies and gentlemen. That's right. The world is becoming nothing more than a giant melting pot. All cutures are combining, races are combining, hatreds, religions, holidays, public general opinion, self-image, everything. Just like cats and dogs. If they were free to run around everywhere and no one went out of their way to keep purebreads, they'd all eventually mix up in some fashion and you'd have a bunch of who-fucking-knows. Mutts. Doesn't fucking matter. These racial barriers will only exist in areas where no one wants to go like Iran. They'll probably always be the same. But everyone else get on your knees and look like you're liking it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-01 9:14

===================
BOB'S MANTRA
"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."


"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."


"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."


"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"


"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"


"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"


"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."


"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."


"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
 

Bob Whitaker http://www.whitakeronline.org/
==================

Every other race is supposedly set to last indefinately due to current population trends except for white people. Why? White people are a relatively small portion of the world population (8% and increasingly old,) their birth rate is abysmal, and they're the only ones demanding unrestricted immigration of non-whites into our countries. I don't see 10 million whites moving to China. The Chinese wouldn't take that sort of shit either. I couldn't go to Korea to do something related to my job because I couldn't get a visa, and over there they do whatever they like (usually nasty), shoot/rape/jail/whatever, to illegal migrants, instead of giving them free citizenship, free health care, welfare benefits, and affirmative action benefits (i.e. benefits to people solely for not being white) like we do in white countries.

You can go to 80% of the world and travel populated land for millions of miles and not see a single person of white ancestry.
What the 'stay at homes' don't realize is that white people are relatively rare, and some of the most civilized and least hostile. Once white people become a minority, in our own countries, nobody is going to be relying on our goodwill anymore; we're going to be relying on THEIR goodwill. Guess what, a great many other races don't like white people very much. Why? Because we're different or they see us intellectually or morally or physically inferior, and you are not going to be changing their minds buddy. You have in your head this idea of a 'world melting pot' and you are sending white people to extinction for it, but the Politically Correct Crew is the world minority on this one. You'll turn white countries into unstable racially mixed countries that are full of competing groups. Those countries will go the way of the Roman Empire.

If non-whites don't see white people as inferior in some way or blasphemously strange, then at the very least they don't want US overpopulating THEIR countries. I don't know. Actually, that seems pretty reasonable to me, but I'm judged by a double standard because I am white.

One thing I've learned about anti-racists is that they are usually some dipshits that sit in their parents' garage and never once went to a non-white country in their entire life (or they are some trust fund baby who never had to struggle during their entire life who is living in a state of academic semi-failture at college) and NEVER had to face the realities of how this world works. They're simply parroting what's popular to say (and it makes them feel good to have SOME reason to feel popular,) and they've never had to be in situations where being white means you could possibly be killed on a whim.  Yes, other races are racially aware, especially within their own freakin' countries. The locals don't have any sympathy for your religion of political correctness.

Every wonder why white flight is so popular? Well that's because black people tend to harass white people when they start feeling confident in a neighborhood. There is this one incident, I think in Kingston, where a black boy pummelled a white boy until his  face and body was so damaged that they had to hold his eyes in with saline bags and staples. This was in the U.S., and white people were terrorized there in that school regularly. Why did the black kid do that to the white kid? Because he was white. Because he was a cracker.

The National Socialists marched there and the media talked more about them than what that monster did to that little boy. The media didn't even mention that story until the National Socialists went there. In fact, that was the reason WHY they went there, to try to drum up some attention for the incident.  

My great grandpa once told me the story about how he once went the 'black side of town' and little kids started throwing rocks at him. He asked their mom why in the world were they doing that, and she told him, "Because you don't belong here."

White people, no matter how 'racist' we are, and I proudly consider myself to be quite 'racist,' generally don't do that. You occasionally get a kook that does something extreme, but generally white people just don't do things like that. They especially don't now. It's not a polite thing to do. It's not a civilized thing to do. You have to keep pressuring and pressuring whites to get us to do that. But, I've gotten that response from people in other less civilized countries from people who have never seen a white person in a thousand generations.    

You don't control those people, and you never will. They are not going to listen to you, and they do not care a damn about the things that you think or your unrealistic expectations of them. You do have the power to influence yourself, and your society. White people have always been willing to give an intelligent person a chance to say something, but this globalist agenda is being implemented in an awfully one sided fashion. Its busy mixing down or squeezing out the white population, but it isn't trying to up the white population either. If I remember correctly, people used to be terrified of overpopulation when white countries were 96% white, but nobody seems to fighting against overpopulation by immigration (but they still call for a lower white birth rate and more white birth control.)

All you are going to get with these anti-white policies is the destruction of white people (not skin--ANCESTRY) and I hardly think white people deserve that. Most of the cool things you are using right now were based on the ideas and work of white people (hopefully I will be adding my own ideas and work to that mix,) and I hardly think that they deserve to be exterminated. I think that we have earned our right to exist.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 6:53

Bon's Mantra is shit. When you need to keep repeating something over and over and over and over so that you can get your point across- you bridge the gap between debate and propaghanda. Seeing as you "Mr. Mantra" has never been able to defend against criticism that run contrary to old Bob's mindset---I think you KNOW where you fall under.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 7:31

Oh, trust me. The US is VERY dense. Ha ha get it? I'm British btw. Ha ha ha.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 7:46

>>1
Got problem with that? Living in cities fucking sucks. True story.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 8:06

>>25

I've got a problem. With something.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-02 10:21

>>26
Same. Shit sux.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 2:07

So, basically, white people feel oppressed into doing shit that makes them weaker and causes them to become a minority.

Funny, really fucking rich people are a minority, why is it that we don't give a ratfuck about taxing the shit out of them? Those poor oppressed rich folks.

The idea is that whites are a wealthy minority, and as such, are subject to be the target of persecution and made to serve the majority of the non-whites.

This is wrong, how? The majority > minority always, its natural order....cry more whitey.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 3:02

why is it that we don't give a ratfuck about taxing the shit out of them?

Because in practice we don't. Where have you been?

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 3:07

How can white people both be the majority that is trying to suppress the various black, hispanic, etc minorites, and at the same time be the rich 10% minority of the population that is oppressing the poor 90%. 

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 6:15

>>30
      Obviously because we hate blacks and hispanics so much that we are willing to be be mostly poor ourselves in order to keep that top 10% white, it gives us the racial pride that justifies our existance for conservative fucks like you.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 7:55

>>31
So people are willing to be racist even if it means being poor? Does that mean the argument has merit?

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 8:46

DENSE IN THE HEAD!
HAAAAAHAHAHA.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 9:07

>>32
       Of course.  Our hatered of blacks is so integrated into our society that we hardly even notice it on a cognigant level.  We are willing to suffer ourselves as long as it means keeping them down.  that is the only reason we put up with the white elite rich such as Bush and Company.  I mean look how much trouble he goes through to even take low paying jobs away from them, he wants to bring in cheap mexican labor to underbid them in even the shit jobs.  You have to see that we are suffering from our hate of the blacks, and we have to overcome this hate.  we need ore black oriented social programs, and we need to force companies to hire black people.  We have to force all whites to treat blacks with respect and dignity, whether they like it or not.  I may still have hatred of blacks somewhere in me, but i have over come it to see how i suffer from it.  these people have been run down enough, and having that much of the population run down hurts the whole economy.  We need to start giving them more preference in economic and social assiatance, in eduational services, etc in order for them to become powerful enough to overcome our hate.  We will be able to get the White Elitists out of power only if we separate oursleves from our hateful need to keep minorites down.  We need to accept responsibility for the fact that we put them all where they are, and put them into higher levels of living with our own power.  that is the only way it can happen.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 10:55

>>34
    2 true, we are keeping them down, and the mexicans too by forcing them to come into this country to be our low income workers.  We NEED to force businesses to take them into higher positions for our good and theirs.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 15:28

Higher positions... like what?

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 16:44

>>36
    does it take that much imagination to think of a job better than burger flipping, trash collector, or any other shitty low income job.  we need to advance these people past the nitch that we carved for them in society.  that means reshaping society, but if we went through the trouble to do it to keep them back, we should be able to go though the trouble to change it to help them.  These people have suffered from our hateful system enough, is it really that much to ask for a little change in policy?  to ask for an oprotunity to get out of that nitch?  I don't think so, we should get them out of the nitch.  We as a nation and as a world suffer because of it.  If we were to allow  minorities into these higher positions we would become more prosperous for it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-03 17:29

>>24
You're not taking into consideration the people that DIDN'T vote for Bush in 2004.

Other than them, yes, the U.S. is very dense.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-04 22:21

Why would anyone want to live in densely populated area? They are good for shopping and "night life" if you're adventurous and daring, but actually living there seriously sucks. Anyone who disagrees doesn't know better or is jealous commie cause "better people" have big ranches in countryside.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-05 3:10

>>39
    I can't argue with most of what you say.  but WTF do you mean by "better people"? you put it in quotes yourself, so better by who's prospective?

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-05 4:59

Rednecks are superior.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-05 10:35

>>40
I meant people with money and jobs as commies and other jealous bastards typically accuse them of being treated as better people.

Name: Anonymous 2006-06-14 22:25

>>1

Who cares? It's our property we can do with it what we want.  Just because someone else doesn't have something, and someone else does (especially if they earned it) is not justification for stealing from the person who does.  And, likewise, it's not our "duty" to help out the less fortunate.  If they want to be more prosperous, they can move to the United States, work, earn it, or else change their shitty governments there. 

The United States was such a brilliant success because we have Capitalism and freedom, the two requirements of man's mind for success in life, happiness, and prosperity.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List